Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T09:58:01.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological features and their phonetic correlates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Peter Ladefoged
Peter Ladefoged
Affiliation:
(University of California, Los Angeles)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is nothing very new about the idea that speech sounds can be classified in terms of a limited number of features. Phonetic taxonomies have existed from the times of the earliest grammarians; and traditional consonant charts can be viewed as attempts to classify sounds in terms of features of place and manner of production. But with the development of the Prague school of phonology (Trubetzkoy, 1939) and the subsequent work of Jakobson and his collaborators (Jakobson, 1962; Jakobson, Fant and Halle, 1951; Jakobson and Halle, 1956) the discussion of the distinctive features of speech came to have more importance. As a result of the more recent work of Chomsky and Halle (1968), the role of distinctive features within phonological theory has become even more crucial. This paper will review the nature of phonological features in general, and will suggest a particular set of features which it might be appropriate to use in phonological descriptions of languages.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , June 1972 , pp. 2 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Catford, J. C. C. (1964). ‘Phonation types: The classification of some laryngeal components of speech production,’ in Abercrombie, D. et al. ed.), In honor of Daniel Jones. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. (1971). ‘Simplicity is a complicated question,’ Working Papers in Phonetics, UCLA, 17, 76–84.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1964). ‘Phonology in generative grammar,’ Word, 18, 54–72.Google Scholar
Halle, M., and Stevens, K. (1971). ‘A note on laryngeal features’, M.I.T. Quarterly Progress Report, 101, 198–213.Google Scholar
Hollien, H., Moore, P., Wendahl, R. W., and Michel, J. F. (1966). ‘On the nature of vocal fry,’ J. Speech & Hearing Research, 9, 245–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobson, R. (1962). Selected writings I: Phonological Studies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, C. G. M., and Halle, M. (1951). Preliminaries to speech analysis. M.I.T. Acoustics Lab. Tech. Rep. 13.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., and Halle, M. (1956). Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971a). ‘The limits of phonology,’ in Spang-Thomson, B. (ed.), Form and Substance. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971b). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (forthcoming). ‘Phonetic prerequisites for a distinctive feature theory,’ in Valdman, A. (ed.), Papers in linguistics and phonetics in memory of Pierre Delattre. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Malmberg, B. (1956). ‘Distinctive features of Swedish vowels: some instrumental and structural data,’ in Halle, M. (ed.), For Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Minnow, M. (1970). Non-binary phonological features made simple. Stockholm: Research Group in Quantitative Linguistics.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1971). ‘The role of intonation: reconsiderations and other considerations,’ Working Papers in Phonetics, UCLA, 21 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Vanderslice, R., and Ladefoged, P. (1971). ‘Binary suprasegmental features’, Working Papers in Phonetics, UCLA, 17, 6–24 (forthcoming in Language).Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1971). ‘Syllabic phonology,’ MS. (forthcoming in J. Linguistics).Google Scholar
Vennemann, T., and Ladefoged, P. (1971). ‘Phonetic features and phonological features,’ Working Papers in Phonetics, UCLA, 21.Google Scholar