Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T13:13:27.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of antibiotics as feed additives for farm animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

I. A. M. Lucas
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on [Food Additives and Contaminants]
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1972

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous (1971 a). Vet. Rec. 88, 236.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1971 b). Vet. Rec. 89, 49.Google Scholar
Balloun, S. L., Miller, D. L., Arends, L. G. & Speers, G. M. (1969). Poult. Sci. 48, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 25, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterham, E. S. & Fagan, V. J. (1970). Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Hub. 10, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekaert, H., Eeckhout, W. & Buysee, I. (1970). Revue Agric., Rrux. 23, 357.Google Scholar
Braude, R. (1967). Wld Rev. Anins. Prod. 3, 69.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G., Newport, M. J. & Pittman, R. J. (1970). Proc. Vutr. SOC. 29, 10–4.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G. & Pittman, R. J. (1971). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30, IIA.Google Scholar
Broome, A. W. & Hoskin, B. D. (1971). The Effect of Quindoxin on the Performance of Fattening Pigs, ICI Ltd, Pharmaceuticals Division, Alderley Park, Cheshire.Google Scholar
Brüggemann, J. & Gropp, J. (1969). Arch. Geflügelk. 33, 300.Google Scholar
Caballero Hidalgo, R., Sierra Plana, M. A. & del Aguila Alascio, F. (1970). Advances Aliment. Mejora animal 11, 501.Google Scholar
Cavill, J. P. (1971). Vet. Rev. 22, 31.Google Scholar
Chang, C. H. & Waibel, P. E. (1970). Poult. Sci. 49, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, A. J. & Alsmeyer, W. L. (1971). J. Anim. Sci. 33, 132 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Coates, M. E. & Harrison, G. F. (1969). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 20, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combs, G. F. & Bassard, E. H. (1963). Poult. Sci. 42, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conney, A. H. & Hitchings, G. H. (1969). Publs natn. Res. Counc., Wask. no. 1679, p. 180.Google Scholar
Costain, R. A. & Lloyd, L. E. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. L., Ott, W. H. & Cobb, W. R. (1970). J. Anim. Sci. 31, 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dřevjaný, L., Hejzlar, Z. & Satava, M. (1970). Biol. Chem. Výž. Zvfřat 6, 361.Google Scholar
Eyssen, H. (1962). Poult. Sci. 41, 1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyssen, II., De Prins, V. & De Somer, P. (1962). Poult. Sci. 41, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyssen, H. & De Somer, P. (1963). J. exp. iVed. 117, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrando, R. & Raynaud, J. P. (1969 a). Recl. Med. vet. Ec. Alfort 145, 575 and 911.Google Scholar
Ferrando, R. & Raynaud, J. P. (1969 b). Recl. Med. vet. Ec. Alfort 145, 725.Google Scholar
Hanrahan, T. J. & O'Grady, J. F. (1968). Anim. Prod. 10, 423.Google Scholar
Hennaux, L., Vandenbyvang, P. & Bodart, C. (1965). Revue Apic., Brux. 18, 1223.Google Scholar
Homb, T. (1959). Norg. LandbrHøisk. Beretn. Foringsfor. no. 96.Google Scholar
Husaas, O. (1969). Zinc Bacitvacin, A Technical Reviem. A/s Apothekernes Laboratorium, Oslo.Google Scholar
Imperial Chemical Industries Limited (1971). Grofas technical brochure. ICI Ltd, Pharmaceuticals Division, Alderley Park, Cheshire.Google Scholar
Jones, J. R. & Pond, W. G. (1963). J. Anim. Sci. 22, 1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keppens, L. (1969). Revue Agric., Brux. 22, 561.Google Scholar
Kobow, J. (1969). Berl. Münch. tierärztl. Wschr. 82, 65.Google Scholar
Kočiová, E., Peter, V., Mikulaj, L. & Húšt'avová, H. (1969). Pol'nohospoddrstvo 15, 804.Google Scholar
Krüger, L., Dzapo, V. & Jesswcin, H. (1969). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierenähr. Futtermittelk. 25, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, L. & Vollrdth, W. (1969). Arch. Geflügelk. 33, 187.Google Scholar
Lettner, F. (1970 a). Bodenkultur 21, 175.Google Scholar
Lettner, F. (1970 b). Bodenkultur 21, 316.Google Scholar
Livingstone, R. M. & Livingstone, D. M. S. (1968). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. (1964). Vet. Rec. 76, 101.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., Livingstone, R. M. & McDonald, I. (1961). Anim. Prod. 3, III.Google Scholar
Mennie, A. T. (editor) (1970). Proceedings of a Symposium on Aspects of Infective Drug Resistance: Cyanamid of Great Britain Ltd. London: PMS Services Ltd.Google Scholar
Miller, E. R., Ullrey, D. E., Ellis, D. J., Schoepke, B. L. & Hoefer, J. A. (1969). J. Anim. Sci. 29, 140 (abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, H. W. (1969). Diss. Abstr. int. 30, 24Bz B.Google Scholar
Moeller, M. W. (1967). J. Anim. Sci. 26, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, C. G. & Lewis, D. (1967). Wld's Poult. Sci. J. 23, 253.Google Scholar
Pensack, J. M. (1968). Proc. Tex. Conf. Nutr. 1968, p. 85.Google Scholar
Pivnjak, I. G. & Konjahin, A. N. (1970). Veeterinariya, Moscow, no. 2, 69.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. (1962). Proceedings of the University of Nottingham 9th Easter School in Agricultural Science, p. 214. London: Buttenvorths.Google Scholar
Reid, W. M. (1969). Publs natn. Res. Counc., Wash. no. 1679, p. 87.Google Scholar
Reyntens, N. & Keppcns, L. (1966). Revue Agric., Brux. 19, 1325.Google Scholar
Rosen, G. (1971). Pig Fmg, March, p. 54.Google Scholar
Šatava, M., Karlová, M., Dřevjaný, L. & Slavik, L. (1970). Biol. Chem. Výž. Zviřat 6, 301.Google Scholar
Shillam, K. W. G. (1971). Vet. Rec. 88, 648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, J. E., Thrasher, G. W., Askelson, C. E., Babcock, W. E. & Charlquest, R. R. (1969). J. Anim. Sci. 29, 144 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Shor, A. L. (1968). Proc. Eur. Poult. Conf., III, Jerusalem, p. 197.Google Scholar
Smith, H. & Banks, D. R. B. (1968). Proc. Eur. Poult. Conf., III, Jerzcsalem, p. 200.Google Scholar
Suttle, N. F. & Mills, C. F. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, M. M. (Chairman) (1969). Joint Committee on the use of Antibiotics in Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine. Report of the Secretary of State for Social Services, the Secretary of State for Scotland, the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Secretary of State for Wales [Cmnd 4190]. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Thrasher, G. W., Shively, J. E., Askelson, C. E., Babcock, W. E. & Charlquest, R. R. (1969). J. Anim. Sci. 28, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrasher, G. W., Shively, J. E., Askelson, C. E., Babcock, W. E. & Charlquest, R. R. (1970). J. Anim. Sci. 31, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tüller, R. (1969). Arch. Geflügelk. 33, 351.Google Scholar
Turek, F., Lettner, F. & Steinacker, G. (1967). Bodenkultur 18, 147.Google Scholar
Vanschoubroek, F. (1964). Vlaams dimgeneesk. Tijdschr. 33, 106.Google Scholar
Vanschoubroek, F. & Vermeersch, G. (1966). Vlaams diwgeneesk. Tijdschr. 35, 122.Google Scholar
Vogt, H. (1969 a). Arch. Geflügelk. 33, 183.Google Scholar
Vogt, H. (1969 b). Arch. Geflügelk. 33, 296.Google Scholar
Vogt, H. & Gtirocak, B. (1970). Arch. Geflügelk. 34, 19.Google Scholar
Wallace, H. D. (1970). J. Anina. Sci. 31, 1118.Google Scholar
Yates, J. D. & Schaible, P. J. (1962). Nature, Lond. 194, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohari, M. (1969). J. Vet. Fac. Univ. Teheran 25 no. 3, p. 26.Google Scholar