Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T01:27:03.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Locally finite theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Jan Mycielski*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309

Extract

We say that a first order theory T is locally finite if every finite part of T has a finite model. It is the purpose of this paper to construct in a uniform way for any consistent theory T a locally finite theory FIN(T) which is syntactically (in a sense) isomorphic to T.

Our construction draws upon the main idea of Paris and Harrington [6] (I have been influenced by some unpublished notes of Silver [7] on this subject) and generalizes the syntactic aspect of their result from arithmetic to arbitrary theories. (Our proof is syntactic, and it is simpler than the proofs of [5], [6] and [7]. This reminds me of the simple syntactic proofs of several variants of the Craig-Lyndon interpolation theorem, which seem more natural than the semantic proofs.)

The first mathematically strong locally finite theory, called FIN, was defined in [1] (see also [2]). Now we get much stronger ones, e.g. FIN(ZF).

From a physicalistic point of view the theorems of ZF and their FIN(ZF)-counterparts may have the same meaning. Therefore FIN(ZF) is a solution of Hilbert's second problem. It eliminates ideal (infinite) objects from the proofs of properties of concrete (finite) objects.

In [4] we will demonstrate that one can develop a direct finitistic intuition that FIN(ZF) is locally finite. We will also prove a variant of Gödel's second incompleteness theorem for the theory FIN and for all its primitively recursively axiomatizable consistent extensions.

The results of this paper were announced in [3].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

[1]Mycielski, J., Analysis without actual infinity, this Journal, vol. 46 (1981), pp. 625633.Google Scholar
[2]Mycielski, J., Finitistic real analysis, Real Analysis Exchange, vol. 6 (1981), pp. 127130.Google Scholar
[3]Mycielski, J., Locally finite counterparts of consistent theories, Abstracts of Papers Presented to the American Mathematical Society, vol. 5 (1984), pp. 229.Google Scholar
[4]Mycielski, J., Finite intuitions supporting the consistency of ZF and ZF + AD (to appear).Google Scholar
[5]Paris, J., Some independence results for Peano's arithmetic, this Journal, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 725731.Google Scholar
[6]Paris, J. and Harrington, L., A mathematical incompleteness in Peano's arithmetic, Handbook of mathematical logic (Barwise, J, editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 11331142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Silver, J., Harrington's version of Paris' result, mimeographed notes, 1977.Google Scholar