Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:11:35.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of weed control provided by three winter cereals in conservation-tillage soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Andrew J. Price ,
D. Wayne Reeves  and
Michael G. Patterson
Andrew J. Price*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 411 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL 36832, USA,.
D. Wayne Reeves
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, J. Phil Campbell, Sr. – Natural Resource Conservation Center, 1420 Experiment Station Road, Watkinsville, GA 30677, USA,.
Michael G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Soils Department, Auburn University, 202 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36830, USA,.
*
*Corresponding author: Email: aprice@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information is needed on the role of cover crops as a weed control alternative due to the high adoption of conservation tillage in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production. Field experiments were conducted from fall 1994 through fall 1997 in Alabama to evaluate three winter cereal cover crops in a high-residue conservation-tillage, soybean production system. Black oat (Avena strigosa Schreb.), rye (Secale cereale L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for their weed-suppressive characteristics compared to a winter fallow system. Three herbicide systems were utilized: no herbicide, a mixture of two pre-emergence (PRE) herbicides, or PRE plus post-emergence (POST) herbicides. The PRE system contained pendimethalin plus metribuzin. The PRE plus POST system contained pendimethalin plus a prepackage of metribuzin and chlorimuron ethyl applied PRE, followed by an additional chlorimuron ethyl POST application. No cover crop was effective in controlling weeds without a herbicide. However, when black oat or rye was utilized with only PRE herbicides, weed control was similar to the PRE plus POST input system. Thus, herbicide reductions may be attained by utilizing cover crops that provide weed suppression. Rye and black oat provided more effective weed control in the PRE only herbicide input system than wheat in conservation-tillage soybean. The winter fallow, PRE plus POST herbicide input system yielded significantly less soybean one out of three years when compared to systems that included a winter cover crop.

Keywords

Avena strigosa Schrebcover cropsSecale cereale LTriticum aestivum L
Type
Review Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 159 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

01Blevins,, R.L., Cook,, D., Phillips,, S.H. and Phillips,, R.E. (1971) Influence of no-tillage on soil moisture. Agronomy Journal 63: 593–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
02Bradley,, J.F. (1995) Success with no-till cotton. In McClelland,, M.R., Valco,, T.D. and Frans,, R.E. (eds). Conservation-Tillage Systems for Cotton. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Report 160 31–33.Google Scholar
03Kaspar,, T.C., Radke,, J.K. and Laflen,, J.M. (2001) Small grain cover crops and wheel traffic effects on infiltration, runoff, and erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 56: 160–164.Google Scholar
04Reeves,, D.W. (1994) Cover crops and rotations. In Hatfield,, J.L. and Stewart,, B.A. (eds). Advances in Soil Science: Crops Residue Management. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 125–172.Google Scholar
05Reeves,, D.W. (1997) The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil and Tillage Research 43: 131–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
06Anonymous. 2004. USDA-NASS. Website: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/pcu-bb/agcs0502.pdf (accessed August 24, 2004).Google Scholar
07Anonymous. 2004. National Crop Management Survey. Conservation Technology Information Center. Website: http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/Core4/CT/ctsurvey/2000/2000USSummary.html (accessed August 24, 2004).Google Scholar
08Nagabhushana,, G.G., Worsham,, A.D. and Yenish,, J.P. (2001) Allelopathic cover crops to reduce herbicide use in sustainable agriculture systems. Allelopathy Journal 8: 133–146.Google Scholar
09Phatak,, S.C. (1998) Managing pests with cover crops. In Shirley,, C., Bowman,, G., Cramer,, C. (eds). Managing Cover Crops Profitably. Sustainable Agriculture Publications, Burlington, VT. p. 25–33.Google Scholar
10Akemo,, M.C., Regnier,, E.E. and Bennett,, M.A. (2000) Weed suppression in spring-sown rye (Secale cereale)–pea (Pisum sativum) cover crop mixes. Weed Technology 14: 545–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Chase,, W.R., Muraleedharan,, G.N. and Putnam,, A.R. (1991) 2,2?-oxo-1,1?-azobenzene: selective toxicity of rye (Secale cereale L.) allelochemicals to weed and crop species: II. Chemical Ecology 17: 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Perez,, J.F. and Ormeno-Nunez, J. (1991) Difference in hydroxamic acid content in roots and root exudates of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rye (Secale cereale L.) possible role in allelopathy. Chemical Ecology 17: 1037–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Yenish,, J.P., Worsham,, A.D. and York,, A.C. (1996) Cover crops for herbicide replacement in no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology 10: 815–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Derpsch,, R., Roth,, C.H., Sidiras,, N., and Köpke,, U. 1991. Controle da erosão no Paraná, Brazil: Sistemas de cobertura do solo, plantio directo e prepare conservacionista do solo. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn, Germany.Google Scholar
15Derpsch,, R. (1985) Guia de Plantas para Adubação Verde de Inverno. Documentos IAPAR No. 9 (May 1985) 96 Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (IAPAR), Secretaria da Agricultura e do Abastecimento, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.Google Scholar
16Derpsch,, R. (1990) Do crop rotation and green manuring have a place in the wheat farming systems of the warmer areas? In Saunders,, D.A. and Mexico,, DF (eds). Wheat for the Nontraditional Warm Areas. Proceedings of an International Conference, June 29–August 3, 1990 International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Mexico, DF, Mexico, CIMMYT. 284–299.Google Scholar
17Bauer,, P.J. and Reeves,, D.W. (1999) A comparison of winter cereal species and planting dates as residue cover for cotton grown with conservation tillage. Crop Science 39: 1824–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Blaine,, A. 2004. Soybeans: no-till and minimum-till guidelines. Website http://msucares.com/pubs/infosheets/is1129.htm (accessed October 14, 2004).Google Scholar
19Flinchum,, W.T. 2004. Soybean production in Tennessee. Website http://www.utextension.utk.edu/publications/pbfiles/PB1608.pdf (accessed October 14, 2004).Google Scholar
20Monks,, C.D., Delaney,, D. and Henderson,, J.B. (1998) Soybean Handbook for Alabama. Alabama Cooperative Extension System publication ANR-18, Auburn, Alabama. Website http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-0018.Google Scholar
21Raymer,, P.L. and Jost,, P.H. (2004) No-till planting. In Jost,, P. (ed.). 2004 Georgia Soybean Production Guide. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service, Athens, GA. Website http://www.griffin.uga.edu/caes/soybeans/2004guide/toc2.pdf.Google Scholar
22Wright,, D.L., Rich,, J.R., Marois,, J.J. and Sprenkel,, R.K. (2004) Soybean production in Florida. The University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Website http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/AG185.Google Scholar
23Reeves,, D.W. 2003. A Brasilian model for no-tillage cotton production adapted to the southeastern USA. Proceedings of the II World Congress on Conservation Agriculture—Producing in Harmony with Nature. Iguassu Falls, Paraná, Brazil. August, 11–15, 2003. p. 372–374.Google Scholar
24Ashford,, D.L. and Reeves,, D.W. (2003) Use of a mechanical roller-crimper as an alternative kill method for cover crops. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Truman,, C.C., Reeves,, D.W., Shaw,, J.N. and Burmester,, C.H. (2002) Soil management effects on interill erodibility of two Alabama soils. In Van Santen,, E. (ed.). Proceedings of the 25th Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture—Making Conservation Tillage Conventional: Building a Future on 25 Years of Research. Special Report No. 1 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station and Auburn University, June 24–26, 2002, Auburn, AL. p. 288–294 .Google Scholar
26Bauer,, P.J. and Reeves,, D.W. (1999) A comparison of winter cereal species and planting dates as residue cover for cotton grown with conservation tillage. Crop Science 39: 1824–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Reddy,, K.N. (2003) Impact of rye cover crop and herbicides on weeds, yield, and net return in narrow-row transgenic and conventional soybean ( Glycine max ). Weed Technology 17: 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Phillips,, R.E., Blevins,, R.L., Thomas,, G.W., Frye,, W.W. and Phillips,, S.H. (1980) No-tillage agriculture. Science 208: 1108–1113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed