Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-gf4tf Total loading time: 1.695 Render date: 2021-08-05T23:18:33.337Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Stratigraphy, mammalian paleontology, paleoecology, and age correlation of the Wasatch Formation, Fossil Butte National Monument, Wyoming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2016

Gregg F. Gunnell
Affiliation:
Division of Fossil Primates, Duke University Lemur Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA 〈gregg.gunnell@duke.edu〉
John-Paul Zonneveld
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T8N 7B2, Canada 〈zonnevel@ualberta.ca〉
William S. Bartels
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Albion College, Albion, MI 49224, USA 〈wbartels@albion.edu〉
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fieldwork conducted in the Wasatch Formation in and around Fossil Butte has yielded a diverse assemblage of early Eocene vertebrates. Fossil vertebrates are distributed through three discrete stratigraphic intervals within the uppermost 180 m of the main body of the Wasatch Formation underlying the Green River Formation. These assemblages were derived primarily from fluvial overbank mudstone units overprinted with variably well-developed paleosols. The lowest (20 m) and highest (60 m) sections are characterized by less mature and more hydromorphic paleosols, whereas the middle section (100 m) is typified by more mature paleosols and more abundant channel sandstones.

The combined assemblages contain at least 46 species of mammals. Faunal characteristics include high abundances of equid perissodactyls and a relatively high abundance and diversity of notharctines primates, an apparent absence of omomyid primates, relatively high rodent diversity, and relatively diverse and abundant artiodactyls. One new genus (Eoictops new genus) and three new species (Eoictops novaceki new species, Palaeosinopa lacus new species, and ?Notoparamys blochi new species) are included in the Fossil Butte assemblage. Also recorded are late occurrences of two hyopsodontid condylarths and an early occurrence of a rare phenacodontid condylarth. The relatively high abundances of equids and notharctines suggest that vertebrate samples were derived from relatively open paleohabitats that included forested areas along water courses.

All three assemblages contain characteristic Lysitean (Wasatchian biochron Wa-6) elements, but the occurrence of the palaeotheriid perissodactyl Lambdotherium in the uppermost horizon indicates a Lostcabinian (Wa-7) age for at least the top of the Wasatch Formation. The overlying predominantly fish-bearing Fossil Butte Member of the Green River Formation also contains Lambdotherium and is therefore Wa-7 in age as well.

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society

Introduction

Fossil vertebrates from Fossil Butte National Monument (FBNM), Wyoming were first discovered in the mid-1800s (Leidy, Reference Leidy1856; Hayden, Reference Hayden1871). Thinly bedded micrite layers in the lacustrine Green River Formation in the central part of Fossil Basin have produced an amazing variety of fish, crocodylians, turtles, birds, rare mammals, and invertebrates (including ostracodes, decapods, gastropods, pelecypods, and insects) (Grande, Reference Grande1984, Reference Grande2001, Reference Grande2013; Buchheim, Reference Buchheim1994; Buchheim and Eugster, Reference Buchheim and Eugster1998; Buchheim et al., Reference Buchheim, Cushman and Biaggi2011). Despite numerous reports on the paleontology of aquatic vertebrate assemblages in the Green River Formation (particularly the fish; e.g., Leidy, Reference Leidy1856; Thorpe, Reference Thorpe1938; Grande, Reference Grande1984, Reference Grande2013; Grande and Bemis, Reference Grande and Bemis1998), little attention has been given to fossils in the alluvial strata with which the lacustrine beds are interstratified.

This study documents the mammalian faunal assemblage of the Eocene Wasatch Formation in the area of Fossil Butte collected by a joint Albion College-University of Michigan-University of Alberta expedition in conjunction with Fossil Butte National Monument. These fossils are important as they provide insight into the ecology and environment of the lowlands adjacent to Fossil Lake during the early Eocene. Additionally, they provide well-defined age constraints on Eocene fluvial-lacustrine strata in Fossil Basin and firmly establish the middle to late early Eocene age (Wa-6–Wa-7) of the Wasatch Formation (Gingerich, Reference Gingerich2001; Gunnell et al., Reference Gunnell, Murphey, Stucky, Townsend, Robinson, Zonneveld and Bartels2009).

Geologic setting

Eocene strata at Fossil Butte National Monument were deposited in Fossil Basin, a small, north-south trending, structurally controlled sedimentary basin within the Wyoming Overthrust Belt (Fig. 1). Fossils mammals reported here were recovered from the uppermost 180 m of the main body of the Wasatch Formation (Fig. 2), which stratigraphically underlies the Fossil Butte Member of the Green River Formation (Oriel and Tracy, Reference Oriel and Tracy1970). In Fossil Basin, the Wasatch Formation consists primarily of brightly variegated mudstone with subordinate interbedded siltstone, sandstone, and conglomerate (Hayden, Reference Hayden1869; Oriel and Tracy, Reference Oriel and Tracy1970) and represents deposition on an intermontane alluvial plain (Oriel and Tracy, Reference Oriel and Tracy1970; Zonneveld et al., Reference Zonneveld, Lavigne, Bartels and Gunnell2006).

Figure 1 Map showing fossil vertebrate localities and measured sections in the Wasatch Formation at Fossil Butte National Monument, Lincoln County, southwestern Wyoming.

Figure 2 Composite measured sections at Fossil Butte National Monument and stratigraphic distribution of important Fossil Butte (FB) fossil localities. Sections were measured in the three main areas of Wasatch outcrop exposure: (1) near the historic quarry trail on the south face of Fossil Butte (Quarry); (2) through the valley on the north side of Fossil Butte (Valley Wall, Valley Center); and (3) near the head of Chicken Creek (arrow indicates position of Chicken Creek section below Valley section). General locations of composite sections are shown on Figure 1.

Distribution of vertebrate fossils in the Wasatch Formation

Eocene vertebrates are well known from Fossil Basin. Most of these fossils come from the Green River Formation (Grande, Reference Grande1984, Reference Grande2001, Reference Grande2013); however, fossil vertebrates are also known from the Wasatch and Fowkes formations (Gazin, Reference Gazin1952, Reference Gazin1961, Reference Gazin1962; Nelson, Reference Nelson1973).

Within the Wasatch Formation at FBNM, vertebrate fossils are known only from the lower member, main body, and Bullpen Member. A single tooth of the condylarth Meniscotherium cf. M. robustum was collected from the lower member near the northwestern margin of the Monument. Fish bones and scales (Asineops and Lepisosteus), common in the Green River Formation, also occur in the lower and Bullpen members.

Fossil vertebrates are considerably more common in the main body of the Wasatch Formation in and around FBNM. Small faunal assemblages have been described from Knight Station (near Evanston), Elk Mountain (~20 km south of FBNM) and from the Monument itself (Hayden, Reference Hayden1869; Cope, Reference Cope1872, Reference Cope1873; Gazin, Reference Gazin1952, Reference Gazin1961, Reference Gazin1962). Recent fieldwork at FBNM has resulted in a diverse collection of mammal fossils from 29 localities in the 180 m of the main body of the Wasatch Formation (Fig. 1, Table 1).

Table 1 Wasatch Formation mammalian faunal list – Fossil Butte National Monument.

Materials and methods

Repositories and institutional abbreviations

Most of the fossil materials described in this paper are housed and cataloged at storage facilities of the National Park Service, Fossil Butte National Monument, near Kemmerer, Wyoming, USA (FBF = old Fossil Butte catalog number; FOBU = new Fossil Butte catalog number). Those few specimens not housed at Fossil Butte can be found in the collections at the University of Michigan, Museum of Paleontology, Ann Arbor (UM); the United States National Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC (USNM); or the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Princeton Collection, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA (YPM-PU).

Systematic paleontology

Nomenclature abbreviations

Wa = Wasatchian biochronologic zone; FB = Fossil Butte field number (for specimen references); FB = University of Michigan Fossil Butte field locality (for locality references). Lower teeth are indicated by a lowercase letter and tooth position number (e.g., m1 = lower first molar), upper teeth by an uppercase letter and tooth position number (e.g., P3 = upper third premolar). All measurements are provided in millimeters.

Class Mammalia Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758

Order Didelphimorphia Gill, Reference Gill1872

Family Didelphidae Gray, Reference Gray1821

Tribe Didelphini Crochet, Reference Crochet1979

Genus Copedelphys Korth, Reference Korth1994a

Type species

Peratherium titanelix Matthew, Reference Matthew1903, Renova Formation, Montana.

Copedelphys innominata (Simpson, Reference Simpson1928)

Figure 3.1–3.2

Figure 3 Images 3 and 7 are SEM photographs; others are standard photographs. (1–2) FOBU 6338, Copedelphys innominatum, left dentary p3-m2 in occlusal (top) and lateral (bottom) views. (3–4) YPM-PU 16171, Eoictops novaceki n. gen. n. sp. (Holotype), left dentary with p5 (erupting), m1-2, and broken m3 in occlusal (top, m3 not shown in this view) and lateral (bottom) views. (5–6) FOBU 6094, Palaeoryctid sp. indet., left broken m1 in occlusal (top) and buccal (bottom) views. (7) FOBU 6189, Apatemys cf. A. whitakeri, right I1 in lateral view. Scale bars=2mm, except for images 5 and 6 where scale bars=1mm.

1928 Peratherium innominatum Reference SimpsonSimpson, p. 6, fig. 5

Holotype

AMNH 11493, left dentary m1-4, Bridgerian biochron Br2, Bridger Formation, Millersville, Uinta County, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Locality FB-19, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6338, left dentary p3-m2.

Remarks

The referred specimen is in the size range of both Copedelphys innominatum and Peradectes chesteri. It differs from Peradectes in having a distinct lower molar entoconid and well-developed entoconid notch with a low hypoconulid. It also has p3 smaller than m1 and m1 with a widely open trigonid lingually. This combination of characters differentiates FOBU 6338 from both Peradectes and Herpetotherium (Korth, Reference Korth2008).

Rothecker and Storer (Reference Rothecker and Storer1996) moved the species Peratherium innominatum, from Peratherium to Copedelphys based mostly on its very small size, upper molars with tiny conules and similar sized stylar cusps, and open lower molar trigonids, especially on m1. The specimen referred here is even smaller than those from Lac Pelletier described by Rothecker and Storer (Reference Rothecker and Storer1996), but the lower molars do have open trigonids lingually. This specimen could conceivably represent a new species of Copedelphys, but given the lack of any known upper molars at present a new name seems premature. Nonetheless this record represents one of the earlier known occurrences of this tiny marsupial outside of the seemingly anomalous earliest Wasatchian record at Castle Gardens in the Bighorn Basin (see Strait, Reference Strait2001).

Measurements

FOBU 6338: p3 = 1.29 x 0.72, m1 = 1.36 x 0.79; m2 = 1.40 x 0.89

Order Leptictida McKenna, Reference McKenna1975

Family Leptictidae Gill, Reference Gill1872

Genus Eoictops new genus

Type species

Eoictops novaceki new species by monotypy.

Diagnosis

As for type species by monotypy.

Etymology

Eos, Greek for early or dawn and Ictops (= Leptictis), a common North American Oligocene leptictid genus, in reference to the earlier occurrence of a related species (and in keeping with Palaeictops, another related taxon, as proposed by Matthew, Reference Matthew1899).

Remarks

Recognition of true Diacodon as an erinaceomorph (Novacek, Reference Novacek1982; Novacek et al., Reference Novacek, Bown and Schankler1985) necessitates a new generic name for Fossil Butte a specimen once assigned to Diacodon since it is clear (see below) that this specimen is a leptictid that differs from all previously known North American members of this order.

Eoictops novaceki new species

Figure 3.3–3.4

1952 Diacodon, cf. alticuspis; Reference GazinGazin, p. 20

1962 Diacodon, cf. alticuspis; Reference GazinGazin, p. 22

Holotype

Type and only specimen, YPM-PU 16171, left dentary with p5 (erupting), m1-2, and broken m3, found “Three miles northwest of Fossil, Wyoming, Wasatch Formation, about 100 feet below the Green River Formation” Gazin, Reference Gazin1952, p. 20 (approximately equivalent to UM Localities FB-7, FB-8, FB-13, FB-19, and FB-24).

Diagnosis

Differs from all other North American leptictids in having p5 the same length as m1 (other leptictids have p5 longer to much longer than m1), p5 with more trenchant talonid exhibiting a very reduced, anteriorly shifted and low entoconid connected via a postentocristid to a small hypoconulid that is appressed to the posterolingual aspect of the hypoconid, and m3 relatively smaller than other lower molars; further differs from Palaeictops by having relatively higher and anteriorly angled molar trigonids and relatively shorter molar talonids.

Occurrence

Late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Description

p5 is in its crypt, but the crown is fully formed. It had a prominent protoconid, the tip of which is now broken away. The p5 paraconid is robust, isolated from the anterior flank of the protoconid, centered on the tooth and positioned very low, forming the anterior base of the tooth. The metaconid appears as if it is somewhat smaller relative to the protoconid, but was probably nearly as tall and distinct. The protoconid and metaconid are positioned directly opposite each other and together form a high and prominent loph. The p5 talonid is trenchant and is dominated by a distinct and robust hypoconid that is placed just labial of center. A much lower and smaller entoconid is present as is a small hypoconulid. A weakly formed postcristid extends from the hypoconid to the hypoconulid and then continues as a curving postentocristid to reach the entoconid. The prehypocristid is steep and does not reach the postvallid, leaving the talonid open labially. Similarly, the preentocrisitd is absent, leaving the talonid open lingually through the entoconid notch. The talonid is shallowly basined due to the presence of the postcristid. There are no cingulids developed on p5.

The lower m1-2 of Eoictops novaceki n. sp. are nearly identical morphologically with m2 being only slightly smaller than m1. Both have tall and acute protoconids and metaconids with the metaconid being somewhat more robust than the protoconid and both being nearly equal height. These cusps are aligned labiolingually and are separated from each other by a fairly deep, v-shaped postprotocristid. The paraconid is much lower and relatively much smaller. It is placed just lingual of center on the prevallid, has an acute tip, and juts slightly anteriorly. A small precingulid is formed just labial and beneath the paraconid and constitutes the only cingulid developed on either tooth. Both teeth have high talonid cusps (not as high as the protoconid and metaconid, however) that are aligned in a slight arc along the posterior margin of the talonid. The hypoconid and hypoconulid are equally as tall and robust with the entoconid being only somewhat lower and smaller. Unlike p5, the prehypocristid extends to the base of the postvallid, joining that surface centrally and closing the talonid labially. The talonid is open lingually through a relatively broad entoconid notch. The talonid is narrowly basined with its occlusal surface sloping rather severely from labial to lingual (as it does in p5).

The lower third molar crown is damaged, but it is clear that m3 would have been smaller than either m1 or m2.

Etymology

Specific name for Michael J. Novacek who untangled the confusing systematics of Cenozoic leptictids and additionally for his many contributions towards the understanding of early insectivorans and the origins of placental mammals.

Remarks

Gazin (Reference Gazin1952, Reference Gazin1962) noted the presence of a leptictid dentary from near Fossil Butte in the collections at Princeton University (now housed at the Yale Peabody Museum). He did not figure or describe this specimen in detail, but assigned it to Diacodon, cf. alticuspis. Novacek (Reference Novacek1977) placed Diacodon, Gazin, Reference Gazin1952 in synonymy with Prodiacodon Matthew, Reference Matthew1929, although he did not specifically mention the Fossil Butte specimen under any of the synonymies he provided for Prodiacodon (also see Gunnell et al., Reference Gunnell, Bown and Bloch2008b). Novacek (Reference Novacek1977) did specifically place Diacodon pineyensis Gazin, Reference Gazin1952 within Prodiacodon tauri-cinerei (Jepsen, Reference Jepsen1930).

Following detailed analyses by Novacek (Reference Novacek1982) and Novacek et al. (Reference Novacek, Bown and Schankler1985), Diacodon alticuspis is now recognized as an erinaceomorph (McKenna and Bell, Reference McKenna and Bell1997; Gunnell et al., Reference Gunnell, Bown, Hutchison and Bloch2008c). Gazin (Reference Gazin1952) had previously stated that D. alticuspis was unlike other species of the genus in its p4 (= p5) morphology, suggesting that perhaps Palaeictops should be resurrected to accommodate the species of Diacodon other than D. alticuspis (Gazin identified these specimens as Palaeictops in 1962). While Gazin (Reference Gazin1952) assigned YPM-PU 16171 to Diacodon, cf. alticuspis, it is clear from his discussion that he viewed this specimen to be a leptictid.

While similar to Diacodon alticuspis in some ways (e.g., simpler p5 talonid, anteriorly sloping molar trigonids, especially notable on m2), YPM-PU 16171 is clearly distinguishable from this New Mexican taxon. Eoictops novaceki differs from Diacodon alticuspis in the following ways: (1) m3 smaller relative to m1-2 (m3 larger in D. alticuspis); (2) lower molar paraconids relatively higher, more cuspate and distinct (not lower, loph-like and less distinct); (3) p5 paraconid larger, higher, and more distinct; (4) p5 metaconid relatively larger and higher; and (5) p5 talonid more sloping (labially to lingually), less basined, and with a very tiny and low entoconid and a small hypoconulid that is positioned close to the posterior aspect of the hypoconid.

As Gazin noted (Reference Gazin1952), YPM-PU 16171 has relatively high molar trigonids, which is one of the characters cited by Novacek (Reference Novacek1977) distinguishing Prodiacodon from Palaeictops, but the differences in p5 structure cited above clearly differentiate this specimen from both Prodiacodon and Palaeictops.

Measurements

YPM-PU 16171: p5 = 3.0 x 1.7, m1 = 3.0 x 2.1, m2 = 2.8 x 1.9.

Order Cimolesta McKenna, Reference McKenna1975

Family Palaeoryctidae Winge, Reference Winge1917

Palaeoryctid indet.

Figure 3.5–3.6

Occurrence

Locality FB-16, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6094, left m1.

Remarks

This slightly broken m1 represents a palaeoryctid based on its relatively high and compressed trigonid and low, lingually open talonid (Gunnell et al., Reference Gunnell, Bown, Bloch and Boyer2008a). It differs from Eoryctes (Thewissen and Gingerich, Reference Thewissen and Gingerich1989) in having a broader talonid basin that is open lingually and in having a more lingually placed entoconid. It differs from Palaeoryctes in having a less compressed trigonid with relatively larger and more inflated protoconid and metaconid, a more mesially directed and stronger paracristid, a relatively lower trigonid, and in having a small but distinct hypoconulid centered between the hypoconid and entoconid. This specimen differs from Pararyctes (Van Valen, Reference Van Valen1966) in having a relatively higher trigonid, a less distinct entoconid, and in lacking an entocristid. It is similar to Ottoryctes (Bloch et al., Reference Bloch, Secord and Gingerich2004) in having a relatively broad talonid and may represent that genus, but definitive identification awaits better specimens.

Measurements

FOBU 6094: m1 = 2.4 x 1.5.

Suborder Apatotheria Scott and Jepsen, Reference Scott and Jepsen1936

Family Apatemyidae Matthew, Reference Matthew1909

Genus Apatemys Marsh, Reference Marsh1872

Type species

Apatemys bellus Marsh, Reference Marsh1872, Bridger Formation, Henrys Fork, Wyoming.

Apatemys cf. A. whitakeri (Simpson, Reference Simpson1954)

Figure 3.7

1954 Teilhardella whitakeri Reference SimpsonSimpson, p. 1, fig. 1

Holotype

AMNH 48004, left dentary p4-m2, Wasatchian Biochron Wa7, San Jose Formation, Almagre Facies, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Occurrence

Locality FB-8, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6189, right I1.

Remarks

Apatemys is relatively rare in biochrons Wa-6 and Wa-7 (Gunnell et al., Reference Gunnell, Bown, Bloch and Boyer2008a). A. whitakeri apparently is the only valid species of the genus now recognized from Wa-6 (Guthrie, Reference Guthrie1967), therefore FB 96-093 is tentatively assigned to that taxon.

Suborder Pantolesta McKenna, Reference McKenna1975

Family Pantolestidae Cope, Reference Cope1884

Genus Palaeosinopa Matthew, Reference Matthew1901

Type species

Palaeosinopa veterrima Matthew, Reference Matthew1901, Willwood Formation, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Palaeosinopa lacus new species

Figure 4.1–4.3

Figure 4 (1–3) FOBU 6205, Palaeosinopa lacus n. sp. (Holotype), left dentary with roots of p2 and slightly broken p3-m1 in occlusal (top), lateral (middle) and medial (bottom) views. (4) UM 102585, Esthonyx cf. E. bisulcatus, left Mx (labial portion missing) in occlusal view. (5) FOBU 6389, Esthonyx cf. E. bisulcatus, right mx trigonid in occlusal view. (6–7) FOBU 6361, Ectoganus sp. indet., incisor fragment (left) and isolated molar (right) in lateral views. (8) FOBU 6356, Coryphodon sp. indet., upper molar fragment in occlusal view. (9) FOBU 6097, Palaeanodon sp. indet., right distal radius in distal view. (10) FOBU 6198, Palaeanodon sp. indet., left broken astragalus in dorsal view. Scale bars=5 mm for images 1–5 and 9–10; 1 cm for images 6–8.

Holotype

FOBU 6205, left dentary p2-m1, only known specimen, from Locality FB-5.

Diagnosis

Differs from all other species of Palaeosinopa in having a very broad and bulbous P/4 with a basined talonid possessing small but distinct hypoconid and entoconid cusps. Further differs from other species of Palaeosinopa in having a relatively smaller (but still distinct) mental foramen placed beneath p4 rather than a larger foramen beneath m1. Palaeosinopa lacus n. sp. is intermediate in size between Palaeosinopa lutreola and Palaeosinopa didelphoides (?= Palaeosinopa veterrima), being larger (about 25%) than the former and smaller (about 30%) than the latter.

Occurrence

Late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Description

The p2 is broken, preserving only its posterior-most part. This tooth is long and relatively narrow and has a tiny, centered talonid cuspule. The talonid is very short and narrow. Compared to P. didelphoides, the p2 of P. lacus is more elongate.

The p3 is broken posteriorly. It has no paraconid or metaconid and lacks an anterior basal cuspule (unlike P. didelphoides). The p3 paracristid is weakly defined and curves antero-lingually. The postvallid is flat and lacks a central ridge unlike P. didelphoides. Overall, p3 is relatively robust and heavily constructed with a blunt, rounded protoconid.

The p4 is broken anteriorly, so the disposition of the paraconid and paracristid cannot be determined. The protoconid is bulbous and robust with a flattened postvallid (lacking the central ridge present in P. didelphoides). There is no metaconid developed. The buccal and lingual margins of the postvallid are more vertical and less flared and sloping compared to P. didelphoides. Overall, p4 has a short and broad talonid with small, but distinct, hypoconid and entoconid cusps, the latter being slightly larger. There is a small basined area developed between these two cusps and the postvallid. Like all of the premolars of P. lacus, p4 lacks cingulid development.

The enlarged p4 of P. lacus is superficially similar to those seen in Paleocene pentacodontines (Gunnell et al., Reference Gunnell, Bown, Bloch and Boyer2008a), but it differs from these taxa in being relatively less bulbous and enlarged, in lacking a metaconid, and in having a shorter, less well-developed talonid basin.

The lower first molar is somewhat broken and worn. It differs from other species of Palaeosinopa in having the talonid distinctly broader than the trigonid. The cristid obliqua joins the postvallid centrally as in most other Palaeosinopa species, but unlike the other species, nearly reaches the crest of the postvallid. The trigonid is worn into a flat triangle, the typical wear pattern exhibited by many pantolestids.

The dentary of P. lacus lacks the enlarged mental foramen beneath m1 typical of many pantolestids, instead having a relatively small mental foramen placed under the p4. The dentary, as in most pantolestids, is relatively shallow and tapers anteriorly.

Etymology

Specific name from “lacus”, Latin for lake, in reference to Fossil Lake, the shores of which provided the habitat for the mammals from Fossil Butte.

Remarks

Matthew (Reference Matthew1909, Reference Matthew1918) recognized three (perhaps four) species of Palaeosinopa and five species of Pantolestes. Gazin (Reference Gazin1962) named an additional early Eocene pantolestid, Amaramnis (based on a single lower jaw with m2-3). While all three genera are probably valid, it seems nearly certain that there were fewer species present than have been previously recognized (Rose, Reference Rose2006; Gunnell et al., Reference Gunnell, Bown, Bloch and Boyer2008a). Matthew (Reference Matthew1918) hinted at this when he tentatively suggested that Palaeosinopa didelphoides and P. veterrima may be conspecific. Further work is required to sort out the diversity of North American Eocene pantolestids.

Measurements

FOBU 6205: p2 = 4.2 x 1.7, p3 = 4.4 x 2.6, p4 = 4.6 x 3.2, m1 = 3.9 x 3.3.

Suborder Tillodontia Marsh, Reference Marsh1875

Family Esthonychidae Cope, Reference Cope1883

Genus Esthonyx Cope, Reference Cope1874

Type species

Esthonyx bisulcatus Cope, Reference Cope1874, San Jose Formation, New Mexico.

Esthonyx cf. E. bisulcatus Cope, Reference Cope1874

Figure 4.4–4.5

1874 Esthonyx bisulcatus Reference CopeCope, p. 6

Holotype

USNM 1103, left dentary p3, m1-3, from Arroyo Blanco, Wasatchian Biochron Wa7, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Occurrence

Localities FB-6, 7, 16, 19, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-6: FOBU 6190, left p4 trigonid; FB-7: UM 102585, left Mx fragment; UM 108144, left m1-2 (broken). FB-16: FOBU 6419, right mx fragment. FB-19: FOBU 6389, right mx trigonid.

Remarks

These fragmentary teeth confirm the presence of Esthonyx at Fossil Butte. Estimating tooth size from the fragments preserved indicates that these specimens are in the size range of E. bisulcatus and probably represent that species.

Measurements

All of these teeth are too broken to provide accurate measurements.

Suborder Taeniodonta Cope, Reference Cope1876

Family Stylinodontidae Marsh, Reference Marsh1875

Genus Ectoganus Cope, Reference Cope1874

Type species

Ectoganus gliriformis Cope, Reference Cope1874, San Jose Formation, New Mexico.

Ectoganus sp. indet.

Figure 4.6–4.7

1962 Ectoganus sp. Reference GazinGazin, p. 44, Pl. 12, fig. 7

Occurrence

Locality FB-16, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6361, incisor and molar fragments.

Remarks

While fragmentary, this specimen confirms the presence of Ectoganus in the Fossil Butte sample.

Measurements

FOBU 6361 is too fragmentary to be certain of tooth position or to provide accurate measurements. Gazin (Reference Gazin1962) figured three fragmentary teeth (USNM 22785) of Ectoganus sp. from Fossil Butte.

Suborder Pantodonta Cope, Reference Cope1873

Family Coryphodontidae Marsh, Reference Marsh1876

Genus Coryphodon Owen, Reference Owen1845

Type species

Coryphodon eocanus Owen, Reference Owen1845, London Clay, Essex, United Kingdom.

Coryphodon sp. indet.

Figure 4.8

1952 Coryphodon, cf. radians (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 63, Pl. 9

1962 Coryphodon radians (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 70, Pl. 11, figs. 1–5, Pl. 12, figs. 1–2

Occurrence

Localities FB-6, 7, 9–12, 18, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-6: FOBU 6135, associated teeth and tooth fragments; FB 96-014, canine. FB-7: UM 102582, tooth fragments; UM 102586, tooth fragments; UM 102592, tooth fragments. FB-9: FB 96-062, canine; FB 96-067, tooth fragments; FB 96-068, canine; FB 97-023, tooth fragments. FB-10: FB 96-082, canine fragments. FB-11: FOBU 6356, upper molar fragment; FOBU 6363, tooth fragments; FB 96-086, postcrania; FB 96-088, tooth fragments. FB-12: FB 96-091, ulna. FB-18: FOBU 6286, postcrania.

Remarks

There are two species of Coryphodon recognized from Wa-6 in Wyoming (Uhen and Gingerich, Reference Uhen and Gingerich1995), the larger C. lobatus and the smaller C. armatus. Most of the Fossil Butte Coryphodon specimens are too fragmentary to assign to either of these species. The relatively large size of the one measurable specimen, FOBU 6135, indicates that this individual probably represents Coryphodon lobatus. In a table (p. 9) published in 1952, Gazin indicated that Coryphodon sp. was present at Fossil Butte, but he did not mention any specific specimens in his discussion (Gazin, Reference Gazin1952, p. 63). Gazin (Reference Gazin1962, p. 70) noted the presence of scattered, fragmentary remains of Coryphodon from the lower slopes at Fossil Butte and included these specimens under his discussion of Coryphodon radians, a taxon now recognized as being restricted to Wasatchian biochron Wa-3 (Uhen and Gingerich, Reference Uhen and Gingerich1995).

Measurements

FOBU 6135: p4 = 26.1 x 20.8.

Order Pholidota Weber, Reference Weber1904

Suborder Palaeanodonta Matthew, Reference Matthew1918

Family Metacheiromyidae Wortman, Reference Wortman1903

Genus Palaeanodon Matthew, Reference Matthew1918

Type species

Palaeanodon ignavus Matthew, Reference Matthew1918, Willwood Formation, Wyoming.

Palaeanodon sp. indet.

Figure 4.9–4.10

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 9, 19, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-9, 19) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FOBU 6163, right metacarpal II fragment; FOBU 6198, left astragalus. FB-9: FOBU 6097, right distal radius. FB-19: FOBU 6315, right dentary.

Remarks

There are two different sizes of palaeanodonts present at Fossil Butte. The small sample size and fragmentary nature of the remains preclude specific determinations.

Order ?Primates Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758

Suborder Plesiadapiformes Simons and Tattersall in Simons, Reference Simons1972

Superfamily Microsyopoidea Osborn and Wortman, Reference Osborn and Wortman1892

Family Microsyopidae Osborn and Wortman, Reference Osborn and Wortman1892

Genus Microsyops Leidy, Reference Leidy1872

Type species

Limnotherium elegans Marsh, Reference Marsh1871, Bridger Formation, Wyoming.

Microsyops latidens (Cope, Reference Cope1882a)

Figure 5.1–5.2

Figure 5 (1) FOBU 6366, Microsyops latidens, left dentary m1 in occlusal view. (2) FOBU 6287, Microsyops latidens, left dentary m2-3 in occlusal view. (3) FOBU 10011, Phenacolemur sp., left I1 in postero-occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6362, Cantius frugivorus, right dentary m2-3 in occlusal view. (5) UM 102587, Copelemur australotutus, right dentary p4-m3 in occlusal view. (6) FOBU 6193, Copelemur tutus, right dentary with p3 talonid, p4-m1, and partial trigonid of m2 showing distinct paraconid in occlusal view. Scale bars=5 mm for images 1–2 and 4–6; 2 mm for image 3.

1882a Cynodontomys latidens Reference CopeCope, p. 151

Holotype

AMNH 4195, left dentary p4, right dentary m1-2, from Wasatchian Biochron Wa6, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-9, 16, 18, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-9: FB 97-020, left m1; FB-16: FOBU 6281, left dentary m1-2 talonids; FOBU 6366, left dentary m1-m/2 talonid. FB-18: FOBU 6287, left dentary m2-3.

Remarks

Microsyops latidens is the most common species of Microsyops from Wa-6 (Gunnell, Reference Gunnell1989). All of these specimens fall in the size range of M. latidens.

Measurements

FOBU 6366: m1 = 3.4 x 2.6; FOBU 6287: m2 = 3.2 x 2.5, m3 = 3.7 x 2.4.

Microsyops knightensis (Gazin, Reference Gazin1952)

1952 Cynodontomys knightensis Reference GazinGazin, p. 20, Pl. 2, fig. 1

Holotype

USNM 19314, left dentary p4-m3, from Knight Beds (=Wasatch Formation), LaBarge Fauna, Green River Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Locality FB-16, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6199, left dentary m1-3 (teeth fragmentary; includes associated miscellaneous fragments cataloged as FOBU 6198).

Remarks

This single specimen represents a species of Microsyops larger than M. latidens. It can be identified as the common Wa-7 species of MicrosyopsM. knightensis. As such, it represents the earliest known (Lysitean = Wa6) occurrence of this species.

Measurements

FOBU 6199: m2 = 4.2 x 3.3.

Superfamily Paromomyoidea Simpson, Reference Simpson1940

Family Paromomyidae Simpson, Reference Simpson1940

Genus Phenacolemur Matthew, Reference Matthew1915b

Type species

Phenacolemur praecox Matthew, Reference Matthew1915b, Willwood Formation, Wyoming.

Phenacolemur sp.

Figure 5.3

Occurrence

Horizon equivalent to locality FB-11 late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 10011, left I1.

Remarks

There is a single specimen representing Phenacolemur from Fossil Butte. It is not currently possible to identify this isolated upper incisor to the species level.

Order Primates Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758

Infraorder Adapiformes Szalay and Delson, Reference Szalay and Delson1979

Family Notharctidae Trouessart, Reference Trouessart1879

Subfamily Notharctinae Trouessart, Reference Trouessart1879

Genus Cantius Simons, Reference Simons1962

Type species

Protoadapis eppsi Cooper, Reference Cooper1932, Blackheath beds, Abbey Wood, Woolwich, Kent, United Kingdom.

Cantius frugivorus (Cope, Reference Cope1875)

Figure 5.4

1875 Pelycodus frugivorus Reference CopeCope, p. 14

1962 Pelycodus, near P. jarrovii; Reference GazinGazin, p. 28

Holotype

Unnumbered (specimen now lost), right dentary m2-3, from San Jose Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico (Neotype designated by Beard, Reference Beard1988: CM 37448, right dentary p3-m3, CM Almagre Locality 2, Sandoval County, New Mexico).

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 4, 6, 7, 11, 19, 25, 26, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-4, 6-7, 11, 19, 25-26) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FB 95-002, right m2 trigonid; FB 96-048, right m2; FB 97-006, navicular. FB-4: FOBU 6362, right dentary p4, m2-3; FOBU 9864, right maxilla M3. FB-6: FB 97-062, right M2. FB-7: UM 102588, right dentary m2, left m1. FB-11: FOBU 6373, left dentary m2-3; FOBU 6381, right dentary m2-3; FOBU 6391, right dentary p4-m3; FOBU 9895, left dentary p4-m2. FB-19: FOBU 6114, right dentary m3. FB-25: FOBU 6116, right dentary p3-m3. FB-26: FOBU 6112, right dentary m2-3.

Remarks

Cantius frugivorus is the most common species of Wa-6 adapiform known from southern Wyoming (Gunnell, Reference Gunnell2002). These referred specimens agree in size and morphology with that species. Gazin (Reference Gazin1962, p 28) noted the presence of five adapiform specimens in the USNM collections from the “slopes of Fossil Butte” (including USNM 22259) that are larger than “Pelycodustrigonodus. One of these specimens (USNM 22261) is the holotype of Copelemur australotutus (see below), while the others likely represent Cantius frugivorus.

Measurements

FOBU 6362: p4 = 3.9 x 2.7, m2 = 4.2 x 3.7, m3 = 5.1 x 3.4; FOBU 6373: m2 = 4.0 x 3.5; FOBU 6381: m2 = 4.6 x 4.2, m3 = 6.8 x 3.7; FOBU 6391: m3 = 5.2 x 3.5; FB 96-048: m2 = 4.5 x 3.6; FOBU 6114: m3 = 5.4 x 3.3; FOBU 6116: p3 = 3.5 x 2.5, p4 = 3.8 x 3.0, m1 = 4.1 x 3.6, m2 = 4.3 x 3.8; FOBU 6112: m3 = 5.5 x 3.4; UM 102588: m2 = 4.4 x 4.1.

Genus Copelemur Gingerich and Simons, Reference Gingerich and Simons1977

Type species

Tomitherium tutum Cope, Reference Cope1877, San Jose Formation, New Mexico.

Copelemur australotutus Beard, Reference Beard1988

Figure 5.5

Holotype

USNM 22261, left dentary p3-m1, from north face of Fossil Butte, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 7, 8, 11, 19, 21, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-7-8, 11, 19, 21) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FB 96-042, left m3 (enamel eroded); FB 96-096, right m1 fragment. FB-7: UM 102587, right dentary p4-m3; UM 102589, left maxilla M2-3, C1, right dentary m3; UM 108138, left m1. FB-8: FB 96-026, left m1 trigonid. FB-11: FOBU 9893, right dentary m1-2. FB-19: FB 97-089, left dentary m2. FB-21: FBF 150, right dentary m2-3.

Remarks

Beard (Reference Beard1988) named C. australotutus based on a relatively poorly preserved specimen from Fossil Butte (USNM 22261). These newly referred specimens corroborate Beard’s recognition of C. australotutus as a distinct species of Copelemur. Relatively large samples of C. australotutus from the Washakie Basin (Gunnell, Reference Gunnell2002), in combination with those from Fossil Butte, make C. australotutus the best-known species of the genus.

Measurements

FB 97-089: m2 = 4.5 x 3.7; UM 102587: p4 = 4.1 x 3.0, m1 = 4.5 x 3.6, m2 = 4.8 x 4.0; UM 102589: M2 = 4.6 x 6.4, M3 = 4.8 x 5.7, m3 = 6.0 x 4.0.

Copelemur tutus (Cope, Reference Cope1877)

Figure 5.6

1877 Tomitherium tutum Reference CopeCope, p. 141, Pl. 39, fig. 19

1881 Pelycodus tutus (in part); Reference CopeCope, p. 187

1915b Pelycodus tutus; Reference MatthewMatthew, p. 441, fig. 15

1962 Pelycodus? tutus; Reference GazinGazin, p. 29

1977 Copelemur tutus; Reference Gingerich and SimonsGingerich and Simons, p. 271, Pl. 1, fig. 3, text fig. 6b

1988 Copelemur tutus; Reference BeardBeard, p 454, Fig. 8, 9

Holotype

Unnumbered (specimen now lost), right dentary p3-m1, from San Jose Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico (Neotype designated by Beard, Reference Beard1988: UALP 10233, right dentary p3-m2, UALP Locality 7745, Regina Member, Sandoval County, New Mexico).

Occurrence

Locality FB-13, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6193, right dentary p4-m1.

Remarks

Copelemur tutus is relatively common in the San Juan Basin in New Mexico but is rare from southern Wyoming (Gingerich and Simons, Reference Gingerich and Simons1977; Gunnell, Reference Gunnell2002). While this specimen is somewhat worn and broken, the clear presence of a distinct paraconid on m2, the presence of a short, lingually bowed entocristid and entoconid notch on m1, and the presence of a distinct, high metaconid and a strong paracristid on p4 identify it as Copelemur. Its large size confirms its identification as C. tutus.

Measurements

FOBU 6193: p4 = 5.0 x 3.8, m1 = 5.6 x 4.0.

Order Condylarthra Cope, Reference Cope1881

Family Hyopsodontidae Trouessart, Reference Trouessart1879

Genus Hyopsodus Leidy, Reference Leidy1870

Type species

Hyopsodus paulus Leidy, Reference Leidy1870, Bridger Formation, Wyoming.

Hyopsodus minor Loomis, Reference Loomis1905

Figure 6.1–6.2

Figure 6 (1) FOBU 6213, Hyopsodus minor, left dentary m1-3 in occlusal view. (2) FOBU 6370, Hyopsodus minor, left maxilla M1-2 in occlusal view. (3) FOBU 6129, Hyopsodus powellianus, left dentary m2-3 in occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6297, Apheliscus cf. A. insidiosus, right p4 in occlusal (top) and buccal (bottom) views. (5) FOBU 6318, Haplomylus cf. H. scottianus, left dentary p3-4 in occlusal view. (6) FOBU 6437, Haplomylus cf. H. scottianus, right m2 in occlusal view. (7) FOBU 6365, Phenacodus trilobatus, left lower molar fragment (most of trigonid and a portion of the lingual margin missing) in occlusal view. (8–9) FOBU 6229, Ectocion superstes, left broken P4 (left, labial edge missing) and M1 (right, broken labially) in occlusal views. Scale bars=5 mm.

1962 Hyopsodus, cf. H. miticulus (in part); Reference GazinGazin p. 63

Holotype

AC 3492, right dentary m1-3, from Wasatchian Biochron Wa6, Wind River Formation, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 15, 16, 18, 19, 24-27, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-4: FOBU 6370, left maxilla M1-2; FOBU 6412, left dentary m1-2; FOBU 6434, right mx fragment. FB-5: FB 97-015, right P3. FB-6: FB 96-006, right dentary m2-3; FB 96-013, left mx talonid. FB-7: UM 102594, right M2. FB-9: FB 96-063, right dentary m2-3; FOBU 6213, left dentary m1-3. FB-10: FB 96-078, right m1. FB-15: FB 97-026, left maxilla P4-M1; FB 97-028, right dentary m1-3; FB 97-068, left dentary p4. FB-16: FB 97-033, right m3; FOBU 6392, left maxilla M1-2. FB-18: FB 97-075, right M2; FB 97-076, right dentary p4-m1; FB 97-081, right m2. FB-19: FB 97-095, right dentary m3; FB 97-099, left M2. FB-24: FB 97-108, right dentary m1-3. FB-25: FB 97-110, left M2. FB-26: FB 97-115, right dentary m2-3. FB-27: FOBU 6398, left M2.

Remarks

These specimens are consistent in size and morphology with the relatively small species of Hyopsodus, H. minor, documented from several areas in the Green River Basin (Gazin, Reference Gazin1968), other areas in Wyoming, the San Juan Basin in New Mexico, and the Piceance Basin in Colorado (Redline, Reference Redline1997). Gazin tentatively referred several specimens in the USNM collections from Fossil Butte (numbers not cited) to a relatively small species of Hyopsodus, H. miticulus but it is more likely, given the size of these specimens, that they represent H. minor instead.

Measurements

FOBU 6370: M1 = 3.1 x 3.8, M2 = 3.2 x 4.4; FOBU 6398: M2 = 3.6 x 5.0; FOBU 6412: m1 = 3.2 x 2.5, m2 = 3.3 x 2.7; FOBU 6392: M1 = 3.4 x 4.3, M2 = 3.6 x 4.7; FB 96-063: m2 = 3.5 x 3.1, m3 = 3.6 x 2.7; FB 96-078: m1 = 3.2 x 2.6; FOBU 6213: m1 = 3.2 x 2.7, m2 = 3.5 x 3.0, m3 = 3.7 x 2.8; FB 97-026: P4 = 3.3 x 4.3, M1 = 3.7 x 4.9; FB 97-033: m3 = 3.9 x 2.6; FB 97-068: p4 = 3.8 x 2.6; FB 97-076: p4 = 3.1 x 2.8, m1 = 3.5 x 3.2; FB 97-081: m2 = 3.4 x 3.1; FB 97-099: M2 = 3.2 x 4.8; FB 97-108: m1 = 3.0 x 2.6, m2 = 3.3 x 2.9, m3 = 3.6 x 2.6; FB 97-110: M2 = 3.4 x 4.6; UM 102594: M2 = 3.6 x 5.1.

Hyopsodus powellianus Cope, Reference Cope1884

Figure 6.3

1962 Hyopsodus browni (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 65

Lectotype

AMNH 4147, dentary m1-3, from unknown locality, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 15 late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-15) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FOBU 6129, left dentary m2-3; FB 96-035, left maxilla P4-M2. FB-15: FB 97-066, left maxilla M2-3.

Remarks

These teeth are intermediate in size between Hyopsodus powellianus and Hyopsodus paulus (Redline, Reference Redline1997). The M2 is within the size range of Hyopsodus paulus, but P4 is larger than the observed range for this species (Redline, Reference Redline1997), falling instead within the size range of H. powellianus. The lower teeth are within the lower size range for H. powellianus, therefore we identify all of these specimens as that species. Large species of Hyopsodus are relatively rare from biochron Wa-6 in the Green River Basin (Gazin, Reference Gazin1962). Gazin (Reference Gazin1962, p. 65) identified two large Hyopsodus specimens as H. browni, a maxilla with partial M2 and M3 from “high on the southwest slope of Fossil Butte,” in the deeper red beds just beneath the Green River (near UM Localities FB-1 and FB-27) and a dentary with m2 and part of m3 from “the saddle on the north side of Fossil Butte” (near UM Locality FB-22). We consider these specimens to represent H. powellianus.

Measurements

FOBU 6129: m2 = 5.1 x 4.1, m3 = 5.9 x 3.7; FB 96-035: P4 = 4.0 x 4.7; FB 97-066: M2 = 4.1 x 5.5.

Genus Apheliscus Cope, Reference Cope1875

Type species

Prototomus insidiosus Cope, Reference Cope1874, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Apheliscus cf. A. insidiosus (Cope, Reference Cope1874)

Figure 6.4

1874 Prototomus insidiosus Reference CopeCope, p. 14

Holotype

Unnumbered, dentary p4-m3 (specimen lost), from unknown locality, Biochron Wa7, San Jose Formation, New Mexico.

Occurrence

Locality FB-16, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6297, right dentary p4.

Remarks

This p4 is in the size range of A. insidiosus but differs from that species by possessing a small, anterior basal cuspule. Apheliscus is never especially abundant and is exceedingly rare in Wa-6, being represented in this biochron only by: (1) the type specimen of A. insidiosus from the San Juan Basin in New Mexico (the type has been lost for over 80 years, and no other specimens of Apheliscus have been reported from the San Juan Basin; see Rose, Reference Rose1981); (2) the above specimen from Fossil Butte; (3) a few specimens from the Bighorn Basin in northwestern Wyoming (personal communication, K.D. Rose, 2015); and (4) a single reported specimen from the Wind River Basin in south-central Wyoming (Guthrie, Reference Guthrie1967). Apheliscus apparently disappeared by the end of Wa-6 elsewhere (Woodburne et al., Reference Woodburne, Gunnell and Stucky2009).

Measurements

FOBU 6297: p4 = 3.1 x 1.7.

Genus Haplomylus Matthew, Reference Matthew1915a

Type species

Microsyops sperianus Cope, Reference Cope1880, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Haplomylus cf. H. scottianus Gingerich, Reference Gingerich1994

Figure 6.5–6.6

1994 Haplomylus scottianus Reference GingerichGingerich, p. 126, figs. 3c, 3g, 4

Holotype

UM 92489, left dentary p4-m3, Wasatchian Biochron Wa5, Willwood Formation, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-11, 18, 19, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-11: FOBU 6437, right dentary m2. FB-18: FOBU 6304, right dentary with talonid of p4 and m1 with broken trigonid. FB-19: FOBU 6318, left dentary p3-4.

Remarks

These specimens are in the size range of H. scottianus (Gingerich, Reference Gingerich1994), but differ from that species in having a simpler, relatively shorter p4 talonid, a weaker paracristid on m2, and a much weaker hypoconulid on m1-2. These specimens may prove to represent a species distinct from H. scottianus when better samples are discovered. These records (Wa-6) of Haplomylus are the latest known occurrences of the genus, whereas it apparently disappears by the end of Wa-5 elsewhere (Gazin, Reference Gazin1962; Gingerich, Reference Gingerich1994).

Measurements

FOBU 6437: m2 = 2.7 x 2.5; FOBU 6304: m1 = 2.6 x 2.1; FOBU 6318: p3 = 3.2 x 1.6, p4 = 3.4 x 1.9.

Family Phenacodontidae Cope, Reference Cope1881

Genus Phenacodus Cope, Reference Cope1873

Type species

Phenacodus primaevus Cope, Reference Cope1873, Green River Basin, Wyoming.

Phenacodus trilobatus Cope, Reference Cope1882b

Figure 6.7

Holotype

AMNH 4679, left dentary m1-3, locality unknown, middle to late Wasatchian, Willwood Formation, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Locality FB-11, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6365, left lower molar trigonid (worn).

Remarks

This specimen preserves only enough morphology to indicate that it represents a relatively large species of Phenacodus. Phenacodus trilobatus is similar in size and is known from the late Wasatchian (Thewissen, Reference Thewissen1990), therefore this specimen is accordingly identified as that species.

Measurements

No standard measurements are possible on this broken specimen.

Genus Ectocion Cope, Reference Cope1882c

Type species

Oligotomus osbornianus Cope, Reference Cope1882c, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Ectocion superstes Granger, Reference Granger1915

Figure 6.8–6.9

Holotype

AMNH 233A, dentary c1, p3-m3, Bridgerian Biochron Br1a, Wind River Formation, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Locality FB-16, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6229, left P4 and M1, both broken.

Remarks

Besides these two fragments of E. superstes from Fossil Butte, the only other known sample of this rare phenacodontid comes from the earliest Bridgerian (Br1a) in the Wind River Basin of Wyoming (Thewissen, Reference Thewissen1990). These two fragmentary teeth from Wa-6 at Fossil Butte represent the earliest known occurrence of this species.

Measurements

No measurements are possible.

Family Meniscotheriidae Cope, Reference Cope1882d

Genus Meniscotherium Cope, Reference Cope1874

Type species

Meniscotherium chamense Cope, Reference Cope1874, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Meniscotherium cf. M. robustum Thorpe, Reference Thorpe1934

1934 Mensicotherium robustum Reference ThorpeThorpe, p. 401, figs. 1–4

1962 Meniscotherium robustum (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 68

Holotype

YPM 10101, skull, dentary, Knight beds (= Wasatch Formation), middle to late Wasatchian, near Aspen, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Locality FB-15, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-15: FBF 155 (= USNM 22670), left dentary p4-m2, right dentary m1, left maxilla M1-2, associated postcranial fragments.

Remarks

As discussed by Gazin (Reference Gazin1962), Meniscotherium is extremely rare in Fossil Basin, which seems odd given that it is abundant from correlative beds in the adjacent Green River Basin. Gazin (Reference Gazin1962, p. 68) noted the presence of this one specimen of Meniscotherium from “high on Fossil Butte” (UM FB-15) that he hesitantly assigned to M. robustum.

Measurements

FBF 155: p4 = 8.0 x 5.5, m1 = 8.0 x 5.8, m2 = 9.0 x 6.8.

Order Mesonychia Matthew, Reference Matthew1937

Family Mesonychidae Cope, Reference Cope1875

Mesonychid sp. indet.

Occurrence

“Low on slope of Fossil Butte” (Gazin, Reference Gazin1962, p. 51; probably in the vicinity of UM localities FB-4, FB-11, and FB-26), late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Remarks

Gazin (Reference Gazin1962, p. 51) noted the presence of a fragmentary lower cheek tooth of a mesonychid from Fossil Butte. He identified this tooth as Pachyaena gracilis, but noted that it seemed rather small and reminiscent of Dissacus as well. In either case, it represents the only known record of a mesonychid from Fossil Butte.

Order Rodentia Bowdich, Reference Bowdich1821

Family Ischyromyidae Alston, Reference Alston1876

Subfamily Reithroparamyinae Wood, Reference Wood1962

Genus Reithroparamys Matthew, Reference Matthew1920

Type species

Paramys delicatissimus Leidy, Reference Leidy1871, Green River Basin, Wyoming.

Reithroparamys cf. R. debequensis Wood, Reference Wood1962

1962 Reithroparamys debequensis Reference WoodWood, p. 134, fig. 45D–G

1962 Reithroparamys sp., Reference GazinGazin, p. 46

Holotype

FMNH (CNHM) P-26726, left dentary i1, m1-3, Wasatchian Biochron Wa6, Debeque Formation, near Rifle, Colorado.

Occurrence

Saddle north of Fossil Butte (near UM Localities FB-22 and FB-28), late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

USNM 22380, left dentary i1, m1.

Remarks

A single specimen of Reithroparamys is represented at Fossil Butte, questionably identified as R. debequensis by Wood (Reference Wood1962). He noted that it was similar to R. debequensis but that the molar was much narrower than other specimens.

Subfamily Paramyinae Haeckel, Reference Haeckel1895

Genus ?Notoparamys Korth, Reference Korth1984

Type species

Leptotomus costilloi Wood, Reference Wood1962, Huerfano Basin, Colorado.

?Notoparamys blochi new species

Figure 7.1–7.4

Figure 7 (1–2) FOBU 6092, ?Notoparamys blochi n. sp. (Holotype), left m1 (left) and right dentary m1-2 (right) in occlusal view. (3–4) FOBU 6092, ?Notoparamys blochi n. sp. (Holotype), left maxilla M2-3 (top) and right M1 (bottom) in occlusal view. (5) FOBU 6182, Paramys excavatus, left maxilla P4-M1 in occlusal view. (6–7) FOBU 6161, Knightomys depressus, right m2 (left) and FOBU 6408, Knightomys depressus, left m1 (right) in occlusal view. Scale bars=5 mm.

Holotype

Holotype and only specimen, FOBU 6092, associated left dentary m1, right dentary m1-2, left maxilla M2-3, right maxilla M1, and postcranial fragments, found by Jonathan I. Bloch, July 30, 1997, from locality FB-15, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Diagnosis

?Notoparamys blochi n. sp. differs from Notoparamys costilloi in having an unreduced M3, a less transversely elongate hypoconulid on lower molars, an m1-2 mesoconid that is connected to the base of the protoconid and to the anterolingual base of the hypoconid (i.e., complete ectolophid), in lacking a protoconid loph that extends into the trigonid basin, and in lacking full development of the distinctive double-ridged connection between the hypoconulid and entoconid that is apparently typical of Notoparamys (Korth, Reference Korth1984 and discussion below); differs from N. arctios in being substantially larger in tooth dimensions (on average 25% larger in linear dimensions), but does resemble this species in lacking a protoconid extension into the trigonid basin.

Description

The holotype (and only) specimen of ?Notoparamys blochi n. sp. is known from upper and lower molars. Lower m1 and m2 are similar in having bulbous and marginally placed proto-, meta-, hypo-, and entoconids, with the hypoconid being the most robust cusp, followed by the metaconid. The hypoconid bulges buccally towards its base and is essentially separated from the protoconid by a distinct, low mesoconid (the mesoconid is connected to both the proto- and hypoconid on m1). There is a distinct, crescentic hypoconulid present that is centered on posterolophid of each tooth (not more lingually placed as noted for Notoparamys by Korth, Reference Korth1984) and separated from both the hypoconid and entoconid by narrow valleys. There is a short crest that extends from the buccal base of the entoconid posterobuccally toward the hypoconulid but does not reach that cusp. The hypoconulid is not connected to the entoconid by an additional crest posterior to the one from the entoconid, instead being separated posteriorly from the entoconid by a tiny cuspule. Lower m2 differs from m1 in being slightly larger with a slightly more anteroposteriorly compressed metalophid.

Upper molars are all similar to one another and share the following morphological features. Protocones are rounded and robust and paracones. Metacones are distinct and relatively smaller than the protocone, especially on M1-2. A distinct hypocone is present on M1 and M2 (absent on M3) that is separated from the protocone by a sharply defined groove as in Notoparamys . Hypocones do not extend as far lingually as the protocones. Robust and bulbous mesostyles are present on all molars, with M3 having at least three small mesostylar cusps. Incipiently doubled potoconules (best seen on M2-3) and distinctly doubled metaconules are found on all three molars, the latter feature being shared with Notoparamys (and other paramyines as well, see Rose and Von Koenigswald, Reference Rose and Von Koenigswald2007 for discussion). Pre- and postcingula are well developed and anteroposteriorly broad.

M1 differs from M2 in being somewhat smaller and anteroposteriorly narrower with a less broad trigon fovea (basin). M3 differs from both M1 and M2 in lacking a hypocone and in having a more robust and relatively larger protocone. It also differs from the other molars in having a rounded and posteriorly directed metacone, a double-crested metaloph with the posterior branch reaching the postcingulid and forming a small cuspule there, and in being somewhat more triangular in shape rather than more rhomboidal like M1-2.

Etymology

For Jonathan I. Bloch, who discovered the type specimen and for his many contributions to the recovery and study of fossil mammals from Wyoming and elsewhere.

Remarks

Rose and Von Koenigswald (Reference Rose and Von Koenigswald2007) discussed the complicated history of Notoparamys and described a highly variable sample of what they referred to as N. costilloi from Wa-6 in the Bighorn Basin of northwestern Wyoming. They noted that many (most) of the distinctive characters used to diagnose this genus (hypocone distinct and adjacent to metaconule on M1-2, M3 smaller than M1-2, mesoconid large and isolated on lower molars, hypoconulid wide and connected to entoconid by a pair of ridges enclosing a tiny basin that may be open posteriorly, accessory lophid extends from metaconid into trigonid fovea, low incisor flattened medially, rounded laterally, see Korth, Reference Korth1984, Reference Korth1994b; Anderson, Reference Anderson2008) are variably present or absent and variably developed or not in the Bighorn Basin sample.

?Notoparamys blochi n. sp. is no exception, with only a distinct hypocone and an accessory lophid extending from the metaconid into the trigonid fovea on the lower molars being definitively shared in common with the genotype species, N. costilloi. The double-ridge connection of the hypoconulid to the entoconid is only incipient (see description above) on the m1-2 of ?N. blochi. Korth (Reference Korth1984) indicated that both of these ridges originated from the lingual end of the hypoconulid in Notoparamys but it is apparent from the m1-2 of ?N. blochi that the more mesial of these ridges likely originated from the entoconid and extended posterobucally to eventually reach the hypoconulid. The more posterior of these ridges is described as being “broken at its center by narrow valley” (Korth, Reference Korth1984, p. 21). In ?N. blochi, the posterior ridge is clearly differentiated from the entoconid by a rather distinct valley on m1 while that valley is partially bridged by a small cuspule located between the entoconid and hypoconulid on m2.

We tentatively assign this new species to ?Notoparamys. However, we note that, aside from the type sample from Huerfano (Wood, Reference Wood1962; Robinson, Reference Robinson1966; Korth, Reference Korth1984), it is questionable whether or not any of the other specimens assigned to Notoparamys (Korth, Reference Korth1984; Rose and Chinnery, Reference Rose and Chinnery2004; Rose and Von Koenigswald, Reference Rose and Von Koenigswald2007) actually belong to that genus, and if they do, whether or not the genus can be sustained as defined given that virtually every character cited in the diagnosis is so variable as to often be completely absent. We believe that, at the generic level especially, diagnostic characters must be those that are present in all specimens whether or not they are weakly or more strongly formed.

Measurements

FOBU 6092: M1 = 3.7 x 4.3, M2 = 3.8 x 4.3, M3 = 4.3 x 3.9, m1 = 4.1 x 3.5, m2 = 4.5 x 3.8.

Genus Paramys Leidy, Reference Leidy1871

Type species

Paramys delicatus Leidy, Reference Leidy1871 (as designated by Wood, Reference Wood1962), Green River Basin, Wyoming.

Paramys excavatus Loomis, Reference Loomis1907

Figure 7.5

Holotype

ACM 327, right dentary p4-m3, Wasatchian Biochron a6, Wind River Formation, Bridger Creek, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 10, 18, 19, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-10, 18-19) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FB 96-038, left dentary i1; FB 96-039, left m1. FB-10: FOBU 6182, left maxilla P4-M1. FB-18: FB 97-079, left p4. FB-19: FB 97-096, left maxilla P4.

Remarks

These specimens are in the size range of the relatively common taxon Paramys excavatus (Wood, Reference Wood1962) and probably all represent that species.

Measurements

FB 96-039: m1 = 3.1 x 3.0; FOBU 6182: P4 = 2.7 x 3.3, M1 = 2.7 x 3.3; FB 97-079: p4 = 2.6 x 2.1.

Paramyinae sp. indet.

Occurrence

Locality FB-16, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6283, right M2.

Remarks

This tooth represents a small paramyine, larger than Microparamys, but smaller than other known paramyines. M2 is almost square with a relatively small, indistinct, posteriorly placed hypocone, a relatively strong, isolated metaconule, and a tiny mesostyle. This tooth may represent a new paramyine genus, but more complete specimens are required to be certain.

Measurements

FB 6283: M2 = 2.1 x 2.2

Family Sciuravidae Miller and Gidley, Reference Miller and Gidley1918

Genus Knightomys Gazin, Reference Gazin1961

Type species

Tillomys senior Gazin, Reference Gazin1952, Green River Basin, Wyoming.

Knightomys depressus Loomis, Reference Loomis1907

Figure 7.6–7.7

Holotype

ACM 432, skull with right M1-3, left I1, Wasatchian Biochron Wa6, Wind River Formation, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 4, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-4) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FOBU 6161, right m2. FB-4: FOBU 6408, left m1.

Remarks

These two specimens represent a sciuravid larger than Knightomys senior (Gazin, Reference Gazin1952) and are similar in size to K. depressus (Loomis, Reference Loomis1907). The type sample of K. depressus is from the Wa-6 horizon in the Wind River Basin (Wood, Reference Wood1965), but the species may range into the Bridgerian (Korth, Reference Korth1994b).

Measurements

FOBU 6161: m2 = 2.0 x 1.9; FOBU 6408: m = 2.0 x 1.7.

Knightomys huerfanensis (Wood, Reference Wood1962)

1962 Paramys huerfanensis Reference WoodWood, p. 62

1966 Paramys huerfanensis; Reference RobinsonRobinson, p. 45

Holotype

AMNH 55114, right dentary p4-m3, Bridgerian Biochron Br1a, Locality II, Huerfano Formation, Colorado.

Occurrence

Locality FB-19, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6397, left M2.

Remarks

This single tooth represents a relatively large species of Knightomys. It is of similar size to K. huerfanensis and, like that species, has relatively robust and rounded cusps, especially the protocone and hypocone (Korth, Reference Korth1984). This specimen represents the earliest known occurrence (Wa-6) of K. huerfanensis, otherwise only known from the latest Wasatchian (Wa-7) and earliest Bridgerian (Br-1a).

Measurements

FOBU 6397: M2 = 2.3 x 2.5.

Order Oxyaenodonta Van Valen, Reference Van Valen1971

Family Oxyaenidae Cope, Reference Cope1877

Subfamily Oxyaeninae Cope, Reference Cope1877

Genus Oxyaena Cope, Reference Cope1874

Type species

Oxyaena lupina Cope, Reference Cope1874, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Oxyaena forcipata Cope, Reference Cope1874

Figure 8.1–8.2

Figure 8 (1–2) UM 102584, Oxyaena forcipata, left dp4 with broken labial trigonid and lingual talonid in occlusal (top) and lingual (bottom) views. (3) FOBU 6380, Prototomus secundarius, right P4 in occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6380, Prototomus secundarius, left broken M1 in occlusal view. (5) FOBU 6385, Didymictis cf. D. protenus, left m2 in occlusal view. (6) UM 108143, Didymictis cf. D. protenus, left M1 (broken) in occlusal view. Scale bars=5 mm.

Holotype

USNM 1029, left and right dentaries, Wasatchian Biochron Wa7, San Jose Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Occurrence

Locality FB-7, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

UM 102584, left dp4.

Remarks

This specimen represents a relatively large species of Oxyaena. The Wa-6 form, O. forcipata, is of the right size and morphology, and we identify UM 102584 as this species.

Measurements

UM 102584: dp4 length = 13.9 mm (a width measurement is not possible on this broken specimen).

Order Hyaenodonta Van Valen, Reference Van Valen1967

Genus Prototomus Cope, Reference Cope1874

Type species

Prototomus viverrinus Cope, Reference Cope1874, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Prototomus secundarius Cope, Reference Cope1875

Figure 8.3–8.4

1962 Sinopa, cf. S. multicuspis (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 55

Holotype

USNM 1025, left and right dentary fragments, Wasatchian Biochron Wa7, San Jose Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Occurrence

Locality FB-27, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6380, right P4, left maxilla P3-M1.

Remarks

These specimens represent an intermediate-sized hyaenodontid and are of appropriate size and morphology to be identified as P. secundarius. An additional specimen, probably referable to P. secundarius, from “high on Fossil Butte” (Gazin, Reference Gazin1962, p. 55; near UM Localities FB-1 and FB-27), is USNM 22460, a fragmentary right maxilla with two broken molars.

Measurements

FOBU 6380: P3 = 5.0 x 2.7, P4 = 5.5 x 5.0, M1 = 6.0 x 7.2.

Hyaenodontid sp. indet.

Occurrence

Localities FB-13, 18, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-13: FB 97-004, right maxilla, P2 fragment. FB-18: FB 97-077, postcrania.

Remarks

These two specimens represent hyaenodontids, but it is not possible to identify either to genus or species.

Order Carnivora Bowdich, Reference Bowdich1821

Family Viverravidae Wortman and Matthew, Reference Wortman and Matthew1899

Genus Viverravus Marsh, Reference Marsh1872

Type species

Viverravus gracilis Marsh, Reference Marsh1872, Green River Basin, Wyoming.

Viverravus sp. indet.

Occurrence

Localities FB-8, 9, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-8: FOBU 6148, right P4 fragment. FB-9: FOBU 6177, left dentary p4-m2, teeth broken.

Remarks

These two specimens confirm the presence of Viverravus at Fossil Butte. They are too fragmentary for specific determination.

Genus Didymictis Cope, Reference Cope1875

Type species

Limnocyon protenus Cope, Reference Cope1874, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Didymictis cf. D. protenus (Cope, Reference Cope1874)

Figure 8.5–8.6

1874 Limnocyon protenus Reference CopeCope, p. 15

1882a Didymictis curtidens Reference CopeCope, p. 160

1962 Didymictis altidens (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 57

Holotype

USNM 1092, left and right dentaries, Wasachian Biochron Wa7, San Jose Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 5, 7, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-5, 7) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FOBU 6120, left m1 trigonid. FB-5: FOBU 6385, left m2. FB-7: UM 108143, left M1.

Remarks

These specimens represent a medium-sized species of Didymictis. They are similar in size to D. protenus and smaller than D. altidens. Gazin (Reference Gazin1962, p. 57) tentatively assigned some tooth fragments from the “higher slopes of Fossil Butte” (probably near UM Localities FB-1 and FB-27) to D. altidens. We believe it is more probable that they represent D. protenus.

Measurements

FOBU 6385: m2 = 8.0 x 4.7; UM 108143: M1 = 7.0 x 9.9.

Family Miacidae Cope, Reference Cope1880

Genus Vulpavus Marsh, Reference Marsh1871

Type species

Vulpavus palustris Marsh, Reference Marsh1871, Green River Basin, Wyoming.

Vulpavus australis Savagea

1962 cf. Vulpavus australis; Reference GazinGazin, p. 60

Holotype

AMNH 16226, left dentary p4-m3, Wasatchian Wa7, San Jose Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.

Occurrence

“High on the slope of Fossil Butte” (Gazin, Reference Gazin1962, p. 60; probably near UM Localities FB-1 and FB-27), late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-27) or late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

USNM 22474, right M1.

Remarks

Gazin (Reference Gazin1962, p. 60) noted the presence of a single tooth of Vulpavus from Fossil Butte. This specimen conforms in size and morphology with V. australis.

Miacid sp. A & B indet.

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 5, 7, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-5, 7) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FOBU 6109, right m1 trigonid. FB-5: FOBU 6110, right m2 talonid. FB-7: UM 102593, left m2 talonid.

Remarks

These fragmentary specimens represent two different miacid carnivorans, but are too incomplete to be assigned to any particular genus or species.

Order Perissodactyla Owen, Reference Owen1848

Family Equidae Gray, Reference Gray1821

Genus Protorohippus Wortman, Reference Wortman1886

Type species

Hyracotherium venticolum Cope, Reference Cope1881, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Protorohippus venticolum (Cope, Reference Cope1881)

Figure 9.1–9.2

Figure 9 (1) FOBU 6378, Protorohippus venticolum, left dentary p4-m3 in occlusal view. (2) FOBU 6325, Protorohippus venticolum, left maxilla M2-3 in occlusal view. (3) FOBU 6179, Heptodon calciculus, left M1 in occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6154, Lambdotherium popoagicum, left m1 trigonid in occlusal view. (5) DPC 14810, Lambdotherium popoagicum, left m1 in occlusal view. Scale bars=5 mm.

1881 Hyracotherium venticolum Reference CopeCope, p. 198

1886 Protorohippus venticolus; Reference WortmanWortman, p. 105

1908 Eohippus venticolus; Reference GrangerGranger, p. 244

1952 Hyracotherium index (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 66

1956 Hyracotherium vasacciense venticolum; Reference KittsKitts, p. 50

1962 Hyracotherium vasacciense (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 73

1967 Hyracotherium vasacciense; Reference GuthrieGuthrie, p. 43

2002 Protorohippus venticolum; Reference FroehlichFroehlich, p. 180

Holotype

AMNH 4832, skull and skeleton, Wasatchian Biochron Wa7, Wind River Formation, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-4, 5, 7–9, 11, 14–16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 26, 27, 29, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Referred specimens

FB-4: FOBU 6387, left Mx. FB-5: FB 95-006, left m1-2; FOBU 6404, right Mx. FB-7: UM 102583, right maxilla dP3-4-M1; UM 102590, right P3; UM 108137, left P2; UM 108139, right p4; UM 108140, left p3; UM 108141, right P4; UM 108142, right maxilla P2-M1. FB-8: FB 96-017, right dentary m2; FB 96-020, right P3, Mx. FB-9: FB 96-064, right p4; FB 96-073, left M3; FB 96-074, right P4; FB 97-019, left m2. FB-11: FOBU 6358, right dentary m3 (broken); FOBU 6374, left dp4, m2; FOBU 6375, left dentary, postcrania; FOBU 6378, left and right dentaries, right maxilla; FOBU 6383, left m3. FB-14: FB 97-025, left m1. FB-15: FB 97-027, left M3, left m3; FB 97-067, right M1. FB-16: FB 97-031, left maxilla M1-2, right m1; FB 97-032, right dentary m3; FB 97-034, left p4; FB 97-042, right dentary p3-m2, Mx; FB 97-071, left dentary m2; FOBU 6372, right dentary m1-2 (teeth broken); FOBU 6418, left m1. FB-18: FB 97-078, right m1. FB-19: FB 97-084, left dentary m2; FB 97-087, left maxilla M1-3; FB 97-090, right maxilla M1; FB 97-093, right dentary dp4-m3; FOBU 6382, right dentary p3-4, m2-3. FB-21: FB 97-103, left M3. FB-22: FOBU 6325, palate. FB-26: FB 97-114, left dentary m1; FB 97-117, right M2-3. FB-27: FOBU 6428, left p3. FB-29: FB 97-124, left dentary m1.

Remarks

Equids are by far the most common mammals found at Fossil Butte. While there is some variation in tooth size, all of these specimens can be accommodated in Protorohippus venticolum, the most common Wa-6–Wa-7 species of North American equid (Froehlich, Reference Froehlich2002). Gazin (Reference Gazin1952, p 66) referred YPM-PU 16172 from three miles north of Fossil, Wyoming to Hyracotherium index. In 1962, Gazin noted that Kitts (Reference Kitts1956) synonymized H. index with H. vasacciense. Gazin (Reference Gazin1962, p. 73) reallocated all of the specimens he had assigned to H. index in 1952 to H. vasacciense, but noted that he still believed that two species were included within these samples and that H. index was still valid even though he was uncertain how to definitively separate the samples into two distinct species. Froehlich (Reference Froehlich2002) assigned this species to Protorohippus, and we follow that designation here. It seems clear that P. venticolum is a highly variable species, both in size and morphology. We concur with Gazin (Reference Gazin1962) that two species probably are represented within the various samples, but we have chosen to include all of the Fossil Butte specimens referred above in this single species given the fragmentary nature of most specimens and the difficulty in isolating trends in either size or morphology.

Measurements

See Table 2 for tooth measurements of Protorohippus venticolum.

Table 2 Tooth measurements of Protorohippus venticolum; L=maximum length, W=maximum width, d indicates deciduous tooth.

Genus Xenicohippus Bown and Kihm, Reference Bown and Kihm1981

Type species

Xenicohippus grangeri Bown and Kihm, Reference Bown and Kihm1981, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Xenicohippus craspedotum (Cope, Reference Cope1880)

1880 Hyracotherium craspedotum Reference CopeCope, p. 747

1908 Eohippus craspedotum; Reference GrangerGranger, p. 244

1952 Hyracotherium, cf. H. venticolum (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 66

1962 Hyracotherium, cf. H. craspedotum (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 74, Pl. 13, fig. 11

1966 Hyracotherium craspedotum; Reference RobinsonRobinson, p. 61, Pl. IV, fig. 3

Holotype

AMNH 4830, left and right dentaries, Wasatchian Biochron Wa6, Wind River Formation, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 6, 25.

Materials

FB-1: FB 96-040, left p2. FB-6: FB 96-008, right dentary p3-m1. FB-25: FB 97–111, left dentary p3-4, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-6, 25) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Remarks

Three equid specimens from Fossil Butte are outside the tooth size range of H. vasacciense (=P. venticolum) as documented by Kitts (Reference Kitts1956). They can be recognized as the larger Wa-6–Wa-7 equid species, Xenicohippus craspedotum. Gazin (Reference Gazin1952) identified YPM-PU 16173 from near Fossil, Wyoming as Hyracotherium cf. H. venticolum. In 1962, Gazin moved this specimen into Hyracotherium cf. H. craspedotum a decision with which we concur. Froehlich (Reference Froehlich2002) assigned this species to Xenicohippus, and we follow that designation here.

Measurements

FB 96-040: p2 = 6.6 x 3.4; FB 96-008: p3 = 6.5 x 4.3, p4 = 7.4 x 5.9, m1 = 8.2 x 6.2; FB 97-111: p3 = 6.6 x 3.9, p4 = 7.5 x 4.9.

Equid sp. indet.

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 4–9, 11, 16, 19, 27, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-4–9, 11, 16, 19, 27) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FB 96-028, left Mx fragment; FB 96-031, left maxilla P4; FB 96-034, left Mx; FB 96-036, postcrania; FB 96-043, postcrania; FB 96-047, left P4; FB 96-050, postcrania. FB-4: FB 97-009, right Mx fragment. FB-5: FB 96-056, postcrania; FB 96-060, right Mx. FB-6: FB 96-004, left astragalar body; FB-7: UM 108136, postcrania. FB-8: FB 96-016, tooth fragments. FB-9: FB 96-066, postcrania. FB-11: FB 96-087, postcrania; FB 96-089, left Mx; FOBU 6357, postcrania; FOBU 6364, left m3 talonid; FOBU 6450, postcrania. FB-16: FB 97-035, tooth fragments; FOBU 6367, left astragalus; FOBU 6431, right mx trigonid. FB-19: FB 97-085, left dentary dp3; FB 97-086, left maxilla dP3; FB 97-091, right astragalus. FB-27: FOBU 6369, left and right Mx (broken), canine fragment; FOBU 6411, postcrania.

Remarks

These equid specimens are not complete enough for further identification.

Family Helaletidae Osborn and Wortman, Reference Osborn and Wortman1892

Genus Heptodon Cope, Reference Cope1882e

Type species

Lophiodon ventorum Cope, Reference Cope1880, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Heptodon calciculus (Cope, Reference Cope1880)

Figure 9.3

1880 Lophiodon calciculus Reference CopeCope, p. 747

1952 Heptodon cf. H. ventorum (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 70

1962 Heptodon ventorum (in part); Reference GazinGazin, p. 78, Pl. 13, fig. 12

Holotype

AMNH 4858, left and right dentaries p3-m3, Wasatchian Biochron Wa7, Wind River Formation, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-9, 12, 26, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-9: FOBU 6179, left M1; FOBU 6291, right dP4. FB-12: FB 96-092, left M1. FB-26: FOBU 6333, left dentary mx fragment.

Remarks

Heptodon is the most common tapiroid known from Wa-6–Wa-7 in Wyoming and Colorado. These specimens agree in size and morphological detail with H. calciculus and are smaller than Heptodon posticus (Radinsky, Reference Radinsky1963). Gazin (Reference Gazin1952) tentatively identified YPM-PU 16174, a dP/4 from near Fossil, Wyoming, as Heptodon ventorum. In 1962, Gazin again identified this specimen, along with four lots of fragmentary teeth from Fossil Butte (no specimen numbers cited), as H. ventorum, although he noted that all of these specimens corresponded more closely to the holotype of H. calciculus. We recognize all specimens of Heptodon from Fossil Butte as H. calciculus.

Measurements

FOBU 6179: M1 = 10.9 x 12.3; FOBU 6291: dP4 = 11.0 x 11.2.

Family Palaeotheriidae Bonaparte, Reference Bonaparte1850

Genus Lambdotherium Cope, Reference Cope1880

Type species

Lambdotherium popoagicum Cope, Reference Cope1880, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Lambdotherium popoagicum Cope, Reference Cope1880

Figure 9.4

Holotype

AMNH 4863, left dentary p2-m3, Wasatchian Biochron Wa7, Wind River Formation, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Locality FB-1, late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FOBU 6154, left m1 trigonid.

Remarks

Although this specimen is fragmentary, it can be confidently identified as Lambdotherium. Lambdotherium is the primary index taxon of the Lostcabinian, indicating that the top of the Wasatch section at Fossil Butte represents Wa-7.

Order Artiodactyla Owen, Reference Owen1848

Family Dichobunidae Turner, Reference Turner1849

Genus Bunophorus Sinclair, Reference Sinclair1914

Type species

Mioclaenus etsagicus Cope, Reference Cope1882a, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Bunophorus grangeri (Sinclair, Reference Sinclair1914)

Figure 10.1–10.2

Figure 10 (1) FOBU 6441, Bunophorus grangeri, left P3 in occlusal view. (2) FOBU 6410, Bunophorus grangeri, right M1 in occlusal view. (3) FOBU 6122, Diacodexis secans, left dentary m2-3 in occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6123, Hexacodus uintensis, right dentary p4-m2 in occlusal (top) and lingual (bottom) views. Scale bars=5 mm.

1914 Wasatchia grangeri Reference SinclairSinclair, p. 269

Holotype

AMNH 15516, left and right dentaries, Gray Bull beds, middle Wasatchian (Wa3-5), Willwood Formation, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-11, 13, 16, 19, 27, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-11: FOBU 6394, left m2 fragment. FB-16: FOBU 6280, left m2 fragment, M/3. FB-19: FOBU 6441, left P3. FB-27: FOBU 6410, right M1. Also FOBU 6194, a right dentary fragment with c1 from FB-13 is questionably assigned to Bunophorus.

Remarks

These specimens represent a relatively small species of Bunophorus. They agree in size and morphology with B. grangeri (Stucky and Krishtalka, Reference Stucky and Krishtalka1990).

Measurements

FOBU 6410: M1 = 5.8 x 6.8; FOBU 6441: P3 = 5.4 x 4.6.

Genus Diacodexis Cope, Reference Cope1882e

Type species

Pantolestes secans Cope, Reference Cope1881, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Diacodexis secans (Cope, Reference Cope1881)

Figure 10.3

1881 Pantolestes secans Reference CopeCope, p. 187

Holotype

AMNH 4899, left and right dentaries p4-m3, Wasatchian Biochron Wa6, Wind River Formation, Wind River Basin, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-1, 5, 16, 19, 27, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6 (FB-5, 16, 19, 27) and late early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-7 (FB-1), main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-1: FOBU 6182, left mx trigonid. FB-5: FOBU 6421, left M1. FB-16: FOBU 6122, left dentary m2-3; FOBU 6226, right dentary m3; FOBU 6279, left M1; FOBU 6432, left Mx (worn); FOBU 6447, left dentary m1 fragment. FB-19: FOBU 6416, left m1; FOBU 6446, right M3. FB-27: FOBU 6337, left M1.

Remarks

Diacodexis secans is the most common dichobunid artiodactyl known in Wa-6–Wa-7 (Krishtalka and Stucky, Reference Krishtalka and Stucky1985). These specimens agree in size and morphology with this species.

Measurements

FOBU 6122: m2 = 4.2 x 3.5; FOBU 6279: M1 = 4.1 x 4.9; FOBU 6337: M1 = 4.2 x 5.2; FOBU 6416: m1 = 4.2 x 3.5; FOBU 6421: M1 = 4.3 x 5.3; FOBU 6446: M3 = 3.4 x 5.1.

Family Homacodontidae Marsh, Reference Marsh1894

Genus Hexacodus Gazin, Reference Gazin1952

Type species

Hexacodus pelodes Gazin, Reference Gazin1952, Green River Basin, Wyoming.

Hexacodus uintensis Gazin, Reference Gazin1952

Figure 10.4

1952 Hexacodus uintensis Reference GazinGazin, p. 76, Pl. 11, fig. 4

1962 Hexacodus uintensis, Reference GazinGazin, p. 85, Pl. 14, fig. 5

Holotype

USNM 16175, left dentary m1-2, Wasatchian Biochron Wa6, Wasatch Formation, Green River Basin, 3 miles NW of Fossil Station, Wyoming.

Occurrence

Localities FB-11, 16, 19, 24, 27, late middle early Eocene, Wasatchian biochronologic zone Wa-6, main body, Wasatch Formation, Fossil Basin, Lincoln County, Wyoming.

Materials

FB-11: FOBU 6449, right dentary m1 talonid-m2. FB-16: FOBU 6228, left M1. FB-19: FOBU 6123, right dentary p4-m2. FB-24: FOBU 6327, left maxilla M1. FB-27: FOBU 6402, right mx (broken).

Remarks

Hexacodus uintensis was described by Gazin (Reference Gazin1952) based on a single specimen (YPM-PU 16175) from three miles northwest of Fossil, Wyoming. Gazin (Reference Gazin1962) later described another specimen of H. uintensis (USNM 22250) from Fossil Butte and noted that two other specimens, one from Knight Station and the other from the Bighorn Basin, might represent this species as well. The specimens assigned here expand the sample of this rare artiodactyl.

FOBU 6123 includes the first p4 known for H. uintensis. It differs from p4 in H. pelodes in being laterally compressed anteriorly, with the talonid being broader than the anterior part of the tooth. It also has a stronger paracristid that developed a small accessory cuspule close to the anterior flank of the protoconid unlike H. pelodes. The p4 of H. uintensis has a small anterobuccal cingulid, which is lacking in H. pelodes. Unlike that species, the p4 of H. uintensis lacks an entoconid cusp.

Measurements

FOBU 6449: m2 = 4.4 x 3.6; FOBU 6228: M1 = 4.2 x 5.1; FOBU 6123: p4 = 4.9 x 2.7, m1 = 4.4 x 3.1; FOBU 6327: M1 = 4.6 x 5.6.

Faunal comparisons, paleoecology and age

The mammalian assemblage from the Wasatch Formation at Fossil Butte (Table 1) presents interesting similarities and contrasts with other Wa-6 and Wa-7 samples from Wyoming. Figure 11.1 compares diversity as expressed by species per order between the Fossil Butte sample, a Wa-6 sample from the Bighorn Basin in northwestern Wyoming (UM collections), and a Wa-7 sample from the Pinnacles area of the northeastern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming (Gunnell et al., Reference Gunnell, Bartels and Zonneveld2004; UM collections). Although a limited Wa-7 fauna occurs 30 km to the southeast, on Little Muddy Creek near the hamlet of Cumberland Gap (Zonneveld et al., Reference Zonneveld, Gunnell and Bartels2000), this fauna is too limited, in both diversity and abundance to facilitate useful comparison to the Fossil Butte material.

Figure 11 (1) Mammalian species-level diversity (number of species per selected orders) at Fossil Butte compared to a Wa-6 sample from the Bighorn Basin in northwestern Wyoming and a Wa-7 sample from the Pinnacles area near South Pass, southwestern Wyoming. (2) Mammalian abundance (percent total number of specimens representing selected orders) at Fossil Butte compared with same faunal samples as in 1.

The Fossil Butte sample is similar to the Wa-6 sample in having relatively high diversity of Cimolesta, Condylarthra, and Carnivora, but differs in having a lower diversity of Primates, “Creodonta”, and Perissodactyla, and a much higher diversity of Rodentia. In comparison to the Wa-7 sample, Fossil Butte exhibits higher diversity of Cimolesta, Condylarthra, Rodentia, and Carnivora, but lower diversity of Primates and Perissodactyla. Perhaps the most unusual aspect of Fossil Butte mammalian diversity is the relatively low diversities of primates and perissodactyls (especially given the high abundance of perissodactyls, see below) and the very high diversity of rodents.

Relative abundances of Fossil Butte mammals can be compared to assemblages from the Bighorn Basin and the Pinnacles in northwestern and southwestern Wyoming, respectively. Since sample size for the Fossil Butte assemblage is relatively low, these comparisons will be made using percent of specimens in each sample. Figure 11.2 compares relative abundance for eight orders of Fossil Butte mammals with assemblages from the Bighorn Basin and the Pinnacles. Compared to Fossil Butte, both the Bighorn Basin and Pinnacles samples have higher abundances of condylarthans, almost entirely due to the very high abundance of Hyopsodus in the latter two basins. While relatively common at Fossil Butte, Hyopsodus only represents 14% of the mammalian sample compared to 21.5% in the Bighorn Basin and 22.3% at the Pinnacles. Both of these samples also have higher abundances of plesiadapiforms compared to Fossil Butte, almost entirely represented by Microsyops.

In contrast to the Bighorn and Pinnacles samples, perissodactyls are more common at Fossil Butte, almost entirely due to the high abundance of equids. At Fossil Butte, Xenicohippus and Protorohippus account for 32.7% of all mammal specimens, while in the Bighorn Basin the relative abundance of equids is at 23% and 17.6% at the Pinnacles.

Primates exhibit similar specimen abundance in all three samples, but there are substantial differences in the taxonomic composition of primates among the three areas. Primate taxonomic composition at Fossil Butte consists entirely of notharctid primates—there are no omomyid primates yet known from any Fossil Butte locality. Omomyids make up 36% of all primate specimens from Wa-6 localities in the Bighorn Basin and 26.7% of Wa-7 primate specimens from the Pinnacles.

The apparent absence of omomyid primates at Fossil Butte is probably at least partly because of the relatively poor preservation in the Wasatch Formation locally. Specimens are fragmentary with few documented associations. There are no vertebrate bone concentrations and screen washing for smaller members of the vertebrate community has proven unproductive. Omomyids are all relatively small and are difficult to find by surface prospecting. However, paleoecological factors also may be partially responsible for the lack of Fossil Basin omomyids.

Early Eocene (Wasatchian) omomyid primates from both the Fossil and greater Green River basins are extremely rare. Outside of a single series of localities in the Washakie Basin (Savage and Waters, Reference Savage and Waters1978), published records of omomyids from the rest of the early Eocene of southwestern Wyoming consist of fewer than 75 specimens (Gazin, Reference Gazin1952, Reference Gazin1958, Reference Gazin1962; West, Reference West1973; Szalay, Reference Szalay1976; Stucky, Reference Stucky1984; Bown and Rose, Reference Bown and Rose1987; Zonneveld et al., Reference Zonneveld, Gunnell and Bartels2000; Muldoon and Gunnell, Reference Muldoon and Gunnell2002; Holroyd and Strait, Reference Holroyd and Strait2008; Nachman et al., Reference Nachman, Beard and Anemone2010). The paucity of omomyids from early Eocene strata in the greater Green River Basin suggests that ecological conditions were not suitable for anaptomorphine omomyids, the subfamily most common in the Wasatchian (Gunnell, Reference Gunnell1997). However, by the middle Eocene (Bridgerian biochrons Br1b–Br3), omomyine omomyids are common elements in mammalian faunal assemblages of the Bridger Formation in the Green River Basin.

Overall, mammalian faunal community structure at Fossil Butte, combined with geological evidence, suggests paleohabitats consisting of both forested and more open areas. The extremely high abundance of the equid perissodactyls Protorohippus and Xenicohippus argue for open, broken forest habitats. The modestly high abundance of artiodactyls also suggests the presence of some open habitats. The relatively high abundance of notharctine primates indicates that forested areas occurred nearby, perhaps along river and stream courses.

The abundant presence of hydromorphic paleosols (sensu Kraus and Aslan, Reference Kraus and Aslan1993) at the base of the exposed main body of the Wasatch Formation at Fossil Butte suggests that the lower portion of the section was deposited during relatively wet and poorly drained conditions. The middle part of the section (with better developed paleosols) was probably deposited during an interval with better drainage deposition. The upper part of the section was deposited under more poorly drained conditions and was followed by the onset of lake-sediment deposition as Fossil Lake formed during the Lostcabinian (Grande, Reference Grande1984, Reference Grande2013; Lillegraven and Ostresh, Reference Lillegraven and Ostresh1988).

Differences between the mammalian faunal sample at Fossil Butte and those in other areas are almost certainly due to the differing paleoecological condition. The fact that Fossil Basin was geomorphically isolated from other areas to the east by the Wyoming Overthrust Belt and to the west by the Tunp Range, may have contributed to some of the unusual occurrences in the Fossil Butte sample. The presence of Knightomys huerfanensis, Copelemur tutus, and Reithroparamys debequensis, all more common from southern areas (Colorado and New Mexico), suggests some interchange between Fossil Basin and these southern communities. Meniscotherium, which is common in both New Mexico and the adjacent Green River Basin, is nearly absent from Fossil Basin, suggesting that Meniscotherium preferred habitats different from those available in the Fossil Basin.

Given the location of Fossil Basin within the Overthrust Belt, it might be expected that the sample would include faunal indications of basin-margin habitats (Gunnell and Bartels, Reference Gunnell and Bartels2001). Included among basin-margin faunal indicators are the presence of unique species, such as the rodent Adaetoparamys blochi, the artiodactyl Hexacodus uintensis, the leptictid Eoictops novaceki, and the pantolestid Palaeosinopa lacus. The occurrences of the rare Wa-6 taxa Apheliscus and Haplomylus, and the anachronistically early appearance of the very rare Ectocion superstes may also suggest basin-margin influences.

Figure 12 summarizes the stratigraphic ranges of mammalian taxa in the Fossil Butte Wasatch Formation sequence. The Wa6 index taxon Heptodon calciculus is first found 135 m below the base of the Fossil Butte Member of the Green River Formation at locality FB-26. There is only one locality (FB-6) below the level of FB-26 that has yielded any identifiable mammals. None of the taxa recovered from this level suggests any pre-Wa-6 Eocene horizons existing at Fossil Butte. Lambdotherium appears at locality FB-1, within 15 m of the base of the Fossil Butte Member of the Green River Formation. This indicates that the top of the Fossil Butte section of the Wasatch Formation represents the Lostcabinian (Wa-7), as does the Fossil Butte Member of the Green River Formation, wherein Lambdotherium has also been found (Froehlich and Breithaupt, Reference Froehlich and Breithaupt1997). Based on the ranges of mammalian taxa at Fossil Butte, all of the Wasatch Formation represents at least Wa-6, with the top 15 m of the section representing Wa-7.

Figure 12 Stratigraphic ranges of mammalian taxa in the Wasatch Formation at Fossil Butte, not including specimens found previous to this work (Mesonychid indet., Reithroparamys cf. R. debequensis, Vulpavus australis) because it was not possible to precisely fit them into proper stratigraphic position. Left axis shows the distribution of fossil localities in the Fossil Butte section. Right axis shows section measured in m below the base of the overlying Fossil Butte Member of the Green River Formation.

Summary

The mammalian faunal assemblage from the Wasatch Formation at Fossil Butte National Monument consists of 36 genera and as many as 46 species. Two genera and three species are new and, along with Hexacodus uintensis, are unique to the Fossil Butte sample. Most of the other members of the assemblage are well known from other Wa-6 sediments in Wyoming and New Mexico. The top 15 m of the local section samples the beginning of the succeeding Wasatchian biochron (Wa-7), as indicated by the first appearance of the immigrant perissodactyl Lambdotherium. However, some taxa represent relatively rare forms (Ectocion superstes) or unusually late Wasatchian occurrences (Apheliscus, Haplomylus), suggesting that Fossil Basin may have provided a refugium for some taxa. Also, some taxa are more common from southern basins within North America (Knightomys huerfanensis, Copelemur tutus, and Reithroparamys debequensis), indicating that Fossil Basin exchanged faunal elements with these areas during the early Eocene. The most abundant mammals living in Fossil Basin during Wa-6 were equid perissodactyls representing over 30% of the total number of specimens. The relatively high percentage occurrence of fossil horses at Fossil Butte suggests that well-drained, open-forest habitats were common in the area during the early Eocene.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank A.L. Brandes, K.M. Christenson, J.M. Lavigne, S. Zack, R.J. Walker, J.I. Bloch, and A.R. Bair for their work in describing and measuring the stratigraphic sections and fossil collecting. We thank R.L. Anemone for providing access to unpublished data from the southern Red Desert. We also thank the staff at Fossil Butte National Monument, especially Superintendent D. McGinnis, R. Benton, P. Ambrose, V. Santucci, and A. Aase, for their assistance during our work. We thank J.A. Lillegraven, J.E. Storer, D. Anderson, and the late S.L. Walsh for many helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript. This research was supported by National Park Service and NSF grants to WSB and GFG and an NSERC Discovery grant to JPZ.

References

Alston, E.R., 1876, On the classification of the order Glires: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 1876, p. 6198.Google Scholar
Anderson, D., 2008, Ischyromyidae, in Janis, C.M., Gunnell, G.F., and Uhen, M.D., eds., Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, Volume 2: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 311325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, K.C., 1988, New notharctine primate fossils from the early Eocene of New Mexico and southern Wyoming and the phylogeny of Notharctinae: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, v. 75, p. 439469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, J.I., Secord, R., and Gingerich, P.D., 2004, Systematics and phylogeny of late Paleocene and early Eocene Palaeoryctinae (Mammalia, Insectivora) from the Clarks Fork and Bighorn Basins, Wyoming: Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, v. 31, p. 119154.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C.L., 1850, 1. Conspectus Systematis Mastozoologiae. Editio altera reformata, Leiden, Conspectus Systematum, 372 p.Google Scholar
Bowdich, T.E., 1821, An Analysis of the Natural Classifications of Mammalia for the use of Students and Travelers, Paris, J. Smith, 115 p.Google Scholar
Bown, T.M., and Kihm, A.J., 1981, Xenicohippus, an unusual new hyracothere (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from the lower Eocene rocks of Wyoming, Colorado and New Mexico: Journal of Paleontology, v. 55, p. 257270.Google Scholar
Bown, T.M., and Rose, K.D., 1987, Patterns of dental evolution in early Eocene anaptomorphine primates (Omomyidae) from the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming: The Paleontological Society Memoir, v. 23, p. 1151.Google Scholar
Buchheim, H.P., 1994, Paleoenvironments, lithofacies and varves of the Fossil Butte Member of the Eocene Green River Formation, southwestern Wyoming: Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, v. 3, p. 314.Google Scholar
Buchheim, H.P., and Eugster, H.P., 1998, Eocene Fossil Lake: the Green River Formation of Fossil Basin, southwestern Wyoming: Utah Geological Association Publication, v. 26, p. 191208.Google Scholar
Buchheim, H.P., Cushman, R.A. Jr., and Biaggi, R.E., 2011, Stratigraphic revision of the Green River Formation in Fossil Basin, Wyoming: Overfilled to underfilled lake evolution: Rocky Mountain Geology, v. 46, p. 165181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, C.F., 1932, On some mammalian remains from the Lower Eocene of the London Clay: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, London, v. 1901, p. 129153.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1872, Third account of new Vertebrata from the Bridger Eocene of Wyoming Territory: Paleontological Bulletin, v. 3, p. 14.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1873, Fourth notice of extinct Vertebrata from the Bridger and Green River Tertiaries: Paleontological Bulletin, v. 17, p. 14.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1874, Report upon vertebrate fossils discovered in New Mexico with descriptions of new species: Geographical Exploration and Survey West of the 100th Meridian, Appendix FF, Chief of Engineers for 1874, Washington, D.C., p. 1–18.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1875, Systematic catalogue of Vertebrata of the Eocene of New Mexico, collected in 1874: Report to Engineer Department, U. S. Army (Wheeler Survey), Washington, D.C., p. 5–37.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1876, On the Taeniodonta, a new group of Eocene Mammalia: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, v. 28, p. 39.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1877, Report upon the extinct Vertebrata obtained in New Mexico by parties of the expedition of 1874: Chapter XII, Fossils of the Eocene period: Geographical Surveys West of the 100th Meridian, Corps of Engineers (Wheeler Survey), U. S. Army, Washington, D.C., p. 37–282.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1880, The bad lands of the Wind River and their fauna: The American Naturalist, v. 14, p. 745748.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1881, On the Vertebrata of the Wind River Eocene beds of Wyoming: Bulletin of the U. S. Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, v. 6, p. 183202.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1882a, Contributions to the history of the Vertebrata of the lower Eocene of Wyoming and New Mexico made in 1881. I. The fauna of the Wasatch beds of the Basin of the Big Horn River: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, v. 20, p. 139197.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1882b, On the Vertebrata of the Wind River Eocene Beds of Wyoming: Bulletin of the U. S. Geographical and Geological Survey of the Territories, v. 6, p. 183202.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1882c, Notes on Eocene Mammalia: The American Naturalist, v. 16, p. 522.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1882d, New characters of the Perissodactyla Condylartha: The American Naturalist, v. 16, p. 334.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1882e, Two new genera of Mammalia from the Wasatch Eocene: The American Naturalist, v. 16, p. 1029.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1883, On the mutual relations of the bunotherian Mammalia: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, v. 1883, p. 7783.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1884, The Vertebrata of the Tertiary formations of the west: Book I: Report to the U.S. Geological Survey of the Territories (Hayden Survey), v. 3, p. 11009.Google Scholar
Crochet, J.-Y., 1979, Données nouvelles sur l’histoire paléogéographique des Didelphidae (Marsupialia): Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, Paris, v. 288, p. 14571460.Google Scholar
Froehlich, D.J., 2002, Quo vadis Eohippus? The systematics and taxonomy of the early Eocene equids (Perissodactyla): Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 134, p. 141256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froehlich, D.J., and Breithaupt, B.H., 1997, A Lambdotherium specimen from the Fossil Butte Member of the Green River Formation, with comments on its biostratigraphic and paleoenvironmental importance and the phylogenetic significance of its postcrania: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Abstracts, Supplement to v, v. 17, p. 47A.Google Scholar
Gazin, C.L., 1952, The lower Eocene Knight Formation of western Wyoming and its mammalian faunas: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 117, p. 182.Google Scholar
Gazin, C.L., 1958, A review of the middle and upper Eocene primates of North America: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 136, p. 1112.Google Scholar
Gazin, C.L., 1961, New sciuravid rodents from the lower Eocene Knight Formation of western Wyoming: Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, v. 74, p. 193194.Google Scholar
Gazin, C.L., 1962, A further study of the lower Eocene mammalian faunas of southwestern Wyoming: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 144, p. 198.Google Scholar
Gazin, C.L., 1968, A study of the Eocene condylarthran mammal Hyopsodus : Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 153, p. 190.Google Scholar
Gill, T., 1872, Arrangement of the families of mammals with analytical tables: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 2, p. 198.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P.D., 1994, New species of Apheliscus, Haplomylus, and Hyopsodus (Mammalia, Condylarthra) from the late Paleocene of southern Montana and early Eocene of northwestern Wyoming: Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, v. 29, p. 119134.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P.D., 2001, Biostratigraphy of the continental Paleocene-Eocene boundary interval on Polecat Bench in the northern Bighorn Basin, in Gingerich, P.D., ed., Paleocene-Eocene Stratigraphy and Biotic Change in the Bighorn and Clarks Fork Basins, Wyoming, University of Michigan, Papers on Paleontology, v. 33, p. 3771.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P.D., and Simons, E.L., 1977, Systematics, phylogeny, and evolution of early Eocene Adapidae (Mammalia, Primates) in North America: Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, v. 24, p. 245279.Google Scholar
Grande, L., 1984, Paleontology of the Green River Formation, with a review of the fish fauna: The Geological Survey of Wyoming, Bulletin, v. 63, p. 1333.Google Scholar
Grande, L., 2001, An updated review of the fish faunas from the Green River Formation, the world’s most productive freshwater Lagerstätten, in Gunnell, G.F., ed., Eocene Biodiversity—Unusual Occurrences and Rarely Sampled Habitats, New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, p. 138.Google Scholar
Grande, L., 2013, The Lost World of Fossil Lake—Snapshots from Deep Time, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 425 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, L., and Bemis, W.E., 1998, A comprehensive phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history: Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Memoir 4 (Supplement to v. 18), p. 1690.Google Scholar
Granger, W., 1908, A revision of the American Eocene horses: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 24, p. 221264.Google Scholar
Granger, W., 1915, A revision of the lower Eocene Wasatch and Wind River faunas. Part III. Order Condylarthra. Families Phenacodontidae and Meniscotheriidae: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 34, p. 329361.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E., 1821, On the natural arrangement of vertebrose animals: London Medical Repository, v. 15, p. 296310.Google Scholar
Gunnell, G.F., 1989, Evolutionary history of Microsyopoidea (Mammalia, ?Primates) and the relationship between Plesiadapiformes and Primates: Papers on Paleontology, University of Michigan, v. 27, p. 1157.Google Scholar
Gunnell, G.F., 1997, Wasatchian–Bridgerian (Eocene) paleoecology of the western interior of North America: changing paleoenvironments and taxonomic composition of omomyid (Tarsiiform) primates: Journal of Human Evolution, v. 32, p. 105132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnell, G.F., 2002, Notharctine primates (Adapiformes) from the early to middle Eocene (Wasatchian-Bridgerian) of Wyoming: transitional species and the origins of Notharctus and Smilodectes : Journal of Human Evolution, v. 43, p. 353380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnell, G.F., and Bartels, W.S., 2001, Basin margins, biodiversity, evolutionary innovation, and the origin of new taxa, in Gunnell, G.F., ed., Eocene Biodiversity—Unusual Occurrences and Rarely Sampled Habitats, New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, p. 404432.Google Scholar
Gunnell, G.F., Bartels, W.S., and Zonneveld, J.-P., 2004, A late Wasatchian (late early Eocene) vertebrate assemblage preserved in meandering stream channel deposits, northern Red Desert, Wyoming: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, v. 36, no. 5, p. 92.Google Scholar
Gunnell, G.F., Bown, T.M., Bloch, J.I., and Boyer, D.M., 2008a, “Proteutheria”, in Janis, C.M., Gunnell, G.F., and Uhen, M.D., eds., Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, Volume 2: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 6381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, G.F., Bown, T.M., and Bloch, J.I., 2008b, Leptictida, in Janis, C.M., Gunnell, G.F., and Uhen, M.D., eds., Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, Volume 2: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 8288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, G.F., Bown, T.M., Hutchison, J.H., and Bloch, J.I., 2008c, Lipotyphla, in Janis, C.M., Gunnell, G.F., and Uhen, M.D., eds., Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, Volume 2, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 89125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, G.F., Murphey, P.C., Stucky, R.K., Townsend, K.E.B., Robinson, P., Zonneveld, J.-P., and Bartels, W.S., 2009, Biostratigraphy and biochronology of the latest Wasatchian, Bridgerian, and Uintan North American Land Mammal “Ages”, in Albright, L.B., III, ed., Papers on Geology, Vertebrate Paleontology, and Biostratigraphy in Honor of Michael O. Woodburne: Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin, v. 65, p. 279330.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D.A., 1967, The mammalian fauna of the Lysite Member, Wind River Formation (early Eocene) of Wyoming: Memoirs of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, v. 5, p. 153.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E., 1895, Systematische Phylogenie der Wirbelthiere (Vertebrata), Berlin, Dritter Theil des Entwurfs einer systematischen Phylogenie, 660 p.Google Scholar
Hayden, F.V., 1869, Preliminary field report of the United States Geological Survey of Colorado and New Mexico. 3, p. 1144.Google Scholar
Hayden, F.V., 1871, Preliminary report of the United States Geological Survey of Wyoming: United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 4th Annual Report, v. 1871, p. 142144.Google Scholar
Holroyd, P.A., and Strait, S.G., 2008, New data on Loveina (Primates: Omomyidae) from the early Eocene Wasatch Formation and Implications for washakiin relationships, in Fleagle, J.G., and Gilbert, C.C., eds., Elwyn Simons, A Search for Origins, New York, Springer, p. 243257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepsen, G.L., 1930, New vertebrate fossils from the lower Eocene of the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, v. 64, p. 117130.Google Scholar
Kitts, D.B., 1956, American Hyracotherium (Perissodactyla, Equidae): Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 110, p. 160.Google Scholar
Korth, W.W., 1984, Earliest Tertiary evolution and radiation of rodents in North America: Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, v. 24, p. 171.Google Scholar
Korth, W.W., 1994a, Middle Tertiary marsupials (Mammalia) from North America: Journal of Paleontology, v. 68, p. 376397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W.W., 1994b, The Tertiary Record of Rodents in North America, New York, Plenum Press, 319 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W.W., 2008, Marsupialia, in Janis, C.M., Gunnell, G.F., and Uhen, M.D., eds., Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, Volume 2. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, M.J., and Aslan, A., 1993, Eocene hydromorphic paleosols: significance for interpreting ancient floodplain processes: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 63, p. 453463.Google Scholar
Krishtalka, L., and Stucky, R.K., 1985, Revision of the Wind River faunas, early Eocene of central Wyoming. Part 7. Revision of Diacodexis (Mammalia, Artiodactyla): Annals of Carnegie Museum, v. 54, p. 413486.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1856, Notice of some remains of fishes discovered by Dr. John E. Evans: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, v. 6, p. 256257.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1870, Report on the vertebrate fossils of the Tertiary Formations of the west: U. S. Geological Survey of the Territories (Hayden Expedition), v. 1870, p. 340370.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1871, Notice of some extinct rodents: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, v. 22, p. 230232.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1872, On the fossil vertebrates in the early Tertiary formations of Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey of Montana and Adjacent Territories (Hayden Survey), 5th Annual Report, Washington DC, US Government Printing Office, v. 5, p. 353377.Google Scholar
Lillegraven, J.A., and Ostresh, L.M. Jr., 1988, Evolution of Wyoming’s early Cenozoic topography and drainage patterns: National Geographic Research, v. 4, p. 303327.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758, Systema Naturae, Volume I, 10th Edition: Stockholm, Laurentius Salvius, 824 p.Google Scholar
Loomis, F.B., 1905, Hyopsodontidae of the Wasatch and Wind River basins: American Journal of Science, v. 19, p. 416424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, F.B., 1907, Wasatch and Wind River rodents: American Journal of Science, v. 23, p. 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1871, Notice of some new fossil mammals and birds from the Tertiary formations of the West: American Journal of Science, v. 2, p. 120127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1872, Preliminary description of new Tertiary mammals. Parts I through IV: American Journal of Science, v. 4, p. 122128, 202–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1875, On a new order of Eocene mammals: American Journal of Science, v. 9, p. 221.Google Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1876, On some characters of the genus Coryphodon Owen: American Journal of Science, v. 3, p. 425428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1894, Description of Tertiary artiodactyls: American Journal of Science, v. 48, p. 259274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1899, A provisional classification of the fresh-water Tertiary of the West: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 12, p. 1975.Google Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1901, Additional observations on the Creodonta: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 14, p. 138.Google Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1903, The fauna of the Titanotherium beds at Pipestone Springs, Montana: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 19, p. 197226.Google Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1909, Carnivora and Insectivora of the Bridger Basin, middle Eocene: Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 9, p. 291567.Google Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1915a, A revision of the Lower Eocene Wasatch and Wind River faunas. Part II. Order Condylarthra, Family Hyopsodontidae: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 34, p. 311328.Google Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1915b, A revision of the lower Eocene Wasatch and Wind River faunas: Part IV. Entelonychia, Primates, and Insectivora (Part): Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 34, p. 429483.Google Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1918, A revision of the Lower Eocene Wasatch and Wind River faunas. Part V. Insectivora (continued), Glires, Edentata: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 38, p. 565657.Google Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1920, A new genus of rodents from the middle Eocene: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 1, p. 168169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1929, Preoccupied names: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 10, p. 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, W.D., 1937, Paleocene faunas of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, v. 30, p. 1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, M.C., 1975, Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Mammalia, in Luckett, W.P., and Szalay, F.S., eds., Phylogeny of the Primates, New York, Plenum Press, p. 2146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, M.C., and Bell, S.K., 1997, Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level, New York, Columbia University Press, 631 p.Google Scholar
Miller, G.S., and Gidley, J.W., 1918, Synopsis of the supergeneric groups of rodents: Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, v. 8, p. 431448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, K.M., and Gunnell, G.F., 2002, Omomyid primates (Tarsiiformes) from the early middle Eocene at South Pass, Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming: Journal of Human Evolution, v. 43, p. 479511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nachman, B., Beard, K.C., and Anemone, R., 2010, New Primates (Omomyidae) from the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Program and Abstracts, v. 2010, p. 138A.Google Scholar
Nelson, M.E., 1973, Age and stratigraphic relations of the Fowkes Formation, Eocene of southwestern Wyoming and northeastern Utah: Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, v. 12, p. 2731.Google Scholar
Novacek, M.J., 1977, A review of Paleocene and Eocene Leptictidae (Eutheria: Mammalia) from North America: PaleoBios, v. 24, p. 142.Google Scholar
Novacek, M.J., 1982, Diacodon alticuspis, an erinaceomorph insectivore from the early Eocene of northern New Mexico: Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, v. 20, p. 135149.Google Scholar
Novacek, M.J., Bown, T.M., and Schankler, D., 1985, On the classification of the early Tertiary Erinaceomorpha (Insectivora, Mammalia): American Museum Novitates, v. 2813, p. 122.Google Scholar
Oriel, S.S., and Tracy, J.I., 1970, Uppermost Cretaceous and Tertiary stratigraphy of Fossil Basin, southwest Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, v. 635, p. 153.Google Scholar
Osborn, H.F., and Wortman, J.L., 1892, Fossil mammals of the Wasatch and Wind River beds. Collected in 1891: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 4, p. 80147.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1845, Odontography; a treatise on the comparative anatomy of teeth, London, Hippolyte Bailliere, 655 p.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1848, Description of teeth and portions of jaws of two extinct Anthracotherioid quadrupeds (Hyopotamus vectianus and Hyop. bovinus) discovered by the Marchioness of Hastings in the Eocene deposits on the NW coast of the Isle of Wight: with an attempt to develop Cuvier’s idea of the Classification of Pachyderms by the number of their toes: Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, v. 4, p. 103141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radinsky, L., 1963, Origin and early evolution of North American Tapiroidea: Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, v. 17, p. 1106.Google Scholar
Redline, A.D., 1997, Revision of the Wind River faunas, early Eocene of central Wyoming. Part 13. Systematics and phylogenetic pattern of early Eocene Hyopsodus (Mammalia: Condylarthra): Annals of Carnegie Museum, v. 66, p. 181.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., 1966, Fossil Mammalia of the Huerfano Formation, Eocene, of Colorado: Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, v. 21, p. 195.Google Scholar
Rose, K.D., 1981, The Clarkforkian Land-Mammal Age and mammalian faunal composition across the Paleocene-Eocene boundary: University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology, v. 26, p. 1197.Google Scholar
Rose, K.D., 2006, The Beginning of the Age of Mammals, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 428 p.Google Scholar
Rose, K.D., and Chinnery, B.J., 2004, The postcranial skeleton of early Eocene rodents: Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, v. 36, p. 211244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K.D., and Von Koenigswald, W., 2007, The marmot-sized paramyid rodent Notoparamys costilloi from the early Eocene of Wyoming, with comments on dental variation and occlusion in paramyids: Bulletin Carnegie Museum of Natural History, v. 39, p. 111125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothecker, J., and Storer, J.E., 1996, The marsupials of the Lac Pelletier Lower Fauna, middle Eocene (Duchesnean) of Saskatchewan: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 16, p. 770774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, D.E., and Waters, B.T., 1978, A new omomyid primate from the Wasatch Formation of southern Wyoming: Folia Primatologica, v. 30, p. 129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, W.B., and Jepsen, G.L., 1936, The mammalian fauna of the White River Oligocene—Part I. Insectivora and Carnivora: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (New Series), v. 28, p. 1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, E.L., 1962, A new Eocene primate genus, Cantius, and a revision of some allied European lemuroids: Bulletin, British Museum of Natural History (Geology), v. 7, p. 136.Google Scholar
Simons, E.L., 1972, Primate Evolution, an introduction to man’s place in nature, New York, Macmillan, 322 p.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.G., 1928, American Eocene didelphids: American Museum Novitates, v. 307, p. 17.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.G., 1940, Studies on the earliest primates: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 77, p. 185212.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.G., 1954, An apatemyid from the early Eocene of New Mexico: American Museum Novatates, v. 1654, p. 14.Google Scholar
Sinclair, W.J., 1914, A revision of the bunodont Artiodactyla of the middle and lower Eocene of North America: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 33, p. 267295.Google Scholar
Strait, S.G., 2001, New Wa-0 mammalian fauna from Castle Gardens in the southeastern Bighorn Basin, in Gingerich, P.D., ed., Paleocene–Eocene Stratigraphy and Biotic Change in the Bighorn and Clarks Fork Basins, Wyoming: University of Michigan, Papers on Paleontology, v. 33, p. 127143.Google Scholar
Stucky, R.K., 1984, Revision of the Wind River faunas, early Eocene of central Wyoming. Part 5. Geology and biostratigraphy of the upper part of the Wind River Formation, northeastern Wind River Basin: Annals Carnegie Museum, v. 53, p. 231294.Google Scholar
Stucky, R.K., and Krishtalka, L., 1990, Revision of the Wind River faunas, early Eocene of central Wyoming. Part 10. Bunophorus (Mammalia, Artiodactyla): Annals of Carnegie Museum, v. 59, p. 149171.Google Scholar
Szalay, F.S., 1976, Systematics of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates): taxonomy, phylogeny, and adaptations: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 156, p. 159449.Google Scholar
Szalay, F.S., and Delson, E., 1979, Evolutionary History of the Primates, New York, Academic Press, 580 p.Google Scholar
Thewissen, J.G.M., 1990, Evolution of Paleocene and Eocene Phenacodontidae (Mammalia, Condylarthra): University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology, v. 29, p. 1107.Google Scholar
Thewissen, J.G.M., and Gingerich, P.D., 1989, Skull and endocranial cast of Eoryctes melanus, a new palaeoryctid (Mammalia: Insectivora) from the early Eocene of western North America: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 9, p. 459470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, M.R., 1934, Meniscotherium robustum sp. nov. and a discussion of Hyracops socialis Marsh: American Journal of Science, v. 27, p. 401409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, M.R., 1938, Wyoming Eocene fishes in the Marsh collection: American Journal of Science, v. 36, p. 279295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouessart, E.-L., 1879, Catalogue des mammifères vivants et fossiles. I. Primates: Revue et Magasin de Zoologie (Paris), v. 6, p. 108140, 162–169.Google Scholar
Turner, H.N. Jr., 1849, On the evidence of affinity afforded by the skull in the ungulate Mammalia: Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London, v. 1849, p. 147158.Google Scholar
Uhen, M.D., and Gingerich, P.D., 1995, Evolution of Coryphodon (Mammalia, Pantodonta) in the late Paleocene and early Eocene of northwestern Wyoming: Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, v. 29, p. 259289.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L., 1966, Deltatheridia, a new order of mammals: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 132, p. 1126.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L., 1967, New Paleocene insectivores and insectivore classification: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 135, p. 219284.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L., 1971, Adaptive zones and the orders of mammals: Evolution, v. 25, p. 420428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, M., 1904, Die Säugetiere. Einführing in die Anatomie und Systematik der recenten und Fossilen Mammalia, Jena, Gustav Fischer, 866 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R.M., 1973, Geology and mammalian paleontology of the New Fork-Big Sandy Area, Sublette County, Wyoming: Fieldiana Geology, v. 29, p. 1193.Google Scholar
Winge, H., 1917, Udsigt over Insektaedernes indbyrdes Slaegtskab: Videnskabelige Meddelelser Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening, Copenhagen, v. 68, p. 83203.Google Scholar
Wood, A.E., 1962, The Early Tertiary rodents of the family Paramyidae: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, v. 52, p. 1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A.E., 1965, Small rodents from the early Eocene Lysite Member, Wind River Formation of Wyoming: Journal of Paleontology, v. 39, p. 124134.Google Scholar
Woodburne, M.O., Gunnell, G.F., and Stucky, R.K., 2009, Land mammal faunas of North America rise and fall during the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum: Denver Museum of Nature & Science Annals, v. 1, p. 174.Google Scholar
Wortman, J.L., 1886, Species of Hyracotherium and allied perissodactyls from the Wahsatch and Wind River Beds of North America: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 8, p. 81110.Google Scholar
Wortman, J.L., 1903, Studies of Eocene Mammalia in the Marsh collection, Peabody Museum. Part II. Primates, Suborder Cheiromyoidea: American Journal of Science, v. 16, p. 345368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortman, J.L., and Matthew, W.D., 1899, The ancestry of certain members of the Canidae, the Viverridae, and Procyonidae: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 12, p. 109139.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, J.-P., Gunnell, G.F., and Bartels, W.S., 2000, Early Eocene fossil vertebrates from the southwestern Green River Basin, Lincoln and Uinta Counties, Wyoming: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 20, p. 369386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zonneveld, J.-P., Lavigne, J.M., Bartels, W.S., and Gunnell, G.F., 2006, Lunulichnos tuberosus (ichnogen. and ichnosp. nov.) from the Early Eocene Wasatch Formation, Fossil Butte National Monument, Wyoming: an arthropod-constructed trace fossil associated with alluvial firmgrounds: Ichnos, v. 13, p. 8794. Accepted 18 April 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Map showing fossil vertebrate localities and measured sections in the Wasatch Formation at Fossil Butte National Monument, Lincoln County, southwestern Wyoming.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Composite measured sections at Fossil Butte National Monument and stratigraphic distribution of important Fossil Butte (FB) fossil localities. Sections were measured in the three main areas of Wasatch outcrop exposure: (1) near the historic quarry trail on the south face of Fossil Butte (Quarry); (2) through the valley on the north side of Fossil Butte (Valley Wall, Valley Center); and (3) near the head of Chicken Creek (arrow indicates position of Chicken Creek section below Valley section). General locations of composite sections are shown on Figure 1.

Figure 2

Table 1 Wasatch Formation mammalian faunal list – Fossil Butte National Monument.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Images 3 and 7 are SEM photographs; others are standard photographs. (1–2) FOBU 6338, Copedelphys innominatum, left dentary p3-m2 in occlusal (top) and lateral (bottom) views. (3–4) YPM-PU 16171, Eoictops novaceki n. gen. n. sp. (Holotype), left dentary with p5 (erupting), m1-2, and broken m3 in occlusal (top, m3 not shown in this view) and lateral (bottom) views. (5–6) FOBU 6094, Palaeoryctid sp. indet., left broken m1 in occlusal (top) and buccal (bottom) views. (7) FOBU 6189, Apatemys cf. A. whitakeri, right I1 in lateral view. Scale bars=2mm, except for images 5 and 6 where scale bars=1mm.

Figure 4

Figure 4 (1–3) FOBU 6205, Palaeosinopa lacus n. sp. (Holotype), left dentary with roots of p2 and slightly broken p3-m1 in occlusal (top), lateral (middle) and medial (bottom) views. (4) UM 102585, Esthonyx cf. E. bisulcatus, left Mx (labial portion missing) in occlusal view. (5) FOBU 6389, Esthonyx cf. E. bisulcatus, right mx trigonid in occlusal view. (6–7) FOBU 6361, Ectoganus sp. indet., incisor fragment (left) and isolated molar (right) in lateral views. (8) FOBU 6356, Coryphodon sp. indet., upper molar fragment in occlusal view. (9) FOBU 6097, Palaeanodon sp. indet., right distal radius in distal view. (10) FOBU 6198, Palaeanodon sp. indet., left broken astragalus in dorsal view. Scale bars=5 mm for images 1–5 and 9–10; 1 cm for images 6–8.

Figure 5

Figure 5 (1) FOBU 6366, Microsyops latidens, left dentary m1 in occlusal view. (2) FOBU 6287, Microsyops latidens, left dentary m2-3 in occlusal view. (3) FOBU 10011, Phenacolemur sp., left I1 in postero-occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6362, Cantius frugivorus, right dentary m2-3 in occlusal view. (5) UM 102587, Copelemur australotutus, right dentary p4-m3 in occlusal view. (6) FOBU 6193, Copelemur tutus, right dentary with p3 talonid, p4-m1, and partial trigonid of m2 showing distinct paraconid in occlusal view. Scale bars=5 mm for images 1–2 and 4–6; 2 mm for image 3.

Figure 6

Figure 6 (1) FOBU 6213, Hyopsodus minor, left dentary m1-3 in occlusal view. (2) FOBU 6370, Hyopsodus minor, left maxilla M1-2 in occlusal view. (3) FOBU 6129, Hyopsodus powellianus, left dentary m2-3 in occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6297, Apheliscus cf. A. insidiosus, right p4 in occlusal (top) and buccal (bottom) views. (5) FOBU 6318, Haplomylus cf. H. scottianus, left dentary p3-4 in occlusal view. (6) FOBU 6437, Haplomylus cf. H. scottianus, right m2 in occlusal view. (7) FOBU 6365, Phenacodus trilobatus, left lower molar fragment (most of trigonid and a portion of the lingual margin missing) in occlusal view. (8–9) FOBU 6229, Ectocion superstes, left broken P4 (left, labial edge missing) and M1 (right, broken labially) in occlusal views. Scale bars=5 mm.

Figure 7

Figure 7 (1–2) FOBU 6092, ?Notoparamys blochi n. sp. (Holotype), left m1 (left) and right dentary m1-2 (right) in occlusal view. (3–4) FOBU 6092, ?Notoparamys blochi n. sp. (Holotype), left maxilla M2-3 (top) and right M1 (bottom) in occlusal view. (5) FOBU 6182, Paramys excavatus, left maxilla P4-M1 in occlusal view. (6–7) FOBU 6161, Knightomys depressus, right m2 (left) and FOBU 6408, Knightomys depressus, left m1 (right) in occlusal view. Scale bars=5 mm.

Figure 8

Figure 8 (1–2) UM 102584, Oxyaena forcipata, left dp4 with broken labial trigonid and lingual talonid in occlusal (top) and lingual (bottom) views. (3) FOBU 6380, Prototomus secundarius, right P4 in occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6380, Prototomus secundarius, left broken M1 in occlusal view. (5) FOBU 6385, Didymictis cf. D. protenus, left m2 in occlusal view. (6) UM 108143, Didymictis cf. D. protenus, left M1 (broken) in occlusal view. Scale bars=5 mm.

Figure 9

Figure 9 (1) FOBU 6378, Protorohippus venticolum, left dentary p4-m3 in occlusal view. (2) FOBU 6325, Protorohippus venticolum, left maxilla M2-3 in occlusal view. (3) FOBU 6179, Heptodon calciculus, left M1 in occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6154, Lambdotherium popoagicum, left m1 trigonid in occlusal view. (5) DPC 14810, Lambdotherium popoagicum, left m1 in occlusal view. Scale bars=5 mm.

Figure 10

Table 2 Tooth measurements of Protorohippus venticolum; L=maximum length, W=maximum width, d indicates deciduous tooth.

Figure 11

Figure 10 (1) FOBU 6441, Bunophorus grangeri, left P3 in occlusal view. (2) FOBU 6410, Bunophorus grangeri, right M1 in occlusal view. (3) FOBU 6122, Diacodexis secans, left dentary m2-3 in occlusal view. (4) FOBU 6123, Hexacodus uintensis, right dentary p4-m2 in occlusal (top) and lingual (bottom) views. Scale bars=5 mm.

Figure 12

Figure 11 (1) Mammalian species-level diversity (number of species per selected orders) at Fossil Butte compared to a Wa-6 sample from the Bighorn Basin in northwestern Wyoming and a Wa-7 sample from the Pinnacles area near South Pass, southwestern Wyoming. (2) Mammalian abundance (percent total number of specimens representing selected orders) at Fossil Butte compared with same faunal samples as in 1.

Figure 13

Figure 12 Stratigraphic ranges of mammalian taxa in the Wasatch Formation at Fossil Butte, not including specimens found previous to this work (Mesonychid indet., Reithroparamys cf. R. debequensis, Vulpavus australis) because it was not possible to precisely fit them into proper stratigraphic position. Left axis shows the distribution of fossil localities in the Fossil Butte section. Right axis shows section measured in m below the base of the overlying Fossil Butte Member of the Green River Formation.

You have Access
Open access
1
Cited by