Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:55:23.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptual distinctiveness in Native American maize (Zea mays L.) landraces has practical implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

Abdullah A. Jaradat
Abdullah A. Jaradat*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 803 Iowa Avenue, Morris, MN 56267, USA
*
* E-mails: abdullah.jaradat@ars.usda.gov; jarad001@umn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The large variation in multifactorial and seemingly non-adaptive kernel colour traits displayed by Native American maize landraces is an evidence of recurring selection for perceptual distinctiveness. Native American farmers selected for colour traits that allowed them to distinguish between and maintain large diversity within maize landraces for traditional uses. Multivariate statistical procedures were employed to quantify the variation and interrelationships between physical traits, C:N ratio, protein content, micro- and macronutrient concentrations with kernel colour traits measured on random kernel samples of Northern flint maize landraces grown for 2 years in a common-garden experiment. The colour traits (L*, a* and b* indicating dark–light, red–green and yellow–blue colour continuum, respectively) were digitally quantified on 590 random kernels from each of 28 accessions in 11 landraces. Accessions within landraces exhibited the largest variation for all colour traits. The variation in the L*a*b*, L*a* and L*b* combinations explained significant variances in 37, 14 and 37% of 120 landrace–trait combinations, respectively; the remaining 12% were explained by L*, a* or b*. On average, 37.5% of the variation in protein content (range 19.2–64.5%) and 36.6% of the variation in the C:N ratio (range 15.7–65.0%) were explained by the combinations of colour traits in different landraces. Slightly larger average variations in K (43.7%), S (43.0%), Fe (42.2%) and P (40.8%) were accounted for by colour traits. A hierarchical and joint clustering procedure of landraces and traits was developed to facilitate the identification of large variation and the selection of single or multiple traits based on kernel colour traits with reasonable certainty.

