Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-8fhp6 Total loading time: 1.618 Render date: 2021-09-16T17:24:45.130Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Australia’s sugar tale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2019

Adyya Gupta*
Affiliation:
School of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Caroline Miller
Affiliation:
Health Policy Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Jane Harford
Affiliation:
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, The University of Adelaide,Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Lisa G Smithers
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Annette Braunack-Mayer
Affiliation:
School of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
*Corresponding
*Corresponding author: Email ag654@uowmail.edu.au
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To establish high intake of free sugars and its related disease burden as a significant public health challenge in Australia.

Design:

We discuss five key actions to reduce intake of free sugars tailored to the Australian context. These strategies are informed by reviewing the global scientific evidence on the effectiveness of a range of policy responses to reduce intake of free sugars at the population level.

Setting:

Australia.

Participants:

Australian population.

Results:

The five key actions to reduce population levels for intake of free sugars tailored to the Australian context include prioritising health in trade agreements and policy; introducing a fiscal policy supporting health and promoting food reformulation; regulating advertising and improving labelling; strengthening the current dietary guidelines; and encouraging healthy choices.

Conclusions:

The adoption and implementation of the strategies discussed in the current commentary would aid in tackling the rising health burden from the intake of free sugars in Australia.

Type
Commentary
Copyright
© The Authors 2019 

Chronic diseases are the major cause of preventable morbidity and premature mortality worldwide, accounting for 70 % of all deaths(1). Excess intake of free sugars (all monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods by the manufacturer, cook or consumer, plus the sugars that are naturally present in honey, syrups and fruit juices) is associated with increased risk of developing chronic diseases including dental caries(Reference Moynihan and Kelly2, Reference Moynihan3) and obesity(Reference Gibson4Reference Te Morenga, Mallard and Mann7). Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake is associated with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes(Reference Imamura, O’Connor and Ye8Reference Tsilas, de Souza and Mejia10). Obesity is also causally linked to linked to heart disease and thirteen types of cancer(Reference Lauby-Secretan, Scoccianti and Loomis11). Recognising this, the WHO set strong (<10 % of total energy intake) and conditional (<5 % of total energy intake) recommendations for daily intake of free sugars to improve oral and general health(12). Many countries, including Australia, have not adopted these WHO recommendations to date(13).

Almost half of Australians exceed the <10 % and nearly 90 % exceed the <5 % intake of free sugars recommendations(14). According to the Australian Health Survey 2011–2012, Australians on average consumed 57·8 (sd 1·4) g free sugars/d(14, Reference Gupta, Smithers and Braunack-Mayer15). SSB are the largest source of free sugars for Australians(14). The National Health Survey for 2014–2015(16) shows that 63·4 % of Australians are overweight or obese, nearly 1 million (4·4 %) have type 2 diabetes and three in every ten adults (25–44 years) have tooth decay (or dental caries)(17). Despite a marginal decline in the intake of free sugars in the form of SSB(18), Australians are consuming free sugars above the recommended amounts. Collectively, this indicates that high intake of free sugars is a whole-of-population problem in Australia and that population-level interventions are required.

There is substantial international literature on the effectiveness of a range of policies to reduce high intake of free sugars in population diets. Sugar taxation (added and/or free sugars)(19) is one strategy that has now been implemented in many countries and states. Other policy strategies that are effective and being considered in many countries include limiting marketing of foods and drinks(Reference Barragan, Noller and Robles20Reference Gordon, McDermott and Stead24) containing high amounts of free sugars (above the recommended levels), labelling of added and free sugars, and subsiding fruits and vegetables(Reference Cobiac, Tam and Veerman25Reference Thow, Downs and Jan27) to promote uptake of healthy alternatives.

However, Australia is a different case. There is no political consensus to introduce a tax on added and/or free sugars or an SSB tax at the least, despite international evidence and economic modelling demonstrating the health and economic benefits for Australia(Reference Cobiac, Tam and Veerman25, Reference Lee and Giannobile28Reference Colchero, Rivera-Dommarco and Popkin30). There is widespread exposure to unhealthy food advertising and the current standards and codes that govern food advertising are largely industry regulated(31, 32).

Below we discuss five key approaches to reduce intake of free sugars at the population level tailored to the Australian context.

1. Include health in trade and policy

For Australia to maintain its public health leadership in the world, it is vital to ensure that all trade and investment agreements (such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership) are made in the country’s best interests, including public health interest.

Recent disputes around tobacco suggest the potential risk that international trade and agreements create for domestic public health policy(33). Several nations, including Australia, have recently been forced to defend their tobacco control policies against legal action raised by tobacco companies in international trade and investment. Australia’s ongoing commitment to tobacco plain packaging laws(34) is a clear example where Australia successfully prioritised the health of its citizens in the face of enormous tobacco industry opposition. Trade and investment agreements must not prevent or deter Australia, or other countries, from implementing policies to protect the health of its citizens.

As the influence of the sugar industry is evident in Australia’s investment policies(35), trade agreements involving added and free sugars must have protections for public health policy to create healthy environments for better health outcomes. It is vital to refocus policies from one that prioritises industry profits to an approach that gives adequate weight to health(36). Profit-only negotiations gives large food corporations the power to weaken the government’s ability to introduce and enact public health policies(Reference Friel, Gleeson and Thow37). Furthermore, to improve confidence that public health will not be compromised, governments should make the trade negotiation process more transparent and open to public scrutiny.

2. Introduce a fiscal policy supporting health and promote food reformulation

Consistent with international evidence on the effectiveness of SSB tax(Reference Colchero, Rivera-Dommarco and Popkin30, Reference Cabrera Escobar, Veerman and Tollman38Reference Colchero, Salgado and Unar-Munguía40), the Australian Government should implement a fiscal policy on the major source of free sugars, i.e. SSB. This could be the most effective and viable policy action to reduce free sugars consumption.

In addition to reducing SSB consumption, taxation also encourages manufacturers to reformulate their products by reducing free sugars content. For reformulation to be successful, it is essential that all manufacturers sign up for it. Reformulation has been reported in advance of a two-tiered taxation system in the UK, where beverages containing added sugars are taxed at a higher rate(Reference Quinn4143). Tesco (a British multinational grocery and general merchandise retailer) reduced the added sugars content in its home-brand products(Reference Quinn41). The UK has also previously been successful with its salt reformulation strategy(Reference Macgregor and Hashem44). Similar reformulations have also occurred in France where Nestlé and Orangina Schweppes have reduced added sugars in foods and drinks(42). Although evaluation of the effectiveness of these actions is currently underway, modelling studies of the cost-effectiveness of reducing the energy content of SSB has shown that reformulation is a promising strategy that would yield cost savings and long-term health gains for Australia(Reference Crino, Herrera and Ananthapavan45). A core objective of Australia’s Healthy Food Partnership(46) (a joint alliance between Australian Government, the food industry and public health) is to ‘support industry to reformulate their foods’, hence the alliance has the potential to endorse food reformulations with authority and clarity. Setting clear food reformulation targets, aligned with the Australian Dietary Guidelines, would strengthen the impact of this approach, creating a healthier food environment(47).

3. Regulate advertising and improve labelling

There is evidence that ubiquitous marketing of unhealthy food products influences populations’ food choices and consumption(Reference Bialkova, Sasse and Fenko48). Coca Cola, PepsiCo and Schweppes spent nearly $AU 29·6 million, $AU 12·3 million and $AU 10 million, respectively, on media advertising in Australia in 2009(49). Despite the presence of legislated children’s television standards in Australia(50), television advertising of unhealthy foods (includes foods high in fat, sugar and salt) is largely governed by industry codes and self-regulation. Large proportions of children are routinely exposed to unhealthy food and beverage advertising(Reference Smithers, Haag and Agnew51). There is a need for regulatory reform and increased government oversight to limit the volume and content of unhealthy food advertisements, especially for foods high in added and free sugars content. The Obesity Policy Coalition(Reference MacKay, Martin and Swinburn52, 53) has long called for a regulation to protect children from unhealthy food and beverage advertising. Sweden, Norway and Quebec (Canada) have passed laws restricting advertising directed at young children(Reference Caraher, Landon and Dalmeny54). Experience from both Australia and overseas demonstrates that regulatory measures intended to curb children’s exposure to unhealthy food and beverage advertising need to capture actual exposure and not just advertisers’ intent, which is mostly subjective and vulnerable to exploitation.

Another potential point of policy intervention is food labelling laws. At present, there is no clear way for Australian consumers to determine the amount of added or free sugars in the foods and beverages they consume. Product ingredients must be listed on the package in descending order (by ingoing weight). When present, sugars are included in ingredient lists, but sugar goes by many names. Furthermore, nutrition information panels on Australian products describe total sugars only (grouping together, for example, sugars naturally occurring in dairy with added sugars). Transparency would be increased if Australia were, at a minimum, to require sugars in contents lists to be grouped, which is the case in Canada(55), and require added sugars to appear separately in nutrition information panels, as is now required in the USA(56).

WHO recommends the use of interpretive nutrition labels with simplified information on the front of packaged food. Australia and New Zealand employ a Health Star Rating (HSR) system; this is a government-endorsed front-of-pack nutrition labelling system that is voluntary. The HSR system assigns a rating from 0·5 (least healthy) to 5 stars (most healthy) based on the nutritional composition of the product. Limitations of the current algorithm allow many juices to be awarded 5 stars, despite being very high in free sugars. The HSR system is currently under review(57) and the handling of beverages high in free sugars, as well as added sugars compared with total sugars across all categories, is an important opportunity for improvement.

Internationally there are moves to require front-of-pack consumer warning labels about high sugar content (as well as salt and saturated fat). Chile requires warning labels for products high in added sugars(58). Israel has passed legislation requiring the same from 2020(59) and other jurisdictions including Canada and Australia are currently reviewing the front-of-pack warning-style labels for products high in sugar. There is substantial room for improvement in Australia’s interpretive front-of-pack labelling. A system is required that adequately takes account of free sugars, provides consumers with clear guidance on genuinely healthier options, gives a warning for high sugar and is mandatory to ensure universal application.

4. Strengthen Australian Dietary Guidelines

Although previously the recommendation to limit free sugars to <10 % of energy by the WHO report on Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (60) was briefly discussed in Australia’s Nutrient Reference Values (2006)(61), the recommendation was not included the Australian Dietary Guidelines. The Australian Dietary Guidelines, last updated in 2013, advise Australians to ‘limit intake’ of foods and drinks containing added sugars(13). Thus, it is time for Australia to review and update its evidence-based guidelines to include the WHO’s recommendations on thresholds for intake of free sugars. Furthermore, emphasising limits on the intake of fruit juices is important given the high amounts of free sugars present in them and their high intake by the population(Reference Singh, Micha and Khatibzadeh62). Reviewing the guidelines every 5 years to ensure consistency with evidence is also desirable.

5. Introduce other measures to encourage healthier choices

There are multiple other important environmental drivers of free sugars consumption that should be considered as potential opportunities for intervention to reduce free sugars consumption. Improving the availability and uptake of water(Reference Vargas-Garcia, Evans and Prestwich63) as an alternative to drinks containing high free sugars by placing clean water fountains in and around large public places such as shopping malls and food courts is an opportunity. Replacing the unhealthy food with healthy alternatives in vending machines and food outlets within health-care, university and workplace settings is another measure to promote healthy choices(Reference Olstad, Goonewardene and McCargar64, Reference Newman, Javanparast and Baum65). Reducing exposures to sweet snacks at the checkout by removing and/or replacing them with healthier alternatives may positively influence food purchasing behaviours(Reference Thornton, Cameron and McNaughton66, 67). As mass media campaigns have been proven to change smoking behaviour(Reference Wakefield, Durkin and Spittal68Reference Durkin, Brennan and Wakefield70), similar results could be achieved to reduce free sugars consumption(Reference Lane, Porter and Estabrooks71Reference Hedrick, Davy and You73).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the actions required to tackle high intake of free sugars must include a mix of strategies. Although these are discussed in the Australian context in the current commentary, these strategies are applicable worldwide. Key actions include: prioritising health in trade agreements and policy; introducing a fiscal policy supporting health and promoting food reformulation; regulating advertising and improving labelling; strengthening the current dietary guidelines; and encouraging healthy choices. For countries such as Australia, where free sugars are consumed above the levels recommended for prevention of non-communicable diseases, there is a need, first, to recognise that high intake of free sugars is a population problem and that it is modifiable. Second, with the understanding that population-based goals differ from recommendations for individuals, implementing a comprehensive, public health approach to tackle diets high in free sugars and promote overall healthy eating would be valuable. Third, given the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of population-level interventions, it would be effective and efficient to implement population-based strategies to reduce the intake of free sugars. Finally, keeping health in focus, the government along with community support can help create a healthier environment that facilitates and maintains good health for its population.

Acknowledgements

Financial A.G. currently receives a University Postgraduate Award and an International Postgraduate Tuition Award scholarship from University of Wollongong. A.B.-M. is a previous recipient of a Healthy Laws grant funded by the Australian National Preventive Health Agency (grant number 182BRA2011) and is currently a head and professor of the Health and Society Unit at the University of Wollongong. The funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this commentary. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: All authors equally contributed to the conceptualisation and development of this manuscript. A.G. wrote the initial draft and all authors provided feedback and suggestions on multiple drafts of the manuscript. All authors also approved the final manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: Not applicable.

References

World Health Organization (2014) Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014. Geneva: WHO; available at https://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/ Google Scholar
Moynihan, P & Kelly, S (2014) Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. J Dent Res 93, 818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moynihan, P (2016) Sugars and dental caries: evidence for setting a recommended threshold for intake. Adv Nutr 7, 149156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, S (2008) Sugar-sweetened soft drinks and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence from observational studies and interventions. Nutr Res Rev 21, 134147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, FB (2013) Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases. Obes Rev 14, 606619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, GA & Popkin, BM (2014) Dietary sugar and body weight: have we reached a crisis in the epidemic of obesity and diabetes? Health be damned! Pour on the sugar. Diabetes Care 37, 950956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Te Morenga, L, Mallard, S & Mann, J (2013) Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ 346, e7492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imamura, F, O’Connor, L, Ye, Z et al. (2015) Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ 351, h3576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, M, Yu, M, Fang, L et al. (2015) Association between sugar-sweetened beverages and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes Invest 6, 360366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsilas, CS, de Souza, RJ, Mejia, SB et al. (2017) Relation of total sugars, fructose and sucrose with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. CMAJ 189, E711E720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauby-Secretan, B, Scoccianti, C, Loomis, D et al. (2016) Body fatness and cancer – viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med 375, 794798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (2015) Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: WHO; available at http://who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/sugars_intake/en Google Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) Australian Dietary Guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC; available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/n55Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) Australian Health Survey: consumption of added sugars, 2011–12. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4364.0.55.011 (accessed June 2017).Google Scholar
Gupta, A, Smithers, LG, Braunack-Mayer, A et al. (2018) How much free sugar do Australians consume? Findings from a national survey. Aust N Z J Public Health 42, 533540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2015) National Health Survey: first results, 2014–15. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/4364.0.55.001~2014-15~Main%20Features~Key%20findings~1 (accessed September 2016).Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2014) Oral Health and Dental Care in Australia: Key Facts and Figures Trends 2014. Canberra: AIHW; available at http://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/dental-oral-health/key-facts-figures-trends-2014/contents/table-of-contents Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Consumption of added sugars – a comparison of 1995 to 2011–12. Australian Health Survey: consumption of added sugars, 2011–12. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4364.0.55.011Main+Features202011-12?OpenDocument (accessed July 2015).Google Scholar
The global social movement NCD Free (2018) Implemented sugar taxes worldwide [An infographic detailing sugar taxes that have been implemented around the world]. Twitter: @NCDFREE.Google Scholar
Barragan, NC, Noller, AJ, Robles, B et al. (2014) The ‘sugar pack’ health marketing campaign in Los Angeles County, 2011–2012. Health Promot Pract 15, 208216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudoin, CE, Fernandez, C, Wall, JL et al. (2007) Promoting healthy eating and physical activity short-term effects of a mass media campaign. Am J Prev Med 32, 217223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bollard, T, Maubach, N, Walker, N et al. (2016) Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people’s predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, B & Svanaes, S (2014) Literature review of research on online food and beverage marketing to children: Produced for the Committee of Advertising Practice (ACP) by Family Kids and Youth. http://www.asa.org.uk/asset/cd73763f-8619-4939-be6421d122566ea7/ (accessed May 2018).Google Scholar
