Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T03:45:50.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative studies of copper, molybdenum and sulphur metabolism in the ruminant and the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

C. F. Mills
C. F. Mills
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Minor Elements in Nutrition
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , September 1960 , pp. 162 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1960

References

Anderson, C. M. (1956). N.Z.J. Sci. Tech. A, 37, 379.Google Scholar
Arrington, L. R. & Davis, G. K. (1953). J. Nutr. 51, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, D., Motzok, I. & Brannion, H. D. (1958). Poult. Sci. 37, 1181.Google Scholar
Dick, A. T. (1954). Aust. J. agric. Res. 5, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, A. T. (1956). In Symposium on Inorganic Nitrogen Metabolism, p. 445. [McElroy, w. E. and Glass, W. B., editors.] Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Davies, R. E., Reid, B. L., Kurnick, A. A. & Couch, J. R. (1960). J. Nutr. 70, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feaster, J. P. & Davis, G. K. (1959). J. Nutr. 67, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, C. H., Judah, J. D. & Rees, K. R. (1956). Proc. roy. Sol. B, 145, 134.Google Scholar
Gray, L. F. & Daniel, L. J. (1954). J. Nutr. 53, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halverson, A. W., Phifer, J. H. & Monty, K. J. (1960). J. Nutr. 71, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. McC. & Davison, A. N. (1959). Biochem. J. 72, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1954). Biochem. J. 56, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marston, H. R. (1952). Physiol. Rev. 32, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. F., Price, N. O. & Engel, R. W. (1956). J. Nutr. 60, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. F. (1958). Soil Sci. 85, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. F., Monty, K. J., Ichihara, A. & Pearson, P. B. (1958). J. Nutr. 65, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sörbo, B. (1958). Biochem. biophys. Acta, 27, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaï, A. G. (1959). Rec. Méd. oét. 135, 161.Google Scholar
Van Reen, R. (1954). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 53, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Reen, R. & Williams, M. A. (1956). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 63, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainio, W. W., Wende, C. V. & Shimp, N. F. (1958). Fed. Proc. 17, 330.Google Scholar
Williams, M. A. & Van Reen, R. (1956). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 91, 638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L. G. & Bandurski, R. S. (1958). J. biol. Chem. 233, 975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, K. N. & McClymont, G. L. (1956). Aust. J. agric. Res. 7, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar