Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T16:33:42.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on Wild Rats in England, with an account of their Ecto- and Endoparasites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Andrew Balfour
Affiliation:
Director-in-Chief, Wellcome Bureau of Scientific Research, London.

Extract

1. Attempts to secure a micro-organism which could induce abortion or sterility in wild rats and which might be used in an anti-rat campaign, more especially when plague threatens a community, have not been successful.

2. An account, however, is given of certain micro-organisms producing pathological conditions in the genito-urinary tract of wild rats.

3. A routine determination of rat parasites including ecto-parasites, helminths, intestinal protozoa and haematozoa has been undertaken.

4. It has led to the discovery of a new species of Hymenolepis and has shown that Heligmosomum braziliense is present in rats in England. It has also demonstrated the occurrence of haemogregarines in the leucocytes of black rats in this country.

5. Work has been done on the incidence of Leptospira icterohaemorrhagiae in Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus in England and on the mechanism of its transmission.

6. It has been shown that apparently the guinea pig may act as a carrier of the Leptospira without exhibiting any marked symptoms of the disease which the latter produces. There is also some evidence to prove that infection may take place through the alimentary tract.

7. The Leptospira was successfully and easily cultivated in Wenyon's modification of the Noguchi method but in large measure lost its virulence as the result of repeated subcultures. Even after a year, however, it was still capable of producing characteristic symptoms in the guinea pig.

8. General pathological conditions occurring in wild rats have been recorded.

9. A few observations have been made on the seasonal incidence of pregnancy in wild rats.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacot, A. W. (1919). The fleas found on rats and their relation to plague. Journ. Roy. Sanit. Inst. XL. 53.Google Scholar
Balfour, A. (14. v. 1921). Rat destruction: a suggestion. Lancet, I. 1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A. (25. iv. 1922). Observations on certain cestodes of rats, with an account of a new species of Hymenolepis. Parasitology, XIV. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brug, S. L. (1919). De Entamoeben van de rat. Geneesk. Tijdschr. Nederlandsch-Indië. LIV. Part 4.Google Scholar
Chaussat, J. B. (1850). Recherches microscopiques appliqueés à la pathologie. Des hématozoaires. Thèse. 51 pp.Google Scholar
Cleland, J. Burton (1. v. 1918). Presidential Address to the Royal Society of New South Wales. Sydney.Google Scholar
Coles, A. C. (1918). A note on the occurrence of Spirnchaeta icterohaemorrhagiae in the common rat in England. Lancet. 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudgeon, G. C. (25. iv. 1922). Occurrence of Heligmosomum braziliense Trav. in England. Parasitology, XIV. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulerton, A. G. R. (10. iv. 1919). Report on the protozoal parasites of the rat with special reference to the occurrence of spirochaetal jaundice in man and to the London rat as a natural reservoir of Spirochaeta icterohaemorrhagiae. Corporation of London: Public Health Department.Google Scholar
Hall, M. C. (1916). Nematode parasites of mammals of the orders Rodentia, Lagomorpha and Hyracoidea. Proc. U.S National Museum, 30.Google Scholar
Hirst, S. (1914). Preliminary list of the Acari occurring on the brown rat (Mus norvegicus) in Great Britain with the description of a new species (Haemogamasus oudemansi). Bull. Entomol. Research, V. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. and Pettit, A. (1919). Spirochétose ictérohémorragique, 284 pp.Google Scholar
Moll, A. M. (xii. 1917). Animal parasites of rats at Madison, Wisconsin. Journ. of Parasitol. IV. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newstead, R. and Evans, A. M. (1921). Report on rat-flea investigation. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, XV. 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. and Strickland, C. (iv. 1913). Report on rat-fleas in Cambridgeshire Parasitology, VI. 2.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1908). Rats and their parasites. Journ. Economic Biol. III. 61.Google Scholar
Splendore, A. (29. vi. 1918). Studi nell' interesse di una lotta biologica contro le arvicole, Bollet. Ser. B., Ministero·di Agricoltura. Rome.Google Scholar
Stammers, G. E. F. (1920). Haemogregarines in black rats. Journ. Trop. Med. and Hygiene, XXIII. 298.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. C. (i. 1922). The incidence of a Leptospira in the kidneys and of parasites in the intestines of one hundred wild rats examined in England. American Journ. Trop. Med. II. 77.Google Scholar
Strickland, C. and Merriman, G. (iv. 1913). Report on rat-fleas in Suffolk and North Essex. Parasitology, VI. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teacher, J. H. and Burton, J. A. G. (1914 and 1915). Infective abortion in guinea pigs. Journ. Pathol. and Bacteriol. XVIII. 440, and XX. 14.Google Scholar
Uhlenhuth, P. and Zuelzer, M. (1921). Zur Epidemiologie der weilschen Krankheit—zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frage der freilebenden Spirochäten (Icterogenes-ähnliche und andere). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., etc., Orig. LXXXV. Supplement, p. 141.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1921). [Demonstration of a simple culture medium for the cultivation of Leptospira and Protozoa.] Report of Laboratory Meeting. Trans. Roy. Soc. Tropic. Med. and Hygiene, XV. 153.Google Scholar