Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:08:03.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Faunas and Cambrian volcanism on the Avalonian marginal platform, southern New Brunswick

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Ed Landing
Affiliation:
New York State Museum, Madison Avenue, Albany, New York 12230,
Susan C. Johnson
Affiliation:
New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, Geological Surveys Branch, Box 5040, Sussex, New Brunswick E4E 5L2,
Gerd Geyer
Affiliation:
Am Rubenland 17, 97084 Würzburg, Germany,

Abstract

The Cambrian inlier at Beaver Harbour, southern New Brunswick, is now confidently referred to the marginal platform of the late Proterozoic–Early Paleozoic Avalon microcontinent. The sub-trilobitic Lower Cambrian Chapel Island and Random Formations are unconformably overlain by the mafic volcanic-dominated Wade's Lane Formation (new). Late Early Cambrian trilobites and small shelly taxa in the lowest Wade's Lane demonstrate a long Random–Wade's Lane hiatus (middle Terreneuvian–early Branchian). Latest Early–middle Middle Cambrian pyroclastic volcanism produced a volcanic edifice at Beaver Harbour that is one of three known volcanic centers that extended 550 km along the northwest margin of Avalon. Middle Middle Cambrian sea-level rise, probably in the Paradoxides eteminicus Chron, mantled the extinct volcanics with gray-green mudstone and limestone of the Fossil Brook Member. Black, dysoxic mudstone of the upper Manuels River Formation (upper Middle Cambrian, P. davidis Zone) is the youngest Cambrian unit in the Beaver Harbour inlier. Lapworthella cornu (Wiman, 1903) emend., a senior synonym of the genotype L. nigra (Cobbold, 1921), Hyolithellus sinuosus Cobbold, 1921, and probably Acrothyra sera Matthew, 1902a, range through the ca. 8 m.y. of the trilobite-bearing upper Lower Cambrian, and H. sinuosus and A. sera persist into the middle Middle Cambrian. Lapworthella cornu and H. sinuosus replaced the tropical taxa L. schodackensis (Lochman, 1956) and H. micans Billings, 1872, in cool-water Avalon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlberg, P. and Bergström, J. 1978. Lower Cambrian ptychopariid trilobites from Scandinavia. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Avhandlingar och Uppsatser, I 4:o, Series Ca, 49, 40 p.Google Scholar
Angelin, N. P. 1854. Palaeontologia Scandinavica. Pars I. Crustacea Formationis Transitionis. Fac. II. Academiae Regiae Scientiarum Suecanae, p. IIX, 21–92, T.O. Weigel, Leipzig (“Lipsiae”).Google Scholar
Barr, S. M. and Kerr, A. 1997. Late Precambrian plutons in the Avalon terrane of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, p. 4574. In Sinha, A. K., Whalen, J. B., and Hogan, J. P. (eds.), The nature of magmatism in the Appalachian orogen. Geological Society of America Memoir 191.Google Scholar
Barr, S. M. and White, C. E. 1999. Field relations, petrology, and structure of Neoproterozoic rocks in the Caledonian Highlands, southern New Brunswick. Geological Society of Canada Bulletin 530, 101 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, S. M., White, C. E., and MacDonald, A. S. 1996. Stratigraphy, tectonic setting, and geological history of Late Precambrian volcanic-sedimentary-plutonic belts in southeastern Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 468, 84 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, S. M., Raeside, R. P., and White, C. E. 1998. Geological correlations between Cape Breton Island and Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 35:12521270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, S. M., White, C. E., and Miller, B. V. 2002. The Kingston terrane, southern New Brunswick, Canada: evidence for a Silurian volcanic arc. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 114:964982.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, S. M., White, C. E., and Miller, B. V. 2003. Age and geochemistry of late Neoproterozoic and Early Cambrian igneous rocks in southern New Brunswick: similarities and contrasts. Atlantic Geology, 39:5573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrande, J. 1846. Notice préliminaire sur le Système silurien et les trilobites de Bohême. Hirschfeld, Leipzig, 96 p.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1852. Système silurien du centre de la Bohême. 1ère Partie. Recherche paléontologiques. Crustacés, Trilobites, 1. Prague, Paris, 935 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, C. 2005. Constraints on the tectonic evolution of the southern New River terrane and its relationship to other terranes in southern New Brunswick. Unpublished MS thesis, Acadia University, 169 p.Google Scholar
Bengtson, S. 1980. Redescription of the Lower Cambrian Lapworthella cornu . Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 102:5355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, S. and Fletcher, T. P. 1983. The oldest sequence of skeletal fossils in the Lower Cambrian of southeastern Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20:525536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, S., Matthews, S. C., and Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1986. The Cambrian netlike fossil Microdictyon , p. 97115. In Hoffman, A. and Nitecki, M. H. (eds.), Problematical fossil taxa. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, 5.Google Scholar
Bengtson, S., Conway Morris, S., Cooper, B. J., Jell, P. A., and Runnegar, B. N. 1990. Early Cambrian fossils from South Australia. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists Memoir 9, 362 p.Google Scholar
Bergström, J. and Ahlberg, P. 1981. Uppermost Lower Cambrian biostratigraphy in Scania, Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 103(2):193214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, J. and Levi-Setti, R. 1978. Phenotypic variation in the Middle Cambrian trilobite Paradoxides davidis Salter at Manuels, SE Newfoundland. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 12:140.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1872. On some new species of Palaeozoic fossils. Canadian Naturalist, 6:213233, 240.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1984. Microfossils and small shelly fossils from the Lower Cambrian Hyolithes Limestone at Nuneaton, English Midlands. Geological Magazine, 121:229253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasier, M. D. and Sukhov, S. S. 1998. The falling amplitude of carbon isotopic isolations through the Lower to Middle Cambrian: northern Siberia data. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 35:353373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1822. Histoire naturelle des Crustacés fossiles sous les rapports zoologique et géologique, savoir le Trilobites. Les Crustacés proprement dits par A.-G. Desmarest. F.G. Levrault, Paris, 154 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brünnich, M. T. 1772. Zoologiæ fundamenta praelectionibus academicis accommodata. Christian Pelt, Copenhagen and Leipzig, 254 p.Google Scholar
Chang, W. T. 1957. Preliminary note of the Lower and Middle Cambrian stratigraphy of Poshan, central Shantung. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 5(1):1331. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Chien, Y. Y., and Yao, B. J. 1974. Chengkouia , p. 91. In Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, Atlas of Palaeontology and Stratigraphy of Southwest China. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Cobbold, E. S. 1910. On some small trilobites from the Cambrian rocks of Comley (Shropshire). Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 64:1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, E. S. 1911. Trilobites from the Paradoxides beds of Comley (Shropshire), with notes on some of the associated Brachiopoda by Charles Alfred Matley. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 67:282310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, E. S. 1921. The Cambrian horizons of Comley (Shropshire) and their Brachiopoda, Pteropoda, Gasteropoda, etc. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 304:325386.Google Scholar
Cobbold, E. S. 1931. Additional fossils from the Cambrian rocks of Comley, Shropshire. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 87:459512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbold, E. S. and Pocock, R. H. 1934. The Cambrian area of Rushton (Shropshire). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Pt. B, 223:305409.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. and Fritz, W. H. 1984. Lapworthella filigrana from the Lower Cambrian of the Cassiar Mts., northern British Columbia, Can., with comments on possible levels of competition in the Early Cambrian. Paläontologisches Zeitschrift, 58:197209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, K. L. 1988. Saint George map area: the end of the Avalon Zone in southern New Brunswick. Current Research, Pt. B, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 88–1B, p. 916.Google Scholar
Currie, K. L. and McNicoll, V. J. 1999. New data on the age and geographic distribution of Neoproterozoic plutons near Saint John, New Brunswick. Atlantic Geology, 35:157166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dames, W. 1883. Cambrische Trilobiten von Liau-tung, p. 333. In von Richthofen, F. (ed.), China. Ergebnisse eigener Reisen und darauf gegründete Studien. 4, Palaeontologischer Theil. Dietrich Reimer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1982. Middle Cambrian trilobites from the Sosink Formation, Derik-Mardin district, south-eastern Turkey. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology), 36:141.Google Scholar
Dostal, J., Keppie, J. D., and Murphy, J. B. 1990. Geochemistry of Late Proterozoic basaltic rocks from Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 27:619631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, A. J., Epstein, J. B., and Harris, L. D. 1977. Conodont color alteration—an index to organic metamorphism. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 995, 27 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergaliev, G. Kh. and Pokrovskaya, N. V. 1977. Nizhnekembriyskie trilobity Malogo Karatau (yuzhniy Kazakhstan). Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Ordena Trudy Krasnioy Znameni Geologie Institut, Akademiya Nauk Kazakhskoy SSR. Nauka, Alma-Atay, 97 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W. 1962. Other small conoidal fossils, p. W130W143. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. W, Miscellanea. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T. P., Theokritoff, G., Lord, G. S., and Zeoli, G. 2005. The early paradoxidid harlani trilobite fauna of Massachusetts, and its correlatives in Newfoundland, Morocco, and Spain. Journal of Paleontology, 79:312336.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frech, F. 1897. Lethaea geognostica. I. Lethaea palaeozoica, 2, 1. Lieferung. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart 256 p.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1990. Die marokkanischen Ellipsocephalidae (Trilobita: Redlichiida). Beringeria, 3, 363 p.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1998. Intercontinental, trilobite-based correlation of the Moroccan early Middle Cambrian. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 35:374401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. and Landing, E. 2001. Middle Cambrian of Avalonian Massachusetts: stratigraphy and correlation of the Braintree trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 75:116135.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. and Landing, E. 2004. A unified Lower–Middle Cambrian chronostratigraphy for West Gondwana. Acta Geologica Polonica, 54:179218.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. and Malinky, J. M. 1997. Middle Cambrian fossils from Tizi n'Tichka, the High Atlas, Morocco, Pt. 1, Introduction and trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 71:620637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goryansky, V. Yu. and Popov, L. E. 1985. Morphologiya, sistematioskoe doloszenie i pronschozhlenie bezzamkoviz braznopol s rakovinoi. Paleontologiskiy Zhurnal 3:314.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1900. Palaeontology of the Cambrian terranes of the Boston Basin. Occasional Papers of the Boston Natural History Society, 4:601694.Google Scholar
Grennough, J. D., McCutcheon, S. R., and Papezik, V. S. 1985. Petrology and geochemistry of Cambrian volcanic rocks from the Avalon Zone in New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 22:881892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grönwall, K. A. 1902. Bornholms Paradoxideslag og deres Fauna. Danmarks geologiske Undersøgelse, (2), 13:1230.Google Scholar
Hall, J. and Whitfield, R. P. 1877. Palaeontology. Fossils of the Potsdam Group. U.S. Geological Exploration of the 40th Parallel (Publication of the King Survey), Pt.IV, 2:197302, Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Hartt, C. F. 1868. Fossils of the Primordial or Acadian Group at St John, p. 641657. In Dawson, J. W. (ed.), Acadian Geology. The geological structure, organic remains, and mineral resources of Nova Scotia, etc. (Second edition), London.Google Scholar
Hawle, I. and Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. Abhandlungen der Königlich Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 5, 176 p.Google Scholar
Hay, R. L., Wildreth, W., and Lambe, R. N. 1979. Globule ignimbrite of Mount Suswa, Kenya, p. 167175. In Chapin, C. E. and Elston, W. E. (eds.), Ash-flow tuffs. Geological Society of America Special Paper 180, 211 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. O. and Howell, B. F. 1937. Geology of Saint John, New Brunswick. Geological Society of America Special Paper 5, 146 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmstaedt, H. 1968. Structural analysis of the Beaver Harbour area, Charlotte County, New Brunswick. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 196 p.Google Scholar
Hinz, I. 1987. The Lower Cambrian microfauna of Comley and Rushton, Shropshire/England. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 198:41100.Google Scholar
Holmer, L. E., Popov, L. E., and Wrona, R. 1996. Early Cambrian lingulate brachiopods from glacial erratics of King George Island (South Shetland Islands), Antarctica. Palaeontologia Polonica, 55:3750.Google Scholar
Howell, B. F. 1935. New Middle Cambrian agnostidian trilobites from Vermont. Journal of Paleontology, 9:218221.Google Scholar
Hupé, P. 1953. Contribution à l'étude du Cambrien inférieur et du Précambrien III de l'Anti-Atlas marocain. Notes et Mémoirs de la Service géologique du Maroc, 103, 402 p. (“1952”).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, R. D. 1962. Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobite faunas of southeastern Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin, 88, 156 p.Google Scholar
