Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:59:16.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial and temporal repeatability in parasite community structure of tropical fish hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2003

V. M. VIDAL-MARTÍNEZ  and
R. POULIN
V. M. VIDAL-MARTÍNEZ
Affiliation:
Centre of Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnical Institute, Mérida Unit, Antigua Carr. a Progreso, km. 6 C.P. 97310, CORDEMEX, Mérida, Yucatán, México
R. POULIN
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An assessment is made of the repeatability of parasite community structure in space for a marine fish, and in space and time for a freshwater fish from south-eastern Mexico. The marine fish species was the red grouper, Epinephelus morio (collected from 9 localities), and the freshwater species was the cichlid, Cichlasoma urophthalmus (collected from 6 localities: including monthly at 2 localities for 1 year, and bimonthly at 1 locality in 1990 and 1999). Pairwise interspecific associations and analyses of nested patterns in the distributions of parasite species among hosts were used in both fish species, with comparisons over time made only with the cichlid. Positive interspecific associations, and nested patterns were noted in some localities for both fish species, and/or at some sampling times for the cichlid fish. However, non-random patterns in the structure of parasite communities in these 2 host species only were observed sporadically. When present, nestedness in both fish species was apparently linked with a positive association between total infection intensities and fish size. Additionally, adjacent localities were more likely to display similar parasite community structure than distant ones. This preliminary result suggests that distance between localities is an important determinant of predictability in parasite community structure.

Keywords

nestednessparasite community ecologyred groupercichlidssouth-eastern Mexico
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 127 , Issue 4 , October 2003 , pp. 387 - 398
Copyright
2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

BURROUGH, P. A. & McDONNELL, R. A. (1997). Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
CARNEY, J. P. & DICK, T. A. (2000). Helminth communities of yellow perch (Perca flavescens) (Mitchill): determinants of pattern. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 538–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEZFULI, B. S., GIARI, L., DE BIAGGI, S. & POULIN, R. (2001). Associations and interactions among intestinal helminths of the brown trout, Salmo trutta, in northern Italy. Journal of Helminthology 75, 331–336.Google Scholar
ESCH, G. W., BUSH, A. O. & AHO, J. M. (1990). Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes. Chapman and Hall, London.
HUGUENY, B. & GUÉGAN, J. F. (1997). Community nestedness and the proper way to assess statistical significance by Monte-Carlo tests: some comments on Worthen and Rohde's (1996) paper. Oikos 80, 572–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JIMENEZ-GARCÍA, I., VIDAL-MARTÍNEZ, V. M., SABAS-FLORES-DÍAZ, M. & AGUIRRE-MACEDO, L. (2000). Seasonal occurrence of helminthes in wild and experimental cichlid fish Cichlasoma urophthalmus in a tropical locality in Mexico. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Parasitology (ed. Monduzzi Editore), pp. 401–405. Medimond Inc., Bologna.
KODRIC-BROWN, A. & BROWN, J. H. (1993). Highly structured fish communities in Australian desert springs. Ecology 74, 1847–1855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARTÍNEZ-PALACIOS, C. A., CHAVEZ, C. & OLVERA, M. A. (1993). The potential for culture of the American Cichlidae with emphasis on Cichlasoma urophthalmus. In Recent Advances in Aquaculture (ed. Muir, J. F. & Roberts, R. J.), pp. 233–295. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
MOE, M. E. (1969). Biology of the red grouper Epinephelus morio (Valenciennes) from the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Professional Papers Series No. 10. Florida Department of Natural Resources, St. Petersburg, Florida.
PATTERSON, B. D. & ATMAR, W. (1986). Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POULIN, R. (1998). Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites, from Individuals to Communities. Chapman and Hall, London.
POULIN, R. (2000). Variation in the intraspecific relationship between fish length and intensity of parasitic infection: biological and statistical causes. Journal of Fish Biology 56, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POULIN, R. (2001). Interactions between species and the structure of helminth communities. Parasitology 122, (Suppl.) S3–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POULIN, R. & GUÉGAN, J. F. (2000). Nestedness, anti-nestedness, and the relationship between prevalence and intensity in ectoparasite assemblages of marine fish: a spatial model of species coexistence. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 1147–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POULIN, R. & MORAND, S. (1999). Geographical distances and the similarity among parasite communities of conspecific host populations. Parasitology 119, 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POULIN, R. & VALTONEN, E. T. (2001). Nested assemblages resulting from host-size variation: the case of endoparasite communities in fish hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 31, 1194–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POULIN, R. & VALTONEN, E. T. (2002). The predictability of helminth community structure in space: a comparison of fish populations from adjacent lakes. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 1235–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SALGADO-MALDONADO, G. & KENNEDY, C. R. (1997). Richness and similarity of helminth communities in the tropical cichlid fish Cichlasoma urophthalmus from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Parasitology 114, 581–590.Google Scholar
SCHOLZ, T. & AGUIRRE-MACEDO, M. L. (2000). Metacercariae of trematodes parasitizing freshwater fish in Mexico: a reappraisal and methods of study. In Metazoan Parasites in the Neotropics: a Systematic and Ecological Perspective (ed. Salgado-Maldonado, G., García-Aldrete, A. N. & Vidal-Martínez, V. M.), pp. 101–115. Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Mexico.
VIDAL-MARTÍNEZ, V. M., AGUIRRE-MACEDO, M. L., VIVAS-RODRÍGUEZ, C. M. & MORAVEC, F. (1997). Las comunidades de macroparásitos del mero Epinephelus morio (Pisces: Serranidae) en la Península de Yucatán, México. Proceedings of the 50th Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute 50, 764–779.Google Scholar
VIDAL-MARTÍNEZ, V. M., AGUIRRE-MACEDO, M. L., SCHOLZ, T., GONZÁLEZ-SOLÍS, D. & MENDOZA-FRANCO, E. F. (2001). Atlas of the Helminth Parasites of Cichlid Fishes of Mexico. Academia, Prague.
VIDAL-MARTÍNEZ, V. M., AGUIRRE-MACEDO, M. L. & KENNEDY, C. R. (1998). The structuring process of the macroparasite community of an experimental population of Cichlasoma urophthalmus through time. Journal of Helminthology 72, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VIDAL-MARTÍNEZ, V. M. & KENNEDY, C. R. (1998). Potential interactions between the intestinal helminths of the cichlid fish Cichlasoma synspilum from southeastern Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 86, 691–695.Google Scholar
WORTHEN, W. B. (1996). Community composition and nested-subsets analyses: basic descriptors for community ecology. Oikos 76, 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WORTHEN, B. & ROHDE, R. (1996). Nested subsets analyses of colonization-dominated communities: metazoan ectoparasites of marine fishes. Oikos 75, 471–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRIGHT, D. H., PATTERSON, B. D., MIKKELSON, G. M., CUTLER, A. & ATMAR, W. (1998). A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oecologia 113, 1–20.Google Scholar