Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T17:06:24.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Against Non-Comparabilism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Robin Attfield
Affiliation:
University College, Cardiff

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This is the view, for example, of Phillips, D. Z. and Mounce, H. O., Moral Practices (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970)Google Scholar (see e.g. pp. 59 and 70), and of Beardsmore, R. W., Moral Reasoning (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969) (chapters 4, 5 and 9, passim).Google Scholar

2 I have discussed some of these issues elsewhere: see ‘The Logical Status of Moral Utterances’, Journal of Critical Analysis, IV, No. 2, 01 1972, pp. 7084Google Scholar; ‘Towards a Defence of Teleology’, Ethics, 85, No. 2, 01 1975Google Scholar; ‘On Being Human’, Inquiry, 17, 1974, pp. 175192.Google Scholar