Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:02:50.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the biology of Caraphractus cinctus Walker (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), a parasitoid of the eggs of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera). 2. Immature stages and seasonal history with a review of Mymarid larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Dorothy J. Jackson
Dorothy J. Jackson
Affiliation:
North Cliff, St Andrews
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The immature stages of Caraphractus cinctus Walker are described.

Four larval stages have been observed which may correspond to three or four instars. In no stage have mandibles been observed.

The first-instar larva is elongated and active. In the second-instar oral lobes are present. In the next stage the larva becomes shapeless and rather transparent. In the last stage the wall of the mid-gut shows conspicuous opaque spots which consist of single cells containing spherical concretions, probably the products of excretion.

These concretions later become free in the gut of the pupa and are discharged in the meconium when the imago emerges from the host egg.

The effects of parasitism on the host eggs of different ages is discussed. In newly laid host eggs all the contents are consumed by the parasitic larvae. In advanced eggs of Agabus the egg of Caraphractus is laid in the mid-gut of the host embryo where the parasitic larva develops, the hard parts of the host larva remaining intact. Parasitism in advanced eggs of Dytiscus is rarely successful.

The larvae of other Mymaridae are discussed and their main features compared. The first-instar larva of Caraphractus does not correspond to any of the previously described types of mymarid larvae.

The seasonal history is described, with the sequence of hosts parasitized throughout the year. From four to six generations of Caraphractus have been bred indoors during the year. The winter is passed as a diapausing prepupa. In some cases diapause may be prolonged. Fertility is high: 121 imagines have been bred from one female of Caraphractus.

I have much pleasure in acknowledging my gratitude to the late Dr W. D. Hincks for his kindness in reading the typescript of this paper: the comments by such a well-known authority on Mymaridae have been most valuable. I am very grateful to Mr O. Bakkendorf for allowing me to reproduce several of his figures of Mymarid larvae from the valuable work he devoted to the biology of Danish hymenopterous egg-parasites. I am also grateful to Miss B. A. Trott of the Commonwealth Institute of Entomology for the help she has so kindly given me with references.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 51 , Issue 3-4 , November 1961 , pp. 269 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alam, S. M. (1958). The biology of Metaphycus taxi Alam (Encyrtidae: Hymenoptera). Indian J. Ent. 19, 231–40.Google Scholar
Bakkendorf, O. (1925). Biologie de l' Anagrus incarnatus Haliday. Ann. Biol. lacust. 14, 249–70.Google Scholar
Bakkendorf, O. (1934). Biological investigations on some Danish Hymenopterous egg parasites, especially in Homopterous and Heteropterous eggs, with taxonomic remarks and descriptions of new species. Ent. Medd. 19 (1933), 1–135. 164 figs.Google Scholar
Balduf, W. V. (1928). Observations on the Buffalo Tree Hopper Ceresa bubalus Fabr. (Membracidae; Homoptera), and the bionomics of an egg parasite, Polynema striaticorne Girault (Mymaridae, Hymenoptera). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 21, 419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour-Browne, F. (1925). Concerning the Habits of Insects. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chrystal, R. N. (1930). Studies on the Sirex Parasites. The biology and post-embryonic development of Ibalia leucospoides Hochenw. (Hymenoptera-Cynipoidea). Oxford Forestry Memoirs, no. 11.Google Scholar
Clark, A. F. (1931). The parasite control of Gonipterus scutellatus Gyll. N.Z.J. Sci. Tech. 13, 22–8.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. (1940). Entomophagous Insects, pp. 99–106. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 99–106.Google Scholar
Crandell, H. A. (1939). The biology of Pachycrepoideus dubius Ashmead (Hymenoptera), a Pteromalid parasite of Piophila casei Linne (Diptera). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 32, 632–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debauche, H. R. (1948). Études sur les Mymarommidae et les Mymaridae de la Belgique. Mém. Mus. Hist. nat. Belg. no. 108, 248 pp., 24 pls.Google Scholar
Dumbleton, L. J. (1934). The Apple Leaf-hopper (Typhlocyba australis Frogg.) N.Z.J. Sci. Tech. 16, 30–8.Google Scholar
Enock, F. (1914). Fairy flies and their hosts. J. R. Hort. Soc. 40, 45–9.Google Scholar
Faure, J. C. (1926). Contribution à l'étude d'un complex biologique; la Pieride du Chou (Pieris brassicae L.) et ses parasites Hyménoptères. Lyon, Faculté des Sci. de l' Univ. 222 pp.Google Scholar
FerriÈre, C. (1926). Notes sur les Chalcidiens de la Suisse 2. Un parasite des oeufs de Psocides. Schweiz, ent. Anz. 5, 1–3.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. (1942). The larval meconium of parasitic Hymenoptera as a sign of the species. J. Econ. Ent. 35, 456–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullaway, D. T. (1918). The corn leaf-hopper (Peregrinus maidis Ashm.). Bull. Hawaii Bd Agric. Forestry Honolulu Div. Ent. no. 4. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Ganin, M. (1869). Beiträge zur Erkenntniss der Entwickelungsgeschichte bei den Insecten. Z. wiss. Zool. 19, 381–451.Google Scholar
Hallez, P. (1886). Loi de l'orientation de l'embryon chez les insectes. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 103, 606–8.Google Scholar
Hamm, A. H. (1917). The Mymarid Caraphractus cinctus taken at Oxford in 1917. Proc. Ent. Soc. Lond. pp. 84–5.Google Scholar
Henriksen, K. L. (1922). Notes upon some aquatic Hymenoptera. Ann. Biol. lacust. 11, 19–37.Google Scholar
Hincks, W. D. (1950). Notes on some British Mymaridae (Hym.). Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. 10, 167–207.Google Scholar
Hincks, W. D. (1952). The British species of the genus Ooctonus Haliday, with a note on some recent work on the Fairy Flies. Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. 11, 153–63.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. (1957). A General Textbook of Entomology, 9th ed. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Ison, C. H. (1959). Notes on the genus Anagrus (Mymaridae), with an account of rearing techniques. J. Queckett Micr. Cl. Ser. 4, 5, 221–30.Google Scholar
Ivanova-Kazas, O. M. (1952). Postembryonic development of Prestwichia aquatica Lubb. (Hymenoptera). (In Russian.) Trud. Leningr. Obshsch Estestvoisp Leningrad (Zool.). 71, 165–213.Google Scholar
Ivanova-Kazas, O. M. (1954). The influence of parasitism on the embryonic development of Caraphractus reductus R-Kors. (Hymenoptera) (In Russian.) Trav. Soc. Nat. Leningr. 72, 57–74.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J. (1956). Notes on Hymenopterous parasitoids bred from eggs of Dytiscidae in Fife. J. Soc. Brit. Ent. 5, 144–9.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J. (1958 a). A further note on a Chrysocharis (Hym. Eulophidae) parasitizing the eggs of Dytiscus marginalis L., and a comparison of its larva with that of Caraphractus cinctus Walker (Hym. Mymaridae). J. Soc. Brit. Ent. 6, 15–22.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J. (1958 b). Observations on the biology of Caraphractus cinctus Walker (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), a parasitoid of the eggs of Dytiscidae. I. Methods of rearing and numbers bred on different host eggs. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 110, 533–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. J. (1958 c). Egg-laying and egg-hatching in Agabus bipustulatus L., with notes on oviposition in other species of Agabus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 15, 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloet, G. S. & Hincks, W. D. (1945). A Check List of British Insects. Stockport.Google Scholar
Kryger, J. P. (1934). Synonomic remarks on some generic names of Mymaridae (Hym.). Ent. Medd. 18, 503–8.Google Scholar
Kuwayama, S. (1935). Studies on Lema oryzae Kuwayama, the rice leaf beetle. IV. Observations on the biology and liberation of an egg parasite, Anaphes nipponicus Kuwayama. Rep. Hokkaido Agric. Expt. Sta. no. 33, 80 pp.Google Scholar
Macgill, E. J. (1934). On the biology of Anagrus atomus (L.) Hal.: an egg parasite of the leaf hopper Erythronema pallidifrons Edwards. Parasitology, 57, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, R. & Crosby, C. R. (1912). Aquatic Hymenoptera in America. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 5, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulla, M. S. (1956). Two Mymarid egg parasites attacking Typhlocyba species in California. J. Econ. Ent. 49, 438–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, R. C. L. (1905). Leaf-hoppers and their natural enemies. (Pt. VI, Mymaridae, Platygasteridae). Hawaii Sug. Planters Ass. Exp. Sta. Bul. I, 187–205.Google Scholar
Quednau, W. (1957). Über den Einflusz von Temperatur und Luftfeuchtigkeit auf den Eiparasiten Trichogramma cacoeciae Marchal. Mitt. biol. ZentAnst., Berl., 90, 1–63.Google Scholar
Rimsky-Korsakov, M. N. (1925). Ueber Wasserhymenopteren aus der Gattung Caraphractus Haliday. (In Russian with German summary). Trav. Soc. Nat. Leningr. 54, 97–113.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1933). Experimental Studies in Insect Parasitism. I. Introduction and Technique. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 114, 450–4.Google Scholar
Satterthwait, A. F. (1931). Anaphoidea calendrae Gahan, a Mymarid parasite of eggs of weevils of the genus Calendra. N.Y. Ent. Soc. J. 39, 171–90.Google Scholar
Schell, S. C. (1943). The biology of Hadronotus ajax Girault (Hymenoptera-Scelionidae) a parasite in the eggs of squash-bug (Anasia tristis De Geer). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 36, 625–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiegs, O. W. (1922). Researches on the insect metamorphosis I, II. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 46, 319–527.Google Scholar
Tooke, F. G. C. (1953). The Eucalyptus Snout-beetle, Gonipterus scutellatus Gyll. A study of its ecology and control by biological means. Ent. Mem. Dep. Agric. S. Afr. 3, 282 pp.Google Scholar
Tullgren, A. (1916). Rosenstriten (Typhlocyba rosae L.) och en ny äggparasit pa densamma. Stockholm. Medd. Cent. Anst. Försoksv. Jordbr. Ent. Avdeln. no. 24, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Whiting, A. R. (1940). Do Habrobracon females sting their eggs? Amer. Nat. 72, 577–8.Google Scholar