No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Deceptions? Assertions? or Second-string Verbiage?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0031819100049810/resource/name/firstPage-S0031819100049810a.jpg)
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1981
References
1 King-Farlow, John, ‘Self-Deceivers and Sartrean Seducers’, Analysis 24, No. 5 (1963), 131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Critical Notice of Fingarette's, HerbertSelf-Deception in Metaphilosophy 4, No. 1 (1973), 76–84Google Scholar; ‘Foi, Bonne, Foi, Mauvaise, Sincérité et Espoir’, Dialogue 12, No. 3 (1973), 502–514Google Scholar; ‘Philosophical Nationalism: Self-Deception and Self-Direction’, Dialogue 17, No. 4 (1978), 591–615.
2 Searle, John R., Speech Acts (Cambridge: CUP, 1969), Chapter Six, especially Part 3, pp. 141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 For typically confused and unhelpful uses of asterisking by linguists, see my ‘Pronouns, Primacy and Falsification in Linguistics’, Philosophy of Social Science 3, No. 1 (1973), 41–61.
4 Compare again the four papers cited in footnote 1.