Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T04:55:28.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oldest record of peduncular attachment of brachiopods to crinoid stems, Upper Ordovician, Ohio, U.S.A. (Brachiopoda; Atrypida: Echinodermata; Crinoidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Michael R. Sandy
Michael R. Sandy*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, Ohio 45469-2364, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A hand-specimen, bedding-plane sample of limestone (wackestone) from the Upper Ordovician Waynesville Formation has numerous brachiopod specimens (at least 60) exposed on its surface (Figure 1). The brachiopods have been identified as members of the atrypid species Zygospira modesta (Say in Hall) 1847 (the type species of the genus Zygospira Hall, 1862) and are concentrated in an area measuring approximately 9 cm x 2 cm. A wide range of specimen sizes from juvenile to adult are present and are believed to represent a brachiopod life-assemblage (Figure 2).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , May 1996 , pp. 532 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bottjer, D. J., and Ausich, W. I. 1986. Phanerozoic development of tiering in soft substrata suspension-feeding communities. Paleobiology, 12:400–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1990. Evolutionary paleobiology of behavior and co-evolution. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 725 p.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1991. Organism-sediment relationships in Silurian marine environments. Special Papers in Palaeontology, Number 44:301–344.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Baird, G. C. 1986. Comparative taphonomy: A key to paleoenvironmental interpretation based on fossil preservation. Palaios, 1:207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Eckert, J. D. 1982. Paleoecology of a well-preserved crinoid colony from the Silurian Rochester Shale in Ontario. Life Science Contributions, Royal Ontario Museum, 131, 20 p.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Speyer, S. E. 1990. Taphofacies, p. 258–263. In Briggs, D. E. G. and Crowther, P. R. (eds.), Paleobiology: A synthesis. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G., and Surlyk, F. 1973. Borings produced by brachiopod pedicles, fossil and Recent. Lethaia, 6:349–365.Google Scholar
Brunton, C. H. C. 1966. Silicified productoids from the Visean of County Fermanagh. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), London, Geology, 12, 5:175–243.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. 1876. On an adherent form of Productus and a small Spiriferina from the Lower Carboniferous Limestone Group of the East of Scotland. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 32:454–465.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1963. Unusual attachment of a Permian linoproductid brachiopod. Journal of Paleontology, 37:134–140.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1968. Structural adaptation in two Permian brachiopod genera, Salt Range, West Pakistan. Journal of Paleontology, 42:1–32.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1981. Living habits of ancient articulate brachiopods, p. 127–140. In Dutro, J. T. and Boardman, R. S. (eds.), Lophophorates—Notes for a Short Course. University of Tennessee, Department of Geological Sciences, Studies in Geology, 5.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1847. Palaeontology of New York. Volume 1. Containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower division of the New-York System, (equivalent to the Lower Silurian rocks of Europe.) C. Van Benthuysen, Albany, New York. 338 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1862. Contributions to palaeontology comprising descriptions of new species of fossils from the Upper Helderberg, Hamilton and Chemung Groups. New York State Cabinet of Natural History, Annual Report, 15:29–197.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1993. Sequence stratigraphy of a carbonate-clastic ramp: The Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician) in its type area. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 105:306–322.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., and Ausich, W. I. 1983. Biotic interactions among Recent and fossil crinoids, p. 377–427. In Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic interactions in Recent and fossil benthic communities. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., and Cooper, G. A. 1960. Morphology, classification and life habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda). Geological Society of America Memoir, 81, 447 p.Google Scholar
Richards, R. P. 1972. Autecology of Richmondian brachiopods (Late Ordovician of Indiana and Ohio). Journal of Paleontology, 46:386–405.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. R. 1981. Brachiopods in mud-resolution of a dilemma. Science, 211:1161–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1970. Living and fossil brachiopods. Hutchinson University Press, London. 199 p.Google Scholar
Schumacher, G. A. 1986. Ordovician echinoderm fossils. Ohio Geology Newsletter, Division of Geological Survey, 1986(Summer):5–7.Google Scholar
Schumacher, G. A., and Ausich, W. I. 1983. New Upper Ordovician echinoderm site: Bull Fork Formation, Caesar Creek Reservoir (Warren County, Ohio). Ohio Journal of Science, 83:60–64.Google Scholar
Tobin, R. C. 1982. A model for cyclic deposition in the Cincinnatian Series of southwestern Ohio, northern Kentucky and southeastern Indiana. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 483 p.Google Scholar
Unklesbay, A. G., and Niewoehner, W. B. 1959. Attachment loops on infant brachiopods from the Louisiana Limestone in Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 33:547–549.Google Scholar
Wright, A. D. 1968. The brachiopod Dicoelosia biloba (Linnaeus) and related species. Arkiv för Zoologi, 20:261–319.Google Scholar