Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-tmfhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T18:58:43.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative in situ X-ray diffraction analysis of early hydration of Portland cement at defined temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

C. Hesse
Affiliation:
Mineralogy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
F. Goetz-Neunhoeffer
Affiliation:
Mineralogy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
J. Neubauer
Affiliation:
Mineralogy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
M. Braeu
Affiliation:
BASF Construction Chemicals GmbH, D-83308 Trostberg, Germany
P. Gaeberlein
Affiliation:
BASF Construction Chemicals GmbH, D-83308 Trostberg, Germany

Abstract

Investigation into the early hydration of Portland cement was performed by in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD). Technical white cement was used for the XRD analysis on a D5000 diffractometer (Siemens). All diffraction patterns of the in situ measurement which were recorded up to 22 h of hydration at defined temperatures were analyzed by Rietveld refinement. The resulting phase composition was transformed with respect to free water and C-S-H leading to the total composition of the cement paste. The hydration reactions can be observed by dissolution of clinker phases as well as by the formation of the hydrate phases ettringite and portlandite. With increasing temperatures the reactions proceed faster. The formation of ettringite is directly influenced by the rate of dissolution of anhydrite and tricalcium aluminate (C3A). The beginning of the main period of hydration is marked by the start of portlandite formation. The experiments point out that a quantitative phase analysis of the cement hydration is feasible with standard laboratory diffractometers.

Type
X-Ray Diffraction
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A. J., Thomas, J. J., and Jennings, H. M. (2007). “Composition and density of nanoscale calcium–silicate–hydrate in cement,” Nature Mater.NMAACR 6, 311316.10.1038/nmat1871CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, A. N., Scarlett, N. V. Y., Madsen, I. C., Jensen, T. R., and Hanson, J. C. (2003). “Real time study of cement and clinker phases hydration,“ (8),” Dalton Trans.DTARAF15291536.10.1039/b301095nCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, C., Degenkolb, M., Gäberlein, P., Götz-Neunheoffer, F., Neubauer, J., and Schwarz, V. (2008). “Investigations into the influence of temperature and w/c ratio on the early hydration of white cement,” Cem. Int. 06/2008, 6878.Google Scholar
Hesse, C., Degenkolb, M., Gaeberlein, P., Goetz-Neuhoeffer, F., Kutschera, M., Neubauer, J., and Schwarz, V. (2007). “In-situ XRD investigations on hydration of cement pastes at different temperatures and water-cement values,” Tagung der GDCh-Fachgruppe Bauchemie, Siegen, Germany 37, 213220.Google Scholar
Kjellsen, K. O. and Detwiler, R. J. (1992). “Reaction kinetics of Portland cement motars hydrated at different temperatures,” Cement Concr. Res. 22, 112120.10.1016/0008-8846(92)90141-HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlini, M., Artioli, G., Cerulli, T., Cella, F., and Bravo, A. (2008). “Tricalcium aluminate hydration in additivated systems. A crystallographic study by SR-XRPD,” Cement Concr. Res. 38, 477486.10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, I. G. (2008). “The calcium silicate hydrates,” Cement Concr. Res. 38, 137158.10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. F. W. (1990). Cement Chemistry (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar