Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T13:07:32.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives on the Self-Destructive Tendencies of Humanity: A Symposium Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Lynton Keith Caldwell
Lynton Keith Caldwell*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, USA
Get access

Extract

A symposium has been defined as a collection of essays on a particular subject and as a philosophical or other focused discussion. It derives from a Greek origin meaning a drinking party. The focus of this symposium is on the published version of a plenary address given in Boston at the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, on September 4, 1998. The article, “Is Humanity Destined to Self-Destruct?” was printed in the preceding issue of this journal (1999a). Because not all readers of the present issue may have seen the article toward which the preceding commentaries are directed, a brief summary of its argument follows here:

As the twenty-first century approaches, we may identify both constructive and destructive trends that will influence the future. Which set of trends will dominate is uncertain. Attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors all interact to direct the flow of change over time. However, the options and constraints of human life are ultimately fixed by those elements of the environment over which humans have little control. The modem assumption of a world without end or limits risks collision with the obdurate reality called “nature.” Facing threats to its survival, humanity is challenged to learn how to build a sustainable future. A successful effort will require a concerted and cooperative effort among all fields of knowledge. The threats are both “natural” and “societal.” Humanity is an inseparable part of its planetary environment. Chaos and conflict in human society, shortsightedness and indifferences, delay the cooperative action needed to move toward a sustainable future. We do not know how much time we have to avoid catastrophic collision with the hard realities of the planet Earth. This article identifies some of the trends that threaten humanity's future and suggests four lines of action that should be pursued in order to reduce the likelihood that humanity will inadvertently destroy itself.

Type
Symposium: Humanity and Self-Destruction
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , September 1999 , pp. 269 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, M. (1966). “Dover Beach.” In Tinker, G. B. (ed.), Poetical Works of Matthew Arnold. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Browning, R. (1964). “Andrea del Sarto.” In Poetical Works of Robert Browning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L.K. (1994). “Sustainable Development: Viable Concept and Attainable Goal?” Environmental Conservation 21: 193–94.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L.K. (1999a). “Is Humanity Destined to Self-Destruct?” Politics and the Life Sciences 18: 3–14.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L.K. (1999b). “Is World Law an Emerging Reality? Environmental Law in a Transnational World.” Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 10: 217–43.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L.K. (1999c). “The Concept of Sustainability: A Critical Approach.” In Lemons, J., Westra, L., and Goodland, R. (eds.), Ecological Sustainability and Integrity: Concepts and Approaches. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
de Noüy, P.L. (1947). Human Destiny. London: LongmansGoogle Scholar
Dorsey, G.A. (1925). Why We Behave Like Human Beings. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Elliott, L. (1998). Global Politics of the Environment. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.B. (1969). Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1989). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffers, R. (1987). “The Beaks of Eagles.” In The Selected Poetry of Robinson Jeffers. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Jolly, A. (1980). A World Like Our Own: Man and Nature in Madagascar. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Khoshoo, T.N. (1999). “The Dharma of Ecology.” Current Science 11 (9): 1147–53.Google Scholar
Lubchenco, J. (1998). “Entering the Century of the Environment A New Social Contract for Science.” Science 279 (January 23): 496.Google Scholar
Meggers, B.J. (1971). Amazonia: Man and Culture in a Counterfeit Paradise. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Monod, J. (1972, 1980). Chance and Necessity. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Newman, J.H. (1841; 1917). “Knowledge and Faith.” In Alden, R. M. (ed.), Readings in the English Prose of the Nineteenth Century, Part II. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R.A. (1982). Prejudices: A Philosophical Dictionary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, G.R. (1949). The Earth Abides. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Thiele, L.P. (1999). Environmentalism for a New Millennium: The Challenge of Coevolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Unamuno, M. de (1921; 1954). The Tragic Sense of Life. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
World Scientists' Warning to Humanity (1992). Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists, November 18.Google Scholar