Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:33:04.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scope and Method of Schumpeter's Universal Social Science: Economic Sociology, Instrumentalism, and Rhetoric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Yuichi Shionoya
Yuichi Shionoya
Affiliation:
Emeritus Professor of Economics, Hitotsubashi University. Home Address: 3-34-8 Sakuragaoka, Tama, Tokyo 206–0013, Japan.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper brings together and expands methodological ideas on Joseph Alois Schumpeter that I have discussed in detail and at length elsewhere (Shionoya 1997). Schumpeter is known for his wide-ranging work, and I interpret it as an attempt a universal social science consisting of three systems of thought: i.e., substantive theory, metatheory, and pretheory. These three systems stand for the scope and method of his universal social science.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 331 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aristotle, . 1991 On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by Kennedy, George A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Backhaus, U. 2002. “Seventh Chapter of the Theory of Economic Development.” Industry and Innovation 9 (04): 93–145. Also reprinted in Jürgen Backhaus, ed., Joseph Alois Schumpeter: Entrepreneurship, Style and Vision. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 2003, 61–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hands, D. W. 2001. Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. 1998. “The Approach of Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (03): 166–92.Google Scholar
Honderich, T., ed., 1995. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 2nd ed., 1970.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. 1925. “Das Problem einer Soziologie des Wissens.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 53. Reprinted in Wissenssoziologie. Berlin: Luchterhand, 1964.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, M.Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft. Leipzig: Der Neue-Geist Verlag. Reprinted in Gesammelte Werke, vol. 8. Bern: Francke Verlag, 1960.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1908. Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1912. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 2nd ed., 1926. (English translation, 1934.)Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1914. Epochen der Dogmen- und Methodengeschichte. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. (English translation: Economic Doctrine and Method: An Historical Sketch. Translated by R. Aris, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954.)Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1915. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Sozialwissenschaften. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1926. “Gustav v. Schmoller und die Probleme von heute.” Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft 51: 337–88.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1927. “Die sozialen Klassen in ethnish homogenen Milieu.” Archiv fur Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 5: 1–67. (English translation: Imperialism and Social Classes. Translated by Heinz Norden. New York: Augustus M. Kelly, 1951.)Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Translated by Opie, Redvers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, 2 vols. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3rd edition. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1950.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1949. “Science and Ideology.” American Economic Review 39 (03): 345–59.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shionoya, Y. 1990a. “Instrumentalism in Schumpeter's Economic Methodology.” History of Political Economy 22 (Summer): 187–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shionoya, Y. 1990b. “The Origin of the Schumpeterian Research Program: A Chapter Omitted from Schumpeter's Theory of Economic Development.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 146 (06): 314–27.Google Scholar
Shionoya, Y. 1991. “Schumpeter on Schmoller and Weber: A Methodology of Economic Sociology.” History of Political Economy 23 (Summer): 193–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shionoya, Y. 1995. “A Methodological Appraisal of Schmoller's Research Programm.” In Koslowski, Peter, ed., The Theory of Ethical Economy in the Historical School, 57–8. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shionoya, Y. 1997. Schumpeter and the Idea of Social Science: A Metatheoretical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shionoya, Y. Forthcoming. “Joseph Alois Schumpeter: The Economist of Rhetoric.” In Jürgen Backhaus, ed., The Founders of Modern Economy: Maastricht Lectures in Political Economy. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar