Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T13:43:57.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nomenclature of a bivalve boring from the Upper Ordovician of the Midwestern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Mark A. Wilson  and
Timothy J. Palmer
Mark A. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691
Timothy J. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University College of Wales, Dyfed SY23 2DB, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although the burrows and trails in the Upper Ordovician rocks around Cincinnati, Ohio, have been fully documented and are well known (Osgood, 1970), comparatively little attention has been paid to the borers. Nevertheless, borers are very common in a variety of hard substrates in these rocks. These substrates include the skeletons of bryozoans, corals, and stromatoporoids (Palmer and Wilson, 1988), as well as cobbles and hardgrounds (Palmer, 1982; Wilson, 1985). By far the most common type of boring is the elongate tube Trypanites, which could have been made by a variety of filter-feeding worms. Trypanites is common on hard substrates throughout the lower Paleozoic (Palmer, 1982).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , March 1988 , pp. 306 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ekdale, A. A., Bromley, R. G., and Pemberton, S. G. 1984. Ichnology: the use of trace fossils in sedimentology and stratigraphy. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Short Course, 15:1–317.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W. 1973. Concepts in the study of biogenic sedimentary structures. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 43:6–19.Google Scholar
Kelley, S. R. A., and Bromley, R. G. 1984. Ichnological nomenclature of clavate borings. Palaeontology, 27:793–807.Google Scholar
Osgood, R. G. Jr. 1970. Trace fossils of the Cincinnati area. Palaeontographica Americana, Vol. VI, No. 41:281–444.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. J. 1982. Cambrian to Cretaceous changes in hardground communities. Lethaia, 15:309–323.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. J., and Wilson, M. A. 1988. Parasitism of Ordovician bryozoans and the origin of pseudoborings. Palaeontology (in press).Google Scholar
Pojeta, J. Jr., and Palmer, T. J. 1976. The origin of rock boring in mytilacean pelecypods. Alcheringa, 1:167–179.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A. 1985. Disturbance and ecological succession in an Upper Ordovician cobble-dwelling hardground fauna. Science, 228:575–577.Google Scholar