Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-g5k2d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-13T07:58:25.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On a Supposed Contradiction in Hume

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2007

Sophie Botros
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy, University of London

Extract

One of the most powerful arguments in meta-ethics today is that of Treatise, Book 3, in which Hume seeks to show that morality's practical influence precludes its being based on reason. H.O. Mounce, in his review1 of my Hume, Reason and Morality: A Legacy of Contradiction,2 rejects my central contention that this argument contains a contradiction. This review is however flawed on several counts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mounce, H.O. (2006) Philosophy, Vol. 81 Issue 04, 682–5Google Scholar.

2 (London: Routledge, 2006).

3 Harrison, J. (1976) Hume's Moral Epistemology, (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 10Google Scholar.

4 Dancy, J. (1993) Moral Reasons (Oxford: Blackwell) 2Google Scholar.

5 Penelhum, T. (1975) Hume (London: MacMillan) 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar.