Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T05:33:11.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Junctional complexes in the inner cyst tissue of the cysticercoid of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. Sylvia Richards  and
C. Arme
K. Sylvia Richards
Affiliation:
Parasitology Research Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, Staffs. ST5 5BG
C. Arme
Affiliation:
Parasitology Research Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, Staffs. ST5 5BG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The inner cyst tissue development is anteriad and centripetal. The cells produce lamellar extensions which assume parallel alignment. The first contact points (approximately 4 days post-infection) establish heptalaminar (gap) junctions. Lamellar attenuation results in a decreased intercellular space, and at 5–6 days pentalaminar junctions (with fused outer plasmalemma leaflets to give an electron-dense, approximately 3 nm wide O–O line) occur. This is the first maturation (Ml) stage. The O–O lines are permeable to lanthanum, and evidence of their possible transformation from heptalaminar junctions is presented. Continued lamellar attenuation, associated with scolex retraction and subsequent growth, results in cytoplasmic occlusion and contact between the inner leaflets of the same lamella. The resultant electron-dense I–I line is approximately 3 nm wide; the O–O line is now less electron-dense and thinner (approximately 2 nm). This final maturation (M2) stage, resembling vertebrate myelin, occurs over limited areas; closely adjacent regions either remaining at the M1 stage, or not displaying junctional complexes. Since in vivo and in vitro excystment can occur before the M2 stage, the inner cyst tissue is not considered to be protective against the definitive host. That the tissue may function in limiting nutrient flow, thus regulating the size of the presumptive adult, is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , October 1983 , pp. 295 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baron, P. J. (1971). On the histology, histochemistry and ultrastructure of the cysticercoid of Raillietina cesticillus (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). Parasitology 62, 233–45.Google Scholar
Caley, J. (1974). The functional significance of scolex retraction and subsequent cyst formation in the cysticercoid larva of Hymenolepis microstoma. Parasitology 68, 207–27.Google Scholar
Caley, J. (1976). Ultrastructural studies of the cysticercoid of Moniezia expansa (Anoplocephalidae) with special reference to the development of the cyst. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 48, 251–62.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W. H. (1972). Gap junctions between the axolemma and myelin sheath in the central nervous system. Journal of Cell Biology 55, 75a.Google Scholar
Green, C. R. (1981). A clarification of the two types of invertebrate septate junction. Tissue and Cell 13, 173–88.Google Scholar
Green, C. R. & Bergquist, P. R. (1982). Phylogenetic relationships within the Invertebrata in relation to the structure of septate junctions and the development of ‘occluding’ junctional types. Journal of Cell Science 53, 279–305.Google Scholar
Hirano, A. & Dembitzer, H. M. (1967). A structural analysis of the myelin sheath in the central nervous system. Journal of Cell Biology 34, 555–67.Google Scholar
Hirano, A. & Dembitzer, H. M. (1969). The transverse bands as a means of access to the periaxonal space of the central myelinated nerve fibre. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 28, 141–9.Google Scholar
Krasnoshchekov, G. P., Moczoń, T. & Pluzhnikov, L. T. (1979). Ultrastructure of the cyst of Hymenolepis diminuta larvae. Folia Parasitologica (Praha) 26, 245–51.Google Scholar
Lane, N. J. (1978). Intercellular junctions and cell contacts in invertebrates. In Electron Microscopy, Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Electron Microscopy, vol. 3. State of the Art (ed. Sturgess, J. M.), pp. 673–91. Toronto: Imperial Press.Google Scholar
Lane, N. J. & Skaer, H., le, B. (1980). Intercellular junctions in insect tissues. Advances in Insect Physiology 15, 35–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, R. D. & Specian, R. (1980). The morphology, histology and fine structure of the adult stage of the cyclophyllidean tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta. In Biology of the Tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta, (ed. Arai, H. P.), pp. 157–280. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Napolitano, L. M. & Scallen, T. J. (1969). Observations on the fine structure of peripheral nerve myelin. Anatomical Record 163, 1–6.Google Scholar
Revel, J. -P. & Hamilton, D. W. (1969). The double nature of the intermediate dense line in peripheral nerve myelin. Anatomical Record 163, 7–16.Google Scholar
Richards, K. S. & Arme, C. (1981). The ultrastructure of the scolex-neck syncytium, neck cells and frontal gland cells of Caryophyllaeus laliceps (Caryophyllidea: Cestoda). Parasitology 83, 173–88.Google Scholar
Richards, K. S. & Arme, C. (1982). Sensory receptors in the scolex-neck region of Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Caryophyllidea: Cestoda). Journal of Parasitology 68, 416–23.Google Scholar
Richards, K. S. & Arme, C. (1983). The rostellar tegumentary cytoplasm of the metacestode of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cyclophyllidea: Cestoda). Parasitology 86, 83–8.Google Scholar
Schnapp, B., Peracchia, C. & Mugnaini, E. (1976). The paranodal axo-glial junction in the central nervous systen studied with thin sections and freeze fracture. Neuroscience 1, 181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staehelin, L. A. (1974). Structure and function of intercellular junctions. International Review of Cytology 39, 191–283.Google Scholar
Threadgold, L. T. & Read, C. P. (1970). Cell relationships in Hymenolepis diminuta. Parasitology 60, 181–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed