Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:32:15.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A small-bodied species of Brontotheriidae from the middle Eocene Nut Beds of the Clarno Formation, John Day Basin, Oregon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2016

Matthew C. Mihlbachler  and
Joshua X. Samuels
Matthew C. Mihlbachler
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, New York 11568, USA 〈mmihlbac@nyit.edu〉 Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West At 79th Street, New York, New York 10024, USA
Joshua X. Samuels
Affiliation:
John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Kimberly, Oregon 97848, USA 〈Joshua_Samuels@nps.gov〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We diagnose a new species of Brontotheriidae from a middle Eocene locality, the Clarno Nut Beds, from the Clarno Formation, John Day Basin, Central Oregon. Though renowned for its richness in fossil flora, fossil vertebrates are rare in the Clarno Nut Beds and this new species is the most abundantly represented mammal. Radiometric dating constrains the age of the Nut Beds fauna to about 43.76 Ma within the Uintan North American Land Mammal Age. This new taxon, represented by numerous cranial, mandibular, and dental specimens, is comparatively small for a brontothere and notable for its cranio-caudally shorted nasal incision, a trait shared with three larger-bodied middle Eocene species, Metatelmatherium ultimum, Wickia brevirhinus, and Sthenodectes incisivum. Phylogenetic analysis suggests the sister taxon of the Nut Beds brontothere could be one of two species—Wickia brevirhinus from the Sand Wash Basin of Colorado and Washakie Formation of Wyoming, or Metatelmatherium ultimum, a pan-Beringian species known from the Uintan Formation of Utah (and other Uintan age deposits) and the “Irdin Manha” Formation of Inner Mongolia, China. Phylogenetic results also indicate that the Nut Beds brontothere is a dwarf taxon. Though brontotheres are renowned for having evolved very large body sizes, this new brontothere is one of several discovered in recent decades that suggest evolutionary reductions in body size may have been relatively common in Brontotheriidae.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 6 , November 2016 , pp. 1233 - 1244
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, L.B. III, Woodburne, M.O., Fremd, T.J., Swisher, C.C. III, MacFadden, B.J., and Scott, G.R., 2008, Revised chronostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the John Day Formation (Turtle Cove and Kimberly Members), Oregon, with implications for updated calibration of the Arikareean North American Land Mammal Age: The Journal of Geology, v. 116, p. 211–237.Google Scholar
Bestland, E.A., and Retallack, G.J., 1994, Geology and paleoenvironments of the Painted Hills Unit, John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon: National Park Service Final Report, Contract CX-9000-1-10009, p. 1-211.Google Scholar
Bestland, E.A., Hammond, P.E., Blackwell, D.L.S., Kays, M.A., Retallack, G.J., and Stimac, J., 1999, Geologic framework of the Clarno Unit, John Day Fossil Beds National Monument: Central Oregon: Oregon Geology, v. 61, p. 3–19.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1880, The bad lands of the Wind River and their fauna: American Naturalist, v. 14, p. 745–748.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J., 1989, Speciation and its ontology: The empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation, in Otte, D., and Endler, J.A., eds. Speciation And Its Consequences: Sunderland Massechussets, Sinauer, p. 28–59.Google Scholar
Davis, J.I., and Nixon, K.C., 1992, Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species: Systematic Biology, v. 41, p. 421–435.Google Scholar
Dillhoff, R.M., Dillhoff, T.A., Dunn, R.E., Myers, J.A., and Strömberg, C.A.E., 2009, Cenozoic paleobotany of the John Day Basin, central Oregon, in O’Connor, J.E., Dorsey, R.J. and Madin I.P., eds., Volcanoes To Vineyards: Geologic Field Trips Through The Dynamic Landscape Of The Pacific Northwest: Geological Society of America Field Guide. 15, p. 135–164.Google Scholar
Douglass, E., 1909, Preliminary descriptions of some new titanotheres from the Uinta deposits: Annals of the Carnegie Museum, v. 6, p. 304–313.Google Scholar
Eberle, J.J., 2006, Early Eocene Brontotheriidae (Perissodactyla) from the Eureka Sound Group, Ellesmere Island, Canadian high artic—implications for Brontothere origins and high altitude dispersal: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 26, p. 381–386.Google Scholar
Eberle, J.J., and Eberth, D.A., 2015, Additions to the Eocene Perissodactyla of the Margaret Formation, Eureka Sound Group, Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 52, p. 123–133.Google Scholar
Eberle, J.J., and Storer, J.E., 1999, Northernmost record of brontotheres, Axel Heiberg Island, Canada—implications for age of the Buchanan Lake Formation and Brontothere Paleobiology: Journal of Paleontology, v. 73, p. 979–983.Google Scholar
Fortelius, M., 1990, Problems with using fossil teeth to estimate body sizes of extinct mammals, in Damuth, J., and MacFadden, B.J., eds., Body Size In Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation And Biological Implications: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 207–228.Google Scholar
Fremd, T.J., 2010, Guidebook: SVP Field Symposium 2010: John Day Basin Field Conference, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, 153 p.Google Scholar
Froehlich, D.J., 2002, Quo vadis Eohippus? The systematics and taxonomy of the early Eocene equids (Perissodactyla): Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 134, p. 141–256.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., and Nixon, K.C., 2008, TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis: Cladistics, v. 24, p. 774–786.Google Scholar
Gould, G.C., and MacFadden, B.J., 2004, Gigantism, dwarfism, and Cope’s Rule: “Nothing in evolution makes sense without phylogeny”: Bulletin of The American Museum of Natural History, v. 285, p. 219–237.Google Scholar
Granger, W., and Gregory, W.K., 1943, A revision of the Mongolian titanotheres: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 80, p. 349–389.Google Scholar
Gunnell, G.F. and Yarborough, V.L., 2000, Brontotheriidae (Perissodactyla) from the late early and middle Eocene (Bridgerian), Wasatch and Bridger formations, southern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 20, p. 349–368.Google Scholar
Hanson, C.B., 1989, Teletaceras radinskyi, a new primitive rhinocerotid from the late Eocene Clarno Formation of Oregon, in Prothero, D.R., and Schoch, R.M., eds., The Evolution of Perissodactyls: New York, Oxford University Press, p. 235–256.Google Scholar
Hanson, C.B., 1996, Stratigraphy and vertebrate faunas of the Bridgerian–Duchesnean Clarno Formation, north-central Oregon, in Prothero, D.R., and Emry, R.J., eds., The Terrestrial Eocene–Oligocene Transition in North America: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 206–239.Google Scholar
Holroyd, P.A. and Ciochon, R.L., 2000, Bunobrontops savagei: and new genus and species of brontotheriid perissodactyl from the Eocene Ponduang fauna of Myanmar: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 20, p. 408–410.Google Scholar
Janis, C.M., 1990, Correlation of cranial and dental variables with body size in ungualtes and macropodids, in Damuth J., and MacFadden, B.J., eds., Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation and Biological Implications: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 255–300.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1870a, (Description of a new genus and species, Megacerops coloradensis): Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 22, p. 1–2.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1870b, (Descriptions of Palaeosyops paludosus, Microsus cuspidatus, and Notharctus tenebrosus): Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 22, p. 113–114.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1871, Remarks on fossil vertebrate from Wyoming: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, v. 23, p. 229.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1872, Remarks on fossils from Wyoming: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 23, p. 228229.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758, Systema naturae per regna trie naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis: Editio Decima, Reformata, Stockholm (Laurentii Salvii), 824 p., doi:10.5962/bhl.title.542.Google Scholar
Lucas, S.G., 2006, A new amynodontid (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from the Eocene Clarno Formation, Oregon, and its biochronological significance: PaleoBios, v. 26, p. 7–20.Google Scholar
Lucas, S.G., Foss, S.G., and Mihlbachler, M.C., 2004, Archaenodon (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from the Eocene Clarno Formation, Oregon, and the age of the Hancock Quarry Local fauna, in Lucas, S.G., Zeigler, K.E., and Kondrashov, P.E., eds., Paleogene Mammals: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 26, p. 89–95.Google Scholar
Mader, B.J., 2009, A species-level revision of the North American brontotheres Eotitanops and Palaeosyops (Mammalia, Perissodactyla): Zootaxa, v. 2339, p. 1–43.Google Scholar
Mader, B.J., and Alexander, J.P., 1995, Megacerops kuwagatarhinus n. sp., an unusual brontothere (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) with distally forked horns: Journal of Paleontology, v. 69, p. 581–587.Google Scholar
Manchester, S.R., 1981, Fossil plants of the Eocene Clarno Nut Beds: Oregon Geology, v. 43, p. 75–81.Google Scholar
Manchester, S.R., 1990, Eocene to Oligocene floristic changes recorded in the Clarno and John Day formations, Oregon, U.S.A, in Knobloch E., and Kvacek, Z., eds., Paleofloristic and paleoclimatic changes in the Cretaceous and Tertiary, Symposium Proceedings: Prague, Czekoslovakian Geological Survey Press, p. 183–187.Google Scholar
Manchester, S.R., 1994, Fruits and seeds of the middle Eocene Nut Beds flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon: Palaeontographica Americana, v. 58, 205 p.Google Scholar
Manchester, S.R., 1995, Yes, we had bananas: Oregon Geology, v. 57, p. 41–43.Google Scholar
Manchester, S.R., 2000, Late Eocene fossil plants of the John Day Formation, Wheeler County, Oregon: Oregon Geology, v. 62, p. 51–63.Google Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1872a, Preliminary description of new Tertiary mammals: American Journal of Science and Arts, v. 4, p. 1–35.Google Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1872b, Preliminary description of new Tertiary mammals. Part II: American Journal of Science, v. 4, p. 202–224.Google Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1873, Notice of New Tertiary Mammals: American Journal of Science and Arts, v. 7, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1874, Notice of new equine mammals from the Tertiary formation: American Journal of Science, v. 7, p. 247–258.Google Scholar
McClaughry, J.D., Ferns, M.L., Streck, M.J., Patridge, K.A., and Gordon, C.L., 2009, Paleogene calderas of central and eastern Oregon: Eruptive sources of widespread tuffs in the John Day and Clarno formations, in O’Connor, J.E., Dorsey, R.J., and Madin I.P., eds., Volcanoes To Vineyards: Geologic Field Trips Through the Dynamic Landscape of the Pacific Northwest: Geological Society Of America Field Guide 15, p. 407–434.Google Scholar
Miao, D., 1982, Early Tertiary fossil mammals from the Shinao basin, Panxian County, Guizhou Province: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 21, p. 527–536.Google Scholar
Mihlbachler, M.C., 2007, Eubrontotherium clarnoensis, a new genus and species of brontothere (Brontotheriidae, Perissodactyla) from the Hancock Quarry, Clarno Formation, Wheeler County, Oregon: Paleobios, v. 21, p. 19–39.Google Scholar
Mihlbachler, M.C., 2008, Species taxonomy, phylogeny, and biogeography of the Brontotheriidae (Mammalia: Perissodactyla): Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 311, p. 1–475.Google Scholar
Mihlbachler, M.C., 2011, A new Uintan horned brontothere from Wyoming and the evolution of canine size and sexual dimorphism in the Brontotheriidae (Perissodactyla: Mammalia): Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 31, p. 202–214.Google Scholar
Mihlbachler, M.C., and Deméré, T.A., 2009, A new species of Brontotheriidae (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Santiago Formation (Duchesnian, Middle Eocene) of Southern California: Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, v. 41, p. 1–36.Google Scholar
Mihlbachler, M.C., and Deméré, T.A., 2010, Phylogenetic status of Metarhinus pater (Brontotheriidae; Perissodactyla) from southern California and species variation in Metarhinus from the middle Eocene of North America: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 30, p. 1229–1244.Google Scholar
Mihlbachler, M.C., and Samuels, J.X., 2013, Little titans of the Eocene: Cope’s rule or sampling artifact?, in, Maxwell, E., Miller-Camp, J., and Anemone, R., Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Program and Abstracts 13, p. 176.Google Scholar
Mihlbachler, M.C., Lucas, S.G., Emry, R.J., and Bayshashov, B.U., 2004a, A new brontothere (Brontotheriidae, Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Eocene of the Ily Basin of Kazakstan and a phylogeny of Asian “Horned” Brontotheres: American Museum Novitates, v. 3439, p. 1–43.Google Scholar
Mihlbachler, M.C., Lucas, S.G., and Emry, R.J., 2004b, The holotype specimen of Menodus giganteus, and the “insoluble” problem of Chadronian brontothere taxonomy, in Lucas, S.G, Zeigler, K.E., and Kondrashov, P.E., eds., Paleogene Mammals: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 26, p. 129–135.Google Scholar
Missiaen, P., Gunnell, G.F., and Gingerich, P.D., 2011, New Brontotheriidae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from the early and middle Eocene of Pakistan with implications for mammalian paleobiogeography: Journal of Paleontology, v. 85, p. 665–677.Google Scholar
Myers, J.A., 2003, Terrestrial Eocene–Oligocene vegetation and climate in the Pacific Northwest, in Prothero, D.R., Ivany, L.C., and Nesbitt, E.A., eds., From Greenhouse To Icehouse, The Marine Eocene–Oligocene Transition: New York, Columbia University Press, p. 171–185.Google Scholar
Nixon, K.C., and Wheeler, K.C., 1990, An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept: Cladistics, v. 6, p. 211–223.Google Scholar
Noblett, J.B., 1981, Subduction-related origin of the volcanic rocks of the Eocene Clarno Formation near Cherry Creek, Oregon: Oregon Geology, v. 43, p. 91–99.Google Scholar
Osborn, H.F., 1889, The Mammalia of the Uinta formation. Part III. The Perissodactyla: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, v. 16, p. 505–530.Google Scholar
Osborn, H.F., 1895, Fossil mammals of the Uinta Basin. Expedition of 1894: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 7, p. 71–105.Google Scholar
Osborn, H.F., 1908, New or little known titanotheres from the Eocene and Oligocene: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 24, p. 599–617.Google Scholar
Osborn, H.F., 1919, New titanotheres of the Huerfano: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 41, p. 557–569.Google Scholar
Osborn, H.F., 1925, Upper Eocene and lower Oligocene titanotheres of Mongolia: American Museum Novitates, v. 202, p. 1–12.Google Scholar
Osborn, H.F., 1929, Embolotherium, gen. nov., of the Ulan Gochu, Mongolia: American Museum Novitates, v. 353, p. 1–20.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, J., 2003, A new species of Archaeohippus (Mammalia, Equidae) from the Arikareean of central Florida: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 23, p. 877–885.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1848, Description of teeth and portions of jaws of two extinct antracotherioid quadrupeds (Hyopotamus vectianus and Hyop. bovinus) discovered by the Marchioness of Hastings in the Eocene deposits on the N.W. coast of the Isle of Wight: with an attempt to develop Cuvier’s idea of the classification of pachyderms by the number of their toes: Quaternary Journal of Geology of the Society of London, v. 4, p. 103–141.Google Scholar
Peck, D.L., 1964, Geologic reconnaissance of the Antelope-Ashwood area of north-central Oregon, with emphasis on the John Day Formation of late Oligocene and early Miocene age: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1161-D, 26 p.Google Scholar
Qi, T., and Beard, K.C., 1996, Nanotitan shanghuangensis, gen. et sp. nov.: The smallest known brontothere: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 16, p. 578–581.Google Scholar
Retallack, G.J., Bestland, E.A., and Fremd, T.J., 2000, Eocene and Oligocene paleosols of central Oregon: Geological Society of America Special Paper 344, 196 p.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.T., 1975, Reconnaissance geologic map of the John Day Formation in the southwestern part of the Blue Mountains and adjacent areas, north-central Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-872, scale 1:125,000, 1 sheet, http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/i872 (accessed June 2016).Google Scholar
Robinson, P.T., Gunnell, G.F, Walsh, S.L., Clyde, W.C., Storer, J.E., Stucky, R.K., Froelich, D.J., Ferrusquia-Villafranca, I., and McKenna, M.C., 2004, Wasatchian through Duchesnean Biochronology, in Woodburne, M.O., ed., Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America: New York, Columbia University Press, p. 106–155.Google Scholar
Savage, D.E., Russell, D.E., and Louis, P., 1965, European Eocene Equidae: University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 56, 94 p.Google Scholar
Scott, R.A., 1954, Fossil fruits and seeds from the Eocene Clarno Formation of Oregon: Palaeontographica, v. B96, p. 66–97.Google Scholar
Sellick, J.T.C., 1994, Phasmida (stick insect) eggs from the Eocene of Oregon: Palaeontology, v. 37, p. 913–921.Google Scholar
Sites, J.W. Jr., and Marshall, J.C., 2004, Operational criteria for delimiting species: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, v. 35, p. 199–227.Google Scholar
Stirton, R.A., 1944, A rhinoceros tooth from the Clarno Eocene of Oregon: Journal of Paleontology, v. 18, p. 265–267.Google Scholar
Swisher, C.C. III, 1992, 40Ar/39Ar dating and its application to the calibration of the North American Land Mammal ages [Ph.D. dissertation]: Berkeley, University of California, 239 p.Google Scholar
Thorley, J.L., and Page, R.D.M., 2000, RadCon: phylogenetic tree comparison and consensus: Bioinformantics, v. 16, p. 486–487.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., 1995, A new primitive Chalicothere (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the early Eocene of Hubei, China: Vertebrata Palasiatica, v. 33, p. 138–159.Google Scholar
Wheeler, E.A., and Manchester, S.R., 2002, Woods of the Eocene Nut Beds flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon, USA: International Association of Wood Anatomists Journal Supplement 3, 188 p.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Q.D., and Platnick, N.I., 2000, The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick), in Wheeler, Q.D., and Meier, R., eds., Species Concepts In Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate: New York, Columbia Univeristy Press, p. 55–69.Google Scholar
White, J.D.L., and Robinson, P.T., 1992, Intra-arc sedimentation in a low-lying marginal arc, Eocene Clarno Formation, central Oregon: Sedimentary Geology, v. 80, p. 89–114.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M., 1994, Common cladistic information and its consensus representation: reduced Adams and reduced cladistic consensus trees and profiles: Systematic Biology, v. 43, p. 343–368.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M., 1995, More on reduced consensus methods: Systematic Biology, v. 44, p. 435–439.Google Scholar
Winston, J.E., 1999, Describing Species: Practical Taxonomic Procedure for Biologists: New York, Columbia University Press, 518 p.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J.A., 1992, Climatic, floristic, and vegetational change near the Eocene/Oligocene boundary in North America, in Prothero, D.R., and Berggren, W.A., eds., Eocene–Oligocene Climatic And Biotic Evolution: Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, p. 421–436.Google Scholar
Ye, J., 1983, Mammalian fauna from the late Eocene of Ulan Shireh Area, Inner Mongolia: Vertebrata PalAsiatica, v. 21, p. 109–118.Google Scholar