Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Psychological Medicine
  4. Volume 32
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 32 - November 2002

Contents

Page 9 of 9

Correspondence

Addendum

Book Review

Correspondence

  • To the Editor

  • RICHARD ABRAMS
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 October 2002, pp. 1321-1326

  • The report of Prudic and colleagues (2001, 31, pp. 929–934) on the results of a mailed questionnaire survey of ECT practices at a sample of New York City Metropolitan area hospitals is in the best tradition of professional self-evaluation, as exemplified by the influential survey conducted by Pippard & Ellam (1981) in the United Kingdom.

Book Review

Noticeboard

Correction

Book Review

Noticeboard

Book Review

Correspondence

  • The authors reply

  • JOAN PRUDIC, MARK OLFSON, HAROLD A. SACKEIM
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 October 2002, pp. 1321-1326

  • We thank Dr Abrams and Dr Fink for their comments on our article, ‘Electroconvulsive therapy practices in the community’ (Prudic et al. 2001). The major point of our paper was that there was considerable heterogeneity in the nature of ECT practices employed in hospitals in the New York City metropolitan region. Neither Dr Abrams nor Dr Fink disputes this, as the evidence was straight forward.

Correction

Book Review

Noticeboard

Addendum

Correction

Page 9 of 9