Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-2wqtr Total loading time: 0.277 Render date: 2021-09-17T23:43:56.233Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Consumption of foods by young children with diagnosed campylobacter infection – a pilot case–control study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Scott Cameron
Affiliation:
Communicable Disease Control Branch, Department of Human Services, South Australian Government, Adelaide, Australia Department of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Karin Ried
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Anthony Worsley
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
David Topping*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Health Sciences and Nutrition, Kintore Avenue, PO Box 10041, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
*Corresponding
*Corresponding author: Email david.topping@csiro.au
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To determine whether parentally reported habitual intake of specific foods differed between children with diagnosed Campylobacter jejuni infection and children of a comparison group without diagnosed infection.

Design, setting and subjects:

Information was collected from the parents or primary caregivers of South Australian children aged 1–5 years with diagnosed C. jejuni (cases, n=172) and an age- and gender-matched group of uninfected children (controls, n=173). Frequency of consumption of 106 food and drink items was determined for the preceding two months by food-frequency questionnaire. Four children in the control group had recorded diarrhoeal episodes during the assessment period and were excluded, so 169 responses were evaluated for this group. Information was gathered on possible confounders including socio-economic status. Response frequencies were classified into three levels of consumption (rarely, weekly or daily) and statistical comparison was made by frequency of consumption of foods versus the ‘rarely’ classification for cases and controls, respectively.

Results:

Frequency of consumption of most foods, including starchy foods and fruits and vegetables, did not differ between cases and controls. However, reported consumption of eight food items (block and processed cheese (slices and spread), salami/fritz (a form of processed sausage), chicken nuggets, pasteurised milk, fish (canned or fresh) and hot French fries) was significantly higher by controls.

Conclusions:

The hypothesis that reported consumption of starchy foods was lower by cases than by controls was not supported by the data. However, consumption of some processed and unprocessed foods was higher by controls. Some of these foods have established bactericidal actions in vitro that may indicate a possible mechanism for this apparent protection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2004

References

1Gracey, M. Nutritional effects and management of diarrhea in infancy. Acta Paediatrica (Supplement) 1999; 88: 110–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Cohen, ML. Changing patterns of infectious disease. Nature 2000; 406: 762–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Stafford, R, Tenkate, T, McCall, B. A five year review of Campylobacter infection in Queensland. Communicable Diseases Intelligence 1996; 20: 478–82.Google Scholar
4Brieseman, MA. A further study of the epidemiology of Campylobacter jejeuni infections. New Zealand Medical Journal 1990; 103: 207–9.Google Scholar
5Tauxe, RV, Hargrett-Bean, N, Patton, CM, Wachsmut, IK. Campylobacter isolates in the United States 1982–1986. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1988; 37(SS-2): 113.Google ScholarPubMed
6Gibson, GR, Roberfroid, MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition 1995; 125: 1401–12.Google ScholarPubMed
7Topping, DL, Clifton, PM. Short chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and non-starch polysaccharides. Physiological Reviews 2001; 81: 1031–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Bird, AR, Brown, IL, Topping, DL. Starches, resistant starches, the gut microflora and human health. Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology 2000; 1: 2537.Google ScholarPubMed
9Ramakrishna, BS, Venkataraman, S, Srinivasan, S, Dash, P, Young, GP, Binder, HJ. Amylase-resistant starch plus oral rehydration solution for cholera. New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 342: 308–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Rabbani, GH, Teka, T, Zaman, B, Majid, N, Khatun, M, Fuchs, GJ. Clinical studies in persistent diarrhea: dietary management with green banana or pectin in Bangladeshi children. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 554–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Hampson, DJ, Robertson, ID, La, T, Oxberry, SL, Pethick, DW. Influences of diet and vaccination on colonisation of pigs by the intestinal spirochaete Brachyspira (Serpulina) pilosicoli. Veterinary Microbiology 2000; 73: 7584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Baghurst, PA, Baghurst, KI, Record, SJ. Dietary fibre, non-starch polysaccharides and resistant starch – a review. Food Australia 1996; 48(Suppl.): S3–35.Google Scholar
13Cassidy, A, Bingham, SA, Cummings, JH. Starch intake and colorectal cancer risk: an international comparison. British Journal of Cancer 1994; 69: 937–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Wilson, DH, Starr, GJ, Taylor, AW, Del Grande, E. Random digit dialling and Electronic White Pages samples compared: demographic profiles and health estimates. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 1999; 23: 627–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Baghurst, KI, Crawford, DA, Worsley, A, Record, SJ. The Victorian Nutrition Survey – intakes and sources of dietary fats and cholesterol in the Victorian population. Medical Journal of Australia 1988; 149: 1220.Google ScholarPubMed
16Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Nutrition Survey 1995. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1997.Google Scholar
17Stata Corp. Stata Statistical Software, Release 7. College Station, TX: Stata Corp., 2000.Google Scholar
18 Department of Human Services. Notifiable Disease in South Australia. Annual Summary 1996. Adelaide: Department of Human Services, 1997.Google Scholar
19Anon. Topics in minority health: Yersinia entercolitica infections during the holidays in black families – Georgia. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1990; 39: 819–20.Google Scholar
20Schorr, D, Schmid, H, Rieder, HL, Baumgartner, A, Vorkauf, H, Burnens, A. Risk factors for Campylobacter enteritis in Switzerland. Zentralblatt für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin 1994; 196: 327–37.Google ScholarPubMed
21Bachmann, HP, Spahr, U. The fate of potentially pathogenic bacteria in Swiss hard and semihard cheeses made from raw milk. Journal of Dairy Science 1995; 78: 476–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22English, R, Lewis, J. Food for Health. A Guide to Good Nutrition with Nutrient Values for 650 Australian Foods. Canberra: National Food Authority, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1991.Google Scholar
23Kuratko, CN, Becker, SA. Dietary lipids alter fatty acid composition and PGE2 production in colonic lymphocytes. Nutrition and Cancer 1998; 31: 5661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Cohen, SA, Hendricks, K, Mathis, R, Laramee, S, Walker, WA. Chronic non-specific diarrhea – complication of dietary fat restriction. Pediatrics 1979; 64: 402–7.Google Scholar
25National Health and Medical Research Council. Dietary Guidelines for Children and Adolescents. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1995.Google Scholar
26Gould, GW. Methods for preservation and extension of shelf life. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1996; 33: 5164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Kashket, S, Paolino, VJ, Lewis, DA, van Houte, J. In-vitro inhibition of glucosyltransferase from the dental plaque bacterium Streptococcus mutans by common beverages and food extracts. Archives of Oral Biology 1985; 30: 821–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Murrell, WG, Roth, L, Egerton, J, Samela, J, Walker, PD. Pig-bel: enteritis necroticans. A study in diagnosis and management. Lancet 1966; i: 217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Vandenberghe, J, Verheyen, A, Lauwers, S, Geboes, K. Spontaneous adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon in Wistar rats: the intracytoplasmic presence of a Campylobacter-like bacterium. Journal of Comparative Pathology 1985; 95: 4555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
You have Access
9
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Consumption of foods by young children with diagnosed campylobacter infection – a pilot case–control study
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Consumption of foods by young children with diagnosed campylobacter infection – a pilot case–control study
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Consumption of foods by young children with diagnosed campylobacter infection – a pilot case–control study
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *