Since most coin hoards are found without any archaeological context, even when excavation after discovery is possible, prompt publication of a large hoard of denarii with its context is so unusual an event that a few extra comments and questions may be allowed.

I have doubts about the comparison with the site at Frocester (Glos.). The finds there suggested the remains of an iron-bound chest, and it might be that that was a strong box. If so, it was a permanent feature but was found empty. The Shapwick hoard was deposited in a scoop in the ground and was presumably a temporary hiding-place for a sum of money which might be roughly £150,000 to £250,000 in modern terms. The hiding of the hoard would, in a sense, be more ‘normal’, and certainly more safe, if it were done within the walls of a derelict building rather than an active farm. From the archaeological details this seems to be a possibility.