Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T12:12:38.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WAS THE POLIS A PERSON IN CLASSICAL ATHENS? CIVIC BODIES AND CHORAL POLITICS IN THE THEATER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2021

Johanna Hanink
Johanna Hanink*
Affiliation:
Brown Universityjohanna_hanink@brown.edu
Get access

Extract

In his History of the Peloponnesian War, Thucydides waits until he has passed the midpoint of Book 1 to introduce an individual speaking ‘character’ into his narrative. He does not do so until the scene of the Congress at Sparta (1.67–88), where it is first ‘the Corinthians’ and then ‘the Athenians’ who plead their cases before the Spartan assembly. One of the functions of this scene is to illustrate the internal division of opinion among the Spartans, and Thucydides now brings two distinct, elite Spartans onstage to voice their conflicting perspectives: King Archidamus addresses his countrymen urging caution (1.80–5), while the ephor Sthenelaidas makes suitably laconic remarks pressing for war (1.86). Before this turning point, Thucydides had carried out his analysis of the war's causes exclusively with reference to foreign rulers and Greek polis-populations (‘the Athenians’, ‘the Spartans’, etc.)—and not to any individual actors or leaders of those poleis, such as Archidamus and Sthenelaidas of Sparta.

Type
IV. The Body Politic
Information
Ramus , Volume 50 , Special Issue 1-2: In Terms of Athens , December 2021 , pp. 145 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Ramus 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, G. (2018), The Realness of Things Past: Ancient Greece and Ontological History (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atack, C. (2020), The Discourse of Kingship in Classical Greece (Abingdon/New York).Google Scholar
Barrenechea, F. (2018), Comedy and Religion in Classical Athens: Narratives of Religious Experience in Aristophanes’ Wealth (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berent, M. (2004), ‘In Search of the Greek State: A Rejoinder to M.H. Hansen’, Polis 21, 107–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buis, E.J. (2018), Taming Ares: War, Interstate Law, and Humanitarian Discourse in Classical Greece (Leiden).Google Scholar
Constantakopoulou, C. (2007), The Dance of the Islands: Insularity, Networks, the Athenian Empire, and the Aegean World (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, F.M. (1907), Thucydides Mythistoricus (London).Google Scholar
Crane, G. (1998), Thucydides and the Ancient Simplicity: The Limits of Political Realism (Berkeley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
duBois, P. (2020), ‘The Wasps Dance, The Wasps Sing’, Ramus 49, 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, P.E. (1985), ‘Anachronism in Greek Tragedy’, JHS 105, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, M.I. (1963), The Ancient Greeks (London).Google Scholar
Folch, M. (2015), The City and the Stage: Performance, Genre, and Gender in Plato's Laws (Oxford).Google Scholar
Gardner, P. (1888), ‘Countries and Cities in Ancient Art’, JHS 9, 47–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2010), The Greeks and Their Past (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gribble, D. (2006), ‘Individuals in Thucydides’, in Rengakos, A., Tsakmakis, A., Canfora, L. and Bakker, E.J. (eds), Brill's Companion to Thucydides (Leiden), 439–68.Google Scholar
Hanink, J. (2014), ‘Crossing Genres: Comedy, Tragedy, and Satyr Play’, in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy (Oxford), 258–77.Google Scholar
Hansen, M.H. (1998), Polis and City-State: An Ancient Concept and Its Modern Equivalent. Acts of the Copenhagen Polis Centre vol. 5 (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Jackson, L.C.M.M. (2020) The Chorus of Drama in the Fourth Century BCE (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2013), ‘Imagining Chorality: Wonder, Plato's Puppets, and Moving Statues’, in Peponi, A.-E. (ed.), Performance and Culture in Plato's Laws (Cambridge), 123–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, M. (2020), Dangerous Counsel: Accountability and Advice in Ancient Greece (Chicago).Google Scholar
Lever, K. (1953), ‘Poetic Metaphor and Dramatic Allegory in Aristophanes’, CW 46, 220–3.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1986), The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City, tr. Sheridan, A. (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1998), Mothers in Mourning, tr. Pache, C. (Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
Mills, S. (1997), Theseus, Tragedy and the Athenian Empire (Oxford).Google Scholar
Morgan, K. (ed.) (2003), Popular Tyranny: Sovereignty and Its Discontents in Ancient Greece (Austin, TX).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S.D. (2007), Broken Laughter: Select Fragments of Greek Comedy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oprisko, R., and Kaliher, K. (2014), ‘The State as a Person? Anthropomorphic Personification vs. Concrete Durational Being’, Journal of International and Global Studies 6, 30–49.Google Scholar
Orwin, C. (2015), ‘Reading Thucydides with Leo Strauss’, in Burns, T. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Leo Strauss’ Writings on Classical Political Thought (Leiden), 50–75.Google Scholar
Prauscello, L. (2014), Performing Citizenship in Plato's Laws (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, R.S. (1901), Personification and the Use of Abstract Subjects in the Attic Orators and Thukydides (Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (1997), ‘The Gendered City’, in Dobrov, G.W. (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama (Chapel Hill, NC), 149–76.Google Scholar
Sansone, D. (2016), ‘The Size of the Tragic Chorus’, Phoenix 70, 233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholtz, A. (2004), ‘Friends, Lovers, Flatterers: Demophilic Courtship in Aristophanes’ Knights’, TAPhA 134, 263–93.Google Scholar
Sebastiani, S. (2011), ‘National Characters and Race: A Scottish Enlightenment Debate’, in Ahnert, T. and Manning, S (eds), Character, Self, and Sociability in the Scottish Enlightenment (New York), 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidwell, K. (1993), ‘Authorial Collaboration? Aristophanes’ Knights and Eupolis’, GRBS 34, 365–89.Google Scholar
Smith, A.C. (2003), ‘Athenian Political Art from the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BCE: Images of Political Personifications’, in C.W. Blackwell (ed.), Demos: Classical Athenian Democracy (A. Mahoney and R. Scaife [eds], The Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org]), edition of 18 January 2003, accessed 27 September 2020.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. (2010), The Tangled Ways of Zeus: And Other Studies in and around Greek Tragedy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, I.C. (2003), Eupolis, Poet of Old Comedy (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, I.C. (2011), Fragments of Old Comedy, Volume III: Philonicus to Xenophon. Adespota (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1964), The City and the Man (Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
Telò, M. (2007), Eupolidis: Demi (Florence).Google Scholar
Ugolini, G. (2016), ‘Drama and Historiography: the Interaction between Diegesis and Mimesis in Herodotus and Thucydides’, Skenè. Journal of Theatre and Drama Studies 2, 35–62.Google Scholar
Visvardi, E. (2015), Emotion in Action: Thucydides and the Tragic Chorus (Leiden/Boston, NJ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, A. (2004), ‘The State as Person in International Theory’, Review of International Studies 30, 289-316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, D. (1996), ‘Polis-toponyms as Personal Entities’, MH 53, 1–11.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (2002), Love among the Ruins: The Erotics of Democracy in Classical Athens (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Wolpert, A.O. (2003), ‘Addresses to the Jury in the Attic Orators’, AJP 124, 537–55.Google Scholar