Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T03:00:40.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pits and Post-holes in the British Early Iron Age: some alternative explanations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2014

Ann Ellison  and
Peter Drewett
Ann Ellison
Affiliation:
Newnham College, Cambridge
Peter Drewett
Affiliation:
Inspectorate of Ancient Monuments, Department of the Environment
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From ethnography and social anthropology ‘the prehistorian learns how particular peoples adapt themselves to their environments, and shape their resources to the ways of life demanded by their own cultures: he thus gains a knowledge of alternate methods of solving problems and often of alternative ways of explaining artefacts resembling those he recovers in antiquity. Study of ethnography will not as a rule … give him straight answers to his queries. What it will do is to provide him with hypotheses in the light of which he can resume his attack on the raw materials of his study’ (Clark, 1957, 172). Such a controlled use of ethnographic parallels has recently been applied successfully in the spheres of art and burial practices (e.g. Ucko, 1969, 262 and references there cited) but not as yet to the study of prehistoric settlement patterns or economy. In this paper it is hoped to show how the consideration of ethnographic parallels can help us to reach some possible alternative interpretations of two classes of excavated evidence: the pits and the two-, four-, five- and six-post-hole structures found mainly on Lowland Zone Iron Age settlements in Britain. These, usually interpreted in the literature as storage pits, ‘drying-racks’ and ‘granaries’ have been taken to be characteristic features of the ‘Woodbury Type’ economy of the earlier pre-Roman Iron Age in the Lowland Zone (Piggott, 1958, 3–4 and Bowen, 1969, 13–5), bearing in mind that ‘the type site must be clearly distinguished from the economy, and the economy itself seems to have been as variable as possible within the rather narrow Iron Age technical limits, (Bowen, 1969, 13).

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , July 1971 , pp. 183 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annable, F. K., 1961. ‘Excavation and Fieldwork in Wiltshire, 1960’, Wilts. Arch. Mag., LVIII, 30–8.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. J. C., 1965. ‘Wayland's Smithy’, Antiquity, XXXIX, 126–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersu, G., 1940. ‘Excavations at Little Woodbury, Wilts.’, PPS, VI, 30–111.Google Scholar
Best, E., 1916. ‘Maori Storehouses and kindred structures’, Dominion Museum Bulletin, No. 5.Google Scholar
Bowen, H. C., 1969. ‘The Celtic Background’, in Rivet, A. L. F. (ed.), The Roman Villa in Britain, London.Google Scholar
Bowen, H. C. and Wood, P., 1967. ‘Experimental Storage of corn underground and its implications for Iron Age Settlements’, Bull. Inst. Arch., 7, 1–14.Google Scholar
Brewster, T. C. M., 1963. The excavation of Staple Howe.Google Scholar
Bushnell, D. I., 1927. ‘Burials of the Algonquian, Siouan and Caddoan Tribes’, Bull. Bureau Amer. Eth., Washington, LXXXIII.Google Scholar
Carter, P., Phillipson, D. and Higgs, E. S., 1965. ‘Animal Bones’ in Hastings, F. A., ‘Excavation of an Iron Age Farmstead at Hawk's Hill, Leatherhead’, Surrey Arch. Colls., 62, 1–43.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., 1957. Archaeology and Society, London.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., 1962. Prehistoric England, London.Google Scholar
Cotton, M. A. and Frere, S. S., 1968. ‘Ivinghoe Beacon Excavations, 1963–5’, Records of Bucks., XVIII, 187–260.Google Scholar
Cra'ster, M. D., 1961. ‘The Aldwick Iron Age Settlement, Barley, Herts.’, Proc. Cam. Ant. Soc., LIV, 22–46.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. and Phillipson, D. W., 1968. ‘Excavations at Eldon's Seat, Encombe, Dorset, England’, PPS, XXXIV, 191–237.Google Scholar
Cunnington, M. E., 1923. The Early Iron Age inhabited site at All Cannings Cross Farm, Wilts.Google Scholar
Driver, O., 1961. Indians of North America, Chicago.Google Scholar
Firth, R., 1929. Economics of the New Zealand Maori, Wellington.Google Scholar
Forde, C. D., 1956. Habitat, Economy and Society. London.Google Scholar
Fox, C. F., 1930. ‘The Bronze Age Pit at Swanwick, Hants. Further Finds’, Ant. J., X, 30–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, B. R., 1957. ‘The Wandlebury Iron Age Hill-fort, Excavations of 1955–6’, Proc. Cam. Ant. Soc., L, 1–28.Google Scholar
Hodson, F. R., 1961. ‘Cultural Grouping within the British pre-Roman Iron Age’, PPS, XXX, 99–110.Google Scholar
SirKeith, Arthur, 1924. ‘Report on a Skull from the Ancient Village Site near Fifield Bavant, Wilts, of La Tene I Date’, Wilts. Arch. Mag., CXL, 494–6.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1958. ‘Native Economies and the Roman Occupation of north Britain’, in Richmond, I. A. (ed.), Roman and Native in North Britain, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1963. ‘The Bronze Age Pit at Swanwick, Hants: a Postscript’, Ant. J., XLIII, 286–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, A., 1888. Excavations in Cranbourne Chase, Vol. II.Google Scholar
Richmond, I. A., 1968. Hod Hill. Volume II, London.Google Scholar
Ritchie, A., 1969. Settlements and Economy in Britain during the first Millennium B.C., Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Ross, A., 1968. ‘Shafts, pits, wells—sanctuaries of the Belgic Britons?’, in Coles, J. M. and Simpson, D. D. A. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Europe, Leicester.Google Scholar
Stanford, S. C., 1966. Croft Ambrey excavations 1960–66. Fifth Interim Report, Woolhope Naturalists Field Club.Google Scholar
Stead, I. M., 1968. ‘An Iron Age Hill-Fort at Grimthorpe, Yorkshire, England’, PPS, XXXIV, 148–190.Google Scholar
Tildesley, M. L., 1934. ‘Report on the Human Bones’ in ‘The Highfield Pit Dwellings, Fisherton, Salisbury’, Wilts. Arch. Mag., 46, 618–9.Google Scholar
Ucko, P. J., 1969. ‘Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of Funerary Remains’, World Archaeology, 1, No. 2, 262–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wainwright, G. J., 1968. ‘The Excavation of a Durotrigan Farmstead near Tollard Royal in Cranbourne Chase, Southern England’, PPS, XXXIV, 102–147.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J., 1969. ‘The excavation of Balksbury Camp, Andover, Hants’. Procs. Hants. Field Club, XXVI, 21.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R. E. M., 1943. Maiden Castle, Dorset. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarrow, H. C., 1880. ‘Introduction to the Study of Mortuary Customs among the North American Indians’. Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar