Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:50:29.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Caledonian Triassic Bryozoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Andrej Ernst ,
Priska Schäfer  and
Jack A. Grant-Mackie
Andrej Ernst
Affiliation:
Institut für Geologie, Universität Hamburg, Bundesstr. 55, D-20146, Hamburg, Germany 〈andrej.ernst@uni-hamburg.de〉
Priska Schäfer
Affiliation:
Institut für Geowissenschaften der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Ludewig-Meyn-Str. 10, D-24118 Kiel, Germany 〈ps@gpi.uni-kiel.de〉
Jack A. Grant-Mackie
Affiliation:
School of Environment, University of Auckland, PB 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand 〈grant-mackie@xtra.co.nz〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four trepostome bryozoan species are described from the Upper Triassic of New Caledonia. They include one new genus Metastenodiscus n. gen. The studied fauna shows strong paleobiogeographic relations to New Zealand and less so to Japan. Morphological similarities between Middle Paleozoic and Triassic trepostome bryozoans (e.g., abundant diaphragms) are explained by homeomorphy.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 89 , Issue 5 , September 2015 , pp. 730 - 747
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, J.C., Ireland, T. R., Clarke, G.L., Cluzel, D., Davis, A.M., and Meffre, S., 1998, Regional implications of U/Pb age constraints on the tectonic evolution of New Caledonia: Tectonophysics, v. 299, p. 333–343.Google Scholar
Anstey, R.L., 1987, Astogeny and phylogeny: evolutionary heterochrony in Paleozoic bryozoans: Paleobiology, v. 13, p. 20–43.Google Scholar
Anstey, R.L., and Perry, T.G., 1970, Biometric procedures in taxonomic studies of Paleozoic bryozoans: Journal of Paleontology, v. 44, p. 383–398.Google Scholar
Avias, J., 1953, Contribution à l’étude stratigraphique et paléontologique des formations antécretacées de la Nouvelle-Calédonie centrale: Sciences de la Terre, v. 1, p. 1–276.Google Scholar
Blake, D.B., 1980, Homeomorphy in Paleozoic bryozoans: a search for explanations: Paleobiology, v. 6, p. 451–465.Google Scholar
Boardman, R.S., 1984, Origin of the Post-Triassic Stenolaemata (Bryozoa): a taxonomic oversight: Journal of Paleontology, v. 58, p. 19–39.Google Scholar
Boardman, R.S., and McKinney, F.K., 1976, Skeletal architecture and preserved organs of four-sided zooids in convergent genera of Paleozoic Trepostomata (Bryozoa): Journal of Paleontology, v. 50, p. 25–78.Google Scholar
Borg, F., 1926, Studies on Recent cyclostomatous Bryozoa: Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala, v. 10, p. 181–507.Google Scholar
Campbell, H.J., and Grant-Mackie, J.A., 1984, Biostratigraphy of the Mesozoic Baie de St-Vincent Group, New Caledonia: Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 14, p. 349–366.Google Scholar
Campbell, H.J., and Grant-Mackie, J.A., 2000, The marine Triassic of Australasia and its interregional correlation, in Yin H., Dickens, J.M., Shi, G.R., and Tong, J., eds., Permian-Triassic evolution of Tethys and Western Circum-Pacific, Amsterdam, Elsevier, p. 235–255.Google Scholar
Campbell, H.J., Grant-Mackie, J.A., and Paris, J.-P., 1985, Geology of the Moindou-Téremba area, New Caledonia, stratigraphy and structure of Téremba Group (Permian-Lower Triassic) and Baie de St-Vincent Group (Upper Triassic-Lower Jurassic): Géologie de la France, v. 1985(1), p. 19–36.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.D., 1956, The Otapirian stage of the Triassic system of New Zealand, part II: Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 84, p. 45–50.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.A., 2004, The New Zealand Geological timescale: Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Monograph, v. 22, p. 1–284.Google Scholar
Crockford, J., 1945, Stenoporids from the Permian of New South Wales and Tasmania: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 70, p. 9–24.Google Scholar
Davies, H., Bani, P., Black, P.M., Smith, I.E.M., Garaebiti, E., and Rodda, P., 2004, Oceania (including Fiji, PNG and Solomons), in Selley, R.C., Cocks, L.R.M., and Plimmer, I.R., eds., Encyclopedia of Geology, vol. 10, New York, Science Direct, p. 109–122.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1831, Symbolae physicae animalia evertebrata exclusis insectis. Series prima cum tabularum decade prima continent animalia Africana et Asiatica. Decas Prima, in Hemprich, F.G., and Ehrenberg, C.J., eds., Symbolae physicae, seu Icones adhue ineditae corporum naturalium novorum aut minus cognitorum quae ex itineribus per Libyam Aegyptum, Nubiam Dengalam, Syriam, Arabiam et Habessiniam, Pars Zoologica 4: Berlin, Officina Academica, p. pls. 1–2. [1828], text [1831].Google Scholar
Ernst, A., Taylor, P., Bohatý, J., and Wyse Jackson, P.N., 2012, Homeomorphy in Lunostoma, a new Middle Devonian cryptostome bryozoan: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 86, p. 135–145.Google Scholar
Faure, P., and Paris, J.-P., 1982, Notice explicative sur la feuille La Tontouta: Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Orléans, France, with geological map at 1, p. 50,000, 32 p.Google Scholar
Fritz, M.A., 1961, A new bryozoan genus from Lake Hazen, northeastern Ellesmere Island: Proceedings of the Geological Association of Canada, v. 13, p. 53–59.Google Scholar
GNS SCIENCE 2012, New Zealand geological timescale v. 2012/1: Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Ltd, Lower Hutt, chart, 2 p.Google Scholar
Grant-Mackie, J.A., 1985, The Warepan Stage of the Upper Triassic: redefinition and subdivision: New Zealand Journal of Geology & Geophysics, v. 28, p. 701–724.Google Scholar
Grant-Mackie, J.A., and Lowry, D.C., 1964, Upper Triassic rocks of Kiritehere, southwest Auckland, New Zealand, pt 1: submarine slumping of Norian strata: Sedimentology, v. 3(4), p. 296–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselbo, S.P., Robinson, S.A., Surlyk, F., and Piasecki, S., 2002, Terrestrial and marine extinction at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary synchronized with major carbon-cycle perturbations: a link to initiation of massive volcanism?: Geology, v. 30, p. 251–254.Google Scholar
Hinds, R.W., 1975, Growth mode and homeomorphism in cyclostome Bryozoa: Journal of Paleontology, v. 49, p. 875–910.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1948, The Geotectonics of the Japanese Island, 2, Tokyo, Meguro Book Co, [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., 1949, Shikoku Region, Regional Geology of Japan, Tokyo, Asakura Book Co, [in Japanese].Google Scholar
MacFarlan, D.A.B., 1992, Triassic and Jurassic Rhynchonellacea (Brachiopoda) from New Zealand and New Caledonia: Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin, v. 31, p. 1–310.Google Scholar
Marwick, J., 1953, Divisions and faunas of the Hokonui System (Triassic and Jurassic): New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, v. 21, p. 1–141.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K., Taylor, P.D., and Zullo, V.A., 1993, Lyre-shaped hornerid bryozoan colonies: homeomorphy in colony form between Paleozoic Fenestrata and Cenozoic Cyclostomata: Journal of Paleontology, v. 67, p. 343–354.Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., 1961, Devonskie mshanki Minusinskikh i Kuznetskoi kotlovin [Devonian Bryozoa of the Minusinsk and Kuznetsk depressions]: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 86, p. 1–206. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., 1969, O sistematicheskom sostave i rasprostranenii mshanok v triase [Systematic composition and range of Triassic bryozoans]: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, v. 1969(2), p. 49–57. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., and Zharnikova, I.K., 1984, On new Triassic bryozoans: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, v. 1984, p. 73–79. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Palfy, J., Mortensen, J.K., Carter, E.S., Smith, P.L., Friedman, R.M., and Tipper, H.W., 2000, Timing the end-Triassic mass extinction: first on land, then in the sea?: Geology, v. 28, p. 39–42.Google Scholar
Paris, J.-P., 1981, Géologie de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Un essai de synthèse: Mémoire du Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières v. 113, p. 1–274, with a geological map at 1, p. 1:200,000.Google Scholar
Pharo, C.H., 1967, The geology of some islands in Baie de Pritzbuer, New Caledonia [PhD dissertation], Auckland, New Zealand, University of Auckland Library, 149 p.Google Scholar
Sakagami, S., 1972, The Triassic Bryozoa from Kusaka, Sakawa Basin, Shikoku, Japan: Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan N.S., v. 85, p. 275–279.Google Scholar
Sakagami, S., and Sakai, A., 1979, Triassic bryozoans from the Hidaka Group in Hokkaido, Japan: Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan new series, v. 114, p. 77–86.Google Scholar
Schäfer, P., and Grant-Mackie, J.A., 1994, Triassic Bryozoa from the Murihiku and Torlesse Supergroups, New Zealand: Memoirs of the Australasian Association of Palaeontologists, v. 16, p. 1–52.Google Scholar
Schäfer, P., and Grant-Mackie, J.A., 1998, Revised systematics and palaeobiogeography of some Late Triassic colonial invertebrates from the Pacific region: Alcheringa, v. 22, p. 87–122.Google Scholar
Schäfer, P., Cuffey, R., and Young, A.R., 2003, New trepostome Bryozoa from the Early Triassic (Smithian/Spathian) of Nevada: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 77, p. 323–340.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D., and Badve, R.M., 1995, A new cheilostome bryozoan from the Cretaceous of India and Europe: a cyclostome homeomorph: Palaeontology, v. 38, p. 627–657.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D., and Weedon, M.J., 2000, Skeletal ultrastructure and phylogeny of cyclostome bryozoans: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 128, p. 337–399.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., 1882, American Palaeozoic Bryozoa: The Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, v. 5, p. 233–257.Google Scholar
Voigt, E., and Flor, F.D., 1970, Homoeomorphien bei fossilen cyclostomen Bryozoen, dargestellt am Beispiel der Gattung Spiropora Lamouroux 1821: Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Palaeontologischen Institut der Universitaet Hamburg, v. 39, p. 7–96.Google Scholar
Waagen, W., and Wentzel, J., 1886, Salt range fossils, pt. Coelenterata: Memoir of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologica Indica, v. 13, p. 835–924.Google Scholar
Waeschenbach, A., Cox, C.C., Littlewood, D.T.J., Porter, J.S., and Taylor, P.D., 2009, First molecular estimate of cyclostome bryozoan phylogeny confirms extensive homoplasy among skeletal characters used in traditional taxonomy: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 52(1), p. 241–251.Google Scholar
Wilckens, O., 1927, Contributions to the paleontology of the New Zealand Trias: Palaeontological Bulletin of the Geological Survey Branch, v. 12, p. 1–65.Google Scholar
Zhang, W.-P., and Grant-Mackie, J.A., 2001, Late Triassic-Early Jurassic palynofloral assemblages from Murihiku strata of New Zealand, and comparisons with China: Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 31, p. 575–683.Google Scholar