Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T06:03:57.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trypanosoma congolense: appearance and distribution of variable antigen types during metacyclic differentiation in vitro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2017

C. J. Prain
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG
C. A. Ross
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG

Summary

Differentiation of epimastigotes and production of infective metacyclic forms of Trypanosoma congolense were examined in a culture system which enabled manipulation of the population density of insect forms. Scanning electron microscopy of cultures revealed the attachment sites of epimastigotes in detail, showing them to be attached as ‘clusters’ or ‘bundles’ and having associated fibrillar structures. Dividing epimastigotes were observed either within individual bundles or in association with two bundles. Metacyclic forms were detected by an immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) using metacyclic variable-antigen type (M-VAT) specific monoclonal antibodies, by day 7 after seeding cultures. Trypanosomes expressing M-VATs appeared singly in bundles, observed by both IFAT and an immunogold labelling method. Statistical analysis using Poisson calculations suggested that, in general, the distribution of metacyclics expressing individual M-VATs was random throughout cultures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crowe, J. S., Barry, J. D., Luckins, A. G., Ross, C. A. & Vickerman, K. (1983). All metacyclic variable antigen types of Trypanosoma congolense identified using monoclonal antibodies. Nature, London 306, 389–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, G. M. (1980). Statistics and Experimental Design, 2nd Edn. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.Google Scholar
Duke, H. L. (1923). The transmission of Trypanosoma congolense by Glossina palpalis. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 17, 511–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, D. A., Ellis, D. S. & Stamford, S. (1979). Ultrastructural studies of certain aspects of the development of Trypanosoma congolense in Glossina morsitans morsitans. Journal of Protozoology 26, 557–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, R. M. (1957). Trypanosoma congolense in its passage through the peritrophic membrane of Glossina morsitans. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 51, 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. A., Cunningham, I., Gardiner, P. R., Taylor, A. M. & Luckins, A. G. (1981). Cultivation of infective forms of Trypanosoma congolense from trypanosomes in the proboscis of Glossina morsitans. Parasitology 82, 8195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, M. A., Ross, C. A., Taylor, A. M. & Luckins, A. G. (1984). In vitro cultivation of Trypanosoma congolense: the production of infective metacyclic trypanosomes in cultures initiated from cloned stocks. Acta Tropica 41, 343–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Gray, M. A., Ross, C. A., Taylor, A. M., Tetley, L. & Luckins, A. G. (1985). In vitro cultivation of Trypanosoma congolense: the production of infective forms from metacyclic trypanosomes cultured on bovine endothelial cell monolayers. Acta Tropica 41, 99111.Google Scholar
Hendry, K. A. K. & Vickerman, K. (1988). The requirement for epimastigote attachment during division and metacyclogenesis in Trypanosoma congolense. Parasitology Research 74, 403–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoare, C. A. (1972). The Trypanosomes of Mammals. A zoological monograph. Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hommel, M. & Robertson, E. (1976). In vitro attachment of trypanosomes to plastic. Experientia 32, 464–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luckins, A. G., Frame, I. A., Gray, M. A., Crowe, J. S. & Ross, C. A. (1986). Analysis of trypanosome variable antigen types in cultures of metacyclic and mammalian forms of Trypanosoma congolense. Parasitology 93, 99109.Google Scholar
Molyneux, D. H., Selkirk, M. & Lavin, D. R. (1978). Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) melophagium in the sheep ked Melophagus ovinus. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) study of the parasites and insect gut wall surfaces. Acta Tropica 35, 319–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Molyneux, D. H., Lavin, D. R. & Elce, B. (1979). A possible relationship between salivarian trypanosomes and Glossina labrum mechano-receptors. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 73, 287–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prain, C. J. & Ross, C. A. (1988). Trypanosoma congolense: interactions between trypanosomes expressing different metacyclic variable antigen types in vitro and in vivo. Parasitology 97, 277–86.Google ScholarPubMed
Tetley, L. & Vickerman, K. (1985). Differentiation in Trypanosoma brucei: host-parasite cell junctions and their persistence during acquisition of the variable antigen coat. Journal of Cell Science 74, 119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tetley, L., Turner, C. M. R., Barry, J. D., Crowe, J. S. & Vickerman, K. (1987). Onset of expression of the variant surface glycoproteins of Trypanosoma brucei in the tsetse fly studied using immunoelectron microscopy. Journal of Cell Science 87, 363–72.Google Scholar
Thevenaz, PH. & Hecker, H. (1980). Distribution and attachment of Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense in the proximal part of the proboscis of Glossina morsitans morsitans. Acta Tropica 37, 163–75.Google Scholar
Vickerman, K. (1973). The mode of attachment of Trypanosoma vivax in the proboscis of the tsetse fly Glossina fuscipes: an ultrastructural study of the epimastigote stage of the trypanosome. Journal of Protozoology 20, 394404.Google Scholar