Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:22:48.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of increasing fruit and vegetable intake on nitric oxide status: a randomised controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2014

L. L. Hamill
Affiliation:
Nutrition & Metabolism Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's UniversityBelfast BT12 6BJ
C. Mc Master
Affiliation:
Nutrition & Metabolism Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's UniversityBelfast BT12 6BJ
C. E. Neville
Affiliation:
Nutrition & Metabolism Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's UniversityBelfast BT12 6BJ
A. J. McGrath
Affiliation:
Nutrition & Metabolism Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's UniversityBelfast BT12 6BJ
C. R. Draffin
Affiliation:
Nutrition & Metabolism Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's UniversityBelfast BT12 6BJ
A. McGinty
Affiliation:
Nutrition & Metabolism Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's UniversityBelfast BT12 6BJ
M. C. McKinley
Affiliation:
Nutrition & Metabolism Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's UniversityBelfast BT12 6BJ
J. V. Woodside
Affiliation:
Nutrition & Metabolism Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's UniversityBelfast BT12 6BJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Epidemiological data indicates that increased intake of fruit and vegetables (FV) is associated with decreased incidence of chronic diseases. This evidence would appear to be strongest for leafy green vegetables for diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk( Reference Carter, Gray and Troughton 1 Reference Bendinelli, Masal and Saieva 2 ), and it has been proposed that this may be due to the high nitrate content of such vegetables( Reference Hord, Tang and Bryan 3 ). Increasing evidence supports such a hypothesis and indicates that dietary nitrate, which is subsequently reduced to nitrite and nitric oxide (NO), has the ability to reduce blood pressure and improve endothelial function( Reference Webb, Patel and Loukogeorgakis 4 Reference Hobbs, Kaffa and George 5 ). While these studies have focused on beetroot, a particularly rich source of nitrates, very few studies have examined the effect of increased general FV consumption on NO status. The aim of this study was to analyse serum NO in a randomised controlled trial which assessed intake of different portions of FV, to examine the effect of increasing intake on NO status. To do so, we used a subsample from the BIOFAV study.

A total of 20 healthy volunteers were screened, recruited and randomised to consume either 2 (n = 11) or 8 (n = 9) portions of FV/day for 4 weeks. Fasting serum samples collected at baseline and week 4 were analysed for NO using an ELISA (R and D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) based on the Griess reaction. Between-group and within- group differences were tested using independent and paired sample t tests respectively. Associations between NO at baseline, change in NO and baseline characteristics (age, gender, BMI) were also assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients.

There was no significant difference between groups in change in NO status (P = 0·14). Those participants who consumed 2 portions FV/day for 4 weeks had a small, but significant (P = 0·039) decrease in NO status from baseline while those who consumed 8 portions FV maintained their NO status (P = 0·78). There were no significant associations between NO at baseline, change in NO and baseline characteristics.

NO might be a useful surrogate marker of systemic NO production after intake of nitrate rich V, but did not respond to an increase in overall FV intake. This study was a small pilot study, and therefore larger numbers of samples may be required to comprehensively establish if increasing FV intake has the potential to alter NO status. Urine NO status may also be of interest, considering that the majority of dietary nitrate is excreted via the kidney.

References

1. Carter, P, Gray, LJ, Troughton, J et al. (2010) BMJ 341, c4229.Google Scholar
2. Bendinelli, B, Masal, G, Saieva, C et al. (2011) Am J Clin Nutr 93, 275283.Google Scholar
3. Hord, NG, Tang, Y & Bryan, NS (2009) Am J Clin Nutr 90, 110.Google Scholar
4. Webb, AJ, Patel, N, Loukogeorgakis, S et al. (2008) Hypertension 51, 784790.Google Scholar
5. Hobbs, DA, Kaffa, N, George, TW et al. (2012) Br J Nutr 108, 20662074.Google Scholar