Gordon, R, McDermott, L, Stead, M et al. (2006) The effectiveness of social marketing interventions for health improvement: what’s the evidence? Public Health 120, 11331139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobiac, LJ, Tam, K, Veerman, L et al. (2017) Taxes and subsidies for improving diet and population health in Australia: a cost-effectiveness modelling study. PLoS Med 14, e1002232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niebylski, ML, Redburn, KA, Duhaney, T et al. (2015) Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: a systematic review of the evidence. Nutrition 31, 787795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thow, A, Downs, S & Jan, S (2014) A systematic review of the effectiveness of food taxes and subsidies to improve diets: understanding the recent evidence. Nutr Rev 72, 551565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, JY & Giannobile, WV (2016) Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: a strategy to reduce epidemics of diabetes, obesity, and dental caries? J Dent Res 95, 13251326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerman, JL, Sacks, G, Antonopoulos, N et al. (2016) The impact of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages on health and health care costs: a modelling study. PLoS One 11, e0151460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colchero, MA, Rivera-Dommarco, J, Popkin, BM et al. (2017) In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff (Millwood) 36, 564571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Australian Communications and Media Authority (2016) Regulatory responsibility. http://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/About/Corporate/Responsibilities/regulation-responsibilities-acma (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Australian Association of National Advertisers (2004) Commercial television industry code of practice. http://www.acma.gov.au/Industry/Broadcast/Television/TV-content-regulation/commercial-television-code-of-practice-tv-content-regulation-i-acma (accessed November 2017).Google Scholar
Attorney-General’s Department, Australian Government (2017) Tobacco plain packaging – investor-state arbitration. http://www.ag.gov.au/Internationalrelations/InternationalLaw/Pages/Tobaccoplainpackaging.aspx (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Department of Health, Australian Government (2018) Evaluation of tobacco plain packaging in Australia. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/tobacco-plain-packaging-evaluation (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Australian Sugar Industry Alliance (2010) Submission to Productivity Commission Review of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements. Brisbane, QLD: Australian Sugar Industry Alliance; available at http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/trade-agreements/submissions/sub015.pdf Google Scholar
Public Health Association of Australia (2018) PACER Plus: trade agreements must consider health impacts on developing countries and on Australia. http://www.phaa.net.au/documents/item/2681 (accessed May 2018).Google Scholar
Friel, S, Gleeson, D, Thow, A-M et al. (2013) A new generation of trade policy: potential risks to diet-related health from the Trans Pacific Partnership agreement. Global Health 9, 46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabrera Escobar, MA, Veerman, JL, Tollman, SM et al. (2013) Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 13, 1072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colchero, MA, Popkin, BM, Rivera, JA et al. (2016) Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ 352, h6704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colchero, MA, Salgado, JC, Unar-Munguía, M et al. (2015) Changes in prices after an excise tax to sweetened sugar beverages was implemented in Mexico: evidence from urban areas. PLoS One 10, e0144408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, I (2015) Tesco first to commit to sugar reduction programme. The Grocer, 18 May. http://www.thegrocer.co.uk/buying-and-supplying/health/tesco-first-to-commit-to-sugar-reduction-programme/518722.article (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2017) Incentives and disincentives for reducing sugar in manufactured foods: an exploratory supply chain analysis. A set of insights for Member States in the context of the WHO European Food and Nutrition Action Plan 2015–2020. http://www.evidence.nhs.uk/document?id=1914507&returnUrl=Search%3Fps%3D20%26q%3DPricing%26s%3DDate&q=Pricing (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Public Health England (2017) Sugar reduction and wider reformulation. http://www.gov.uk/government/collections/sugar-reduction (accessed March 2018).Google Scholar
Macgregor, GA & Hashem, KM (2014) Action on sugar – lessons from UK salt reduction programme. Lancet 383, 929931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crino, M, Herrera, AMM, Ananthapavan, J et al. (2017) Modelled cost-effectiveness of a package size cap and a kilojoule reduction intervention to reduce energy intake from sugar-sweetened beverages in Australia. Nutrients 9, E9813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Department of Health (2016) Healthy Food Partnership. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/healthy-food-partnership (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Obesity Policy Coalition and Global Obesity Centre (2017) Tipping the Scales: Australian Obesity Prevention Consensus. Melbourne, VIC: Obesity Policy Coalition; available at http://www.opc.org.au/downloads/tipping-the-scales/tipping-the-scales.pdf Google Scholar
Bialkova, S, Sasse, L & Fenko, A (2016) The role of nutrition labels and advertising claims in altering consumers’ evaluation and choice. Appetite 96, 3846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen (2010) Special report – top media advertisers [Non-alcoholic beverages]. AdNews, 26 March. http://www.adnews.com.au/07878040-6C6D-11DF-BCB9005056B05D57 (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Australian Communications and Media Authority (2009) Children’s television standards. http://www.acma.gov.au/-/media/Diversity-Localism-and-Accessibility/Advice/pdf/childrens_tv_standards_2009-pdf.pdf (accessed September 2017).Google Scholar
Smithers, L, Haag, D, Agnew, B et al. (2018) Food advertising on Australian television: frequency, duration and monthly pattern of advertising from a commercial network (4 channels) for the entire 2016 year. J Paediatr Child Health 54, 962967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, SAN, Martin, J & Swinburn, B (2011) A Comprehensive Approach to Protecting Children from Unhealthy Food Advertising. Melbourne, VIC: Obesity Policy Coalition; available at http://www.opc.org.au/downloads/submissions/protecting-children-unhealthy-food-advertising-promotion.pdf Google Scholar
Obesity Policy Coalition (2018) Policy Brief: Food Advertising to Children. Melbourne, VIC: Obesity Policy Coalition; available at http://www.opc.org.au/downloads/policy-briefs/food-advertising-to-children.pdf Google Scholar
Caraher, M, Landon, J & Dalmeny, K (2006) Television advertising and children: lessons from policy development. Public Health Nutr 9, 596605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Food and Drug Administration (2017) Changes to the nutrition facts label. http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm385663.htm (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Health Star Rating System (2018) Formal review of the system after five years of implementation (June 2014 to June 2019). http://healthstarrating.gov.au/internet/healthstarrating/publishing.nsf/Content/formal-review-of-the-system-after-five-years (accessed May 2018).Google Scholar
FratiniVergano (2015) Chile adopts warning statements in the form of a black STOP sign for ‘HFSS foods’ (i.e., foods high in fat, salt or sugar). Trade Perspectives © issue 16. http://www.fratinivergano.eu/static/upload/1/1/15.09_.11_TP_Issue_16_.pdf (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
State of Israel, Ministry of Health (2019) Food label and nutritional labeling. http://www.health.gov.il/English/Topics/FoodAndNutrition/Nutrition/Adequate_nutrition/Pages/labeling.aspx (accessed February 2019).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. WHO Technical Report Series no. 916. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/who_fao_expert_report.pdf Google Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Government Department of Heakth and Ageing & New Zealand Ministry of Health (2006) Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand. Canberra: NHMRC; available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/n35-n36-n37 Google Scholar
Singh, GM, Micha, R, Khatibzadeh, S et al. (2015) Global, regional, and national consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juices, and milk: a systematic assessment of beverage intake in 187 countries. PLoS One 10, e0124845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas-Garcia, EJ, Evans, CEL, Prestwich, A et al. (2017) Interventions to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages or increase water intake: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 18, 13501363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olstad, DL, Goonewardene, LA, McCargar, LJ et al. (2014) Choosing healthier foods in recreational sports settings: a mixed methods investigation of the impact of nudging and an economic incentive. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11, 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, L, Javanparast, S, Baum, F et al. (2015) Evidence review: settings for addressing the social determinants of health inequities. http://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/~/media/resourcecentre/publicationsandresources/health inequalities/fair%20foundations/full%20reviews/healthequity_settings-evidence-review.pdf (accessed August 2016).Google Scholar
Thornton, LE, Cameron, AJ, McNaughton, SA et al. (2012) The availability of snack food displays that may trigger impulse purchases in Melbourne supermarkets. BMC Public Health 12, 194194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1986) The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/ Google Scholar
Wakefield, M, Durkin, S, Spittal, M et al. (2008) Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health Aff 98, 14431450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinn, MP, Carson, KV, Esterman, AJ et al. (2010) Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev issue 11, CD001006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkin, S, Brennan, E & Wakefield, M (2012) Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: an integrative review. Tob Control 21, 127138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, H, Porter, K, Estabrooks, P et al. (2016) A systematic review to assess sugar-sweetened beverage interventions for children and adolescents across the socioecological model. J Acad Nutr Diet 116, 12951307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoellner, JM, Hedrick, VE, You, W et al. (2016) Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13, 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedrick, VE, Davy, BM, You, W et al. (2017) Dietary quality changes in response to a sugar-sweetened beverage-reduction intervention: results from the Talking Health randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 105, 824833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
You have Access
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Australia’s sugar tale
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Australia’s sugar tale
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Australia’s sugar tale
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *