Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:32:12.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maternal Diet and Neonatal Body Composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2014

L. Mullaney
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland
A. O'Higgins
Affiliation:
UCD Centre for Human Reproduction, CWIUH, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland
A. Doolan
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
M. Sheridan-Pereira
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
D. McCartney
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland
M. J. Turner
Affiliation:
UCD Centre for Human Reproduction, CWIUH, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

There is now considerable evidence that maternal nutritional intake may programme fetal development. For example, low iron status in pregnancy has been linked to low birth weight and impaired cognitive development( Reference Haider, Olofin, Wang, Spiegelman, Ezzati and Fawzi 1 , Reference Tran, Biggs, Tran, Simpson, Hanieh, Dwyer and Fisher 2 , Reference Radlowski and Johnson 3 ). In addition to this, children born to obese women have been shown to be at increased risk of obesity and diabetes in adolescence and later adult life( Reference Baker, Michaelsen, Rasmussen and Sorensen 4 , Reference Satpathy, Fleming, Frey, Barsoom, Satpathy and Khandalavala 5 ). However, most studies use birth weight as a surrogate marker to evaluate intra-uterine nutritional status and prospective neonatal health outcomes. Studies investigating the association between maternal nutritional intake and neonatal body composition are lacking.

This prospective observational study examined the relationship between maternal nutritional intake in the first trimester and neonatal body composition.

Women were recruited in February 2013 after sonographic confirmation of a singleton pregnancy in the first trimester. Clinical and socio-demographic details were recorded and maternal body mass index (BMI) measured. Dietary information was collected at the same visit using a Willett Food Frequency Questionnaire (WFFQ) previously validated in pregnancy( Reference McGowan, Curran and McAuliffe 6 ). Neonatal body composition was measured within three days of delivery using air displacement plethysmography.

Of the 75 mother-infant pairs, the mean maternal BMI was 25·1 kg/m2(± 5·7) and 14·8% were obese. The mean birth weight was 3·5 kg (±0·5) and mean percentage body fat was 10·8% (±4·5). Mean percentage energy intakes from protein, fat, and carbohydrate were 17·2%, 35·4%, and 49·8% respectively. There was no association between birth weight and maternal energy intakes from protein, fat, or carbohydrate. However the mean infant body fat percentage for mothers in the lowest fat consumption quartile was 8·7% compared to 12·5% in the highest quartile (p = 0·02). Mean infant body fat percentage for mothers in the lowest carbohydrate consumption quartile was 13·1% compared to 9·1% in the highest quartile (p = 0·003). Neonatal adiposity was not associated with maternal protein intake.

These findings suggest that interventions that decrease maternal fat intake in early pregnancy may decrease neonatal adiposity and thus, potentially, the lifelong risk of metabolic dysfunction.

References

1. Haider, BA, Olofin, I, Wang, M, Spiegelman, D, Ezzati, M, Fawzi, WW. (2013) BMJ 346, f3443.Google Scholar
2. Tran, TD, Biggs, BA, Tran, T, Simpson, JA, Hanieh, S, Dwyer, T, Fisher, J. (2013) PLoS One 8, e74876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Radlowski, EC & Johnson, RW. (2013) Front Hum Neurosci 7, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Baker, JL, Michaelsen, KF, Rasmussen, KM, Sorensen, TI. (2004) Am J ClinNutr 80, 15791588.Google Scholar
5. Satpathy, HK, Fleming, A, Frey, D, Barsoom, M, Satpathy, C, Khandalavala, J (2008) Postgrad Med 120, 0109.Google Scholar
6. McGowan, CA, Curran, S, McAuliffe, FM (2013) J Hum Nutr Diet [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar