Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T19:36:10.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on host resistance to secondary infections of Raillietina cesticillus Molin, 1858 in the fowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. S. Gray
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, Royal Holloway College (University of London), Englefield Green, Surrey

Extract

Worms of secondary infections of Raillietina cesticillus established in 10-week-old birds but failed to grow mature strobilae. This was taken as an indication of resistance to the cestode. The resistance was inhibited by the immunosuppressant and anti-inflammatory drug dexamethasone, which prevented the local inflammation around attached scolices characteristic of secondary infections of R. cesticillus. Mast cell hyperactivity and eosinophil infiltration in intestinal tissues and immunofluorescent antibodies in sera of infected birds were also demonstrated. Scolices without strobilae from refractory hosts with both primary and secondary infections regrew their strobilae when transplanted into susceptible hosts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dobson, C. (1966). The demonstration of antibodies in the intestinal mucus of sheep infected with Oesophagostomum columbianum by means of the percutaneous anaphylaxis test. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 19, 339–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, J. S. (1972 a). The effect of host age on the course of infection of Raillietina cesticillus (Molin, 1858) in the fowl. Parasitology 65, 235–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S. (1972 b). Studies on the course of infection of the poultry cestode, Raillietina cesticillus (Molin, 1858) in the definitive host. Parasitology 65, 243–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A., Subramanian, G. & Stallard, H. (1972 a). The development of Hymenolepis diminuta in primary and secondary infections in mice. Parasitology 64, 401–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A., Subramanian, G. & Stallard, H. (1972 b). The effect of immunosuppressants on the development of Hymenolepis diminuta in mice. Parasitology 65, 111–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luttermoser, G. W. (1938). Susceptibility of chickens to reinfection with Raillietina cesticillus as determined by the presence of the original terminal segment. Journal of Parasitology 24, 14.Google Scholar
Meinkoth, N. A. (1947). Host parasite relations of the fowl tapeworms Raillietina cesticillus and Choanotaenia infundibulum. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Sinha, P. K. & Srivastava, H. D. (1958). Studies on age resistance and resistance to superinfection of poultry against Raillietina cesticillus (Molin) with some observations on the host specificity of the parasite. Indian Veterinary Journal 35, 288–91.Google Scholar