Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:41:37.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synchrotron applications in archaeometallurgy: Analysis of high zinc brass astrolabes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

Brian Newbury*
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015-3115
Bruce Stephenson
Affiliation:
Adler Planetarium and Astronomy Museum, Chicago, Illinois 60605-2403
Jon Almer
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439-4844
Michael Notis
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015-3115
G. S. Cargill III
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015-3115
G. Brian Stephenson
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439-4844
Dean Haeffner
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439-4844
*
a)Electronic mail: bdn2@lehigh.edu

Abstract

Synchrotron X rays were used to perform nondestructive transmission diffraction and fluorescence experiments on a group of 24 European and Islamic astrolabes dated between 1350–1720 A.D. in order to determine their compositions. A group of six astrolabes produced in Lahore between 1601–1662 A.D. were found to contain a mixed α+β brass microstructure, proving that the brass was produced by a comelting technique rather than the traditional cementation process. The results also show evidence of dezincification, attributed to heavy annealing of the brass during astrolabe manufacture. This effect was so severe that an accurate analysis of the bulk Zn composition could not be determined from the fluorescence results alone; transmission X-ray diffraction gives a more accurate measurement of the bulk Zn composition.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayley, J. (1983). JHMSZZZZZZ 18, 4243.Google Scholar
Craddock, P. T.Bull. Metals MuseumZZZZZZ 10, 325.Google Scholar
Craddock, P. T., Freestone, I. C., Gurjar, L. K., Middleton, A. P., and Willies, L., 2000 Years of Zinc and Brass, British Museum Occasional Paper Number 50, revised Edition, edited by Craddock, P. T., pp. 2772.Google Scholar
Day, J. and Tylecote, R. F. (1991). The Industrial Revolution in Metals (The Institute of Metals, London), p. 193.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. I., Newbury, D. E., Echlin, P., Joy, D. C., Romig, A. D. Jr., Lyman, C. E., Fiori, C., and Lifshin, E. (1992). Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, 2nd ed. (Plenum, New York), pp. 131139.Google Scholar
Haedecke, K. (1973). ErzmetallZZZZZZ 26, 229233.Google Scholar
Mendenhall, J. H. (1980). Understanding Copper Alloys (Wiley, New York), p. 59.Google Scholar
Pearson, W. B. (1964). Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals (Pergamon, Oxford), p. 601.Google Scholar
Schechner, S., “Astrolabes: A cross-cultural and social perspective,” in Webster and Webster, pp. 235.Google Scholar
Vegard, L.and Schjelderup, H. (1917). Phys. Z. PHZTAO 18, 9396. phz, PHZTAO Google Scholar
Webster, R. and Webster, M., Western Astrolabes (The Adler Planetarium and Astronomy Museum, Chicago, IL), p. 53.Google Scholar
Zacharias, S. K. (1989). All That Glitters: Readings in Historical Metallurgy, edited by Wayman, M. L. (The Metallurgical Society of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Montreal), pp. 3540.Google Scholar