Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T02:49:06.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Till Hoeppner, Urteil und Anschauung. Kants metaphysische Deduktion der Kategorien, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021. Pp. xvii + 410. ISBN 9783110556278 (hbk) $126.99

Review products

Till Hoeppner, Urteil und Anschauung. Kants metaphysische Deduktion der Kategorien, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021. Pp. xvii + 410. ISBN 9783110556278 (hbk) $126.99

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2023

Dennis Schulting*
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandt, Reinhard (1991) Die Urteilstafel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft A67–76;B92–101. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Conant, James (2016) ‘Why Kant Is Not a Kantian’. Philosophical Topics, 44(1), 75125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, Ian (2003) ‘Kant’s Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41(2), 209229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus (1932) Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Berlin: R. Schoetz.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael (1995) Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar