Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T03:17:08.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between internal and external morphology in Paleofavosites (Tabulata): the unity of growth and growth form

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Graham A. Young  and
Robert J. Elias
Graham A. Young
Affiliation:
Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature, 190 Rupert Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0N2, Canada
Robert J. Elias
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During growth of colonial corals, the basic organization of skeletal elements was determined by inherent factors, but arrangement of corallites within a colony could be affected if environmental change induced a modified growth form. Comparisons of internal and external characters during colony development indicate how environmental and genetic factors determined growth form. The results of these comparisons have implications for understanding of colony integration, functional morphology, and systematics.

This study is based on serially sectioned coralla of the cerioid tabulate Paleofavosites subelongus, from the uppermost Ordovician to lowermost Silurian of the east-central United States. Colony growth form resulted from changes in maximum growth angle of marginal corallites, and in the shape of the growth surface. These features were coordinated with corallite characters and were dependent on variation in corallite growth. At the same time that a colony became broader by expanding its maximum growth angle and developing a taller growth surface, its corallites became larger, more new corallites were initiated, and recently initiated corallites expanded more rapidly. When a colony's maximum growth angle was reduced and the growth surface became flatter, corallites also became smaller, fewer corallites were initiated, and those corallites that were recently initiated expanded slowly.

Genetic constraint of growth is illustrated by consistent patterns of initial colony growth, and by relationships among characters of internal and external morphology. Frequent small-scale variations in growth angle and growth surface height:width during astogeny indicate fluctuating environmental factors. Sedimentation and subsidence of the colony were probably the major environmental controls on form.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 73 , Issue 4 , July 1999 , pp. 580 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, B. M. 1974. Flume studies on the stability of model corals as an aid to quantitative palaeoecology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 15:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beklemishev, V. N. 1969. Principles of Comparative Anatomy of Invertebrates, Volume 1, Promorphology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 490 p.Google Scholar
Coates, A. G., and Jackson, J. B. C. 1985. Morphological themes in the evolution of clonal and aclonal marine invertebrates, p. 67–106. In Jackson, J. B. C., Buss, L. W., and Cook, R. E. (eds.), Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Coates, A. G., and Jackson, J. B. C. 1987. Clonal growth, algal symbiosis, and reef formation by corals. Paleobiology, 13:363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, A. G., and Oliver, W. A. Jr. 1973. Coloniality in zoantharian corals, p. 3–27. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A. Jr. (eds.), Animal Colonies; Their Development and Function Through Time. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Dodd, J. R., and Stanton, R. J. Jr. 1981. Paleoecology, Concepts and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 559 p.Google Scholar
Dodd, J. R., and Stanton, R. J. Jr. 1990. Paleoecology, Concepts and Applications (second edition). John Wiley and Sons, New York, 502 p.Google Scholar
Dustan, I. 1975. Growth and form in the reef-building coral Montastrea annularis. Marine Biology, 33:101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, R. J., and Young, G. A. 1998. Coral diversity, ecology, and provincial structure during a time of crisis: the latest Ordovician to earliest Silurian Edgewood Province in Laurentia. Palaios, 13:98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gattuso, J.-P. 1985. Features of depth effects on Stylophora pistillata, an hermatypic coral in the Gulf of Aqaba (Jordan, Red Sea). Proceedings of the Fifth International Coral Reef Congress, Tahiti, 6:95–100.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. A., and Broadhead, T. W. 1989. Species-specific growth responses of favositid corals to soft-bottom substrates. Lethaia, 22:287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1895. Development of the corallum in Favosites forbesi, var. occidentalis. American Geologist, 15:131–146.Google Scholar
Graus, R. R., and Macintyre, I. G. 1982. Variation in growth forms of the reef coral Montastrea annularis (Ellis and Solander): a quantitative evaluation of growth response to light distribution using computer simulation. Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences, 12:441–465.Google Scholar
Hunter, C. L. 1985. Assessment of clonal diversity and population structure of Porites compressa (Cnidaria, Scleractinia). Proceedings of the Fifth International Coral Reef Congress, Tahiti, 6:69–74.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C. 1979. Morphological strategies of sessile animals, p. 499–555. In Larwood, G. and Rosen, B. R. (eds.), Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms (Systematics Association Special Volume 11). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
James, N. P., and Bourque, P.-A. 1992. Reefs and mounds, p. 323–347. In Walker, R. G. and James, N. P. (eds.), Facies Models: Response to Sea Level Change. Geological Association of Canada, St. John's (Newfoundland).Google Scholar
Jones, O. A. 1936. The controlling effect of environment upon the corallum in Favosites; with a revision of some massive species on this basis. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 17:1–24, 3 plates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappraff, J. 1991. Connections: The Geometric Bridge Between Art and Science. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 471 p.Google Scholar
Kershaw, S. 1981. Stromatoporoid growth form and taxonomy in a Silurian biostrome, Gotland. Journal of Paleontology, 55:1284–1295.Google Scholar
Kershaw, S. 1990. Stromatoporoid palaeobiology and taphonomy in a Silurian biostrome in Gotland, Sweden. Palaeontology, 33:681–705.Google Scholar
LeCompte, M. 1970. Die Riffe im Devon der Ardennen und ihre Bildungsbedingungen. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 4:25–70.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-J., and Noble, J. P. A. 1988. Evaluation of corallite size as a criterion for species discrimination in favositids. Journal of Paleontology, 62:32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leleshus, V. L. 1985. Evolution of the natural life span of coral polyps during the Paleozoic of central Asia. Paleontological Journal, 1985:14–17.Google Scholar
Lidgard, S., and Jackson, J. B. C. 1989. Growth in encrusting cheilostome bryozoans: I. Evolutionary trends. Paleobiology, 15:255–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manten, A. A. 1971. Silurian reefs of Gotland. Developments in Sedimentology, 13. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 537 p.Google Scholar
Noble, J. P. A., and Lee, D.-J. 1990. Ontogenies and astogenies and their significance in some favositid and heliolitid corals. Journal of Paleontology, 64:515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr. 1966. Description of dimorphism in Striatopora flexuosa Hall. Palaeontology, 9:448–454.Google Scholar
Pachut, J. F. 1992. Morphological integration and covariance during astogeny of an Ordovician trepostome bryozoan from communities of different diversities. Journal of Paleontology, 66:750–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M. 1984. Environmental influence on growth form in some massive tabulate corals from the Hamilton Group (Middle Devonian) of New York State, p. 538–542. In Oliver, W. A. Jr., Sando, W. J., Cairns, S. D., Coates, A. G., Macintyre, I. G., Bayer, F. M., and Sorauf, J. E. (eds.), Recent Advances in the Paleobiology and Geology of the Cnidaria; Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria (and Archaeocyaths and Stromatoporoids) held in Washington, D.C., U.S.A., August, 1983. Palaeontographica Americana.Google Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M., and Burke, C. D. 1989a. Environmental distribution of colony growth form in the favositid Pleurodictyum americanum. Lethaia, 22:69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M., and Burke, C. D. 1989b. Shape analysis of two sympatric coral species: implications for taxonomy and evolution. Lethaia, 22:183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philcox, M. E. 1971. Growth forms and role of colonial coelenterates in reefs of the Gower Formation (Silurian), Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 45:338–346.Google Scholar
Powell, J. H., and Scrutton, C. T. 1978. Variation in the Silurian tabulate coral Paleofavosites asper, and the status of Mesofavosites. Palaeontology, 21:307–319.Google Scholar
Savage, T. E. 1913. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Alexandrian Series in Illinois and Missouri, Part 1. Illinois State Geological Survey, Urbana, 124 p. [pre-print of Illinois State Geological Survey, Bulletin 23 (1917), p. 67-160]Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1983. Astogeny in the Devonian rugose coral Phillipsastrea nevadensis from northern Canada, p. 237–259. In Jell, P. A. and Roberts, J. (eds.), Dorothy Hill Jubilee Memoir. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir, 1.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1989. Intracolonial and intraspecific variation in tabulate corals, p. 33–43. In Jell, P. A. and Pickett, J. W. (eds.), Fossil Cnidaria 5:Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria Including Archaeocyatha and Spongiomorphs held in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 25-29 July 1988. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir, 8.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1993. Growth-form variation and control in two British Silurian species of Propora, p. 273–281. In Oekentorp-Küster, P. (ed.), Proceedings of the VI. International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria and Porifera held in Münster, Germany, 9-14 September 1991. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, 164.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1997. Growth strategies and colonial forms in tabulate corals, p. 179–191. In Perejón, A. and Comas-Rengifo, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria and Porifera held in Madrid, Spain, 1995. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Espanola de Historia Natural, 91.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T., and Powell, J. H. 1980. Periodic development of dimetrism in some favositid corals. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 25:477–491.Google Scholar
Stel, J. H. 1978a. Environment and quantitative morphology of some Silurian tabulates from Gotland. Scripta Geologica, 47:1–75.Google Scholar
Stel, J. H. 1978b. Studies on the palaeobiology of favositids. Stabo, Groningen, 246 p.Google Scholar
Struve, W. 1961. Das Eifeler Korallen-Meer. Der Aufschluß, Sonderheit 10 (Die Nördlicher Eifel):81–107.Google Scholar
Tesakov, Yu. I. 1973. Izmenchivost diametra korallitov i por u Favosites gothlandicus i ee svyazi obitaniya, p. 84–92. In Betekhtina, O. A. et al. (ed.), Sreda i zhizn'v geologicheskom proshlom (pozdniy dokembriy i paleozoy Sibiri). Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. W. 1942. On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1116 p.Google Scholar
Tripp, K. 1933. Die favositen Gotlands. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 79:1–221.Google Scholar
Willis, B. L. 1985. Phenotypic plasticity versus phenotypic stability in the reef corals Turbinaria mesenterina and Pavona cactus. Proceedings of the Fifth International Coral Reef Congress, Tahiti, 4:107–112.Google Scholar
Willis, B. L. and Ayre, D. J. 1985. Asexual reproduction and genetic determination of growth form in the coral Pavona cactus: biochemical genetic and immunogenic evidence. Oecologia, 65:516–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, G. A. 1999a. Fossil colonial corals: colony type and growth form, p. 647–666. In Savazzi, E. (ed.), Functional Morphology of the Invertebrate Skeleton. John Wiley and Sons, London.Google Scholar
Young, G. A. 1999b. Fossil colonial corals: growth patterns and coral-substrate relationships, p. 667–687. In Savazzi, E. (ed.), Functional Morphology of the Invertebrate Skeleton. John Wiley and Sons, London.Google Scholar
Young, G. A. and Elias, R. J. 1993. Biometry and intraspecific variation in favositid and heliolitid corals, p. 283–291. In Oekentorp-Küster, P. (ed.), Proceedings of the VI. International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria and Porifera held in Münster, Germany, 9-14 September 1991. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 164.Google Scholar
Young, G. A., and Elias, R. J. 1995. Latest Ordovician to earliest Silurian colonial corals of the east-central United States. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 108(347):1–148.Google Scholar
Young, G. A., and Elias, R. J. 1997. Patterns of variation in Late Ordovician and Early Silurian tabulate corals, p. 193–204. In Perejón, A. and J., Comas-Rengifo (eds.), Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria and Porifera held in Madrid, Spain, 1995. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Espanola de Historia Natural, 91.Google Scholar
Young, G. A., and Scrutton, C. T. 1991. Growth form in Silurian heliolitid corals: the influence of genetics and environment. Paleobiology, 17:369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar