Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T13:37:51.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hammondia heydorni infection in sheep, goats, moose, dogs and coyotes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. P. Dubey
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
C. S. F. Williams
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animal Care Service, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Summary

The transmission of Hammondia heydorni among sheep, goats, cattle, dogs and coyotes is described. Oocysts of H. heydorni, obtained from dog faeces by feeding naturally infected goat meat, were fed to an experimental goat. After 312 days tissues from this animal were fed to 2 dogs. One dog, which received goat muscle, shed oocysts, whereas the other dog which received brain, spleen, kidneys, lungs and liver did not. Oocysts from the dog fed goat muscle were fed to an experimental sheep. After 73 days sheep tissues were fed to a dog and a coyote, both of which shed oocysts 5–8 days later. A second isolate of H. heydorni was obtained by feeding naturally infected beef to a coyote. These oocysts were fed to a single goat and sheep and after 71 days, muscle from these 2 animals was fed to 2 dogs and 2 coyotes, all of which shed oocysts 5–8 days later. None of the animals inoculated with H. heydorni became ill and no Hammondia-like organisms were found in tissue sections from the herbivores. Another dog shed H. heydorni-like occysts between 7 and 10 days after ingesting naturally infected muscles from a moose. These results indicate that H. heydorni infects goats, sheep, moose and coyotes in addition to cattle and dogs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashford, R. W., (1977). The fox, Vulpes vulpes, as a final host for Sarcocystis of sheep. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 71, 2934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dissanaike, A. S., & Kan, S. P., (1977). Isospora heydorni-type oocysts in faeces of a dog. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 8, 419.Google ScholarPubMed
Dubey, J. P., (1977). Toxoplasma, Hammondia, Besnoitia, Sarcocystis and other tissue cystforming coccidia of man and animals. In Parasitic Protozoa (ed. Kreier, J. P.), pp. 101237. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dubey, J. P., (1978). Patent Toxocara canis infection in ascarid-naive dogs. Journal of Parasitology 64, 1021–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubey, J. P., (1980). Mouse-pathogenicity of Toxoplasma gondii isolated from a goat. American Journal of Veterinary Research 41, 427–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Dubey, J. P., & Fayer, R., (1976). Development of Isospora bigemina in dogs and other mammals. Parasitology 73, 371–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Entzeroth, R., Scholtyseck, E., & Gruel, E., (1978). The roe deer intermediate host of differen coccidia. Naturwissenschaften 655, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayer, R., (1974). Development of Sarcocystis fusiformis in the small intestine of the dog. Journal of Parasitology 60, 660–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, H. S., Singh, A., Vadehra, D. V., & Sethi, S. K., (1978). Shedding of unsporulated isosporan oocysts in faeces of dog fed diaphragm muscles from water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) naturally infected with Sarcocystis. Journal of Parasitology 64, 549–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heydorn, A. O., (1973). Zum Lebenszyklus der kleinen Form von Isospora bigemina des Hundes. 1. Rind und Hund als mogliche Zwischenwirte. Berliner und Munchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 86, 323–9.Google Scholar
Tadros, W., & Laarman, J. J., (1976). Sarcocystis and related coccidium parasites: a brief general review, together with a discussion on some biological aspects of their life cycles and a new proposal for their classification. Acta Leidensia 44, 1107.Google Scholar