Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:40:00.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FAITHFULNESS OF THE 2-BRAID GROUP VIA ZIGZAG ALGEBRA IN TYPE B

Part of: Special aspects of infinite or finite groups Connections with homological algebra and category theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2023

EDMUND HENG Open the ORCID record for EDMUND HENG [Opens in a new window]  and
KIE SENG NGE Open the ORCID record for KIE SENG NGE [Opens in a new window]
EDMUND HENG*
Affiliation:
Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, 35, Route de Chartres, 91440 Bures-sur-Yvette, France
KIE SENG NGE
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Xiamen University Malaysia, Block A4, Jalan Sunsuria, Bandar Sunsuria, 43900 Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia e-mail: kieseng.nge@xmu.edu.my
*
e-mail: heng@ihes.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that a certain category of bimodules over a finite-dimensional quiver algebra known as a type B zigzag algebra is a quotient category of the category of type B Soergel bimodules. This leads to an alternate proof of Rouquier’s conjecture on the faithfulness of the 2-braid groups for type B.

Keywords

2-braid groupsSoergel bimodulesTemperley–Lieb algebrastype B braid groups

MSC classification

Primary: 20F36: Braid groups; Artin groups
Secondary: 20J05: Homological methods in group theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , First View , pp. 1 - 18
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Communicated by Oded Yacobi

References

Bigelow, S., ‘The Burau representation is not faithful for n = 5’, Geom. Topol. 3 (1999), 397–404.10.2140/gt.1999.3.397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brav, C. and Thomas, H., ‘Braid groups and Kleinian singularities’, Math. Ann. 351(4) (2010), 1005–1017.10.1007/s00208-010-0627-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, B. and Williamson, G., ‘Soergel calculus’, Represent. Theory Amer. Math. Soc. 20(12) (2016), 295–374.10.1090/ert/481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R. M., ‘Generalized Temperley–Lieb algebras and decorated tangles’, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 7(2) (1998), 155–171.10.1142/S0218216598000103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heng, E. and Nge, K. S., ‘Curves in the disc, the type B braid group, and the type B zigzag algebra’, Quantum Topol., to appear.Google Scholar
Jensen, L. T., ‘Categorification of Braid Groups’, MA Thesis, Mathematisch-Naturwissen-schaftliche Fakultat Der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, 2014.Google Scholar
Jensen, L. T., ‘The 2-braid group and Garside normal form’, Math. Z. 286(1–2) (2016), 491–520.10.1007/s00209-016-1769-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khovanov, M. and Seidel, P., ‘Quivers, Floer cohomology, and braid group actions’, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15(1) (2002), 203–271.10.1090/S0894-0347-01-00374-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khovanov, M. and Thomas, R., ‘Braid cobordisms, triangulated categories, and flag varieties’, Homology Homotopy Appl. 9(2) (2007), 19–94.10.4310/HHA.2007.v9.n2.a2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouquier, R., ‘Categorification of $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ and braid groups’, in: Trends in Representation Theory of Algebras and Related Topics, Contemporary Mathematics, 406 (eds. de la Peña, J. A. and Bautista, R.) (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006), 137–167.10.1090/conm/406/07657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soergel, W., ‘The combinatorics of Harish–Chandra bimodules’, J. reine angew. Math. 429 (1992), 49–74.Google Scholar
Soergel, W., ‘Kazhdan–Lusztig–Polynome und unzerlegbare Bimoduln über Polynomringen’, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 6(3) (2007), 501–525.10.1017/S1474748007000023CrossRefGoogle Scholar