Illing, V. C. 1916. The paradoxidian fauna of a part of the Stockingford Shales. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 71(3) (for 1915), 283:386450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isachsen, C. E., Bowring, S. A., Landing, E., and Samson, S. D. 1994. New constraint on the division of Cambrian time. Geology, 22:496498.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1909. Über die Agnostiden. Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, 61:380401.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. C. 2001. Contrasting geology in the Pocologan and Long Reach areas; implications for the New River belt and correlations in southern New Brunswick and Maine. Atlantic Geology, 37:6179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. C. and McLeod, M. J. 1996. The New River belt: a unique segment along the western margin of the Avalon composite terrane, southern New Brunswick, Canada, p. 149178. In Nance, R. D. and Thompson, M. (eds.), Avalonian and related peri-Gondwanan terranes of the circum-North Atlantic. Geological Society of America Special Paper 304.Google Scholar
Keppie, J. D. and Dostal, J. 1991. Late Proterozoic tectonic model for the Avalon terrane in Maritime Canada. Tectonics, 10:842850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keppie, J. D., Nance, R. D., Murphy, J. B., and Dostal, J. 2003. Tethyan, Mediterranean, and Pacific analogues for the Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic birth and development of peri-Gondwanan terrances and their transfer to Laurentia and Laurussia. Tectonophysics, 365:195219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D. H., Westrop, S. R., and Landing, E. 2002. Acadian (Middle Cambrian) conocoryphid and paradoxidid trilobites from the upper Chamberlain's Brook Formation, Newfoundland and New Brunswick. Journal of Paleontology, 76:818838.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1935. The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of South Chosen. Paleontology, Pt. III, Cambrian faunas of South Chosen with a special study on the Cambrian trilobite genera and families. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section II, 4(2):49344.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1939. On the Agnostids (Pt. I). Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section II, 6(5):62198.Google Scholar
Kuhn, O. 1949. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie. Schweitzerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 326 p.Google Scholar
Lake, P. 1906–1946. A monograph of the British Cambrian trilobites. Paleontographical Society Monographs, 1:128, 1906; 2:29–48, 1907; 3:49–64, 1908; 4:65–88, 1913; 5:89–120, 1919; 6:121–148, 1931; 7:149–172, 1932; 8:173–196, 1934; 9:197–224, 1935; 10:225–248, 1937; 11:249–272, 1938; 12:273–306, 1940; 13:307–332, 1942; 14:333–350, addenda, errata, 1946.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1984. Skeleton of lapworthellids and the suprageneric classification of tommotiids (Early and Middle Cambrian phosphatic problematica). Journal of Paleontology, 58:13801398.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1988. Lower Cambrian of eastern Massachusetts: stratigraphy and small shelly fossils. Journal of Paleontology, 62:661695.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1992. Lower Cambrian of southeastern Newfoundland. Epeirogeny and Lazarus faunas, lithofacies-biofacies linkages, and the myth of a global chronostratigraphy, p. 283309. In Lipps, J. H. and Signor, P. W. (eds.), Origin and early evolution of metazoa. Topics in Geobiology, 10, 570 p. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E. 1995. Upper Placentian–Branchian Series of mainland Nova Scotia (middle–upper Lower Cambrian): faunas, paleoenvironments, and stratigraphic revision. Journal of Paleontology, 69:475495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E. 1996a. Avalon—Insular continent by the latest Precambrian, p. 2764. In Nance, R. D. and Thompson, M. (eds.), Avalonian and related peri-Gondwanan terranes of the circum-North Atlantic. Geological Society of America Special Paper 304.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1996b. Reconstructing the Avalon continent: marginal-to-inner platform transition in the Cambrian of Avalonian New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33:623632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E. 2004. Precambrian–Cambrian boundary interval deposition and the marginal platform of the Avalon microcontinent. Journal of Geodynamics, 37:411435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E. 2005. Early Paleozoic Avalon–Gondwana unity: an obituary—response to “Palaeontological evidence bearing on global Ordovician–Silurian continental reconstructions” by R. A. Fortey and L. R. M. Cocks. Earth-Science Reviews, 69:169175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E. and Bartowski, K. E. 1996. Oldest shelly fossils from the Taconic allochthon and late Early Cambrian sea-levels in eastern Laurentia. Journal of Paleontology, 70:741761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E. and Benus, A. P. 1988. Stratigraphy of the Bonavista Group, southeastern Newfoundland: growth faults, and the distribution of the sub-trilobitic Lower Cambrian, p. 5971. In Landing, E., Narbonne, G. M., and Myrow, P. (eds.), Trace fossils, small shelly fossils, and the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. New York State Museum Bulletin, 463.Google Scholar
Landing, E. and Murphy, J. B. 1991. Uppermost Precambrian(?)–Lower Cambrian of mainland Nova Scotia: faunas, depositional environments, and stratigraphic revisions. Journal of Paleontology, 65:382396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E. and Westrop, S. R. 1996. Upper Lower Cambrian depositional sequence in Avalonian New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33:404417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E. and Westrop, S. R. 1998a. Cambrian faunal sequence and depositional history of Avalonian Newfoundland and New Brunswick: Field workshop, p. 575. In Landing, E. and Westrop, S. R. (eds.), Avalon 1997—The Cambrian standard. Third International Field Conference of the Cambrian Chronostratigraphy Working Group and I.G.C.P. Project 366 (Ecological Aspects of the Cambrian Radiation). New York State Museum Bulletin 492, 92 p.Google Scholar
Landing, E. and Westrop, S. R. 1998b. Revisions in the stratigraphic nomenclature of Avalonian North America and comparisons with Avalonian Britain, p. 7687. In Landing, E. and Westrop, S. R. (eds.), Avalon 1997—The Cambrian standard. Third International Field Conference of the Cambrian Chronostratigraphy Working Group and I.G.C.P. Project 366 (Ecological Aspects of the Cambrian Radiation). New York State Museum Bulletin 492, 92 p.Google Scholar
Landing, E. and Westrop, S. R. 2004. Environmental patterns in the origin and evolution and diversification loci of Early Cambrian skeletalized Metazoa: evidence from the Avalon microcontinent, p. 93105. In Lipps, J. H. and Wagoner, B. (eds.), Neoproterozoic–Cambrian Biological Revolutions. Paleontological Society Papers, 10, 130 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Nowlan, G. S., and Fletcher, T. P. 1980. A microfauna associated with Early Cambrian trilobites of the Callavia Zone, northern Antigonish Highlands, Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 17:400418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Narbonne, G. M., and Myrow, P. 1988. Trace fossils, small shelly fossils, and the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. New York State Museum Bulletin 463, 81p Google Scholar
Landing, E., Myrow, P., Benus, A. P., and Narbonne, G. M. 1989. The Placentian Series: appearance of the oldest skeletalized faunas in southeastern Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology, 63:739769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Geyer, G., and Heldmaier, W. 1995. First African lapworthellid: Lapworthella vandali n. sp. from the lower Middle Cambrian boundary interval of Morocco, p. 243253. In Geyer, G. and Landing, E. (eds.), MOROCCO '95—The Lower–Middle Cambrian Cambrian standard of western Gondwana. Beringeria Special Issue 2, 269 p.Google Scholar
Landing, E., Bowring, S. A., Davidek, K., Westrop, S. R., Geyer, G., and Heldmaier, W. 1998. Duration of the Early Cambrian: U-Pb ages of volcanic ashes from Avalon and Gondwana. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 35:329338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Geyer, G., and Bartowski, K. B. 2002. Latest Early Cambrian small shelly fossils, trilobites, and Hatch Hill dysaerobic interval on the east Laurentian continental slope. Journal of Paleontology, 76:285303.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Westrop, S. R., and Kim, D. H. 2003. First Middle Ordovician biota from southern New Brunswick: stratigraphic and tectonic implications for the evolution of the Avalon continent. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40:715730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Peng, S., Babcock, L. E., Geyer, G., and Mocydlowska-Vidal, M. 2007. Global standard names for the lowermost Cambrian series and stage. Episodes. 30:283291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarenko, N. P. 1962. Novye srednekembriyskie trilobity Sovetskoy Arktiki. Sbornik statey paleontologiya i biostratigrafiya. Nauchno-issled. Institut geologii Arktiki, NIIGA, 14:516.Google Scholar
Lermontova, E. V. 1940. Arthropoda, p. 112157. In Vologdin, A. (ed.), Atlas rukovodyashchikh form iskopaemykh faun SSSR. 1, Kembriy. Gosudarstvennoe izdat. geol. lit., 193 p.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1869. Om Vestergötlands Cambriska och Siluriska aflagringar. Konglishe Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademi, Handlingar, 8(2), 89 p.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1871. Om några försteningar from Sveriges och Norges ‘Primordialzon.’ Ofversigt af Konglishe Vetenskaps-Akademi Förhandlingar, 6:789796.Google Scholar
Lisogor, K. A., Rozov, S. N., and Rozova, A. V. 1988. Korrelyatsiya srednekembriyskikh otlozheniy Malogo Karatau i Sibirskoy platformy po trilobitam, p. 5482. In Zhuravleva, I. T. and Repina, L. N. (eds.), Kembriy Sibiri i Srednej Azii. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe otdelenie, Institut geologii i geofiziki. Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
Lochman, C. 1956. Stratigraphy, paleontology, and paleogeography of the Elliptocephala asaphoides strata in Cambridge and Hoosick quadrangles, New York. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67:13311396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1883. Illustrations of the fauna of the St. John Group. No. I.— The Paradoxides. (Supplementary section describing the parts.) Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 1(4):271279 (for 1882).Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1885. Illustrations of the fauna of the St. John Group continued: on the Concoryphea, with further remarks on Paradoxides. Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 2(4):99124 (for 1884).Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1887. Illustrations of the fauna of the St. John Group. No. 4.—On the smaller-eyed trilobites of Division I., with a few remarks on the species of the higher divisions of the group. Canadian Record of Science, 2:357363.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1888. Illustrations of the fauna of the St. John Group. No. IV.—Pt. I. Description of a new species of Paradoxides (Paradoxides regina). Part II. The smaller trilobites with eyes (Ptychoparidae and Ellipsocephalidae). Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 5(4):115166 (for 1887).Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1892. Protolenus—a new genus of Cambrian trilobites. Bulletin of the Natural History Society of New Brunswick, 10:3437.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1897. Studies of Cambrian faunas, Pt. I, On a new subfauna of the Paradoxides beds of the St. John Group. Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Series 2, 3(4):165193.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1899a. The Etcheminian fauna of Smith Sound, Newfoundland. Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Series 2, 5(4):97123.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1899b. Preliminary notice of the Etcheminian fauna of Cape Breton. Bulletin of the Natural Historical Society of New Brunswick, 4(3):190208.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1901. Acrothyra, a new genus of Etcheminian brachiopods. Bulletin of the Natural Historical Society of New Brunswick, 4(4):303, 304.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1902a. Additional notes on the Cambrian of Cape Breton, with description of new species. Bulletin of the Natural Historical Society of New Brunswick, 4(5):377425.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1902b. Ostracoda of the basal Cambrian rocks in Cape Breton. Canadian Record of Science, 8:437470.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. C. 1973. Lapworthellids from the Lower Cambrian Strenuella Limestone at Comley, Shropshire. Palaeontology, 16:139148.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1851. On some new Cambro–Silurian fossils. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 2, 8:387409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, C. T. 1828. Synopsis methodica molluscorum generum omnium et speciarum earum quae in Museo Kenkeano adservantur. Pyrmonti, 91 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mergl, M. 1988. Inarticulate brachiopods of early Middle Cambrian age from High Atlas, Morocco. Věstník Ústředního ustavu Geologického, 63:291295.Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1966. First discovery of Lapworthella in the Lower Cambrian of the Siberian Platform, Paleontological Journal, 2:1318. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1969. Paleontological part, p. 94194. In Raaben, M. E. (ed.), The Tommotian Stage and the Cambrian lower boundary problem. Trudy, Geologichesky Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 206, Moscow. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Myrow, P. and Landing, E. 1992. Mixed siliciclastic-carbonate deposition in an Early Cambrian oxygen-stratified basin, Chapel Island Formation, southeastern Newfoundland. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 62:455473.Google Scholar
Nance, R. D., Murphy, J. B., and Keppie, J. D. 2002. Cordilleran model for the evolution of Avalonia. Tectonophysics, 352:1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica 1974. Handbook of stratigraphic paleontology in Southwest China. Scientific Publishing House, Beijing, 454 p.Google Scholar
Nicholas, T. C. 1916. Notes on the trilobite fauna of the Middle Cambrian of the St. Tudwal's Peninsula (Carnarvonshire). Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 71:451472 (for 1915).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature. 1983. North American Stratigraphic Code. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 67:841875.Google Scholar
Raaf, J. F. M. de, Boersma, J. R., and van Gelder, A. 1977. Wave-generated structures and sequences from a shallow marine succession, County Cork, Ireland. Sedimentology, 24:451483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rast, N., O'Brien, B. H., and Wardle, R. J. 1976. Relationships between Precambrian and Lower Palaeozoic rocks of the “Avalon Platform” in New Brunswick, the northeast Appalachians, and the British Isles. Tectonophysics, 30:315338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1935. Leanchoilia and other mid-Cambrian Arthropoda. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 76:205230.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1936. Second contribution to nomenclature of Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 95(4), 29 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. and Endo, R. 1937. Description of the fossils, p. 103301. In Endo, R. and Resser, C. E. (eds.), The Sinian and Cambrian formations and fossils of southern Manchoukuo. Manchurian Science Museum, Bulletin, 1.Google Scholar
Richter, R. 1932. Crustacea (Paläontologie), p. 840863. In Handwörterbuch der Naturwissenschaften, 2. Auflage, Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1967. Ontogeny of Bathyuriscus fimbriatus and its bearing on affinities of corynexochid trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 41:221231.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 1974. The Cambrian of Wales and England, p. 43121. In Holland, C. H. (ed.), Cambrian of the British Islands, Norden, and Spitsbergen. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 1979. A review of the Middle Cambrian Agnostida from the Abbey Shales, England. Alcheringa, 3:4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. and Berg-Madsen, V. 2002. The age of the Middle Cambrian “Paradoxides forchhammeri Grit” of the Wrekin District, Shropshire, England. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Earth Sciences, 92:335346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1859. On the fossils of the Lingula-flags or “Zone Primordiale.” Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 15:551555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1863. On the discovery of Paradoxides in Britain. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 19:274277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864–1883. A monograph of the British trilobites. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, p. 180, 1864; 81–128, 1865; 129–176, 1866; 177–214, 1867; 215–224, 1883; compenda, 1864; errata, 1865; addenda et compenda, 1866.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1866. Appendix. On the fossils of North Wales. Geological Survey of Great Britain Memoir, 3:240381.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. and Hicks, H. 1867. On a new Lingulella from the red Lower Cambrian rocks of St. Davids. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 23:339341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrank, E. 1977. Kambrische Trilobiten der China-Kollektion v. Richthofen. 4. und letzter Teil: Mittelkambrische Faunen von Wulopu. Zeitschrift für geologische Wissenschaften, 5:141165.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1893. A classification of the Brachiopoda. American Geologist, 11:141167.Google Scholar
Shaler, N. S. and Foerste, A. F. 1888. Preliminary description of North Attleboro fossils. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 16:2741.Google Scholar
Siveter, D. J. and Williams, M. 1997. Cambrian bradoriid and phosphatocopid arthropods of North America. Special Papers in Palaeontology 57, 69 p.Google Scholar
Skovsted, C. B. 2006. Small shelly fauna from the late Early Cambrian Bastion and Ella Island Formations, North-East Greenland. Journal of Paleontology, 80:10871112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1957. O nových trilobitech z českého kambria. Věstník Ústředního ustavu Geologického, 32:235244.Google Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H. 1915. Suggestions for a revised classification of trilobites. Geological Magazine, Series 6, 2:487496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, R. D. and McKerrow, W. S. 1995. Early Paleozoic chronology: a review in light of new U-Pb zircon ages from Newfoundland and Britain. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 32:368379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. and Bassler, R. S. 1931. Cambrian bivalved Crustacea of the Order Conchostraca. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 78(9):1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Staal, C. R., Dewey, J. F., MacNiocaill, C., and McKerrow, W. S. 1998. The Cambrian–Silurian tectonic evolution of the northern Appalachians and British Caledonides: history of a complex west and southwest Pacific-type segment of Iapetus, p. 199242. In Blundell, D. J. and Scott, A. C. (eds.), Lyell: the past is the key to the present. Geological Society of London Special Publication 143.Google Scholar
Vogdes, A. W. 1893. A classed and annotated bibliography of of the Palaeozoic Crustacea 1698–1892 to which is added a catalogue of North American species. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, 4:1412.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. H. 1885. Salt Range fossils, Pt 4 (2), Brachiopoda. Palaeontologica Indica, Memoir, Series 13, Fascule 5:729770.Google Scholar
Wahlenberg, G. 1818. Petrificata Telluris Svecanae examinata. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientarum Upsaliensis, 8, 116 p.Google Scholar
Walch, J. E. I. 1771. Die Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen, zur Erläuterung der Knorrischen Sammlung von Merkwürdigkeiten der Natur. Dritter Theil, Paul Jonathan Felstecker, Nürnberg, 235 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884. On the Cambrian faunas of North America. Preliminary studies. III. Fauna of the Braintree argillites. Bulletin of the U.S. Geological Survey, 2(10):4349.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1886. Second contribution to the studies on the Cambrian faunas of North America. Bulletin of the U.S. Geological Survey, 30, 225 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1889. Description of new genera and species of fossils from the Middle Cambrian. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 11:441446 (for 1888).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1890. The fauna of the Lower Cambrian or Olenellus Zone. U.S. Geological Survey, Tenth Annual Report, p. 509763.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1902. Cambrian Brachiopoda: Acrotreta, Linnarsonella, Obolus: with descriptions of new species. U.S. National Museum Proceedings, 25:577612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1912. Cambrian Brachiopoda. U.S. Geological Society, Monograph, 51, 1235 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1913. The Cambrian faunas of China. Research in China, 3. Publications of the Carnegie Institute, 54(3):3276.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1948. Non-agnostidean trilobites of the Middle Cambrian of Sweden. I. Sveriges geologiska Undersökning, Series C, 498, 42(7), 32 p.Google Scholar
Westrop, S. R. and Landing, E. 2000. Lower Cambrian (Branchian) trilobites and biostratigraphy of the Hanford Brook Formation, southern New Brunswick. Journal of Paleontology, 74:858878.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R. R. 1942. New mid-Cambrian ptychoparid. American Journal of Science, 240:567570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. E. and Barr, S. M. 1996. Geology of the Brookville belt, southern New Brunswick, Canada, p. 133147. In Nance, R. D. and Thompson, M. D. (eds.), Avalonian and related Peri-Gondwanan terranes of the circum-North Atlantic. Geological Society of America Special Paper 304.Google Scholar
White, C. E., Barr, S. M., Miller, B. V., and Hamilton, M. A. 2002. Granitoid plutons of the Brookville terrane, southern New Brunswick: petrology, age, and tectonic setting. Atlantic Geology, 38:5374.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F. W. 1936. The Cambrian faunas of north-eastern Australia. Part 1: Stratigraphical outline, Pt. 2, Trilobita (Miomera). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 11:59112.Google Scholar
Wiman, C. 1903. Studien über das Nordbaltische Silurgebiet. I. Olenellussandstein, Obolussandstein und Ceratopygeschieffer. Bulletin of the Geological Institution of the University of Uppsala, 6:1276.Google Scholar
Wohletz, K. H. and Sheridan, M. F. 1979. A model of pyroclastic surge, p. 177204. In Chapin, C. E. and Elston, W. E. (eds.), Ash-flow tuffs. Geological Society of America Special Paper 180, 211 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenker, J. 1833. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Urwelt. Organische Reste (Petrefacten) aus der Altenburger Braunkohlen-Formation, dem Blankenburger Quadersandstein, jenaischen bunten Sandstein und böhmischen Uebergangsgebirge, mit 6 illuminirten Kupfertafeln. Friedrich Mauke, Jena, 67 p.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. T. and Jell, P. A. 1987. Cambrian trilobites of North China; Chinese Cambrian trilobites housed in the Smithsonian Institution. Science Press, Beijing, 459 p.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. T., Lu, Y. H., Zhu, Zh. L., Qian, Y. Y., Lin, H. L., Zhou, Zh. Y., Zhang, S. G., and Yuan, J. L. 1980. Cambrian trilobite faunas of southwestern China. Palaeontologia Sinica, 159, N.S.B, 16, 497p. (In Chinese with English summary) Google Scholar