Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78bd46657c-dj9st Total loading time: 0.21 Render date: 2021-05-06T22:38:01.873Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Strip-tillage reduces productivity in organically managed grain and forage cropping systems in the Upper Midwest, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Sharon L. Weyers
Affiliation:
USDA-Agricultural Research Service-North Central Soil Conservation Research Lab., 803 Iowa Ave., Morris, MN 56267, USA
David W. Archer
Affiliation:
USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, 1701 10th Ave. SW, Mandan, ND 58554, USA
Frank Forcella
Affiliation:
USDA-Agricultural Research Service-North Central Soil Conservation Research Lab., 803 Iowa Ave., Morris, MN 56267, USA
Russ Gesch
Affiliation:
USDA-Agricultural Research Service-North Central Soil Conservation Research Lab., 803 Iowa Ave., Morris, MN 56267, USA
Jane M.F. Johnson
Affiliation:
USDA-Agricultural Research Service-North Central Soil Conservation Research Lab., 803 Iowa Ave., Morris, MN 56267, USA
Corresponding

Abstract

Tillage is decreasing globally due to recognized benefits of fuel savings and improved soil health in the absence of disturbance. However, a perceived inability to control weeds effectively and economically hinders no-till adoption in organic production systems in the Upper Midwest, USA. A strip-tillage (ST) strategy was explored as an intermediate approach to reducing fuel use and soil disturbance, and still controlling weeds. An 8-year comparison was made between two tillage approaches, one primarily using ST the other using a combination of conventional plow, disk and chisel tillage [conventional tillage (CT)]. Additionally, two rotation schemes were explored within each tillage system: a 2-year rotation (2y) of corn (Zea mays L.), and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) with a winter rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop; and a 4-year rotation (4y) of corn, soybean, spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) underseeded with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), and a second year of alfalfa. These treatments resulted in comparison of four main management systems CT-2y, CT-4y, ST-2y and ST-4y, which also were managed under fertilized and non-fertilized conditions. Yields, whole system productivity (evaluated with potential gross returns), and weed seed densities (first 4 years) were measured. Across years, yields of corn, soybean and wheat were greater by 34% or more under CT than ST but alfalfa yields were the same. Within tillage strategies, corn yields were the same in 2y and 4y rotations, but soybean yields, only under ST, were 29% lower in the fertilized 4y than 2 yr rotation. In the ST-4y system yields of corn and soybean were the same in fertilized and non-fertilized treatments. Over the entire rotation, system productivity was highest in the fertilized CT-2y system, but the same among fertilized ST-4y, and non-fertilized ST-2y, ST-4y, and CT-4y systems. Over the first 4 years, total weed seed density increased comparatively more under ST than CT, and was negatively correlated to corn yields in fertilized CT systems and soybean yields in the fertilized ST-2y system. These results indicated ST compromised productivity, in part due to insufficient weed control, but also due to reduced nutrient availability. ST and diverse rotations may yet be viable options given that overall productivity of fertilized ST-2y and CT-4y systems was within 70% of that in the fertilized CT-2y system. Closing the yield gap between ST and CT would benefit from future research focused on organic weed and nutrient management, particularly for corn.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Al-Kaisi, M.M., Yin, X., and Licht, M.A. 2005. Soil carbon and nitrogen changes as influenced by tillage and cropping systems in some Iowa soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 105:635647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.L. 2015. Integrating a complex rotation with no-till improves weed management in organic farming. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35:967974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbuckle, J.G. and Roesch-McNally, G. 2015. Cover crop adoption in Iowa: The role of perceived practice characteristics. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 70:418429. doi:10.2489/jswc.70.6.418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, D.W., Jaradat, A.A., Johnson, J.M., Weyers, S.L., Gesch, R.W., Forcella, F., and Kludze, H.K. 2007. Crop productivity and economics during the transition to alternative cropping systems. Agronomy Journal 99:15381547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. 1985. The annual dormancy cycle in buried weed seeds: A continuum. BioScience 35:492498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckendorf, E.A., Catangui, M.A., and Riedell, W.E. 2008. Soybean aphid feeding injury and soybean yield, yield components, and seed composition. Agronomy Journal 100:237246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bietila, E., Silva, E.M., Pfeiffer, A.C., and Colquhoun, J.B. 2016. Fall-sown cover crops as mulches for weed suppression in organic small-scale diversified vegetable production. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 32:349357.Google Scholar
Bond, W. and Grundy, A.C. 2001. Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems. Weed Research 41:383405. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3180.2001.00246.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, P.M., Gramig, G.G., and Liebig, M.A. 2013. Impacts of organic zero tillage systems on crops, weeds, and soil quality. Sustainability 5:31723201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, A.T., Collins, D.P., Krebill-Prather, R.L., Benedict, C.A., and Moore, D.L. 2015. Adoption potential and perceptions of reduced tillage among organic farmers in the maritime Pacific Northwest. eOrganic, 9597. Available at Web site http://articles.extension.org/pages/68283/adoption-potential-and-perceptions-of-reduced-tillage-among-organic-farmers-in-the-maritime-pacific- (verified 31 December 2016).Google Scholar
Dimitri, C. and Oberholtzer, L. 2009. Marketing U.S. organic foods: Recent trends from farmers to consumers. Economic Information Bulletin 58. USDA Economic Research Service, 36 pg. Available at Web site https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/eib58/11009_eib58_1_.pdf (verified 31 December 2016).Google Scholar
Donald, W.W. 2000. Timing and frequency of between-row mowing and band-applied herbicide for annual weed control in soybean. Agronomy Journal 92:10131019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, C.F., Tan, C.S., Reynolds, W.D., Welacky, T.W., Weaver, S.E., Hamill, A.S., and Vyn, T.J. 2003. Impacts of zone tillage and red clover on corn performance and soil physical quality. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67:867877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eghball, B. 2000. Nitrogen mineralization from field-applied beef cattle feedlot manure or compost. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:20242030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erazo-Barradas, M. 2016. Corncob grit application as an alternative to control weeds in two crop production systems. PhD thesis, South Dakota State University. 165 p. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2028&context=etd (verified 31 December 2016).Google Scholar
Filipovic, D., Kosutic, S., Gospodaric, Z., Zimmer, R., and Banaj, D. 2006. The possibilities of fuel savings and the reduction of CO2 emissions in the soil tillage in Croatia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 115:290294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F. 2012. Air-propelled abrasive grit for postemergence in-row weed control in field corn. Weed Technology 26:161164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F. 2013. Short- and full-season soybean in stale seedbeds versus rolled-crimped winter rye mulch. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 29:9299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, G.T. and Mt. Pleasant, J. 1994. Competitive abilities of six corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids with four weed control practices. Weed Technology 8:124128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, T. 2005. Does no-till farming require more herbicides? Outlooks on Pest Management, 16:188191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, H.M. 2001. Fuel required for field operations. Iowa State University, University Extension. PM709. Available at Web site https://www.extension.iastate.edu/AgDM/crops/pdf/a3-27.pdf (verified 31 December 2016).Google Scholar
Johnson, J.M.F., Archer, D.W., Weyers, S.L., and Barbour, N.W. 2011. Do mitigation strategies reduce global warming potential in the northern U.S. corn belt? Journal of Environmental Quality 40:15511559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kladivko, E.J. 2001. Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil and Tillage Research 61:6176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kladivko, E.J., Kaspar, T.C., Jaynes, D.B., Malone, R.W., Singer, J., Morin, X.K., and Searchinger, T. 2014. Cover crops in the upper Midwestern United States: Potential adoption and reduction of nitrate leaching in the Mississippi River Basin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69:279291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koga, N., Tsuruta, H., Tsuji, H., and Nakano, H. 2003. Fuel consumption-derived CO2 emissions under conventional and reduced tillage cropping systems in northern Japan. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 99:213219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornecki, T.S., Price, A.J., and Raper, R.L. 2006. Performance of different roller designs in terminating rye cover crop and reducing vibration. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 22:633641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurstjens, D.A. 2007. Precise tillage systems for enhanced non-chemical weed management. Soil and Tillage Research 97:293305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R. 2004. Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International 30:981990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Licht, M.A. and Al-Kaisi, M. 2005. Strip-tillage effect on seedbed soil temperature and other soil physical properties. Soil and Tillage Research 80:233249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M. and Dyck, E. 1993. Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecological Applications 3:92122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mäder, P. and Berner, A. 2012. Development of reduced tillage systems in organic farming in Europe. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, N.B., Drury, C.F., Reynolds, W.D., Yang, X.M., Li, Y.X., Welacky, T.W., and Stewart, G. 2008. Energy inputs for conservation and conventional primary tillage implements in a clay loam soil. Transactions of the ASABE 51:11531163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsky, S.B., Ryan, M.R., Teasdale, J.R., Curran, W.S., Reberg-Horton, C.S., Spargo, J.T., Wells, M.S., Keene, C.L., and Moyer, J.W. 2013. Overcoming weed management challenges in cover crop-based organic rotational no-till soybean production in the Eastern United States. Weed Technology 27:193203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, N.L., Miller, P.C.H., Orson, J.H., and Froud-Williams, R.J. 2010. The adoption of non-inversion tillage systems in the United Kingdom and the agronomic impact on soil, crops and the environment—A review. Soil and Tillage Research 108:115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R.G., Hellwinckel, C.M., Brandt, C.C., West, T.O., De La Torre Ugarte, D.G., and Marland, G. 2009. Energy use and carbon dioxide emissions from cropland production in the United States, 1990–2004. Journal of Environmental Quality 38:418425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NOAA-NCDC. 2013. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climate Database Center. Climate Data Online. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/ (accessed: 27 September 2013).Google Scholar
Oriade, C.A. and Forcella, F. 1999. Maximizing efficacy and economics of mechanical weed control in row crops through forecasts of weed emergence. Journal of Crop Production 2:189205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peigné, J., Ball, B.C., Roger-Estrade, J., and David, C. 2007. Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review. Soil Use and Management 23:129144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, C.R. and Forcella, F. (1997). WeedCast: Forecasting weed emergence and growth in crop environments. Available at Web site https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/software/ (verified 31 December 2016).Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2014a. SAS/STAT® 13.2 User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2014b. JMP® 11 Basic Analysis. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2014c. JMP® 11 Multivariate Methods. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Silva, E.M. 2014. Screening five fall-sown cover crops for use in organic no-till crop production in the Upper Midwest. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38:748763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sindelar, A.J., Schmer, M.R., Gesch, R.W., Forcella, F., Eberle, C.A., Thom, M.D., and Archer, D.W. 2015. Winter oilseed production for biofuel in the US Corn Belt: Opportunities and limitations. GCB Bioenergy 117. doi:10.1111/gcbb.1229Google Scholar
Singh, S.N., Sah, A.K., Singh, R.K., Singh, V.K., and Hasan, S.S. 2010. Diversification of rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based crop sequences for higher production potentials and economic returns in India's central Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 34:141152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tautges, N.E., Burke, I.C., Borrelli, K., and Fuerst, E.P. 2017. Competitive ability of rotational crops with weeds in dryland organic wheat production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 32:5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, J.R., Mangum, R.W., Radhakrishnan, J., and Cavigelli, M.A. 2004. Weed seedbank dynamics in three organic farming crop rotations. Agronomy Journal 96:14291435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA-AMS 2016. Bi-Weekly National Organic Comprehensive Report. Available at Web site https://www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/lsbncor.pdf (verified: 31 December 2016).Google Scholar
USDA ERS 2012. Prices for organic grains and feedstuffs, regional markets, monthly 2008–2011. Available at Web site https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/Organic_Prices__18001/grainsandfeedstuff2008to11.xls?v=41050 (verified 31 December 2016).Google Scholar
USDA ERS 2014. Wholesale prices for organic grains and feedstuff, U.S., monthly, 2011–13. Available at Web site https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/Organic_Prices__18001/OrganicGrainPrices.xls?v=41719 (Verified 31 December 2016).Google Scholar
USDA-NRCS 2016. Web Soil Survey. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Available at Web site http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. (accessed 27 September 2013).Google Scholar
Wayman, S., Cogger, C., Benedict, C., Collins, D., Burke, I., and Bary, A. 2015. Cover crop effects on light, nitrogen, and weeds in organic reduced tillage. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 39:647665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, T.O. and Marland, G. 2002. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: Comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 91:217232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyers, S.L., Johnson, J.M., and Archer, D.W. 2013. Assessment of multiple management systems in the Upper Midwest. Agronomy Journal 105:16651675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyers, S.L., Archer, D.W., Forcella, F., Gesch, R., and Johnson, J.M.F. 2017. Can reducing tillage and increasing crop diversity benefit grain and forage production? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Strip-tillage reduces productivity in organically managed grain and forage cropping systems in the Upper Midwest, USA
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Strip-tillage reduces productivity in organically managed grain and forage cropping systems in the Upper Midwest, USA
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Strip-tillage reduces productivity in organically managed grain and forage cropping systems in the Upper Midwest, USA
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *