Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T08:23:48.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trypanosoma congolense: interactions between trypanosomes expressing different metacyclic variable antigen types in vitro and in vivo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. J. Prain
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland
C. A. Ross*
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland
*
To whom reprint requests should be sent.

Summary

In Trypanosome congolense, the surface antigens expressed by cultured metacyclic forms are a limited and serodeme-specific subset of variable antigen types (VATs). Experiments were carried out in mammalian-form (MF) cultures, comprising dividing trypanosomes which express metacyclic VATs (M-VATs) maintained in vitro with a mammalian cell feeder layer, or in mice following infection with cultured metacyclic populations. Selective neutralization experiments were performed by incubating populations of trypanosomes with one or a combination of McAbs to remove their respective M-VATs. Deletion of one M-VAT from the population had no effect on expression and growth of other unrelated M-VATs. Deleted M-VATs were detected in very small proportions of the total population 2–7 days following neutralization. Subsequent incubation of neutralized cultures resulted in growth of deleted M-VATs which, in most cases, reached pre-neutralization levels. It appears, therefore, that in conditions where expression of M-VATs on dividing trypanosomes occurs, removal of individual M-VATs results in their re-expression within the population.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

New England Biolabs Inc., 32 Tozer Road, Beverly, Ma, USA 01915–9990.

References

REFERENCES

Barry, J. D. & Emery, D. L. (1984). Parasite development and host responses during the establishment of Trypanosoma brucei infection transmitted by the tsetse fly. Parasitology 88, 6784.Google Scholar
Barry, J. D., Crowe, J. S. & Vickerman, K. (1983). Instability of the Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense variable antigen repertoire. Nature, London 306, 699701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, J. D., Crowe, J. S. & Vickerman, K. (1985). Neutralization of individual variable antigen types in metacyclic populations of Trypanosoma brucei does not prevent their subsequent expression in mice. Parasitology 90, 7988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, J. D., Hajduk, S. L., Vickerman, K. & Le Ray, D. (1979). Detection of multiple variable antigen types in metacyclic populations of Trypanosoma brucei. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 73, 205–8.Google Scholar
Crowe, J. S., Barry, J. D., Luckins, A. G., Ross, C. A. & Vickerman, K. (1983). All metacyclic variable antigen types of Trypanosoma congolense identified using monoclonal antibodies. Nature, London 306, 389–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, M. A. & Luckins, A. G. (1982). Growth characteristics of cloned stocks of Trypanosoma congolense cultivated in vitro. In Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, Parasites – Their World and Ours (ed. Mettrick, D. F. and Desser, S. S.), p. 587, Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Parasitology, Toronto, 1982.Google Scholar
Gray, M. A., Ross, C. A., Taylor, A. M. & Luckins, A. G. (1984). In vitro cultivation of Trypanosoma congolense: the production of infective metacyclic trypanosomes in cultures initiated from cloned stocks. Acta Tropica 41, 343–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Gray, M. A., Ross, C. A., Taylor, A. M., Tetley, L. & Luckins, A. G. (1985). In vitro cultivation of Trypanosoma congolense: the production of infective forms from metacyclic trypanosomes cultured on bovine endothelial cell monolayers. Acta Tropica 42, 99111.Google ScholarPubMed
Kearney, J. F., Radbroch, A., Liesgang, B. & Rajeway, K. (1979). A new mouse myeloma cell line that has lost immunoglobulin expression but permits the construction of antibody secreting hybrid cells. Journal of Immunology 123, 1548–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luckins, A. G., Frame, I. A., Gray, M. A., Crowe, J. S. & Ross, C. A. (1986). Analysis of trypanosome variable antigen types in cultures of metacyclic and mammalian forms of Trypanosoma congolense. Parasitology 93, 99109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nantulya, V. M., Musoke, A. J., Moloo, S. K. & Ngaira, J. M. (1983). Analysis of the variable antigen composition of Trypanosoma brucei brucei metacyclic trypanosomes using monoclonal antibodies. Acta Tropica 40, 1924.Google Scholar
Ortega-Pierres, G., MacKenzie, C. D. & Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1984). Protection against Trichinella spiralis induced by a monoclonal antibody that promotes killing of new-born larvae by granulocytes. Parasite Immunology 6, 275–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. J., Gray, M. A. & Gray, A. R. (1969). Local skin reactions in cattle at the site of infection with Trypanosoma congolense by Glossina morsitans and G. tachinoides. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 63, 620–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, C. A., Gray, M. A., Taylor, A. M. & Luckins, A. G. (1985). In vitro cultivation of Trypanosoma congolense: establishment of infective mammalian forms in continuous culture after isolation from the blood of infected mice. Acta Tropica 42, 113–22.Google Scholar