Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:04:31.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal variation in the biochemical composition of Mytilicola intestinalis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. S. Williams
C. S. Williams
Affiliation:
Biological Laboratories, The Polytechnic, Regent Street, London, W.1*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The biochemical constitution of the copepod parasite Mytilicola intestinalis was determined and seasonal changes were detected which, in general, could be correlated with the life-history of the parasite.

Biochemical constituents have been discussed in relation to those in other endoparasites and free-living crustaceans. It was concluded that carbohydrates and lipids both formed important stores of energy in M. intestinalis. Protein levels were reduced compared with those in free-living forms.

This work forms part of a Ph.D. thesis in the University of London. It was completed during the tenure of a Research Assistantship at The Polytechnic, Regent Street, London W. 1.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , November 1969 , pp. 775 - 782
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, H., Barnes, M. & Finlayson, D. M. (1963). The seasonal changes in body weight, biochemical composition, and oxygen uptake of two common boreo-arctic cirripedes, Balanus balanoides, and B. balanus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 43, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, T. von (1966). Biochemistry of parasites, 429 pp. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Coe, W. R. & Fox, D. L. (1944). Biology of the Californian sea mussel (Mytilus californianus). III. Environmental conditions and rate of growth. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 87, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodgson, R. W. (1928). Report on mussel purification. Fishery Invest., Lond. (Ser. 2), 10 (1), 498 pp.Google Scholar
Ellenby, C. (1947). A copepod parasite of the mussel new to the British fauna. Nature, Lond. 159, 645–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiretti, F. (1966). Respiration. In Physiology of Mollusca. vol. 2 (eds. Wilbur, K. M. and Yonge, C. M.), 645 pp. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L. & Smith, M. H. (1965). Hemoglobins of parasitic animals. Expl Parasit. 16, 392–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendel, B., Kemp, A. & Myers, D. K. (1954). A colorimetric micro-method for the determining of glucose. Biochem. J. 56, 639–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, R. (1965). The role of detritus in the nutrition of two marine deposit feeders, the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae and the bivalve Macoma balthica. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 144, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, A. P. (1934). On the biology of Calanus finmarchicus. IV. Seasonal changes in the weight and chemical composition in Loch Fyne. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 19, 613–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G., Austin, J. & Linford, E. (1966). Biochemical studies on marine zooplankton. III. Seasonal variation in the biochemical composition of Neomysis integer. In Some Contemporary Studies in Marine Science (ed. Barnes, H.), pp. 597–605. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. C., Roe, A. & Lewontin, R. C. (1960). Quantitative Zoology (revised edition), 440 pp. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Smith, J. C. (1968). Bibliography on the biochemistry of endoparasites. Expl Parasit. 22, 352–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C. S. (1969 a). The effect of Mytilicola intestinalis on the biochemical composition of mussels. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 49, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. S. (1969 b). The life history of Mytilicola intestinalis Steuer. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer. 32 (in the press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar