Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:01:19.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A scheme of cation distribution in the amphiboles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Subrata Ghose*
Affiliation:
Inst. Kristallogr. Petrogr., Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Sonneggstrasse 5, Zürich 6, Switzerland

Summary

The four principles governing the cation distribution in various octahedral metal sites in the amphibole structure are: Ionic size—the M4 position prefers large cations like Ca2+, Na+; charge balance—when the M4 position is occupied by a monovalent ion, like Na+, Li+, the neighbouring M2 position is occupied by a trivalent ion like Al3+, Fe3+; role of the strongly polarizing cations—cations like Fe2+ prefer the M4 site, since they tend to form covalent bonds with the O4 oxygens; and the role of the (OH) ions—these form part of the brucite layer and repel large or strongly polarizing cations, which tend to distort the regularity of the sheet structure.

The Al-Si distribution in the two different tetrahedral sites are governed by three principles: relief of the Si-O-Si bond strain—Al3+ in the Si1 site causes fewer Si4+ cations to share more than two anions with other Si4+ cations; charge balance—with the introduction of alkali ions in the ‘A’ position, Al3+ is introduced in the Si1 position, since the coordinating oxygens around the A position mostly belong to Si1; and steric considerations—occupation of the M4 site by a large cation tends to rotate the Si2 tetrahedron anticlockwise; Al3+ substitution in the Si1 site rotates the Si1 tetrahedron clockwise and thus the regularity and the constancy of the repeat distance of the silicate double chain is maintained.

Based on these principles, a scheme of cation distribution in the M1, M2, M3, M4, A, Si1, and Si2 positions in the amphibole structure has been derived for most of the common amphibole varieties, except richterite, whose position is anomalous from a crystallochemical point of view.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Deer, (W. A.), Howle, (R. A.), and Zussman, (J.), 1963. The rock forming minerals, (London), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Devore, (G. W.), 1957. Journ. Geol., vol. 65, pp. 178195.Google Scholar
Ernst, (W. G.), 1963. Amer. Min., vol. 48, pp. 241260.Google Scholar
Ghose, (S.), 1961. Acta Cryst., vol. 14, pp. 622627.Google Scholar
Ghose, (S.), 1962. Amer. Min., vol. 47, pp. 388394.Google Scholar
Heritsch, (H.), Pauzitsch, (P.), and Walitzi, (E. M.), 1957. Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., vol. 6, pp. 215225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritsch, (H.), Bertoldi, (G.), and Walitzi, (E. M.), 1959. Ibid., vol. 7, pp. 210217.Google Scholar
Heritsch, (H.), and Kahler, (E.), 1959. Ibid., pp. 218234.Google Scholar
Heritsch, (H.), and Riechert, (L.), 1959. Ibid., pp. 235245.Google Scholar
Kranck, (S. H.), 1961. Journ. Petr., vol. 2, pp. 137184.Google Scholar
Larsen, (E. S.), 1942. U.S. Geol. Surv., Prof. Paper 197-A.Google Scholar
Meier, (W. M.), 1960. Zeits. Kris., vol. 113, pp. 430444.Google Scholar
Morimoto, (N.), Appleman, (D. E.), and Evans, (H. T.), 1960. Ibid., vol. 114, pp. 120147.Google Scholar
Mueller, (R. F.), 1962. Geoehimica Aeta, vol. 26, pp. 581598.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, (J. C.), 1948. Amer. Min., vol. 33, pp. 263323.Google Scholar
Radoslovich, (E. W.), 1960. Aeta Cryst., vol. 13, pp. 919932.Google Scholar
Thompson, (J. B., JR.), 1963. Priv. comm.Google Scholar
Warren, (B. E.) and Bragg, (W. L.), 1929. Zeits. Krist., vol. 69, pp. 168193.Google Scholar
Warren, (B. E.) 1930. Ibid., vol. 72, pp. 493517.Google Scholar
Warren, (B. E.) and Biscoe, (J.), 1931. Ibid., vol. 80, pp. 391401.Google Scholar
Whittaker, (E. J. W.), 1949. Acta Cryst., vol. 2, pp. 312317.Google Scholar
Whittaker, (E. J. W.), 1960. Ibid., vol. 13, pp. 291298.Google Scholar
Zussman, (J.), 1955. Ibid., vol. 8, pp. 301308.Google Scholar