Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-cn8nj Total loading time: 0.307 Render date: 2021-09-23T12:54:07.938Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

TRACES OF PHILOLOGY IN MID-REPUBLICAN LATIN POETRY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2020

Enrica Sciarrino*
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, New Zealandenrica.sciarrino@canterbury.ac.nz

Extract

At some point in the early second century CE Suetonius set out to compose biographies of important Roman literary figures. The largest surviving section of this work—known as the De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus—opens with what is generally considered an account of the early beginnings of philology in Rome.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ramus , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , December 2019 , pp. 148 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Ramus 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L., and Stephens, S.A. (eds) (2011), Brill's Companion to Callimachus (Leiden/Boston).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B., and Stephens, S.A. (2012), Callimachus in Context. From Plato to the Augustan Poets (Cambridge/New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J.N. (2003), Bilingualism and the Latin Language (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Affleck, M. (2013), ‘Priest, Patrons and Playwrights: Libraries in Rome before 168 BC’, in Konig, J., Oikonomopoulou, A., and Woolf, A. (eds), Ancient Libraries (Cambridge), 124–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1989), ‘L'epos’, in Cavallo, G. et al. (1989), 115–41.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997), ‘Otto punti su una mappa dei naufragi’, in Fowler, D. and Hinds, S. (eds), Memoria, arte allusiva, intertestualità. Materiali e Discussioni 39, 209–26.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005), ‘The search for the Perfect Book: A PS to the New Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book (Oxford), 320–42.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2011), ‘Roman Callimachus’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus, Stephens (2011), 509–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckelhymer, S.D. (2014), ‘The Way That Our Catullus Walked: Grammar and Poetry in the Late Republic’, Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations, 1205.Google Scholar
Brooks, R.A. (1981), Ennius and Roman Tragedy (New York) [orig. publ. 1949].Google Scholar
Brown, P.G.McC. (2002), ‘Actors and Actor-Managers at Rome in the time of Plautus and Terence’, in Easterling and Hall (2002), 225–37.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G., et al. (eds) (1989), Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica. La produzione del testo. vol.i (Rome).Google Scholar
Clausen, W. (1964), ‘Callimachus and Latin Poetry’, GRBS 5.3, 181–96.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. (1994), Latin Literature: A History (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Conte, G.B., and Barchiesi, A. (1989), ‘Imitazione e arte allusiva. Modi e funzioni dell'intertestualità’, in Cavallo, G. et al. (1989), 81114.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. 2003 [1993]. Archaic Latin Prose (Atlanta).Google Scholar
du Plessis, P. (2010), Borkowski's Textbook on Roman Law. Fifth edition (Oxford).Google Scholar
De Crom, D. (2011), ‘Translation and Directionality in the Hebrew-Greek Tradition’, in McElduff, S. and Sciarrino, E. (eds), Complicating the History of Western Translation. The Ancient Mediterranean in Perspective (Manchester), 7787.Google Scholar
Easterling, P., and Hall, J. (eds) (2002), Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession (Cambridge/New York).Google Scholar
Edmondson, J.C. (1999), ‘The Cultural Politics of Public Spectacle in Rome and the Greek East, 167–166 BCE’, in Bergman, B. and Kondoleon, C. (eds), The Art of Ancient Spectacle. Studies in the History of Art 56 (Washington), 7789.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (2001), Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M., and Hunter, R. (2004), Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2014) ‘Looking for Empedocles in Latin Poetry: A Skeptical Approach’, Dyctinna 11.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2016), Beyond Greek. The Beginnings of Latin Literature (Cambridge, Mass.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, E. (2000), Quinto Ennio, Annali (Libri I–VIII). Introduzione, testo critico con apparati, traduzione. vol.i (Naples).Google Scholar
Flores, E., Esposito, P., Jackson, G., and Tomasco, D. (eds) (2002), Quinto Ennio, Annali (Libri I–VIII): Commentari. vol.ii (Naples).Google Scholar
Fountaine, M. (2010), Funny Words in Plautine Comedy (Oxford).Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (2007), Plautine Elements in Plautus (Oxford) [orig. publ. Plautinisches im Plautus, 1922; tr. by F. Muecke and T. Drevikovsky].Google Scholar
Fraenkel, H. (1932), ‘Griechische Bildung in Altrömischen Epen I’, Hermes 67, 303–11.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (1979), Theatrical Performances in the Ancient World: Hellenistic and Early Roman Theater (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2003), ‘The “Annalist” before the Annalists: Ennius and his Annales’, in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N., and Walter, U. (eds), Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius. Gattungen–Autoren–Kontexte (Darmstadt), 93114.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007), Paideia Romana. Cicero's Tusculan Disputations, PCPS Suppl. 30.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. (1986), Understanding Terence (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. (1995), Epic in Republican Rome (Oxford).Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. (2005), Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and Its Reception (Cambridge/New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. (2013), Terence: Hecyra (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Grilli, A. (1965), Studi enniani (Brescia).Google Scholar
Gruen, E.S. (1990), Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, H.U. (2003), The Powers of Philology: Dynamics of Textual Scholarship (Urbana-Champaign).Google Scholar
Gurd, S. (2015), ‘Philology and Greek Literature’, Oxford Handbooks Online. Accessed 27 December 2017.Google Scholar
Habinek, T.N. (1998), The Politics of Latin Literature. Writing, Identity and Empire in Ancient Rome (Princeton).Google Scholar
Habinek, T.N. (2005), The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Habinek, T.N. (2006), ‘The Wisdom of Ennius’, Arethusa 39, 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T.N. (2009), ‘Presence and Meaning in Roman Culture’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998), Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry (Cambridge/New York).Google Scholar
Jacob, C. (1999), ‘From Book to Text: Towards a Comparative History of Philologies’, Diogenes 47 (186), 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccottet, A. (2003), Choisir Dionysos. Les associations dionysiaques ou la face cachée du dionysisme. vol.i: text; vol.ii: documents (Zurich).Google Scholar
Kaster, R.A. (ed.) (1995), C. Suetonius Tranquillus: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2011), ‘Excerpting as a Reading Practice’, in Reydams-Schils, G. (ed.), Thinking through Excerpts: Studies on Stobaeus (Turnhout), 922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, J.L. (2002), ‘Nothing to do with the technitai of Dionysus?’, in Easterling and Hall (2002), 209–24.Google Scholar
Littlewood, J.R. (2006), A Commentary on Ovid's Fasti, Book 6 (Oxford).Google Scholar
McNamee, K. (2007), Annotations in Greek and Latin Texts from Egypt. American Studies in Papyrology 45 (Atlanta).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariotti, S. (1986), Livio Andronico e la traduzione artistica. Saggio critico ed edizione dei frammenti dell’ Odyssea (Urbino) [first published 1952].Google Scholar
Matthaios, S. (2011), ‘Eratosthenes of Cyrene. Readings of his “Grammar” Definition’, in Matthaios, S., Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A. (eds), Ancient Scholarship and Grammar. Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts (Berlin), 5585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miano, D. (2012), ‘Moneta: Sacred Memory in Mid-Republican Rome’, in Bommas, M., Harrisson, J., and Roy, P. (eds), Memory and Urban Religion in the Ancient World (London), 89110.Google Scholar
Montana, F. (2011), ‘The Making of Greek Scholiastic Corpora’, in Montanari and Pagani (2011), 105–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montana, F. (2015), ‘Hellenistic Scholarship’, in Montanari, Matthaios, and Rengakos (2015), 60183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, F. (2006), ‘Glossario, parafrasi, “edizione commentate” nei papiri’, in I classici greci e i loro commentatori. Atti del Convegno Rovereto 20 ottobre 2006, 915.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., and Pagani, L. (eds) (2011), From Scholars to Scholia. Chapters in the History of Ancient Greek Scholarship. Trends in Classics Suppl. Vol. 9 (Berlin/New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, F. (2011), ‘Correcting a Copy, Editing a Text, Alexadrian Ekdosis and Papyri’, in Montanari and Pagani (2011), 115.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds) (2015), Brill's Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (Amsterdam).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narducci, E. (1997), Cicerone e l'eloquenza romana (Rome/Bari).Google Scholar
Nickau, K. (1972), ‘Zenodotos von Mallos’, RE X/A, 23–45.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968), History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age (Oxford).Google Scholar
Pagani, L. (2011), ‘Pioneers of Grammar. Hellenistic Scholarship and the Study of Language’, in Montanari and Pagani (2011), 1764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Possanza, D.M. (2004), Translating the Heavens. Aratus, Germanicus, and the Poetics of Latin Translation (New York).Google Scholar
Possanza, D.M. (2006), Edward Courtney, The Fragmentary Latin Poets, BMCR 95.10.06.Google Scholar
Reggiani, R. (1979), I proemi degli Annales: programma letterario e polemica. Filologia e critica 28 (Rome).Google Scholar
Riggsby, A.M. (2010), Roman Law and the Legal World of the Romans (Cambridge/New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, H.T. (tr.) (1874), The Comedies of Terence (New York).Google Scholar
Rolfe, J.C. (tr.) (1914), Suetonius. vol. ii (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Romano, A. (1990), Il collegium scribarum. Aspetti giuridici della produzione letteraria tra il terzo e il secondo secolo A.C. (Naples).Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (1995), Kalender und Öffentlichkeit: Die Geschichte der Repräsentation und religiösen Qualifikation von Zeit in Rom (Berlin).Google Scholar
Sarullo, G. (2013), ‘Translating a translation: the Odusia by Livius Andronicus and its English versions’, in Astori, D. (ed.), Produrre ‘quasi’ lo stesso effetto. Quindici percorsi nei boschi traduttivi (Parma), 157–66.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. (2011), Cato the Censor and the Beginnings of Roman Prose: From Poetic to Elite Transcripts (Columbus).Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. (2015), ‘Hyperreality, Intertextuality and the Study of Latin Poetry’, Arethusa 48, 369–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skutsch, O. (ed.) (1985), The Annals of Q. Ennius (Oxford).Google Scholar
Swain, S. (2002), ‘Bilingualism in Cicero? The Evidence of Code-Switching’, in Adams, J.N., Janse, M., Swain, S. (eds), Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Word (Oxford), 128–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traina, A. (1970), Vortit barbare. Le traduzioni poetiche da Livio Andronico a Cicerone (Rome).Google Scholar
Troxel, R.L. (2008), LXX Isaiah as Translation and Interpretation. The Strategies of the Translator of the Septuagint of Isaiah. SJSJ 124 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Weiden Boyd, B. (2017), Ovid's Homer: Authority, Repetition and Reception (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, J.T. (2011), ‘Accius, Porcius Licinius, and the Beginning of Latin Literature’, JRS 101, 3150.Google Scholar
Wouters, A., and Swiggers, P. (2015), ‘Definitions of Grammar’, in Montanari, Matthaios, and Rengakos (2015), 515–44.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. (1981), Latin Textual Criticism in Antiquity (New York).Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. (2018), Critics, Compilers and Commentators. An Introduction to Roman Philology, 200 BCE–800 CE (Oxford).Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

TRACES OF PHILOLOGY IN MID-REPUBLICAN LATIN POETRY
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

TRACES OF PHILOLOGY IN MID-REPUBLICAN LATIN POETRY
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

TRACES OF PHILOLOGY IN MID-REPUBLICAN LATIN POETRY
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *