Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:35:21.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal misclassification error and magnitude of true between-person variation in dietary nutrient intake: a random coefficients analysis and implications for the Japan Public Health Center (JPHC) Cohort Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Michael T Fahey ,
Satoshi Sasaki ,
Minatsu Kobayashi ,
Masayuki Akabane  and
Shoichiro Tsugane
Michael T Fahey*
Affiliation:
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577Japan
Satoshi Sasaki
Affiliation:
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577Japan
Minatsu Kobayashi
Affiliation:
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577Japan
Masayuki Akabane
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Japan
Shoichiro Tsugane
Affiliation:
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-8577Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Email fahey@iarc.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

We examine (1) the extent to which seasonal diet assessments correctly classify individuals with respect to their usual nutrient intake, and (2) whether the magnitude of true variation in intake between individuals is seasonal. These effects could lead, respectively, to bias in estimates of relative risk for associations between usual nutrient exposure and disease, and to an increase in required sample size.

Subjects and setting:

One hundred and twenty-seven families in four regions of the Japan Public Health Center (JPHC) Cohort Study.

Design:

On average, 48 weighed daily food records were collected per family over six seasons of 1994 and 1995.

Results:

A random slopes regression model was used to predict the correlation between seasonal and annual average intakes, and to estimate true between-person variation in intakes by season. Mean vitamin C intake was greatest in summer and autumn, and seasonal variation was attributable to the consumption of fruit and vegetables. Predicted correlations between seasonal and annual average vitamin C intake ranged from 0.62 to 0.87, with greatest correlations in summer and autumn. True between-person variation in vitamin C intake was also strongly seasonal, ranging from 45 to 78% of total variance, and was again greatest in summer and autumn. These effects were less seasonal among energy and 13 other nutrients.

Conclusions:

It may be possible substantially to reduce both seasonal misclassification of individuals with respect to their usual vitamin C intake, and required sample size, by asking subjects to report high-season intake of fruit and vegetables in the JPHC Study.

Keywords

SeasonsVitamin CMisclassification errorTrue varianceEpidemiological methodsMultilevel analysisFood recordsMeasurement errorJapan
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , June 2003 , pp. 385 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2003

References

1Willett, WC, Sampson, L, Stampfer, MJ, Rosner, B, Bain, C, Witschi, J, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1985; 122: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Ziegler, RG, Wilcox, HB, Mason, TJ, Bill, JS, Virgo, PW. Seasonal variation in intake of carotenoids and vegetables and fruits among white men in New Jersey. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1987; 45; 107–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Hunter, DJ, Rimm, EB, Sacks, FM, Stampfer, MJ, Colditz, GA, Litin, LB, et al. Comparison of measures of fatty acids intake by subcutaneous fat aspirate, food frequency questionnaire, and diet records in a population of free living US living men. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1992; 135: 418–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Subar, AF, Frey, CM, Harlan, LC, Kahle, L. Differences in reported food frequency by season of questionnaire administration: the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. Epidemiology 1994; 5: 226–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Hartman, AM, Brown, CC, Palmgren, J, Pietinen, P, Verkasalo, M, Myer, D, et al. Variability in nutrient and food intakes among older middle-aged men. Implications for design of epidemiologic and validation studies using food recording. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1990; 132: 999–1012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Tsugane, S, Fahey, MT, Sasaki, S, Baba, S for the JPHC Study Group. Alcohol consumption and all-cause mortality among middle-aged Japanese men: seven-year follow-up of the JPHC Study Cohort I. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1990; 150: 1201–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Tsugane, S, Akabane, M, Inami, T, Matsushima, S, Ishibashi, T, Ichinowatari, Y, et al. Urinary salt excretion and stomach cancer mortality among four Japanese populations. Cancer Causes Control 1991; 2: 165–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Tsubonoy, Y, Kobayashi, M, Tsugane, S. Food consumption and gastric cancer mortality in five regions of Japan. Nutr. Cancer 1997; 27: 60–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Tsugane, S, Gey, F, Ichinowatari, Y, Miyajima, Y, Ishibashi, T, Matsushima, S, et al. Cross-sectional epidemiologic study for assessing cancer risks at the population level: II baseline data and correlation analysis. J. Epidemiol. 1992; 2: 83–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Science and Technology Agency, Japan. Standard Tables of Food Consumption in Japan. 4th revised ed. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Finance Printing Bureau, 1999 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
11Beaton, GH, Milner, J, Corey, P, McGuire, V, Cousins, M, Stewart, E, et al. Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1979; 32: 2546–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Tsubono, Y, Fahey, MT, Takahashi, T, et al. Interpopulation and intrapopulation variability of nutrient intake in five reigons of Japan. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998; 52: 176–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Diggle, PJ, Liang, KY, Zeger, SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
14Longford, NT. Random Coefficient Models. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1993.Google Scholar
15Byrk, AS, Raudenbush, SW. Hierarchical Linear Models. CA: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar
16Tsubono, Y, Takamori, S, Kobayashi, M, Takahashi, T, Iwase, Y, Iitoi, Y, et al. A data-based approach for designing a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire for a population-based prospective study in Japan. J. Epidemiol. 1996; 6: 45–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Wynder, EL, Hebert, JR. Homogeneity in nutrient exposure: an impediment in cancer epidemiology. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1987; 79: 605–7.Google Scholar
18Prentice, RL, Pepe, M, Self, SC. Dietary fat and breast cancer: a quantitative assessment of the epidemiologic literature and discussion of methodologic issues. Cancer Res. 1989; 49: 3147–56.Google Scholar
19McKeown-Eyssen, GE, Tibshirani, R. Implications of measurement error in exposure for the sample size of case–control studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994; 139: 415–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20White, E, Kushi, LH, Pepe, MS. The effect of exposure variance and exposure measurement error on study sample size: implications for the design of epidemiologic studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1994; 47: 873–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Kaaks, R, Riboli, E. Validation and calibration of dietary intake in the EPIC project: methodological considerations. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26: S15–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Riboli, E, Norat, T. Cancer prevention and diet: opportunities in Europe. Public Health Nutr. 2001; 4: 475–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed