Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:54:57.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transport Costs Impacts on the Fresh Market for Peaches—with Special Emphasis on the Northeast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Daymon W. Thatch
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, Cook College, Rutgers, the State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 (201-932-9270)
Thomas C. Slane
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, Cook College, Rutgers, the State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 (201-932-9270)
Howard Edelberg
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, Cook College, Rutgers, the State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 (201-932-9270)
Get access

Abstract

An interregional transportation model was constructed using ordinary least squares and reactive programming to evaluate the short-run economic impact of changing transportation rate on the U.S. interregional equilibrium and, in particular, the Northeast's competitive position for fresh peaches. Using fixed regional supplies, uniquely determined regional per capita consumption and existing transportation rates the reactive programming algorithm obtains solutions to the spatial equilibrium problem including: overall regional quantities supplied and demanded, prices, consumers’ outlays, producers’ revenues and opportunity, transfer and shipping costs. Transportation rates were varied 20 percent above and below the current rates to examine the short-run economic impact on the prevailing equilibrium. The East Coast was a relatively isolated market and therefore was not significantly affected by changes in transportation rates. The most significant changes in producers’ revenues and trade flow patterns occurred in the remaining regions that traded mostly amongst themselves.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Publication No. P-02452-2-84 supported by State funds and in part by a financial grant from the Federal-State Marketing Service Program conducted under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946.

References

Beilock, Richard P., and Dunn, James W.An Econometric Model of the U.S. Emphasizing the Effect of Changes in Energy Cost.” A.E. & R.S. No. 839, Dept. of Agr. Eco. & Rur. Soc., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 1982.Google Scholar
Dunn, James W., and Beard, Stanley M. Jr.The Effect of Higher Energy Prices on Interregional Competition: The Case of Peaches.” A.E. & R.S. No. 841, Dept. of Agr. Eco. & Rur. Soc., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 1982.Google Scholar
Dunn, James W.The Effect of Higher Energy Prices on the Competitive Position of Northeast Agriculture.” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council 10 (1981):8386.Google Scholar
Edelberg, Howard. “The Economic Impact of Changing Transportation Costs on the U.S. Fresh Peach Market.” Unpublished , Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, N.J. Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, October 1984.Google Scholar
Hallberg, M.C., Hahn, D. E., Stammer, R. W., Elterich, G. J., and Fife, C. L. Impact of Alternative Federal Milk Marketing Order Pricing Policies on the United States Dairy Industry. Bulletin 318, Pennsylvania State University, May 1978.Google Scholar
King, Richard A., and Gunn, John (1981). “Reactive Programming User Manual: A Market Simulating Spatial Equilibrium Algorithm.” Economics Research Report No. 43, Raleigh, North Carolina: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Law, M. S.The New York State Food Industry.” Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, A.E. Res. 81-3, April 1981.Google Scholar
Swackhamer, Gene L.Competitive Position of Northeast Agriculture.” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council 10 (1981):916.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Food Consumption of Households Survey 1965–66.” North Central, Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Food Consumption of Households Survey 1965–66.” North Central, Northeast, South and West, ARS, Washington, D.C., Spring 1965.Google Scholar