Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T09:35:24.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Variability of Rhipicephalus pulchellus (Gerstäcker, 1873), together with its Geographical Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Norman Cunliffe
Norman Cunliffe
Affiliation:
(From the Quick Laboratory, Cambridge.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been pointed out by Warburton (1912) that the degree of variation within the species of the genus Rhipicephalus is very considerable, and in view of this fact it is important to investigate the range of a species and the value of the differential structural characters upon which species are based. The great majority of the Rhipicephali are inornate and this, in conjunction with the general lack of distinguishing structural features and the wide variation found within the species, renders determinations difficult. As Rhipicephalus pulchellus, however, possesses a characteristic and well-marked ornamentation, which is subject to but slight variation, any specimen, at least in the case of the males, may be determined without difficulty.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , July 1913 , pp. 204 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dönitz, W. (1905). Die Zecken des Rindes als Krankheitsüberträger. Sitzungsber. der Geselhch. naturforschender Freunde, Berlin, Jahrg. No. 4, p. 117.Google Scholar
Dönitz, W. (1907). Die wirtsckaftlichwichtigen Zecken, etc. Leipzig: J.A. Barth, 127 pp., 6 pls.Google Scholar
Neumann, L. G. (1911). “Ixodidae” in Das Tierreich, im Auftrage der K. preuss. Akad. d. Wiss. zu Berlin herausg. v. F. E. Schulze. Berlin: Friedländer, 169 pp., 76 text figs.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I. (1900). On a collection of insects and arachnids made in 1895 and 1897, by Mr C. V. A. Peel, F.Z.S., in Somaliland, with descriptions of new species. 9. Chilopoda and Arachnida. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1900, pp. 49–51 (relate to ticks), PI. iii, Figs. 1–1 d, 2–2 f.Google Scholar
Wahburton, C. (1912). Notes on the Genus Rhipicephalus etc. Parasitology, v. pp. 1–20.Google Scholar