Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T17:17:42.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spiritual Values, Religious Practices, and Democratic Attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2008

Myunghee Kim
Myunghee Kim*
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
*
Address correspondence and reprint request to: Myunghee Kim, Department of Political Science, University of Central Florida, P. O. Box 161356, Orlando, Florida 32816-1356. E-mail: myukim@mail.ucf.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using data from the 1999–2001 World Values and European Values Surveys, this article examines the impact of spiritual values and religious practices on democratic attitudes in twenty countries throughout Western Europe, North America, South America, Asia, and Africa. I assume that a reciprocal interaction between national conditions and individual orientations shapes support for democracy. Religious commitment as theological orthodoxy and attendance at religious services does not strengthen democratic views. Instead, explicitly political and cultural variables explain approval for democratic principles, particularly among industrialized countries. Individuals who express a low fear of threatening groups also back democratic institutions, regardless of a nation's industrialization. Among religious affiliations, Protestants in developing countries advocate democratic values. So do Muslims in industrialized countries. Nonmembers of religious institutions, however, are less likely to uphold democratic attitudes.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , August 2008 , pp. 216 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achen, C.H. 2005. “Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis.” Political Analysis 13:447–456.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Esterly, W., Kurlat, S., and Wacziarg, R.. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8:155–194.Google Scholar
Ali, M. 2005. “The Rise of the Liberal Islam Network (JIL) in Contemporary Indonesia.” American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 22:1–27.Google Scholar
Alm, J., and Torgler, B.. 2006. “Culture Differences and Tax Morale in the United States and in Europe.” Journal of Economic Psychology 27:224–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. 2004. “Does God Matter, and if So Whose God? Religion and Democratization.” Democratization 11:192–217.Google Scholar
Baker, W. 2005. America's Crisis of Values: Reality and Perception. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, D.C., and Tinnick, J.D. III. 2006. “Competing Visions of Parental Roles and Ideological constraints.” American Political Science Review 100:249–263.Google Scholar
Bottici, C., and Challand, B.. 2006. “Rethinking Political Myth: The Clash of Civilizations as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” European Journal of Social Theory 9:315–336.Google Scholar
Cohrs, J.C., Moschner, B., Maes, J., and Kielmann, S.. 2005. “The Motivational Bases of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Relations to Values and Attitudes in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31:1425–1434.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. 2005. “What Political Institutions Does Large-Scale Democracy Require?” Political Science Quarterly 120:187–197.Google Scholar
George, A.L., and Bennett, A.. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2006. World Report 2006. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., Basáñez, M., Díez-Medrano, J, Halman, L., and Luijkx, R.. 2004. Human Belief and Values: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook Based on the 1999–2002 Values Surveys. México: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., and Welzel, C.. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karner, C., and Aldridge, A.. 2004. “Theorizing Religion in a Globalizing World.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 18:5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katnik, A. 2002. “Religion, Social Class, and Political Tolerance: A Cross-National Analysis.” International Journal of Sociology 32:14–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 2006. Whose Freedom? The Battle over America's Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J., and Goertz, G.. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14:227–249.Google Scholar
Marcus, G.E., Sullivan, J.L., Theiss-Morse, E., and Wood, S.L.. 1995. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McClosky, H., and Brill, A.. 1983. Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe about Civil Liberties. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
McClosky, H., and Zaller, J.. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, M.D., and Budge, I.. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracies: Conferring the Median Mandate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, L.M., and Ovadia, S.. 2006. Accounting for Spatial Variations in Religion: The Effects of Education and Religion. Social Forces 84:2205–2222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P., and Inglehart, R.. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, A.B. 1999. “Toleration and Religious Tradition.” Society 36:47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., and Gorodzeisky, A.. 2006. “The Rise of Anti-Foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988–2000.” American Sociological Review 71:426–449.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2006. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stenner, K. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. 2000. “Religion, Democracy, and the ‘Twin Tolerations.’” Journal of Democracy 11:37–57.Google Scholar
Weber, L. 2003. “Rugged Individuals and Social Butterflies: The Consequences of Social and Individual Political Participation for Political Tolerance.” Social Science Journal 40:335–342.Google Scholar
Weldon, S.A. 2006. “The Institutional Context of Tolerance for Ethnic Minorities: A Comparative, Multilevel Analysis of Western Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 50:331–349.Google Scholar
Welzel, C., and Inglehart, R.. 2005. “Liberalism, Postmaterialism, and the Growth of Freedom.” International Review of Sociology 15:81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar