Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-fzmlz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T09:05:47.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FROM THE FRONTIER TO GERMAN SOUTH-WEST AFRICA: GERMAN COLONIALISM, INDIANS, AND AMERICAN WESTWARD EXPANSION*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2010

JENS-UWE GUETTEL*
Affiliation:
The Department of History and Religious Studies, The Pennsylvania State University E-mail: jug17@psu.edu

Abstract

This article argues that positive perceptions of American westward expansion played a major (and so far overlooked) role both for the domestic German debate about the necessity of overseas expansion and for concrete German colonial policies during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. During and after the uprising against colonial rule (1904–7) of the two main indigenous peoples, the Herero and the Nama, of German South-West Africa (Germany's only settler colony), colonial administrators actively researched the history of the American frontier and American Indian policies in order to learn how best to “handle” the colony's peoples. There exists a substantial literature on the allegedly exceptional enchantment of Germans with American Indians. Yet this article shows that negative views of Amerindians also influenced and shaped the opinions and actions of German colonizers. Because of its focus on the importance of the United States for German discussions about colonial expansion, this article also explores the role German liberals played in the German colonial project. Ultimately, the United States as a “model empire” was especially attractive for Germans with liberal and progressive political convictions. The westward advancement of the American frontier went hand in hand with a variety of policies towards Native Americans, including measures of expulsion and extinction. German liberals accepted American expansionism as normative and were therefore willing to advocate, or at least tolerate, similar policies in the German colonies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dernburg, Bernhard, “Speech in Front of the Kolonialpolitisches Aktionskomité,” in Schmoller, Gustav, ed., Reichstagsauflösung und Kolonialpolitik (Berlin: Wedekind, 1907), 8Google Scholar.

2 Ibid.; Zimmerman, Andrew, Alabama in Africa: Booker T. Washington, the German Empire, and the Globalization of the New South (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

3 Ratzel, Friedrich, Wider die Reichsnörgler (München: 1884), 23Google Scholar.

4 Conrad, Sebastian, Globalisierung und Nation im Deutschen Kaiserreich (München: C. H. Beck, 2006), 104–5, 17, 18, 236–7Google Scholar; Smith, Woodruff D., “‘Weltpolitik’ und ‘Lebensraum’,” in Conrad, Sebastian and Osterhammel, Jürgen, eds., Das Kaiserreich transnational: Deutschland in der Welt 1871–1914 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004), 36–7Google Scholar; Mauch, Christof, “Indianer und Schwarze aus deutscher Perspektive: Sichtweisen des 19. Jahrhunderts,” Amerikastudien 40/4 (1995), 625Google Scholar; Wildenthal, Lora et al. , “German Colonial Imagination,” German History 26/2 (2008)Google Scholar; Zantop, Susanne, Colonial Fantasies: Conquest, Family, and Nation in Precolonial Germany, 1770–1870 (Durham: Duke University Press, 1997), 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Calloway, Colin G., The World Turned Upside Down (Boston: Bedford Books, 1994), viiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Penny, H. Glenn, “Elusive Authenticity: The Quest for the Authentic Indian in German Public Culture, Comparative Studies in Society and History 48/4 (2006), 798–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Blackbourn, David, The Conquest of Nature: Water, Landscape and the Making of Modern Germany (London: Jonathan Cape, 2006), 280–96Google Scholar. Compare Grimmer-Solem, Erik, “The Professors’ Africa: Economists, the Elections of 1907, and the Legitimation of German Imperialism,” German History 25/3 (2007), 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mauch, “Indianer und Schwarze”; Steinweis, Alan E., “Eastern Europe and the Notion of the ‘Frontier’ in Germany to 1945,” Yearbook of European Studies 13 (1999)Google Scholar; Steinmetz, George, The Devil's Handwriting: Precoloniality and the German Colonial State in Qingdao, Samoa, and South-West Africa (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 238–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Zantop, Susanne, “Close Encounters: Deutsche und Indianer,” in Calloway, Colin G., Gemünden, Gerd, and Zantop, Susanne, eds., Germans and Indians: Fantasies, Encounters, Projections (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2002), 4Google Scholar; Penny, “Elusive Authenticity”, 798–9; Gassert, Philipp, “‘Without Concession to Marxist or Communist Thought’: Fordism in Germany, 1923–1939,” in Barclay, David E. and Gläser-Schmidt, Elisabeth, eds., Transatlantic Images and Perceptions: Germany and American since 1776 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 231Google Scholar; Detlef Junker, “The Continuity of Ambivalence: German Views of America, 1933–1945,” in ibid., 251.

7 Zantop, Colonial Fantasies, 3, 7, 9, 14, 90; idem, “The Beautiful, the Ugly, and the German: Race, Gender and Nationality in Eighteenth-Century Anthropological Discourse,” in Patricia Herminghaus and Magda Mueller, eds., Gender and Germanness (Providence: Berghahn, 1997); 23, Hartmut Lutz, “German Indianthusiasm: A Socially Constructed German National(ist) Myth,” in Calloway, Gemünden, and Zantop, Germans and Indians, 167; Zantop, Susanne, “‘Der Indianer’ im Rasse- und Geschlechterdiskurs der deutschen Spätaufklärung,” in Schmidt-Linsenhoff, Viktoria, ed., Das Subjekt und die Anderen: Interkulturalität und Geschlechterdifferenz vom 18. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart (Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 2001), 133Google Scholar; Brenner, Peter J., Reisen in die Neue Welt (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1991), 212–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Feest, Christian F., “The Indian in Non-English Literature,” in Washburn, Wilcomb E., ed., History of Indian–White Relations (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, 1988)Google Scholar; Liebersohn, Harry, Aristocratic Encounters: European Travelers and North-American Indians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 5, 166–70Google Scholar; Christian F. Feest, “Germany's Indians in a European Perspective,” in Calloway, Gemünden, and Zantop, Germans and Indians, 36, 37; Kort, Pamela, “The Unmastered Past of the Indians’ Murder,” in Kort, Pamela and Hollein, Max, eds., I like America: Fictions of the Wild West (Munich: Prestel, 2006), 45Google Scholar; Penny, “Elusive Authenticity”, 798, n. 1; idem, “Illustrating America: Images of the North American Wild West in German Periodicals, 1825–1890,” in Kort and Hollein, I like America; Zantop, “Close Encounters,” 13, n. 8.

8 Sammons, Jeffrey L., Ideology, Mimesis, Fantasy: Charles Sealsfield, Friedrich Gerstäcker, Karl May, and Other German Novelists of America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998), 229Google Scholar.

9 Otto, Viktor, Deutsche Amerika-Bilder. Zu den Intellektuellen-Diskursen um die Moderne 1900–1950 (München: Wilhelm Fink, 2006), 89109 (esp. 96–7), 43–85Google Scholar; May, Karl, Winnetou I (Bamberg: Bayerische Verlagsanstalt, 1950Google Scholar; first published 1892), 5–6.

10 Hagedorn, Hermann, Roosevelt in the Badlands (n.p.: Houghton Mifflin, 1921), 355Google Scholar.

11 Nichols, Roger L., “Western Attractions: Europeans and America,” Pacific Historical Review 74/1 (2005) 1, 2, 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Billington, Ray Allen, “The Plains and Deserts through European Eyes,” Western Historical Quarterly 10/4 (1979), 467–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Land of Savagery/Land of Promise (New York: Norton, 1981), 139–41, 44–5.

12 Betts, Raymond F., “Immense Dimensions: The Impact of the American West on Late Nineteenth-Century European Thought about Expansion,” Western Historical Quartely 10/2 (1979), 154Google Scholar; Kuhn, Alexander, Zum Eingeborenenproblem in Deutsch-Südwestafrika (Berlin: Dietrich Reimer (Ernst Vohsen), 1905), 3Google Scholar; Beckert, Sven, “From Tuskegee to Togo: The Problem of Freedom in the Empire of Cotton,” Journal of American History 92/2 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zimmerman, Andrew, “A German Alabama in Africa: The Tuskegee Expedition to German Togo and the Transnational Origins of West African Cotton Growers,” American Historical Review 110 (2005), Zantop, Colonial Fantasies, 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Wrobel, David M., The End of American Exceptionalism (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1993), 45Google Scholar; Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Lectures on the Philosophy of World History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tocqueville, Alexis de, Democracy in America (New York: Random House, 1981), 172, 73Google Scholar; idem, Writings on Empire and Slavery, ed. Jennifer Pitts (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001), xiv–xv.

14 Bassin, Mark, “Turner, Solov'ev, and the ‘Frontier Hypothesis’,” Journal of Modern History 65/3 (1993), 473CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gassert, “Without Concession,” 222–3; Haeckel, Ernst, Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte, 10th edn, vol. 1 (Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1902 (1st edn published 1868)), 242Google Scholar, Gerstäcker, Friedrich, Reisen, 4 vols. (Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta'scher Verlag, 1853), 1: 320, 69–73Google Scholar; idem, Neue Reisen, 3 vols. (Jena: Hermann Costenoble, 1876), 2: 200–1, Pfeiffer, Ida, Reise in die neue Welt: Amerika im Jahre 1853 (Wien: Promedia, 1994), 38–9, 132–3Google Scholar.

15 Gerstäcker, Reisen, 1: 369–73, 20, idem, Neue Reisen, 2: 200–1.

16 Das Ausland (1869), 149; ibid. (1863), 1103–4.

17 Hellwald, Friedrich von, Kulturgeschichte in ihrer natürlichen Entwicklung bis zur Gegenwart, 4 vols. (Leipzig: Friesenhahn, 1898), 4: 615–16Google Scholar.

18 Weikart, Richard, From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), 8, 24–5, 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Weikart, Richard, “Progress through Racial Extermination: Social Darwinism, Eugenics, and Pacifism in Germany, 1860–1918,” German Studies Review 26/2 (2003), 278–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Das Ausland (1855), 387, 424; ibid. (1860), 393; ibid. (1867), 1225.

19 Haeckel, Natürlich Schöpfungsgeschichte, 242; Bowler, Peter J., Evolution: The History of an Idea (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989), 202, 90Google Scholar.

20 von Hellwald, Friedrich, Amerika in Wort und Bild. Eine Schilderung der Vereinigten Staaten, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Heinrich Schmidt & Carl Günther 1885), 2: 502, 504–5Google Scholar; von Hellwald, Friedrich, Naturgeschichte des Menschen, 2 vols. (Stuttgart: W. Spemann, 1882), 1: 337–8Google Scholar. Cronau quoted in Janeck, Undine, Zwischen Gartenlaube und Karl May. Deutsche Amerikarezeption in den Jahren 1871–1913 (Aachen: Shaker Verlag, 2003), 205–6Google Scholar.

21 Billington, Land of Savagery, 139–40; Madley, Benjamin, “California's Yuki Indians: Defining Genocide in Native American History,” Western Historical Quarterly 39/3 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Jacoby, Karl, “‘The Broad Platform of Extermination’: Nature and Violence in the Nineteenth-Century North American Borderlands,” Journal of Genocide Research 10/2 (2008), 252CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Das Ausland (1831), 425–6, 37–9.

22 Ratzel, Wider die Reichsnörgler, 8; idem, “Über allgemeine Eigenschaften der geographischen Grenzen und über die politischen Grenzen,” Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leizpig, Philologisch-Historische Klasse 44 (1892), 65, 74–5, 99; idem, Dr. A Petermanns Mitteilungen aus Justus Perthes Geographischer Anstalt 41 (1895), 122; idem, Politische Geographie (München und Leipzig: R. Oldenbourg, 1897), 1–14; idem, Der Lebensraum: Eine biogeographische Studie (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgemeinschaft, 1966; first published 1901), 45, 55–6, 67; Kane, Murray, “Some Considerations on the Frontier Concept of Frederick Jackson Turner,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 27/3 (1940), 398–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Smith, Woodruff D., “Friedrich Ratzel and the Origins of ‘Lebensraum’,” German Studies Review 3/1 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Block, Robert H., “Fredrick Jackson Turner and American Geography,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70/1 (1980), 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Ratzel's works on the United States, in order of publication date: Städte und Culturbilder aus Nordamerika, 2 vols. (Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1876); Die Vereinigten Staaten von Nord-Amerika, 2 vols. (München: R. Oldenbourg, 1878); Physikalische Geographie und Naturcharakter der Vereinigten Staaten von Nord-Amerika (München: Oldenbourg, 1878); Culturgeographie der Vereinigten Staaten von Nordamerika unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der wirtschaftlichen Verhältnisse, 2 vols. (München: Oldenbourg, 1880); Politische Geographie der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika, 2nd edn, 2 vols. (München: R. Oldenbourg, 1893).

23 Ratzel, Wider die Reichsnörgler, 8, 23; Peters, Carl, Carl Peters gesammelte Schriften, ed. Frank, Walter, 3 vols. (München and Berlin: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1943), 1: 318Google Scholar, Fitzpatrick, Matthew P., Liberal Imperialism in Germany: Expansionism and Nationalism, 1848–1884 (New York: Berghahn Books, 2008)Google Scholar.

24 Smith, “‘Lebensraum’,” 57; Smith, Woodruff D., The Ideological Origins of Nazi Imperialism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 21, 26, 28, 30, 48–50Google Scholar.

25 Ratzel, Politische Geographie der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika, 95.

26 Smith, Origins, 21, 26, 28, 30, 48–50; Conrad, Globalisierung, 85; Weber, Max, Max Weber, Gesammelte Werke und Schriften (InteLex Corporation, 1999)Google Scholar; available from http://www.library.nlx.com/cgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?softpage=GetClient42&depth=3&view=browse&infobase=pmweber.nfo; Langewiesche, Dieter, Liberalismus in Deutschland, 1st edn, Neue historische Bibliothek (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988), 219–20Google Scholar; Sheehan, James J., German Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), 276–8Google Scholar; Blackbourn, David and Eley, Geoff, The Peculiarities of German History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), 146–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Wehler, Hans Ulrich, Bismarck und der Imperialismus (Köln, Berlin: Kiepenheuer u. Witsch, 1969), 454503Google Scholar.

27 Ratzel, Friedrich, Der Staat und sein Boden geographisch betrachtet (Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1896), 97, 98Google Scholar, Tocqueville, Writings on Empire and Slavery, xv.

28 Ratzel, Der Staat und sein Boden, 86; idem, Lebensraum, 45, 55–6, 67.

29 Conrad, Globalisierung, 61, Coleman, William, “Science and Symbol in the Turner Frontier Hypothesis,” American Historical Review 72/1 (1966), 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Livingstone, David N., “Science and Society: Nathaniel S. Shaler and Racial Ideology,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series, 9/2 (1984), 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, Neil, American Empire: Roosevelt's Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003), 38–9, 334–5Google Scholar.

30 Bassin, “Turner,” 480; Billington, Ray Allen, The Genesis of the Frontier Thesis (San Marino: Huntington Library, 1971), 96–7, 268Google Scholar; Turner, Frederick Jackson, “Geographic Influences in American History (Book Review),” Journal of Geography 4 (1905), 34Google Scholar.

31 Wrobel, The End of American Exceptionalism, 1, 2, 21, 37, 57–61; Wirth, Albrecht, Das Wachstum der Vereinigten Staaten von Nordamerika und ihre auswärtige Politik (Bonn: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei von Carl Georgi, 1899), 25Google Scholar.

32 Peters, Schriften, 321–2, Perras, Arne, Carl Peters and German Imperialism, 1856–1918 (Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press, 2004), 10Google Scholar; Kundrus, Birthe, “Die Kolonien – “Kinder des Gefühls und der Phantasie,” in Kundrus, Birthe, ed., Phantasiereiche. Zur Kulturgeschichte des deutschen Kolonialismus (Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag, 2003), 10Google Scholar; Christian Geulen, “‘The Final Frontier . . .’ Heimat, Nation und Kolonie um 1900: Carl Peters,” in ibid., 41–2; Langewiesche, Liberalismus, 219–20; Sheehan, Liberalism, 276–78, von Kardorff, Siegried, Wilhelm von Kardorff. Ein nationaler Parlamentarier im Zeitalter Bismarcks und Wilhelms II (Berlin: E. S. Mittler & Sohn, 1936), 361Google Scholar.

33 Perras, Peters, 211–13, 27–8, Peters, Schriften, 378.

34 Peters, Schriften, 378; Gründer, Horst, Geschichte der deutschen Kolonien (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1985), 58–9, 63–77Google Scholar, Adams, Willi Paul, Deutschland und Amerika (Berlin: Colloquium Verag, 1985)Google Scholar; Depkat, Volker, Amerikabilder in politischen Diskursen (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1998)Google Scholar; Horst Dippel, “Die Wirkung der amerikanischen Revolution auf Deutschland und Frankreich,” in 200 Jahre amerikanische Revolution und moderne Revolutionsforschung. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, Sonderheft, no. II (1976); Dippel, Horst, Germany and the American Revolution (Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978)Google Scholar; Schmidt, Alexander, Reisen in die Moderne (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Klautke, Egbert, Unbegrenzte Möglichkeiten. “Amerikanisierung” in Deutschland und Frankreich (1900–1933) (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2003)Google Scholar.

35 Peters, Schriften, 393, 406–7, Perras, Peters, 10, 44–5, Wehler, Bismarck, 338.

36 Peters, Schriften, 378, 86, 93, 408–9.

37 Perras, Peters, 222.

38 Ibid., 214–15, Kardorff, Kardorff, 362.

39 Madley, Benjamin, “Patterns of Frontier Genocide 1803–1910,” Journal of Genocide Research 6/2 (2004), 167–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Kolonialer Vortrag vor Deutschamerikanern,” Deutsche Kolonialzeitung 1909, 565. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Kolonialgesellschaft 1888, (Berlin: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1889), 1; Jahresbericht der Deutschen Kolonialgesellschaft 1914/1915, (Berlin: Deutsche Kolonialgesellschaft, 1916), 29.

40 Hendrik Lorenzen, “Stereotypen des kolonialen Diskurses in Deutschland und ihre innenpolitische Funktionalisierung bei den ‘Hottentottenwahlen’ 1907,” masters’ dissertation, Universität Hamburg, 1991, 55–9; Madley, “Patterns,” 181; Zimmerer, Jürgen, Deutsche Herrschaft über Afrikaner (Münster: Lit, 2001)Google Scholar; Drechsler, Horst, Aufstände in Südwestafrika (Berlin (East): Dietz, 1984), 51Google Scholar; Gründer, Geschichte, 120–22, 63.

41 Gründer, Geschichte, 58, 121–2; Conrad, Globalisierung, 85–6; Crothers, George, The German Elections of 1907 (London, 1941)Google Scholar; Lorenzen, “Stereotypen des kolonialen Diskurses,” 87–88.

42 Lorenzen, “Stereotypen des kolonialen Diskurses,” 87–9; Reichstagsdebatte (1–19-1904), 365; Reichstagsdebatte (03–07-1913), 1893, 97, 900; Reichstagsdebatte (3–17-1904), 1892, 93; Reichstagsdebatte (12–06-1904), 3384; Reichstagsdebatte (12–2-1905), 111. Reichstag deputies addressed warfare in GSWA in January, March, May, and December 1904; in May and December of 1905; and in December of 1906. Lorenzen, “Stereotypen des kolonialen Diskurses,” 63–5. In all of these debates, Trotha was criticized only once by a left-liberal deputy, Karl Schrader, a member of the Freisinnige Vereinigung. Reichstagsdebatte (12–5-1905), 103.

43 Reichstagsdebatte (12–06-1904), 3391; Gründer, Geschichte, 118; Drechsler, Aufstände, 48; Missions-Gesellschaft, Rheinische, Berichte der Rheinischen Missionsgesellschaft, vol. 52 (Barmen: Rheinische Missions-Gesellschaft, 1896)Google Scholar.

44 Smith, Helmut Walser, “The Logic of Colonial Violence: Germany in South-West Africa (1904–1907); the United States in the Philippines (1899–1902),” in Lehmann, Hartmut and Wellenreuther, Hermann, eds., German and American Nationalism: A Comparative Perspective (New York: Berg, 1999), 211Google Scholar.

45 Ibid., 209–11; Smith, Helmut Walser, “The Talk of Genocide, the Rhetoric of Miscegenation: Notes on the Debates in the German Reichstag Concerning South-West Africa, 1904–14,” in Friedrichsmeyer, Sara, Lennox, Sara, and Zantop, Susanne, eds., The Imperialist Imagination: German Colonialism and Its Legacy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998), 113Google Scholar; Grimmer-Solem, “Professors’ Africa,” 313–15; Zimmerman, Alabama; Conrad, Globalisierung, 85; Madley, Patterns, 167–8; Jacoby, “The Broad Platform of Extermination,” 252.

46 Dernburg, “Speech,” 8.

47 Hull, Isabel V., Absolute Destruction: Military Culture and the Practices of War in Imperial Germany (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004), 86Google Scholar; Reichstagsdebatte (05–08-1907), 1501–2.

48 Hull, Absolute Destruction, 86–8.

49 “Zur Dernburgschen Eingeborenenpolitik,” Berliner Neueste Nachrichten, 6 March 1909; “Eingeborenenfragen,” Berliner Neueste Nachrichten, 8 March 1909; “Die Erwiderung des Staatssekretärs Dernburg am 2. März,” Berliner Neueste Nachrichten, 13 March 1909; Reichstagsdebatte (03–02-1909), 7270.

50 Anker, Josef, “Paul Rohrbach,” in Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie (Berlin: Rohmer - Schinkel, 2005), 56Google Scholar; Smith, “Colonial Violence,” 211.

51 Gründer, Horst, “Zum Stellenwert des Rassismus im Spektrum der deutschen Kolonialideologie,” in Becker, Frank, ed., Rassenmischehen – Mischlinge – Rassentrennung. Zur Politk der Rasse im deutschen Kolonialreich (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2004), 39Google Scholar; Frank Becker, “Kolonialherrschaft und Rassenpolitik,” in ibid., 20; Madley, Benjamin, “From Africa to Auschwitz,” European History Quarterly 35/3 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Gründer, Geschichte, 124; Rohrbach, Paul, Der deutsche Gedanke in der Welt (Königstein: Langewiesche, 1915), 124–5Google Scholar.

52 Reichstagsdebatte (3–17-1904), 1896; Reichstagsdebatte (03–07-1913), 4364; Busch, Helmut, “Reinhard Mumm,” in Allgemeine deutsche Biographie & Neue deutsche Biographie (Berlin: Moller-Nausea, 1997), 582–3Google Scholar. Helmut Walser Smith wrongly attributes Mumm's quote to the left-liberal Ernst Müller. Smith, “The Talk of Genocide,” 114–15; Smith, Helmut Walser, The Continuities of German History: Nation, Religion, and Race across the Long Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 201Google Scholar.

53 Kuhn, Eingeborenenproblem, 3. See also Klössel, M. Hans, “Grund und Boden in Nordamerika,” Beiträge zur Kolonialpolitik und Kolonialwirtschaft 3 (1901–2), 576–8Google Scholar; Stroever, Carl, “Treibende Kräfte amerikanischer Kolonialpolitik,” Beiträge zur Kolonialpolitik und Kolonialwirtschaft 2 (1900–1), 129–32Google Scholar; Wirth, Eduard, “Die jüngste Entwicklung Nordamerikas,” Beiträge zur Kolonialpolitik und Kolonialwirtschaft 2 (1900–1), 609–11Google Scholar; Hermann, Rudolf A., “Von der Kolonialpolitik der nordamerikanischen Union,” Beiträge zur Kolonialpolitik und Kolonialwirtschaft 4 (1902–3), 15Google Scholar, Anton, G. K., “Zur Landfrage in den Kolonien,” Beiträge zur Kolonialpolitik und Kolonialwirtschaft 5 (1903), 25Google Scholar, Gessert, Ferdinand, “Das Wasserrecht des amerikanischen Westen mit Bezug auf Deutsch-Süd-West-Afrika,” Zeitschrift für Kolonialpolitik, Kolonialrecht und Kolonialwirtschaft 8/7 (1906), 441–6Google Scholar.

54 Aktionskomité, Kolonialpolitisches, ed., Kolonialpolitischer Führer (Berlin: Wedekind, 1907), 12, 13, 16Google Scholar.

55 Leutwein, Theodor, Deutsch-Süd-West-Afrika (Berlin: Dietrich Reimer, 1898), 36–7, 42–3Google Scholar; idem, Elf Jahre Gouverneur in Deutsch-Südwestafrika, 3rd edn (Berlin: E. S. Mittler & Sohn, 1908), 289–90; Warneck, Gustav, Die gegenwärtige Lage der deutschen evangelischen Mission (Berlin: Martin Warneck, 1905), 8Google Scholar.

56 Bigelow, Poultney, The Children of the Nations (London: W. Heinemann, 1901)Google Scholar; Hermann, “Von der Kolonialpolitik der nordamerikanischen Union,” 4–5; Zantop, Colonial Fantasies, 7.

57 Zantop, Colonial Fantasies, 7.