Keywords

diversitykernel colourNative maize landracesperceptual selectionquality
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 266 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2013 This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altieri, MA and Merrick, LC (1986) In situ characterization of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Economic Botany 41: 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvanitoyyannis, IS and Vlachos, A (2009) Maize authentication: quality control methods and multivariate analysis (Chemometrics). Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 49: 501–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellon, MR (1996) The dynamics of crop infraspecific diversity: a conceptual framework at the farmer level. Economic Botany 50: 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, B, Perales, H and Brush, S (2007) Tzeltal and Tzotzil farmer knowledge and maize diversity in Chiapas, Mexico. Current Anthropology 48: 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boster, JS (1995) Selection for perceptual distinctiveness: evidence from Aguaruna cultivars of Manihot esculentus. Economic Botany 39: 310–325.Google Scholar
Burlingame, B, Charrondiere, R and Mouille, B (2009) Food composition is fundamental to the cross-cutting initiative on biodiversity for food and nutrition. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 22: 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cañas, RA, Amiour, N, Quillere, I and Hirel, B (2011) An integrated statistical analysis of the genetic variability of nitrogen metabolism in the ear of three maize inbred lines (Zea mays L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 2309–2318.Google Scholar
Chambers, KJ, Brish, SB, Grote, MN and Gepts, P (2007) Describing maize (Zea mays L.) landrace persistence in the Bajío of Mexico: a survey of the 1940s and 1950s collection. Economic Botany 61: 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, DA, Soleri, D and Smith, SE (1994) Do folk crop varieties have a role in sustainable agriculture? BioScience 44: 740–751.Google Scholar
Darrigues, A, Hall, J, van der Knapp, E and Francis, DM (2008) Tomato analyzer-color test: a new tool for efficient digital phenotyping. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Sciences 133: 579–586.Google Scholar
Ferreira T, Rasband W (2011) ImageJ User Guide. Available at http://JmageJ.nih.gov/ij/docs/guide.Google Scholar
Flint-Garcia, SA, Bondar, AL and Scott, MP (2009) Wide variability in kernel composition, seed characteristics, and zein profiles among diverse maize inbreds, landraces, and Teosinte. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 119: 1129–1142.Google Scholar
Floyed, CD, Rooney, LW and Bockholt, AJ (1995) Measuring desirable and undesirable color in white and yellow food corn. Cereal Chemistry 72: 488–490.Google Scholar
Gibson, RW (2009) A review of perceptual distinctiveness in landraces including an analysis of how its roles have been overlooked in plant breeding for low-input systems. Economic Botany 63: 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaradat, AA and Goldstein, W (2013) Diversity of maize kernels from a breeding program for protein quality: I. physical, biochemical, nutrients and color traits. Crop Science (in press). Available at https://www.crops.org/publications/cs/first-look.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, S, Singh, N and Rana, JC (2010) Amaranthus hypondriacus and Amaranthus caudatus germplasm: characteristics of plants, grain, and flours. Food Chemistry 123: 1227–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhnen, S, Lemos, PMM, Capestrini, LH, Ogliari, JB, Dias, PF and Maraschin, M (2011) Cartenoid and anthocyanin contents of grains of Brazilian maize landraces. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91: 1548–1553.Google Scholar
Louette, D, Charrier, A and Berthaud, J (1997) In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Economic Botany 51: 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkir, A (2008) Genetic variation for grain mineral content in tropical-adapted maize inbred lines. Food Chemistry 110: 454–464.Google Scholar
Mercer, K, Martínez-Vásquez, A and Perales, H (2008) Asymmetrical local adaptation of maize landraces along an altitudinal gradient. Evolutionary Applications doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00038.x 1: 489–500.Google Scholar
Miller, C (2010) Ogimaag: Anishinaabeg Leadership, 1760–1845. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Moeller, DA and Schaal, BA (1999) Genetic relationships among Native American maize accessions of the Great Plains assessed by RAPDs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 1061–1067.Google Scholar
Nabhan, GP (1985) Native crop diversity in Aridoamerica: conservation of regional gene pools. Economic Botany 39: 387–399.Google Scholar
Olson, MB, Morris, KS and Mendez, VE (2012) Cultivation of maize landraces by small-scale shade coffee farmers in western El Salvador. Agricultural Systems 111: 63–74.Google Scholar
Ortiz, R, Sevilla, R, Alvarado, G and Crossa, J (2008) Numerical classification of related Peruvian highland maize races using internal ear traits. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, RW, Harding, SA, Murray, DA, Soutar, DM, Baired, DB, Welham, SJ, Kane, AF, Gilmore, AR, Thompson, R, Webster, R and Wilson, GT (2007) The Guide to GenStat Release 10. Part 2: Statistics. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International.Google Scholar
Perales, HR, Brush, SB and Qualset, CO (2003) Dynamic management of maize landraces in central Mexico. Economic Botany 57: 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasanna, BM (2012) Diversity in global maize germplasm: characterization and utilization. Journal of Bioscience doi:10.1007/s12038-012–9227-1 37: 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Shiferaw, B, Prasanna, BM, Hellin, J and Bänziger, M (2011) Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Science 3: 307–327.Google Scholar
Simic, D, Sudar, R, Ledencan, T, Jambrovic, A, Zdunic, Z, Brkic, I and Kovacevic, V (2009) Genetic variation of bioavailability iron and zinc in grain of maize population. Journal of Cereal Science 50: 392–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soleri, D and Smith, SE (1995) Morphological and phonological comparisons of two Hopi maize varieties conserved in situ and ex situ. Economic Botany 49: 56–77.Google Scholar
Ureta, C, Martinez-Meyer, E, Peralis, HR and Alvarez-Buylla, ER (2012) Projecting the effects of climate change on the distribution of maize races and their wild relatives in Mexico. Global Change Biology 18: 1073–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), (2009) 2007 Census of Agricultural American Indian Reservations. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.Google Scholar
van Etten, J (2006) Molding maize: the shaping of a crop diversity landscape in the western highlands of Guatemala. Journal of Historical Geography 32: 689–711.Google Scholar
van de Wouw, M, Kik, C, van Hintum, T, van Treuen, R and Visser, B (2009) Genetic erosion in crops: concepts, research results and challenges. Plant Genetic Resources: Conservation and Utilization doi:10.1017/S1479262109990062 8: 1–15.Google Scholar
Wood, D and Lenné, JM (1997) The conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm: questioning the emerging paradigm. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 109–129.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, KS (1991) Managing diversity in potato and maize fields of the Peruvian Andes. Journal of Ethnobiology 11: 23–49.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Jaradat Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Jaradat Supplementary Material(File)
File 43.2 KB