Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:20:44.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) enriched bread is acceptable to consumers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2010

A. C. Hall
Affiliation:
Centre for Food Innovation, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
A. C. Fairclough
Affiliation:
Centre for Food Innovation, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
K. Mahadevan
Affiliation:
Centre for Food Innovation, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
J. R. Paxman
Affiliation:
Centre for Food Innovation, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

High-fibre foods (≥6 g dietary fibre/100 g) tend to be less appealing organoleptically than foods with higher energy densities(Reference Burton-Freeman1). Alginate is a dietary fibre found in brown seaweed species, e.g. Ascophyllum nodosum. It has been shown to have numerous health benefits(Reference Paxman, Richardson and Dettmar2Reference Hoad, Rayment and Spiller5). We aimed to determine the acceptability of a seaweed-enriched bread.

We developed bread containing 0 g (control), 5 g, 10 g, 15 g and 20 g Ascophyllum nodosum (sea greens (SG); Seagreens® Ltd, W. Sussex, UK) in 400 g loaves. Analysis using a combined SIGMA/Fibertech method showed the 20 g SG enriched loaf contained 17.8 v. 13.3 g/100 g dietary fibre in the control loaf. Seventy-nine untrained sensory panellists (18–65 years, 40 males) assessed the acceptability of the toasted breads topped with scrambled eggs(6). Coded samples were randomly presented and rated overall, and across 5 sensory attributes(Reference Meilgaard, Civille and Carr7), using visual analogue scales (1–9; extremely unacceptable to extremely acceptable) in FIZZ software (Version 2.10c, Biosystemes, France) in accordance with accepted protocols. A score of 5 was used as a cut-off for lower level acceptability(Reference Mexis, Badeka and Riganakos8). Results were analysed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc analyses (SPSS V17.0, SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA).

The control bread was significantly more acceptable than the SG-enriched breads overall and for aftertaste, and significantly more acceptable than all but the 15 g SG bread for flavour (see table). Post hoc tests showed no significant differences between any of the enriched breads. Importantly, all bread samples were reported as acceptable overall and for all individual sensory attributes.

Data are presented as means and standard deviations. Different letters in the same row denote means that are significantly different to one another

(* P=0.008, **P=0.003, ***P=0.002).

For the first time, this study has shown that seaweed-enriched bread, a high-fibre food, is acceptable when up to 20 g SG are added to a 400 g loaf. Previous studies have included alginate in drinks(Reference Paxman, Richardson and Dettmar2Reference Paxman, Richardson and Dettmar3, Reference Hoad, Rayment and Spiller5)and foods(Reference Williams, Lai and Corwin4, Reference Mattes9), and most authors(Reference Paxman, Richardson and Dettmar2Reference Hoad, Rayment and Spiller5), but not all(Reference Mattes9) have reported beneficial health effects at levels similar to those found in SG-enriched bread. Seaweed presents an attractive option for food manufacturers who are keen to maximise the health-giving potential of their dietary fibre-rich products.

This work was supported by Simon Ranger (Seagreens Health Foundation) with funding from the Weight Management Foundation. With thanks to Paul Ash and Chris Trueman for their assistance.

References

1.Burton-Freeman, B (2000). Dietary fibre and energy regulation. J Nutr 130, 272S275S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Paxman, JR, Richardson, JC, Dettmar, PW et al. (2008). Daily ingestion of alginate reduces energy intake in free-living subjects. Appetite 53, 713719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Paxman, JR, Richardson, JC, Dettmar, PW et al. (2008a). Alginate reduces the increased uptake of cholesterol and glucose in overweight male subjects: a pilot study. Nutr Res 28, 501505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Williams, JA, Lai, C, Corwin, H et al. (2004). Inclusion of guar gum and alginate into a crispy bar improves postprandial glycemia in humans. J Nutr 134, 886889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Hoad, CL, Rayment, P, Spiller, RC et al. (2004). In vivo imaging of intragastric gelation and its effect on satiety in humans. J Nutr 134, 22932300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.FSA/IFR (2002). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 6th summary ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
7.Meilgaard, M, Civille, GV & Carr, BT (2006). Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th ed. London: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Mexis, SF, Badeka, AV, Riganakos, KA et al. (2010). Effect of active and modified atmosphere packaging on quality retention of dark chocolate with hazelnuts. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 11, 177186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Mattes, RD (2007). Effects of a combination fibre system on appetite and energy intake in overweight humans. Physiol Behav 90, 705711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

(*