Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:02:46.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CAESAR'S ‘VIRGILIAN’ KATABASIS AT TROY IN LUCAN BELLVM CIVILE 9.950–99

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2018

Stephen S. McRoberts
Stephen S. McRoberts*
Affiliation:
Patrick Henry Collegessmcroberts@phc.edu
Get access

Extract

Caesar's visit to Troy has always been something of an enigma. Historically, the episode is unattested. Caesar wanders through a congeries of sites at Troy ranging from Ajax's grave on the Rhoetium promontory at its beginning to Priam's Herceian altar at the end. Numerous interpretations have been offered. Bruère has argued for Aeneas' tour through the future site of Rome in Aeneid 8 as a backdrop. Ahl has noted the connection between the ruins of Italy described in Bellum Ciuile (B.C.) 7 and the ruins of Troy in B.C. 9. Rome/Italy and Troy merge in essence as vanishing fabulae, which the poet keeps alive. Zwierlein sees Caesar's visit as modeled on Alexander the Great's visit nearly three hundred years earlier. Caesar through this scene is established as a destroyer of empires, inferior only to Alexander. Ormand stresses Caesar as an authoritative reader of the ruins of Troy, where Caesar reads the Aeneid instead of the Iliad. Rossi similarly focuses on Caesar as reading Troy's ruins to the advantage of the Julian dynasty. Gergo has opened up the passage with the correct observation that Lucan has in mind Aeneas’ katabasis in Aeneid 6. But the relationship between the brief tour at Troy and Aeneid 6 is both more comprehensive and precise. Indeed this essay will present a systematic interpretation of Caesar's tour as a parallel to Aeneid 6 in its entirety, a parallel to which Lucan most likely does not give his character Caesar access.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ramus , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , June 2018 , pp. 58 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Ramus 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahl, F. (1972), ‘Pharsalus and the Pharsalia‘, CM 29, 126–41.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1976), Lucan: An Introduction (Ithaca/London).Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1986), Aeneidos: Liber Sextus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1997), Ideology in Cold Blood (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Bowie, A.M. (1990), ‘The Death of Priam: Allegory and History in the Aeneid‘, CQ 40, 470–81.Google Scholar
Ciechanowicz, J. (1982), ‘Das Problem der Apostrophe IX 980–986 in der Pharsalia’, Eos 70, 265–75.Google Scholar
Conington, J. (1876), P. Vergilii Maronis Opera: with Commentary. vol. 2 (London).Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1996), Writing Rome (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2001), Troy: Between Greece and Rome (London).Google Scholar
Farnell, L.R. (1921), Greek Hero Cults and the Idea of Immortality (Oxford).Google Scholar
Gale, M.R. (2003), ‘Poetry and the Backward Glance in Virgil's Georgics and Aeneid‘, TAPA 133, 323–52.Google Scholar
Gergo, G. (2012), ‘Troy, Italy and the Underworld (Lucan, 9,964–999)’, Graeco-Latina Bernensia 17, 51–61.Google Scholar
Green, C.M.C. (1991), ‘Stimulos dedit Aemula Virtus: Homer and Lucan Reconsidered’, Phoenix 45, 230–54.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1986), Cosmos and Imperium (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hornsby, R.A. (1970), ‘The Pastor in the Poetry of Virgil’, CJ 63, 145–52.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. (1987), Momentary Monsters (Ithaca/London).Google Scholar
Kraggerud, E. (1968), Aeneasstudien (Oslo).Google Scholar
Leaf, W. (1923), Strabo on the Troad (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lintott, A.W. (1975), ‘Lucan and the History of the Civil War’, CQ 21, 488–505.Google Scholar
Mackie, C.J. (1999), ‘Scamander and the Rivers of Hades in Homer’, AJP 120, 485–501.Google Scholar
Masters, J. (1992), Poetry and Civil War in Lucan's Bellum Civile (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mendell, C.W. (1942), ‘Lucan's Rivers’, YCS 8, 3–22.Google Scholar
Mills, D.H. (1978), ‘Virgil's Tragic Vision: The Death of Priam’, CW 72, 159–66.Google Scholar
Ormand, K. (1994), ‘Lucan's Auctor Vix Fidelis’, Cl. Ant. 13, 38–55.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (1993), Epic and Empire (Princeton NJ).Google Scholar
Radicke, J. (2004), Lucans Poetische Technik: Studien Zum Historischen Epos (Leiden).Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2000), ‘The Aeneid Revisited: The Journey of Pompey in Lucan's Pharsalia’, AJP 121, 588f.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2001), ‘Remapping the Past: Caesar's Tale of Troy (Lucan BC 9.964–999)’, Phoenix 55, 313–26.Google Scholar
Sklenar, R.J. (1990), ‘The Death of Priam Aeneid 2.506–558’, Hermes 118, 67–75.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R.J. (1976), Agamemnon. Commentary (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Tesoriero, C. (2005), ‘Trampling over Troy: Caesar, Virgil, Lucan’, in Walde, Christine (ed.), Lukan im 21. Jahrhundert (Berlin), 202–15.Google Scholar
Thompson, L., and Bruère, R.T. (1968), ‘Lucan's Use of Virgilian Reminiscence’, CP 63, 1–21.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. (1985), Auctor & Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. (1986), ‘Lucans Caesar in Troia’, Hermes 114, 460–78.Google Scholar