Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T01:54:17.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hexactinellid and calcareous sponges from the Pennsylvanian (Moscovian) Dikanre Formation from Xinjiang-Uygur Autonomous Region, northwestern People's Republic of China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, S-389 ESC, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-4606
Johnny A. Waters
Affiliation:
2Geology Department, State University of West Georgia, 101 Gallaway Building, Maple Street, Carrollton 30117
Christopher G. Maples
Affiliation:
3Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
N. Gary Lane
Affiliation:
4Department of Geosciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405
Liao Zhou-Ting
Affiliation:
4Department of Geosciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405
Liu Lu-Jon
Affiliation:
5Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, 39 Eastern Beijing Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210008, People's Republic of China

Abstract

A modest assemblage of hexactinellid and calcareous sponges from the Pennsylvanian (Moscovian) Dikanre Formation has been recovered from the Uygur Autonomous Region in eastern Xinjiang Province in northwestern China. Hexactinellids include the reticulosid Stereodictyum proteron Rigby and Washburn, 1972, and the new amphidiscosid species Stioderma sinensis, S. micra, and S. mega. This is the first time the genera Stereodictyum and Stioderma have been reported from Asia. Also included in the assemblage is a silicified porate permosphinctan, Amblysiphonella cf. barroisi Steinmann, 1882, which is the first report of that genus from northwestern China. Species of Stioderma are described from nearly complete specimens for the first time. Previously described species have been based on isolated spicules or relatively small fragments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarke, J. M. 1897. A sphinctozoan calcisponge from the Upper Carboniferous of eastern Nebraska. American Geologist, 20:387392.Google Scholar
De Laubenfels, M. W. 1955. Archaeocyatha and Porifera, p. E21E112. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1960. Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas region: The siliceous sponges. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 120(1):1160.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M. 1899 (1898). A memoir on the Paleozoic reticulate sponges constituting the family Dictyospongidae. New York State Museum, Memoir 2:1350.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1888. A monograph of the British fossil sponges. London, Palaeontographical Society, Pt. 2, p. 93188.Google Scholar
Lévi, C. 1973. Systématique de la classe des Démospongiaria (Demosponges), p. 577631. In Grassé, P. P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie. Masson et Cie, Paris, 3, Volume 1.Google Scholar
Pelzman, I. 1930. Amblysiphonella und Bryozoen aus dem Oberkarbon der Karawanken. Mitteilungen Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein fuer Steiermark, 67:123127.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1958. A monograph of the Upper Cretaceous Hexactinellida of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Pt. I. Palaeontographical Society, London, p. ivlvi.Google Scholar
Rigby, J.K., and Washburn, A. T. 1972. A new hexactinellid sponge from the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian Diamond Peak Formation in eastern Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 46:266270.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1870. Grundzuge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig, p. 188.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1924. Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwest-deutschland III. und letzter Teil. Monographien zür Geologie und Palaeontologie, Berlin, (1)2:1159.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1887. Report on the Hexactinellida collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873-76. The Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger, Zoology, 21:1514.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1962. Die Sphinctozoa, eine Gruppe fossiler Kalkschwämme. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Abhandlungen der Wissenschaften mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen. Klasse, 1961(10):720790.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B. 1990. Die systematische Stellung der thalamiden Schwämme und ihr Bedeutung in der Erdgeschichte. Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Reihe A, Geologie und Paläontologie, 21, 325 p.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1875. Sponges, p. 451. In Encyclopaedia Brittanica (ninth edition). London.Google Scholar
Steinmann, G. 1882. Pharetronen-Studien. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, p. 139191.Google Scholar
Termier, H., and Termier, G., 1974. Spongiaires permiens du Djebel Tebaga (Sud Tunisien). Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris. 279(D):247249.Google Scholar
Wang, Ming-Qian. 1981. The Carboniferous ammonoids of eastern Xinjiang. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 20(5):468481.Google Scholar
Weller, J. M. 1930. Siliceous sponge spicules of Pennsylvanian age from Illinois and Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 4:223251.Google Scholar
Young, J., and Young, J. 1877. On a Carboniferous Hyalonema and other sponges from Ayrshire. Annales and Magazine of Natural History, (4)20:425432.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. 1983. Study on the sphinctozoans of Upper Permian Changxing Formation from Lichuan area, West Hubei, China, p. 111. In A collection of theses for master's degree, 1983. Institute of Geology, Academia Sinica, Beijing.Google Scholar